The Politics of Climate Change: Green New Deal And Other Madness

This gimmick is carrying Climate Change activities - to the extremes?

Climate change activists spray red paint at UK Treasury from fire engine

I'm up to Vol3 of the Cassiopaea Experiment books, and I came across this last night. I think it is the first reference to the earth changes, and it seems to have the most dire warning.
This from Mar 23,1996:

A: Now, for the remainder of this session, we wish to address the so called earth changes for your benefit, as you are stuck here. Those present need to be equi... [Sound anomaly on tape begins here, on second side.] ...pped to stop buying into popular deceptions once and for all! Reread Bramley.

Q: (L) Funny I took him off the shelf today... (V) What's Bramley about? (L) Well, hold on. Do you want me to read it right now?

A: No.

Q: (L) Ok, address the subject.

A: All such changes are caused by three things and three things only! 1) Human endeavors. 2) Cosmic objects falling upon or too near earth. 3) Planetary orbital aberrations.

Q: (L) All right, carry on.

A: Don't believe any of the nonsense you hear from other sources. It is designed to facilitate mass programming and deception.
 
In Austria the Geens gained much more influence:
Notice we have a child in the Tweet, a small "Greta". There was also regarding the interest for Climate Strike in different countries a high number in Austria. Did the interest in Climate Strike aid the Austrian Green party? Or was it the other way around?
I would be interested to follow how this develops, as Austria has had some issues with the EU and especially with regard to Russia, also with the US. Below are some examples:
'Unconstitutional': Austria wants no part of European army proposed by Macron, Merkel
Austria suspends Schengen agreement, radically changes refugee policies
Russia-Austria trade grows almost 60%, approaches pre-sanctions record highs
Evidence before accusations: Austria asks for full-fledged Skripal investigation before casting blame
Austrian Chancellor Kurz loses no-confidence vote Amid Video Scandal
Putin and Austrian chancellor Kurz commit to strengthening political, economic ties amid booming trade between the countries
Austrian vice chancellor: "It is high time to put an end to these annoying sanctions and normalize political and economic relations with Russia"
Head of Austrian General Staff: 'Russia closer to Austria than other major world powers'
 
The politics of climate change is related with the thread Greta Thunberg: False Prophet of the Children's Crusade In one article by Cory Morningstar, there is much info on how one of these climate organisations, XR or Extinction Rebellion finds its support:
These are the main points captured by/for the XR Local Coordinators:
“They’re [the middle group] not interested in political effectiveness, they’re interested in things being perfect and good. This is not a personal judgment, but it won’t help.”
The majority, to be herded like cats (GCCA/TckTckTck – Global Call for Climate Action) are “[T]he people who’re shitting themselves and want something to be done but aren’t highly political.
“Don’t have a Q & A. This allows the extreme people who want it to be one way to bring everyone else down.”
“80% are normal people [and] 20% political absolutists. There to appropriate your energy.”
“It’s not about climate change information, it’s about the emotional way that we say it – needs to create that emotional response, personal reactions are incredibly powerful.”
Herded like cats? Cats are not herded, sheep, cattle and people are. However cats is also slang for women. What are we to make of that? Later there is:
The last thing to reiterate is the emotion – not the information … so the people that are going to lead this rebellion are going to be young people, 14 & 15 year olds …omg – a 14 year-old is in tears, right?, on television, about what’s happening…”

While actions like those of Extinction Rebellion might appear to be turned against big companies; Morningstar claims this is not the case:
For XR leadership, the enemy of Rebellion is not corporate dominance [...] The enemy of the Rebellion is the radical activist, prepared to defend the Earth “by any means necessary”.
This may be an exaggeration, as businesses are many and varied, though one could say that large cooperations and what she calls the NGO industrial complex are more sheltered from an impact than individuals or family having a shop. She also documents that XR is linked up with influential people and organisations.

Further there is, and this reveals there is a range of how far people will go. Professional organizers of the climate movements consider already gathered theory and experience when planning:
Hallam recommends to his students that they study: “The Psychology of Persuasion“, “The Radical Think Tank” (“How to Win“), and “This is an Uprising” by Mark Engler (with glowing forewords by 350.org’s Bill McKibben and Naomi Klein).

Here, is another orchestrated and ongoing effort to further pacify the working class in servitude to the state. One would be wise to toss “This is an Uprising” and instead read “Bloodless Lies: Book Review of This is an Uprising” (November 7, 2016). This is an excellent example of what those enmeshed in the non-profit industrial complex do not want you to read.

Rather than educating citizens why it is paramount that we become revolutionaries in order to protect the last vestiges of the natural world, Hallam encourages his newly-minted coordinators to embrace the role of “generalists”. [XR Generalists: “run meetings, be good with people, know how society changes, etc.; Revolutionary theorists – hard work is already done!; Books to read – This is an Uprising (Mark Engler)”] [Source]
The above points regarding how to affect social change are probably also used in regime changing color revolutions and this could be one potential use of the Climate Strikes.
 
Herded like cats? Cats are not herded, sheep, cattle and people are. However cats is also slang for women. What are we to make of that?
Herding of cats is a saying. Wikipedia has this to say about it:

An idiom denoting a futile attempt to control or organize a class of entities which are inherently uncontrollable – as in the difficulty of attempting to command individual cats into a group (herd).
 
The politics of climate change is related with the thread Greta Thunberg: False Prophet of the Children's Crusade In one article by Cory Morningstar, there is much info on how one of these climate organisations, XR or Extinction Rebellion finds its support: (..)

While actions like those of Extinction Rebellion might appear to be turned against big companies; Morningstar claims this is not the case: This may be an exaggeration, as businesses are many and varied, though one could say that large cooperations and what she calls the NGO industrial complex are more sheltered from an impact than individuals or family having a shop. She also documents that XR is linked up with influential people and organisations.


How Extinction Rebellion climate change zealots are paid £400 a week to bring mayhem to our streets

Activists have been paid more than £200,000 since the start of the scheme

Extinction Rebellion is paying activists up to £400 a week to lead the protests that have brought chaos to the streets of Britain, documents seen by The Mail on Sunday reveal.

Protesters have received payments totalling more than £70,000 in four months alone.


19540094-7556855-Extinction_Rebellion_activist_James_Brown_sits_on_top_of_the_roo-a-3_1570723523664.jpg


Extinction Rebellion activist James Brown sits on top of the roof of a British Airways plane at London City Airport
 
The following just came to mind.

1: One of the biggest scam/propaganda pieces ever invented (if not the biggest) has been created with this climate hysteria and all its consequences on a global scale, based on clear and pretty obvious lies, for decades now

2: Trillions up on Trillions of Dollas/Euros etc. have been and will be spend on the basis of this lie, for NOTHING useful whatsoever, and in most cases, on the contrary, to make things worse! Reshaping whole landscapes and societies for the worse on the basis of this huge lie. Huge amounts of money have and will be thrown literally into a dark pit and burned.

3: May I ask, from all the governments and political leaders in the world, who doesn't toe this established party line, either indirectly or directly in some form or fashion, either by concrete words or actions? Almost Zero! That is quite scary in itself.

4: Only two leaders in the world come to mind who appear to not go along with it blindly in some form or fashion. And only one of the two goes a step further and doesn't go along with the propaganda rhetoric itself; Putin and Trump.

5: Putin, while GOING ALONG with the rhetoric ever so diplomatically, seems to also make some concrete steps against this nonsense, or at least on the basis of the possibility that it could be quite wrong and detrimental.

6: Donald Trump appears to be the only leader in the world who has repeatably called out this scam for what it is, in no uncertain terms (aka BS) and doesn't follow along and has taken concrete steps against it. While NOT reverberating the rhetoric as well.

There is something to be said about reverberating a rhetoric based on lies constantly on all political fronts while not actually believing it for good reasons. Isn't at some point also the reverberation of a clear lie so vehemently, even though you know it is a lie, fueling the beast? So, who is not fueling the beast, neither in words nor in actions? Trump. Here is a small selection. The last one is from a couple of days ago (see next post). Enjoy!





 
Last edited:
Trump has been so villified in the public opinion that most people would embrace the global warming propaganda just to be in opposition to him. It's almost as if the straw man demonisation is part of the global artificial rethoric. So much money has been invested in the fake science of global warming that it is virtually impossible for the PTB or their servants to back down. The plan has to be pushed to its ultimate conclusion, which is why such efforts have been invested.
 
The following just came to mind.

1: One of the biggest scam/propaganda pieces ever invented (if not the biggest) has been created with this climate hysteria and all its consequences on a global scale, based on clear and pretty obvious lies, for decades now

2: Trillions up on Trillions of Dollas/Euros etc. have been and will be spend on the basis of this lie, for NOTHING useful whatsoever, and in most cases, on the contrary, to make things worse! Reshaping whole landscapes and societies for the worse on basis of this huge lie. Huge amounts of money have and will be thrown literally into a dark pit and burned.

3: May I ask, from all the governments and political leaders in the world, who doesn't toe this established party line, either indirectly or directly in some form or fashion, either by concrete words or actions? Almost Zero! That is quite scary in itself.

4: Only two leaders in the world come to mind who appear to not go along with it blindly in some form or fashion. And only one of the two goes a step further and doesn't go along with the propaganda rhetoric itself; Putin and Trump.

5: Putin, while GOING ALONG with the rhetoric ever so diplomatically, seems to also make some concrete steps against this nonsense, or at least on the basis of the possibility that it could be quite wrong and detrimental.

6: Donald Trump appears to be the only leader in the world who has repeatably called out this scam for what it is, in no uncertain terms (aka BS) and doesn't follow along and has taken concrete steps against it. While NOT reverberating the rhetoric as well.

There is something to be said about reverberating a rhetoric based on lies constantly on all political fronts while not actually believing it for good reasons. Isn't at some point also the reverberation of a clear lie so vehemently, even though you know it is a lie, fueling the beast? So, who is not fueling the beast, neither in words nor in actions? Trump. Here is a small selection. The last one is from a couple of days ago (see next post). Enjoy!


Donald Trump: Scientists also have a political agenda!
;-)
 
Trump has been so villified in the public opinion that most people would embrace the global warming propaganda just to be in opposition to him. It's almost as if the straw man demonisation is part of the global artificial rethoric. So much money has been invested in the fake science of global warming that it is virtually impossible for the PTB or their servants to back down. The plan has to be pushed to its ultimate conclusion, which is why such efforts have been invested.

And the ultimate conclusion will be using climate change as a tool for tyranny against almost anybody stepping "out of line."

First they came for the smokers and I thought: I don't smoke...
Then they came for the diesel drivers and I thought: I don't own a diesel...
When they came for the meat-eaters I considered that I might get by on veggies.
And when they came for me because I was denying the existence of climate change
there were no critical minds left and the crowd was demanding: "Lock him up!" :shock:
 
Back
Top Bottom