The sources of the Napoleonic Code and its links with the Book (Sharia)

Black Swan said:
For added research, if you're not familiar with Claude Bernard, a contemporary of Pasteur, you may want to read about some of his contributions. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Bernard
He was definitely on the right track and it is interesting to see how his discoveries were derailed by Pasteur and his followers. Although it's been said that just before his death in 1895, Pasteur, father of the Germ Theory of Disease, said to his friend Professor Renon: "Bernard was right, the germ is nothing, the milieu is everything."

Yes, I am discovering the works of this brilliant physiologist and I knew about this specific sentence of Pasteur at the end of his life. Pasteur was wrong in many applications, but as said Dr Eric Ancelet, it does not excuse the fact that the medicine in Occident is always working on the basis of the works awarded to Pasteur.

Black Swan said:
Perhaps this was a sincere change of heart for Pasteur at the end of his life, but it of course was not enough to undo the damage his work caused the field of medicine nor change 'business as usual' for PTB.

It was not enough, surely, and Occidental medicine had the time to change the way from this time, but "industrialists" decided it was great to continue in this way because they could make a lot of money. To the detriment of our health, of course and unfortunately. THIS let us in the misunderstanding during all this time. And it is only because of the works as those of Claude Bernard or Bechamp, Tissot, Steiner, Odent, and many others more or less known, that we can ask good questions and expect good answers.
And this movie also helps to understand what say these diamonds doctors such as Claude Bernard and Samuel Auguste Tissot: http://www.thelivingmatrixmovie.com/

Black Swan said:
[Added] Another link to check: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,5069.0.html

Thank you Black Swan, I saw this thread just after have posted here, so I let a commentary too on it on the last week here: http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,5069.msg313541.html#msg313541
 
The discussion on Napoleon was absolutely fascinating so I was disappointed with the digression. What disturbs me though is the almost absolute denial of Pasteur's work. It seems as though everyone is denying that germs (bacteria and virus's) have an effect on the human body. Would it now be ok to eat salmonella tainted food, breathe in anthrax, not vaccinate against harsh flu?

If there's one thing Laura has shown it is that there has to be balance. Whatever we eventually find to be the most efficacious form of medical treatment we will always have to acknowledge that germs can be harmful, often deadly.
 
Microbes play a part in disease, but Pasteur's plagiarized and distorted ideas of vaccination should be avoided. Natural immunity works totally differently than the vaccination approach. Also the health of the immune and total system is even more important in disease than microbes.
 
Hi SoCurious,

Welcome to our forum. :)

We recommend all new members to post an introduction in the Newbies section telling us a bit about themselves, how they found the cass material, and how much of the work here they have read.

You can have a look through that board to see how others have done it.
 
Back
Top Bottom