The pyramids at Giza

Maat said:
Here is the paper mentionned in the video:

Click to expand...
That paper is from 2022 and does not include any of the claimed underground structures.

Here is another source claiming that this paper shows those underground structures, even though it does not:

SAR Scan of Khafre Pyramid Shows Huge Underground Structures

One of the greatest mysteries just got bigger
gregreese.substack.com

In other words, these sensationalist claims seem to be a hoax.
 
axj said:
That paper is from 2022 and does not include any of the claimed underground structures.

Here is another source claiming that this paper shows those underground structures, even though it does not:

SAR Scan of Khafre Pyramid Shows Huge Underground Structures

One of the greatest mysteries just got bigger
gregreese.substack.com

In other words, these sensationalist claims seem to be a hoax.
Click to expand...

When I understood the videos correctly, the paper that was posted here is from a previous internal scan of one of the three pyramids of 2022. Now the same people have done another (more extensive?) scan that has revealed those underground structures that will be published in a new paper and presentation soon and the quotes and pictures we see are a preview of that paper.

Edit: Spelling
 
Last edited:
Cosmos said:
Apparently, quite incredible discoveries below the great Pyramid and the whole Giza Plateau have just been published, extending down at least 2 kilometers:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1902380527002275890
Click to expand...

Reminds of session 25 May 1996 :

(...)

A: Magnetic telemetry profile.

[Telemetry is the automated communications process by which measurements are made and other data collected at remote or inaccessible points and transmitted to receiving equipment for monitoring and analysis. The word is derived from Greek roots: tele = remote, and metron = measure.]

Q: (L) Are you suggesting that the hose with the water rushing through it can transmit something from 4th density STO to us?

A: Transceive.

Q: (L) The original Ionic column structure was a hollow tube?

A: Not the point.

Q: (L) It is the fluting, grooving and spiralling that are important?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Okay, once you mentioned that I ought to move the pool and install a maze, or spiral. Well, I am hoping to get some money from the insurance company soon, and I was thinking about putting in an in-ground pool as part of my improvements. Couldn't I have the spiral inlaid in the bottom of the pool in tile.

A: Good. Suggest that you install a triple Ionic column with top beam and base, as the Romans and Greeks did, near the deep end. Two sided triangle when seen from above, flat top of beam, no gables. 1.3 meters between bases of the three columns. Columns 1.6 meters tall. Base set at 30 degree angle. Center column placed to the East of the pool. Use pure spiral, counterclockwise, corresponding to Northern hemisphere of the planet.

Q: (L) Okay, once we have set this up, what is it going to do for us?

A: Empower 4th through 6th density STO channel transceiver.

Q: (L) Well, I guess I need to make some really big bucks to do this!

A: Yes.


(...)
 
Cosmos said:
When I understood the videos correctly, the paper that was posted here is from a previous internal scan of one of the three pyramids of 2022. Now the same people have done another (more extensive?) scan that has revealed those underground structures that will be published in a new paper and presentation soon and the quotes and pictures we see are a preview of that paper.

Edit: Spelling
Click to expand...
Yes, you are right. Apparently he got a copy of "exclusive footage" sent to some journalists ahead of a presentation a few days ago.

The research team says they used publicly available scan data for their analysis:

GmccRSEXsAAUjP6


GmccTjBbUAAt4tw


https://twitter.com/x/status/1902520628898341287
 
I found a video interview (in Italian) of the three researchers discussing their findings ahead of the conference. Galaxy AI summarized the video in English:

Exploring the Mysteries of Giza: Insights from the Upcoming Conference​

A significant conference on March 16, 2025, in Castel San Pietro Terme, will delve into the mysteries of the Giza pyramids, featuring experts Corrado Malanga, Armando Mei, and Filippo Biondi. They will discuss their innovative research combining historical, archaeological, and scientific approaches to uncover hidden structures and knowledge about the pyramids..

The Conference Overview​

The conference will not only highlight the historical and archaeological significance of the Giza plateau but will also introduce innovative scientific methodologies employed by the speakers. The day before the main event, a press conference will be held for accredited media, setting the stage for the discussions to follow.

Key Speakers and Their Contributions​

  1. Corrado Malanga
    A historian and archaeologist, Malanga has dedicated over 40 years to studying Ancient Egypt, particularly the pyramids. His research focuses on ancient texts, including the Egyptian Book of the Dead and the Pyramid Texts, as well as the Emerald Tablets. He aims to uncover hidden codes within the architecture of these monumental structures.
  2. Filippo Biondi
    With a PhD in telecommunications engineering, Biondi has published extensively on signal theory and processing. His contribution to the project involves utilizing satellite imagery to investigate potential voids beneath the pyramids. By analyzing open-source satellite data, he aims to synthesize acoustic information that can penetrate the earth, revealing hidden structures.
  3. Armando Mei
    Mei brings a wealth of experience and a passion for Egyptology. His journey began in childhood, leading him to explore the pyramids and their mysteries. Mei emphasizes the importance of collaboration and the sharing of scientific knowledge in uncovering the truths about these ancient monuments.

Innovative Research Techniques​

The speakers have developed a novel approach to studying the pyramids, combining historical analysis with cutting-edge technology. Biondi explains how they have synthesized acoustic information from electromagnetic data, allowing them to visualize what lies beneath the surface of the Giza plateau. This method, known as tomographic modeling, enables researchers to identify voids and structures without invasive techniques.

The Role of Satellite Data​

Biondi elaborates on the use of high-resolution satellite imagery to investigate the Giza plateau. By employing advanced algorithms, they can detect anomalies that suggest the presence of hidden chambers or corridors within the pyramids. This innovative approach not only enhances our understanding of the pyramids' architecture but also opens new avenues for archaeological research.

The Significance of the Findings​

Malanga discusses the implications of their research, suggesting that the pyramids may have served purposes beyond what is traditionally understood. He posits that the pyramids could have been designed to harness natural energies, potentially facilitating healing processes for the pharaohs. This perspective challenges conventional narratives about the ancient Egyptians and their monumental constructions.

The Quest for Knowledge​

The collaboration among Malanga, Mei, and Biondi represents a significant step towards rewriting the history of the Giza pyramids. Their findings suggest that previous understandings of these structures may be incomplete or inaccurate. As they prepare for the conference, the researchers are eager to share their discoveries and engage with the public and scientific community.

Conclusion​

The upcoming conference on March 16, 2025, promises to be a groundbreaking event in the field of Egyptology and archaeological research. With the combined expertise of Malanga, Mei, and Biondi, attendees can expect to gain new insights into the mysteries of the Giza pyramids. As they continue to explore these ancient wonders, the researchers invite the world to join them in uncovering the truths that lie beneath the sands of time.
Click to expand...
 
I saw this on X today too and if its true then the spiral coil like assembly on the columns indicate energy generationn and transfers. I wonder if some of the other pyramids out there are built similarrly or pethaps not, being cheap imitations of the real thing in Giza. This also indicates a massive flood event which submerged the bottom 2KM portion of the structure. Its quite impressive nonetheless!
 
sid said:
I saw this on X today too and if its true then the spiral coil like assembly on the columns indicate energy generationn and transfers. I wonder if some of the other pyramids out there are built similarrly or pethaps not, being cheap imitations of the real thing in Giza. This also indicates a massive flood event which submerged the bottom 2KM portion of the structure. Its quite impressive nonetheless!
Click to expand...

Assuming those scans represent reality, I don’t think we can say that it necessarily “indicates energy generation and transfers“. We are probably trying to make sense of things from our modern perspective that we will have a very hard time to grasp, if it is true that some civilizations in the past (for example Atlantis, according to the C’s) were so much more “advanced“ that it would be like a Neandertaler trying to fly (let alone, understand) a modern plane. Also, we always tend to assume that past civilizations approached things similarly as we do nowadays, which doesn’t have to be the case at all IMO. And we also always tend to attribute “technology“ to what they did which doesn’t have to be the case either IMO.
 
I think that before jumping into conclusions about structures and so forth, it is important to see whether these numerical methods for analyzing the data are testable with domains of applicability well delimited. Also, many methods produce artifacts that produce signals that aren't there. If one tortures data too much, they'll confess to anything. As an analogy one can think of over-amplified PCR tests. If these precautions are taken into account, and maybe one or two chambers are verified above the ground, then maybe some structures far below the ground become less implausible.
 
mkrnhr said:
I think that before jumping into conclusions about structures and so forth, it is important to see whether these numerical methods for analyzing the data are testable with domains of applicability well delimited. Also, many methods produce artifacts that produce signals that aren't there. If one tortures data too much, they'll confess to anything. As an analogy one can think of over-amplified PCR tests. If these precautions are taken into account, and maybe one or two chambers are verified above the ground, then maybe some structures far below the ground become less implausible.
Click to expand...

Indeed. One thing I‘m rather skeptical about is the apparently high level of “accuracy“ those scans and the subsequent calculation methods seem to yield, judged on the 3D renderings. That mostly stems from my ignorance towards one: the technologies used and how and in what ways they see and/or measure things and two: how that raw data gets “treated“ in order to reveal “what is underground“. I don’t know how good or reliable technologies of that sort are nowadays in the public domain (excluding secret high tech stuff). From that uniformed position it seems to me that it is pretty unlikely that you can see such detailed things to a depth of around 600 meters or more (as is claimed).
 
mkrnhr said:
If these precautions are taken into account, and maybe one or two chambers are verified above the ground, then maybe some structures far below the ground become less implausible.
Click to expand...
They are probably using the known chambers within the pyramids for calibration purposes. They do have that peer-reviewed paper from 2022 using the same method inside the pyramids. The weird publication style of their new findings probably indicates that this won't get through peer-review - either because it goes too much against "accepted science", or because their own science on this is bogus or guesswork.
 
And as far as I understood it, the scans they did on one of the pyramids and published the results in 2022, “have revealed“ at least one not known chamber in that pyramid with “high accuracy“, but as far as I can see, that result has never been tested: aka. that supposed chamber hasn’t been opened/looked at (at least officially) in order to judge the accuracy of the scan results. Which brings up the question: Have those technologies and the subsequent “treatment“ of the raw data ever been tested against similar conditions in reality? One would think so? In other words: How sure can they be that the results they have gotten represent reality underground?
 
If they used known chambers (the burden of proof is on them, it should appear in the paper) and ruled-out false-positives, they could publish a paper on the chambers above the ground first, and then in a second time they could present another paper about underground structures as a separate hypothesis.
 
Speculating a bit on the idea that it might be a hoax or a grift:

Firstly: What better way/publicity could you ever hope to create in a global fashion than to claim such a thing? Can't get much better than that! Secondly: You could basically claim anything you want about "what is below the Giza Pyramids" because the likelihood that anyone will officially dig down to check if what you are saying is true is very slim, and, I would suppose, that grifters could be aware of that fact. Thirdly: You could then make lots of money based on your fame and "your discoveries/technology", not just by making new "scans" in similar areas where no-one will check, but also via various other means such as holding conferences, getting investors, and so on.
 
Yesterday I looked a bit deeper into the matter. Summary:

- The paper from 2022 seems legit but I’m way out of my depths to evaluate that myself because you really need, it seems, quite some solid background in things like mathematics and how things like SAR and sound work. So, it seems like almost impossible for a lay person to check the legitimacy of the claims.

- At least one person whose work and or contribution seems to be the basis of much of it seems legit, namely, Filippo Biondi, PhD. If I understood it correctly, he created the method, which he has patented, to treat the SAR raw data in a way (with certain algorithms?) that can reveal underground structures.

- Now, it seems like he has a website that is dedicated and is FOR PROFIT, where people (probably mostly in the private sector?) can pay for analysis of areas with his patented methods= harmonicsar.com

- Possible clients include mining and oil and gas applications. In other words: It seems like he is profiting, possibly even quite much from the technology/patent himself? Conflict of interest??? Sure, it is all good and justified if he makes money with his methods, but could it be that the paper of 2022 of the Giza Pyramid and now those new “revelations“, (on purpose and nebulously?) show “highly accurate scans“ below the area not because you can actually with any certainty say that, but because it it increases the fame for this technology, and thus, even more money for Biondi and/or others?:


Cosmos said:
Speculating a bit on the idea that it might be a hoax or a grift:

Firstly: What better way/publicity could you ever hope to create in a global fashion than to claim such a thing? Can't get much better than that! Secondly: You could basically claim anything you want about "what is below the Giza Pyramids" because the likelihood that anyone will officially dig down to check if what you are saying is true is very slim, and, I would suppose, that grifters could be aware of that fact. Thirdly: You could then make lots of money based on your fame and "your discoveries/technology", not just by making new "scans" in similar areas where no-one will check, but also via various other means such as holding conferences, getting investors, and so on.
Click to expand...

- It seems like the satellite that has been used for the SAR data is also Italian? I‘m very uncertain there though. It seems like it could be a collaboration between the satellite owner/user and Biondi? Both of which are Italian?

So it might be partially legit and a grift at the same time? Or it is pretty much legit and there isn’t much of a grift?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom