The pyramids at Giza

- Now, it seems like he has a website that is dedicated and FOR PROFIT, where people (probably mostly in the private sector?) can pay for analysis of areas with his patented methods= harmonicsar.com
Well, when a company offers such services it's easy to check if their results are valid. It's possible to scam a few clients but after that everyone would meet at a court.

As with many things in our world it could be half truth / half lies. Let's sit back and enjoy the show.
 
Well, when a company offers such services it's easy to check if their results are valid. It's possible to scam a few clients but after that everyone would meet at a court.

As with many things in our world it could be half truth / half lies. Let's sit back and enjoy the show.

What I’m thinking is that a possible point of it being somewhat of a grift is not if the technology works (which it seems to do) but how accurately you can actually see/represent what is underground. For example, it could be a semi scam/grift where people in the oil industries etc ACTUALLY get good and reliable data from that service/patent, because the data is rather rough (not very accurate to meters or even centimeters): Because you really don’t need very accurate underground representations for oil, gas and mining for example (I would presume). So, those costumers would naturally see no evidence of some kind of grifting going on somewhere on Biondi‘s side, because they get the results they paid for. The actual grift would be to pretend and suggest that you can actually make very precise scans/measurements of underground structures up to 600+ meters and even 2 Kilometers with that technology. And more specifically, use that suggestion on the most famous archeological site in the world where you know nobody will check if what you are saying is true. The result being that you get MASSIVE publicity and interest in your technology/patent which you then use to your advantage to make BIG sums of money. In others words, it could be both things at the same time: real results (up to a certain point of accuracy) and also grifting.
 
Last edited:
Let’s see what is said in the presentation that is supposed to be published in the coming days (and was recorded a couple of days ago). For now I‘m leaning more towards the idea of some kind of semi grift as described above, also on the basis that the publication and distribution of those “new revelations“ on the side of those responsible seems quite a bit untransparent/unprofessional to me and I get a new age flavor from the spokeswoman.
 
Last edited:
Also, it seems to me that in the (unlikely) case that their suggestions about any of the scans in Giza should ever be put to a real life test (aka. looking at those structures via excavations), that the way they have written the 2022 paper (and possibly a new paper as well) would make it rather easy for those involved to use a plausible deniability, like this: “Look at our paper’s, we never said that those 3D renderings have to represent what is actually hidden there“. Pretty nifty, if true, and also quite well thought out. They seem to have covered all their tracks, if it should be a semi grift.
 
At the same time, from my uniformed point of view, it seems like the idea of a semi grift is at least as likely as the idea that what they suggest (those 3D renderings, basically) is actually what is at Giza, because one key component is missing: Nobody has seen or will see those structures in real life anytime soon.

And both ideas seem to indeed indicate that there is something down there, but in the grift idea, it could basically be anything including natural caves or any other natural deposits or structures of different kinds.

Edit: More.
 
Last edited:
Another possible red flag is that the spokeswoman seems to jump to extreme conclusions in her “Press Release“ (translated from Italian?) by claiming that they have discovered “the legendary underground city Amenti“ with those scans at Giza:


Also, I couldn’t find the source of that “Press Release“ anywhere, and where that “Jay Anderson“ person got it from is unclear to me as well. Further, I haven’t found any official website for the “project“ that is behind all of this.
 
Last edited:
Also, I couldn’t find the source of that “Press Release“ anywhere, and where that “Jay Anderson“ person got it from is unclear to me as well.
The press release says that it was sent to some journalists - so he probably received it from one of them, or someone in his Patreon community did.
 
If this research and all the info shared that is coming out is real, and these are the real proportions:

IMG_5407.jpeg

Then it’s certainly mind blowing, the fact that they were made by Atlantean descendants (per Cs), then imagine how were any of the structures, buildings or tech itself, Atlanteans created in their peak era.
 
The press release if it's not a joke: salad of randomly selected words.
I have also taken the first picture of an exoplanet using a pocket camera and a super special image reduction algorithm in the UVb band, based on the dagobevitch-yodakewskii transform that's under review for a patent, and the inverse field theory, during the special alignment of three asteroids with the object to achieve phase closure. Here is the result:
1742585907770.png
give me money
 
Last edited:

Ai summary below

The Khafre Pyramid SAR Scan Project reveals potential underground structures and chambers beneath the Giza Plateau, sparking excitement and speculation in the archaeological community. Trevor Grassi, a key figure in the project, discusses the findings and the implications of the new scanning technology.
This week, the archaeological community has been abuzz with news from the Coffrey Project, which has utilized satellite scans to investigate the Khafre Pyramid on the Giza Plateau. A team of scientists from Italy claims to have discovered evidence of underground structures and tunnel networks beneath the middle pyramid, including five previously unknown chambers at ground level that mirror the King's Chamber in the Great Pyramid. Additionally, they report eight hollow cylindrical structures descending over 400 meters into the earth, connecting to two square chambers measuring 80 by 80 meters. Beneath these, they suggest there may be two kilometers of interconnecting tunnels that warrant further investigation.

The Excitement Surrounding the Findings​

The abstract summarizing these findings has generated significant excitement, leading many to scramble for more information. To trace the source of this abstract, I reached out to Trevor Grassi, a prominent figure in the project, who has been closely involved with the research team. Trevor expressed his enthusiasm about the recent developments and clarified some of the confusion surrounding the project.

Clarifying the Source of Information​

Trevor explained that the abstract was part of a press release from a conference held in Italy, featuring researchers Curado Malango, Filippo Biandi, and Armando May. He noted that he was the first to receive the document and, upon obtaining permission, shared it on his Facebook page. This led to widespread interest, although many were initially confused about the source of the information, as there was no official webpage for the release.

The Conference and Future Expectations​

The conference, which took place over the weekend, was not solely focused on the Khafre Pyramid but included various aspects of the research. Trevor indicated that the team plans to scan the entire Giza Plateau over the next year, with a particular focus on the Khafre Pyramid, also known as G2. He emphasized that while the findings are exciting, they are just the beginning of a much larger investigation into the area.

Addressing Skepticism and Methodology​

One of the key points of discussion has been the skepticism surrounding the new scanning technology, specifically the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) method. Trevor clarified that while this technology has been used in other fields, such as volcanology, it is relatively new to archaeology. Filippo Biandi has adapted it for archaeological purposes, allowing for scans without the need for on-site access or permits, making it an independent project.

The SAR technology sends out radar signals from multiple angles, creating three-dimensional models that reveal anomalies such as chambers or tunnels. This method differs from previous techniques, such as muon detection, which required physical sensors to be placed in specific locations.

Anticipating Further Developments​

Trevor expressed confidence that the team would provide a comprehensive presentation of their findings, including a four-hour video detailing the technical aspects of the project. He also mentioned that a peer-reviewed paper is expected to be released soon, which will further validate the findings and methodology.

The Broader Implications of the Research​

The implications of this research extend beyond the Khafre Pyramid. Trevor highlighted that the technology could revolutionize archaeology, allowing researchers to detect underground structures globally. He noted that much of Egypt remains unexplored, with a significant portion of its history potentially lying beneath the surface.

Conclusion​

As the excitement surrounding the Khafre Pyramid SAR Scan Project continues to grow, the archaeological community eagerly awaits further confirmation and detailed reports from the research team. Trevor Grassi's insights provide a glimpse into the potential discoveries that lie beneath the Giza Plateau, promising to reshape our understanding of ancient Egyptian civilization. The coming weeks will be crucial as more information is released, and the world watches closely for updates on this groundbreaking project.
 
If there are indeed some large structures constructed that far below Giza, this reminds me of Edgar Cayce mentioning in one of his readings that more recent Atlanteans conducted themselves archaeological excavations or research at Giza.

This implies that there may be something there from the much earlier Atlantean times when the technology may have been more advanced, eg. before the first cataclysm around 48,000 BC.

What is relatively well established is that there is a large network of tunnels and maybe caves below Giza. How deep these go nobody knows for sure.
 
If there are indeed some large structures constructed that far below Giza, this reminds me of Edgar Cayce mentioning in one of his readings that more recent Atlanteans conducted themselves archaeological excavations or research at Giza.

This implies that there may be something there from the much earlier Atlantean times when the technology may have been more advanced, eg. before the first cataclysm around 48,000 BC.

What is relatively well established is that there is a large network of tunnels and maybe caves below Giza. How deep these go nobody knows for sure.
Which indeed raises the question , of why they're not being mentioned in this presentation/ radar imaging...
 
Back
Top Bottom