'The Political Compass' Test
- Thread starter Mike
- Start date
Haiku
Jedi Master
Four doors, colored red, blue, purple and green. One can lead you to an STS reality in 4th density. Another leads to a reality in 3rd density that begins again. And still another leads you to a reality in 3rd density where lies are rampant. The last can lead you to STO reality in 4th density, this is the green door.
With the questions that were used, those that fall into the green zone, have the compassion, humanity, understanding and knowledge to go up the STO ladder to 4th density. Not to state that those that fall outside the green zone are not destined for a STO reality. It could be just a fault in the limited answers allowed for the questions. But those that are above, deep, in the authoritarian range probably are not destined to go to a STO reality anytime soon. Anyway, it was most likely an authoritarian who made this test, they like to category this reality unjustly, put you in your place.
From what I see, it is good to be in the green group, the best souls are gathered here. Don’t you think? Haiku …
With the questions that were used, those that fall into the green zone, have the compassion, humanity, understanding and knowledge to go up the STO ladder to 4th density. Not to state that those that fall outside the green zone are not destined for a STO reality. It could be just a fault in the limited answers allowed for the questions. But those that are above, deep, in the authoritarian range probably are not destined to go to a STO reality anytime soon. Anyway, it was most likely an authoritarian who made this test, they like to category this reality unjustly, put you in your place.
From what I see, it is good to be in the green group, the best souls are gathered here. Don’t you think? Haiku …
wanderer
Jedi
My results were solidly in the lefty quadrant like everyone else here, but Laura's right about the questions - Like "if globalism is inevitable it should be for the good of the people". Yeah right, like that's ever going to happen.
Ina
The Living Force
I did not agree with that. when I read the question, my reaction was: Really?Here's mine,
Your Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.0
View attachment 33651
One of my favorite questions: "Some people are naturally unlucky"... How the heck do you answer that?
beetlemaniac
The Living Force
Economic Left/Right: -6.63
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.54
I liked some of the questions because they made me pause and think. Like the one on good healthcare being available only for people who can pay for it. I wondered about how it would be feasible to provide healthcare for the poor at a good standard - but subsidized government healthcare does exist, such as in Malaysia, and standards are fair, I think. So it really depends on how the government manages their coffers and prioritizes the budget. Like mentioned previously - if the US didn't have such a strong focus on global military domination, maybe they could afford to have their people be a little better off. Meanwhile, Russia apparently has a superior military force with a much lower budget, probably because they are so much more efficient and mindful about their spending.
Just my two cents.
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.54
Yes I was dumbfounded when I encountered that question but I find that it seems to be a somewhat common question in some cultures.
I liked some of the questions because they made me pause and think. Like the one on good healthcare being available only for people who can pay for it. I wondered about how it would be feasible to provide healthcare for the poor at a good standard - but subsidized government healthcare does exist, such as in Malaysia, and standards are fair, I think. So it really depends on how the government manages their coffers and prioritizes the budget. Like mentioned previously - if the US didn't have such a strong focus on global military domination, maybe they could afford to have their people be a little better off. Meanwhile, Russia apparently has a superior military force with a much lower budget, probably because they are so much more efficient and mindful about their spending.
Just my two cents.
Ina
The Living Force
Your point is well taken. It is up to the Government to balance the money but also to set standards and stick to them, be it hell or high water. It is sad that the standards seem to be only required in the quantity of red tape including in the number of policies instead of the workability factor, of access to health care if and when needed. How does it help if only theoretically or logically one could have access to basic health care if the system does not allow for flexibility? Example in hand, as eu citizen, one has theoretically access to the health care facilities, however before that to happen one has to be recognized by the system, aka needs to have a card which card cannot be obtained unless one is resident in eu. If one does not reside in the eu, ‘Good Bye, Charlie!’. In the end it is about the money.
What came to mind was Roy Sullivan, the man who got struck by lightning 7 or so times. So with that in mind, I chose Agree.
TheSpoon
Jedi
Leads to fascism do you mean? Book burning, rules about what can and cannot be discussed and the thought police rummaging through your lifetime twitter history?
That must bring up the question of whether or not it was really liberalism in the first place. Which is why I dug out this thread, where it's proposed that the political left/right spectrum is orthogonal to a liberal/authoritarian axis.
For me, I see the initial distinction between left and right as the left saying "Society should have a shared responsibility for itself", whereas the right would say "Individuals have personal responsibility to look after themselves". And then the various policies - taxation, immigration, social support/healthcare and so on all flow that that initial alignment.
The liberal will say "People should be able to do whatever they want" and a left view would say "well yes, as long as you're not hurting anyone else". And that's where the authoritarianism comes in, because someone's feelings might get hurt if you say X, so "you can't say that anymore".
So no, I think liberals remain liberals. It's the confusion of a left wing ideology with liberalism that's muddying the waters, and removes a label from the right wing liberals who are saying "I have responsibility for myself, and I should be able to do whatever I want" - which is what we see in all the pushback against mask mandates and social policy. And since that seems to be quite a large group of people, I think they might want to reclaim the title of "liberal" for themselves and stop suggesting the extreme left is liberal, when it fact it's racing off at 90 degrees in another dimension entirely.
