The strange relationship between Mohamed Merah and Bernard Squarcini
From Morice – Agora Vox
A particularly disturbed young suburban in confidence with officials of the French special services: we will have all seen, definitely, under the Presidency of Nicolas Sarkozy. Because make no mistake: this is what happened, to the point that today we have a quite different look at what happened in Toulouse. At the moment, we see it every day, the Americans, through their killer drones, liquidate one by one all their old Taliban friends. Systematically. Those who helped so much to back up the Soviets in Afghanistan. I had written some time ago that they were conducting a balance of any account, in doing so. Leave the country, certainly, but leaving behind nothing that would re-emerge one day of their actions and of their compromise with those that they blame every day since they turned against them. In France, we don't have drones (otherwise Israeli copies reshaped by Serge Dassault, selling them at an exorbitant price). But we have the same practice, by eliminating those who, at a time of their lives, have treated with services today placed at the foot of the wall and forced to reveal their suspicious links. And even, fearing the possible revelations, to have taken the lead today in le Monde.
Mohammed Merah would have told him, to him or one of his officials "in any event, I had to call you to tell you that I had news to give you, but in fact, I was going to kill you" Bernard Squarcini eventually said in an interview in the newspaper le Monde to try to hide his deleterious role in what is becoming a sordid history, as if the children’s murders of a Jewish school were not yet enough. How is it possible that a lost 23 years old suburban can speak in this tone to the highest instance of the country's security services in France? From where came this familiarity, to this young murderer who wrote to the judge in a very respectful tone? Why had he come to so much familiarity with this official or his subordinates? Why did he finally want to kill the guy he had for months as a privileged interlocutor? He felt betrayed? Why did he come to say, before his life ended at the end of the funnel that he had built, or that was built for him, that he had "brought France to its knees?" In what could he think that he did it in committing such acts?
For a simple reason: he had been assigned a role. A dual role, obviously. The young jihadist had something to tell us, indeed. And once dead, Bernard Squarcini rushed to speak in his place. So rapidly that the suspicion is not even more supposed. The next day the terrorist puppet was found at the bottom of his building riddled with bullets, the man who had asked to meet him in the fall of 2011 came very quickly to talk in his place, to provide us a haunting picture from this character, but also and even more from his own relations with him. A picture of someone who knew him very well since... 2007. One of a young suburb without money, or living with a RSA (a little more than 400 euros per month) having already stamped his passport in nine countries, and not from the least ones. But let therefore the "Squale" provide itself the long list: "he spent time with his brother in Cairo after traveling in the Middle East: Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and even Israel." In Jerusalem, police discovered a Pocket knife in his bag and released him. Then, he went to Afghanistan passing through Tajikistan. He goes through ways that are unusual and does not appear on our radar, or those from French, American and local services. "He arrives on November 13 in Kabul, he is controlled on 22 November in Kandahar and he returns to France on December 5, 2010." Nine countries have I told you: Yes, because to the list, it must also be added Pakistan and even... Iran, which as everyone knows, is a country where we go very easily... it is well known! "Another disturbing element about the movements of Mohamed Merah remains to clarify: its presence in Iran"on two occasions” according to a French military source in Afghanistan. When questioned by Le Monde on Wednesday, the DCRI, responsible for counter-espionage and counter-terrorism, denied the stay" did we also learn today.
