Trans madness: jokes & memes

(Still off-topic)
T.C. said:
The whole Oedipal idea is that boys want to marry their mothers and kill their fathers. If that’s because the mother is the first person they bond with, and that applies to girls too, then why doesn’t the Oedipal complex apply to women also?
Click to expand...
FYI, C.G. Jung proposed the equivalent for girls : the Electra complex.
en.wikipedia.org

Electra complex - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
T.C. said:
It would also raise the question: if women become attracted to other women because of their bond with the mother, then why would they ever become attracted to men at all?
Click to expand...
Good question. :-)
My guess : even if they would be, let's say, first homoromantic, then a mix of genetic programming (?) and social conditioning (wedding, babies, etc.) could change it. Plus puberty, hormones...
 
Bastian said:
(Off-topic)

BTW, about the second statement ("Men are straight and women are bisexual."), a friend of mine explain me a few years ago that, according to a French feminist author (I can't remember her name), that would be natural because :
- children are "in love" with their mother (first),
- consequently, the boys would generally become attracted by females (gynophilic), so "straight",
- and the girls would be first attracted by females (gynophile), so "lesbian", and in a second time would become attracted by males too (androphile), so "bisexual" (gynophile + androphile)...

It made sense to me (maybe just because it matched my prejudices).
Click to expand...
People tend to assume everyoene is like them, and I think this feminist is simply projecting her own Lived Experience (TM) on other women. Looking at her relationship with her father would probably explain a lot.
I'm sure there are many women that do agree with her, and looking at their lives would reveal that they have similar experiences.

So... her saying this reveals to us a lot about her, but not necessarily anything about other women.
 
taratai said:
People tend to assume everyoene is like them, and I think this feminist is simply projecting her own Lived Experience (TM) on other women. Looking at her relationship with her father would probably explain a lot.
I'm sure there are many women that do agree with her, and looking at their lives would reveal that they have similar experiences.

So... her saying this reveals to us a lot about her, but not necessarily anything about other women.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with this. Right or wrong, this is always what I think about the people who have changed cultural views on sexuality.

Freud, Jung, Foucault, etc. Heck, you can even look at Jordan Peterson and all the times he taught men that they should become monsters on the inside, that in the words of Solzhenitsyn, “The line between good and evil runs through every human heart”.

It made sense to me when I first heard Peterson saying those things. Now, I don’t know whether I believe it anymore and that he was probably projecting a lot onto others.

Sure, we’ve all done things we regret, but becoming a nazi storm trooper murdering women and children, or an advocate for genocide? I don’t think everyone’s capable of that.
 
Indeed, "cherry-picking" is in other words the seeding of propaganda. The saying is you are what you eat, but it’s also true that you are what you watch, and we have collectively been served cherry in every form imaginable. Example:

The co-founder of Netflix is Marc Randolph. When you dig on Randolph, you learn his great uncle is Edward Bernays. When you dig on Bernays, you find that his uncle was Sigmund Freud.

Bernays, believing in Freud’s foundational idea that people’s unconscious mind leads them to be easily influenced without knowing it, wrote "Propaganda" in 1928. Bernays became the father of PR. Public Relations was born to rid the public of their negative view toward "purposeful, tactical influence."

Bernays wrote, " "We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society." By influencing public opinion using group psychology, Bernays is the "grand-uncle" of the global woke agenda in a cherry orchard as far as the eye can see and the ear can hear. 🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒🍒

🥧 Pie anyone? Or "say Uncle?"
 
Russell Peters can't stand the new generation's overemphasis on feelings.
[1:54 - 3:11]
We all feel different things at different times. I woke up this morning, guess what I felt? F*cken tired. You know what I felt after I had breakfast? I felt like I took a nap and I felt better. Your feelings change. I'm from the generation where nobody asked how you felt unless you were sick.

"Hey, I heard you were sick, how do you feel?"
"I feel better thanks for asking."

But nobody randomly came up to me and was like:
"Hey man, hey Russell, how do you feel?"
"Huh, what do you mean?"
"Like, are you happy, are you sad, how do you feel?"
"I feel irritated that you're asking me this stupid f*cken question."

But this generation be like:
"Hey man, you feel good, are you feeling happy?"
"Yeah, thanks for asking. Feel so good."

F*cken feelings. That's why they'll do this bullsh*t, because we took adversity away from them and they're like:
"Huh, we got nothing wrong in our lives. What should we do? If I'm a boy, I could say I'm a girl. If I'm a girl, I could say I'm a boy. No like that's been done. Oh, what do we do... what if we claim to be neither, but if we act really angry about it they have to believe it. I like it, I'm going with it, and if they question it, tell them it's how you feel, because nobody can question your feelings."
Click to expand...
 
I did a search for this here but couldn't find anything even though it might already be known. There is something called the "4B Movement" that is apparently gaining traction in the States seemingly because of Trump's election.

It's difficult to track it's history because it seems to be something that keeps morphing, but it's said to have roots in South Korea through the "Escape the Corset" Movement from 2016 which calls for women to liberate themselves from sexual, social, bodily and psychological oppression. There are many social and economic problems in South Korea, but it seems that 'beauty standards' was a major issue for rebellion. In 2017, the US "MeToo" movement became popular with hundreds of South Korean women coming forward with experiences of sexual harassment going as far back as WWII and Japan's occupation. It looks like it mixed with "Escape the Corset". Then in 2019, the radical feminist "4B Movement" (or "Four Nos" (as in: 'No' x 4)) emerged with the original definition being: non-marriage, non-procreation, non-relationship, non-sex. ('Sex strikes' are actually a very old tactic, so there is nothing really new about this.)

However, after Trump won the election, searches for "4B" increased by 450% and TikTok videos mentioning "4B" went viral. It's definition also seems to have become a bit more specific: refuse to date men, get married, have sex with men, or have children.

This movement is also being refered to as "Lysistrata", the Greek comedy of a woman's mission to end the Peloponnesian War by denying all men sex.

This is a pretty niche, mostly online, movement so don't expect to hear a lot about it, but it's certainly being used as a vehicle for Trump hate:
"You have a real recognition that this president and his ilk will be responsive to things like sex strikes because they are motivated by seeing women only through a very narrow lens that leads to their own sexual gratification."
Click to expand...

But what about all the women who voted for Trump? Are they viewing (Democrat? Every?) women the same way? How the heck does that even work?
 
Benjamin said:
I did a search for this here but couldn't find anything even though it might already be known. There is something called the "4B Movement" that is apparently gaining traction in the States seemingly because of Trump's election.

It's difficult to track it's history because it seems to be something that keeps morphing, but it's said to have roots in South Korea through the "Escape the Corset" Movement from 2016 which calls for women to liberate themselves from sexual, social, bodily and psychological oppression. There are many social and economic problems in South Korea, but it seems that 'beauty standards' was a major issue for rebellion. In 2017, the US "MeToo" movement became popular with hundreds of South Korean women coming forward with experiences of sexual harassment going as far back as WWII and Japan's occupation. It looks like it mixed with "Escape the Corset". Then in 2019, the radical feminist "4B Movement" (or "Four Nos" (as in: 'No' x 4)) emerged with the original definition being: non-marriage, non-procreation, non-relationship, non-sex. ('Sex strikes' are actually a very old tactic, so there is nothing really new about this.)

However, after Trump won the election, searches for "4B" increased by 450% and TikTok videos mentioning "4B" went viral. It's definition also seems to have become a bit more specific: refuse to date men, get married, have sex with men, or have children.

This movement is also being refered to as "Lysistrata", the Greek comedy of a woman's mission to end the Peloponnesian War by denying all men sex.

This is a pretty niche, mostly online, movement so don't expect to hear a lot about it, but it's certainly being used as a vehicle for Trump hate:


But what about all the women who voted for Trump? Are they viewing (Democrat? Every?) women the same way? How the heck does that even work?
Click to expand...

Post Trump victory, I think some of them even added in having hysterectomies as well as the "Four Nos"
 
I've seen mentions of a 1100% increase in suicide rates after Trumps victory.
And this "no sex because of Trump" thing is a complete joke, becaue these women were clearly not having sex with those who voted for Trump to begin with!
Plus, them even going as far as cutting their own genitalia because of it seems like another step on the body self-mutilation fetishisation trend (i wonder how much of it is genuine and how much is just empty virtue signaling).

Thus, this looks like the blood sacrifices shall continue, because 4D STS always gets their nourishment, one way or another. If it's not from regular people, it will be from their servants, literally sacrificing themselves or their own body parts.

And if "transitioning" is about to be ended, might as well harvest all of the susceptible ones now and quickly, i suppose?

Hah. In this game of life, The House Always Wins, one way or the other, and the snake always eats its own tail in the end...
 
taratai said:
I've seen mentions of a 1100% increase in suicide rates after Trumps victory.
Click to expand...

There is a report from Lead Stories that came out on Nov. 7 that says "2,000 suicides officially reported in the U.S. the day after the 2024 U.S. presidential election" is disinfo. The source was apparently tracked to a Nov. 6th X post by Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives saying: "2038 suicides have been reported today. If this is linked to the election Democrats have blood on their hands for years of fear mongering a fake narrative." His source is from the WHO.

Added context from readers of Dom's post mention that the WHO "does NOT have an active suicide counter. Its latest data is from 2019, NOT 2024," and "The WHO's mortality data files haven't been updated since Feb. [21,] 2024," and "The CDC's suicide data is from 2022." So, it looks like the increase in suicides is bunk.

However, I don't know how or when these organizations update their info, but it sounds suspicious that these numbers are not being updated or maybe being withheld (?) from the public. If this is the case, then, for all we know, there could be zero suicides to a 100,000% increase. And, that being said, yesterday there was a NYPost story of a Minnesota man (Anthony Nephew) who shot his wife, ex-girlfriend, two kids and then himself with a self-inflicted gunshot wound. He's reported to have had mental health issues and ranted against Trump online.

How many people are actually dying in the States?
 
Last edited:
Benjamin said:
How many people are actually dying in the States?
Click to expand...
I suppose we might get to know that in a roundabout way: by how many people that said they will leave the US if Trump gets elected actually leave.

In 2016 there was a lot of talk about people leaving because of him, but these people never went anywhere in the end. If the situation will be similar this time, then i think it's safe to assume people aren't actually as desperate as they say they are.

And i wonder how much of this is hysteria is genuine, how much is triple letter agencies trying to induce it, and how much is people on the winning side simply trolling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom