truth seeker said:
Yes, this is a very important thing to keep in mind. This can help to prevent us from judging others as more or less worthy than us.
In reading this thread, I've noticed what I perceive to be some confusion between use of the words "worthy" and "trustworthy" To me, asking if a poster is "worthy" implies some kind of broad character judgment whereas the concept of establishing "trustworthiness" (to a small degree) indicates taking the time to try an ascertain if a person can be "trusted" with access to semi private posts, editing features, etc.. "Is that new account a spam bot, known troll, psycho, etc.?" type of thing.
Of course a serious psycho, agent, etc could probably get past the 50 posts pretty quickly, but then a serious psycho, agent, etc. wouldn't need access to see anything he wanted on this forum...or any other.
What the low limit access requirement does do is help identify your classic crystal twink, perv looking for a date, psychic vampire, Jehovah's Witness, etc. etc. To me, all human beings are "worthy" but not all of them are worth the time it takes to read their "I made mad passionate love with a gorgeous alien from Alpha Centauri last night in my dreams...do you think I should take the Morning After Pill just in case?" posts, and I surely wouldn't trust them in a Thread were people might have posted personal details about themselves.
With the kind of training and experience the Cass Team has, I'm betting they can tell an awful lot about a person after 50 posts. :D