Trump Assassination of Iranian General Soleimani - IRGC Counterstrike


Advisory lists UAE, Bahrain, Turkey among countries where Iranian terrorists could strike in wake of killing of nuke chief; travelers told to be vigilant, avoid crowds
The National Security Council issued a travel advisory Thursday, warning that Iran may try to attack Israelis overseas and urging greater vigilance, citing recent threats toward Israel by Iranian officials.

In the travel advisory, the NSC did not specify the nature of the Iranian threats, but alluded to Iranian officials publicly blaming Israel for the assassination of top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh over the weekend, and to Tehran’s vows of revenge. Israeli officials have refused to comment on the killing.

The NSC advisory listed countries neighboring Iran as places where Iranians could try to attack Israelis — including Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey, and Israel’s two new Gulf peace partners the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain — as well as Iraqi Kurdistan, the Middle East in general, and the entire African continent.

shot-e1604393236791-640x400.jpg

A gunman points his weapon during a terror attack on multiple sites in Vienna, November 2, 2020. (Twitter screenshot)

“It’s possible that part of the current wave of Islamist terror will reach targets identified with Israel or [with] Jewish communities” such as “synagogues, Kosher restaurants, and Jewish museums,” the NSC said.

The statement also mentioned the Christmas period at the end of December and called it “attractive for hostile terrorist activity in Europe.”

Because of all this, the NSC recommended that those planning to travel abroad “be more vigilant (including near Israeli missions, synagogues, and Jewish community institutions), obey the security guidelines of local authorities, stay away from crowded areas and avoid staying in unsecured public areas or in the vicinity of government institutions.”

The statement also attached a link to the NSC website for all would-be travelers to check travel warnings regarding their specific planned destinations.

On Monday, the director-general of the Foreign Ministry sent a letter to all Israeli diplomatic missions urging them to be on alert following the assassination of Fakhrizadeh, and Tehran’s subsequent finger-pointing at Israel and vow to avenge his death.

Citing the “events over the weekend,” Alon Ushpiz called on missions to maintain “the highest possible level of preparedness and vigilance for any unusual activity in the area of the mission, at the homes of families and at Jewish and Israeli community centers,” according to Kan news.

Iranian agents and proxy groups have been known to attack Israeli or Jewish targets in the past, including diplomatic missions.

In 1992, a bomb at the Israeli embassy in Argentina killed 29 people, in an attack widely attributed to Iran. In 2012, diplomats were targeted in India, Georgia and Thailand.

Fakhrizadeh, the scientist previously said by Israel and the US to head Iran’s rogue nuclear weapons program, was killed in a military-style ambush Friday on the outskirts of Tehran. The attack reportedly saw a truck bomb explode and gunmen open fire on Fakhrizadeh.

Iranian officials have pointed the finger at Israel for the killing. Jerusalem has long been suspected of taking out scientists amid tensions over Tehran’s rogue nuclear weapons program, which Fakhrizadeh oversaw.

The slaying threatened to renew tensions between the United States and Iran in the waning days of US President Donald Trump’s term, just as President-elect Joe Biden has suggested his administration could return to Tehran’s nuclear deal with world powers from which Trump earlier withdrew. The Pentagon announced early Saturday that it sent the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier back into the Mideast.

The attack came just days before the 10-year anniversary of the killing of Iranian nuclear scientist Majid Shahriari, which Tehran also blamed on Israel.

That and other targeted killings happened at the time that the so-called Stuxnet computer virus, believed to be an Israeli and American creation, destroyed Iranian centrifuges.

Those assaults occurred at the height of Western fears over Iran’s nuclear program. Fakhrizadeh led Iran’s so-called AMAD program that Israel and the West have alleged was a military operation looking at the feasibility of building a nuclear weapon.

Fakhrizadeh was named by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2018 as the director of Iran’s rogue nuclear weapons project. When Netanyahu revealed then that Israel had removed from a warehouse in Tehran a vast archive of Iran’s own material detailing with its nuclear weapons program, he said: “Remember that name, Fakhrizadeh.”
Agencies contributed to this report.

Fakhrizadeh is the second high-level Iranian official to be killed in 2020. In January, Revolutionary Guard Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani was assassinated in a US drone strike in Baghdad during a goodwill visit aimed at defusing tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Iran responded to Soleimani’s killing by launching over a dozen ballistic missiles at two US bases in Iraq, leaving over 100 US troops with traumatic brain injuries.

Israeli officials have not publicly commented on Fakhrizadeh’s murder. However, on Saturday, an unnamed Israeli official said to have been involved in tracking the Iranian nuclear scientist told US media that the world should ‘thank Israel’ for eliminating him, because he purportedly posed a “menace” to the international community through his work on Iran’s nuclear programme.

Iran has repeatedly dismissed US and Israeli claims about its alleged nuclear weapons-related activities, saying its nuclear programme was strictly civilian in nature, and criticised Washington and Tel Aviv for trying to lecture Tehran about nuclear non-proliferation while themselves possessing (and in the US case even using) nuclear weapons themselves. The International Atomic Energy Agency has found no credible evidence of any Iranian nuclear weapons programme.

Fakhrizadeh’s assassination isn’t the first killing of an Iranian nuclear scientist which Tehran has blamed on Israel and Western intelligence agencies.

According to a recent Sputnik investigation, at least seven Iranian nuclear scientists have been targeted in attacks between 2007 and 2020, some of them blamed on the Mossad, and others on the CIA and MI6.



 
Tuesday, 15 December, 2020 - 06:30
1608037437855.png
Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) continue to arrest prominent figures linked to the Saraya al-Khorasani brigades and Iran, who are accused of attacking civilian activists.

Less than 24 hours after the arrest of Hamid al-Jazairi, deputy commander general of the group, the PFM arrested on Monday 30 members of the Brigades while searching for their Secretary-General Ali Al-Yasiri.

Sources reported that Al-Yasiri “was not present at the Saraya headquarters during the raid launched by PMF security personnel."

“He intended to travel to Syria, but he returned and turned himself over in to the PMF Security Directorate,” the sources added.

Another source close to the PMF confirmed to Asharq Al-Awsat the dismantling of the Saraya al-Khorasani.

“The decision was issued following an Iranian approval,” the source explained, adding that the PMF chief of staff Abdul Aziz al-Muhammadawi, known as Abu Fadak, directly supervised the dismantling process, for unknown reasons.

“It seems that the dismantling decision has the blessing of other factions in the PMF and was welcomed by the Iraqi government, particularly given the bad reputation associated with this faction at the local level.”

In May, Head of the PMF Faleh al-Fayyad relieved al-Jazairi and Waad Al-Qaddo of their duties. Both are known for their loyalty to Iran.

The decision has dealt a severe blow to the influence of the Iraqi militias affiliated with Tehran.

Jazairi has been accused of leading a team of snipers who killed protesters in Tahrir Square in central Baghdad in October last year, when Iraqis protested against Iranian influence in Iraq.

The Saraya al-Khorasani Brigades is closely linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and accused of doing Tehran’s “dirty” works in Iraq.


Alan Dershowitz
Former CIA Director John Brennan recently condemned the targeted assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, calling it "a criminal act" and a flagrant violation of international law. Senator Bernie Sanders rushed to join in the condemnation, decrying the killing as "murder."

At the same time, Brennan defended the assassination of Osama bin Laden, which occurred during his tenure and was ordered by his former boss, President Barack Obama. Sanders went even further at the time, "applaud[ing]" the killing of bin Laden and calling it "a historic moment in our fight against terrorism."

Yet, by any standards of law, morality and common sense, the assassination of Fakhrizadeh, as well as the earlier assassination of Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps-Quds Force Commander Qassem Soleimani—both done during President Donald Trump's presidential tenure—were far more justified than even the assassination of Osama bin Laden himself.

Both Fakhrizadeh and Soleimani posed ongoing threats to innocent civilians. At the time of his death, Soleimani was actively planning terrorist attacks against the United States and its allies. Fakhrizadeh was working on the development of a nuclear arsenal for Iran, whose leaders threatened (and still threaten) to use it to murder millions of innocent Israelis and other civilians. The targeted assassinations of these two threats to humanity were fundamentally preventative, in nature.

Osama bin Laden, on the other hand, was a had-been fugitive hiding in a remote location with no contact to the outside world, and no realistic threat of future terrorism. His killing was pure revenge for what he had done in the past. It was, to be sure, justifiable revenge for his ordering the murder of thousands of Americans in the 9/11 attacks. He deserved to be brought to justice—to be placed on trial, if possible. However, the order to the Navy SEALs was apparently not to capture him alive, but to kill him and bury his body at sea. Brennan presumably approved those orders, despite the reality that bin Laden at the time posed no discernible future danger.

I have little moral concern about how Osama bin Laden was handled, but it follows a fortiori that if his revenge killing was justified, then the preventative killings of Fakhrizadeh and Soleimani were even more justified.

The fact that Fakhrizadeh and Soleimani worked for Iran—a nation and thus distinguishable from al-Qaeda, a jihadist outfit—should make no legal or moral difference. They, like bin Laden, were illegal combatants, engaged in crimes against humanity. They, like bin Laden, were leaders of a U.S.-designated terrorist group, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Their potential victims—including those in Israel and the United States—had the right to stop them from carrying out their planned carnage against civilians. In all cases, it would be better to capture such war criminals alive, but if that is not possible, it is entirely lawful and moral to neutralize them and the threats they pose, while limiting the collateral damage to others. Every law-abiding nation in history has done that in extreme cases like those.

The killing of Osama bin Laden was far more questionable, both legally and morally, especially if there was an order not to take him alive. I can understand such an order, from a pragmatic perspective—his capture might well have stimulated hostage-taking—but there is no legal justification for an advance "shoot to kill" order, assuming one did indeed exist. And morally, it is difficult to justify cold-blooded revenge killings, if that is what was indeed ordered.

Again, I am not writing this to condemn the killing of Osama bin Laden, but rather to demonstrate that the killings of Fakhrizadeh and Soleimani were far more justified. I am also writing this to expose the double standard of Brennan, Sanders and others who justify everything done by President Obama while rushing to condemn analogous actions taken by President Trump (and perhaps Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) that were, in actuality, far more justified.

Targeted killings of terrorists and other massive threats are inherently controversial. The concept should be studied, debated and discussed. I wrote an entire book about it, entitled Preemption: A Knife that Cuts Both Ways. In the book, I set out criteria for the deployment of extrajudicial killings (of which targeted assassination is one genre—others include self-defense, defense of others and war). One conclusion should be clear: The justification for extrajudicial killings should not depend on who the president—or the CIA head—happens to be at a given moment in time. The prevention of terrorism is too important to become yet another object of partisan bickering.
 
Middle East 03:54 GMT 29.12.2020Get short URL by Daria Bedenko
Top Iranian General Qasem Soleimani was assassinated in January on the direct order of US President Donald Trump, prompting retaliatory airstrikes from Iran targeting US military bases in Iraq.

The head of the World Assembly of Islamic Awakening Studies Center, Hossein Akbari, told reporters on Monday that the late Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) General Qasem Soleimani defused three major US plots in the Middle East "that could affect the entire world".
“The Americans pursued at least three major projects in the region, each of which could have far-reaching implications for the world and impact on the entire world. But Martyr Soleimani thwarted their plots", Akbari said during a press conference at Mehr News Agency Headquarter.
According to Akbari, the first American "plan" was allegedly referred to "the Great Middle East" in which they intended "to occupy the Islamic world and force the whole Islamic world to give up their values". This "goal" was allegedly to be achieved through Iraq occupation, but, Akbari noted, "their plan in Iraq failed and was thwarted".
“The second plan of the Americans was the ‘New Middle East’ plan in which they wanted to divide the countries of the Islamic world into 200 small units and deprive them of their national power to force the people of these countries to follow them. They also started implementing this plan from Lebanon, and according to them, the beginning of the war in Lebanon was a prelude to the ‘New Middle East’ plan,” Akbari claimed.
The third alleged plan, according to the pundit, involved "bringing ISIL* to the Middle East".
"By bringing ISIL to the Middle East, they wanted to create a full-fledged, long-lasting war in the Islamic world for at least 50 years, as well as chaos among the Islamic countries. It can be clearly said that world security owes much to Gen. Soleimani in the ISIL issue", Akbari said.
When asked about the possibility of Iranian retaliation for Soleimani's death, Akbari asserted that "hard revenge" is still being considered.
“Our revenge will not be just militarily, but it will be in all dimensions, especially software,” he noted.
His comments come as the anniversary of Soleimani's killing looms, echoing remarks made earlier by other Iranian officials.
IRGC Brigadier General Mohammad Hejazi hinted last week that "harsh revenge will be taken" in retaliation for Soleimani's murder, along with the similar statements from Ayatollah Khamenei, who said that the revenge "will certainly at the right time".

Soleimani, along with a senior Iraqi militia commander, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, was killed on 3 January by direct order of US President Donald Trump. The assassination escalated tensions between Washington and Tehran which had already risen after Trump withdrew the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018.

After Soleimani's death, Iran carried out airstrikes against US military bases in Iraq that resulted in traumatic brain injuries of dozens of American soldiers, but caused no deaths or serious injuries.



 
2021-01-02
BEIRUT, LEBANON (4:40 P.M.) – The ex-Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi revealed the contents of the call he received from US President Donald Trump two days before the assassination of the late Quds Force commander, Major General Qassem Soleimani.
In an interview he gave during a documentary, Abdul =Mahdi said, “Trump called me last New Year’s Eve at around nine o’clock Baghdad time, and thanked us for ending the attacks on the American embassy and asked me whether these were Iraqis or Iranians, so I told him Iraqis objected to the American air strikes against factions on the border with Syria.”
“The Americans do not know the Iranians well, but the Iraqis are the ones who know them well,” he said, quoting Trump.
Abdul-Mahdi indicated that he had told Trump: “The Iranians say they do not want a war, and so does America, and they have suggested to him either direct negotiations with the Iranians, or tacit agreements, as has been happening since 2003.

The Iraqi Prime Minister continued: Trump told me you are good negotiators, what you can do in this regard, we are ready for it.”

According to Abdul-Mahdi, Soleimani was coming to Iraq to negotiate because that is what he believed was going to happen on January 3rd, 2020.

Abdul-Mahdi added, “There was approval and an official invitation for the martyr Soleimani to come to Iraq to discuss. The assassination operation was not designed within a day or two; it must not have been decided shortly before.”

Video Issued on: 06/01/2020 - 02:30Modified: 06/01/2020 - 02:37

Snip: 1-3-2021
Sunday marks the one-year anniversary of the January 3rd, 2020 killing of popular Iranian IRGC Gen. Qassem Soleimani, ahead of which US forces in the region, particularly Iraq, have been on high alert.


Iran has over the past days accused both Israel and the United States of seeking to provoke a “pretext for war” during the last weeks of the Trump presidency, before Biden enters office and seeks rapprochement centered on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) nuclear deal.

On Saturday Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif again leveled the charge of the Islamic Republic’s enemies seeking to stage provocations in order to give Trump a “fake casus belli”. This time more specifics were offered, with Zarif claiming Israel is seeking to do this through “Israeli agent-provocateurs” – citing unspecified intelligence in a message on Twitter.

 
Here is an article which supports our contention that the Iranian ayatollahs were happy to get rid of Soleimani. It describes an IRGC propaganda video just aired, while talks are ongoing in Vienna, the video portraying an Iranian missile striking the Capitol in Washington:

Iran Airs Disturbing Propaganda Clip Of IRGC Blowing Up Capitol Building

This is the relevant passage from that article:
"The other interesting aspect to the timing of the IRGC propaganda video is that it comes on the heels of the 'Zarif-Gate' leaked audio scandal wherein Foreign Minister Javad Zarif is heard criticizing 'national hero' Qassem Soleimani, while also broadly accusing the military and IRGC in particular of often sabotaging diplomacy.

"Zarif basically admitted in the audio leak that the powerful IRGC runs the country and even overrides government decisions - something which has never been so bluntly confessed to by a top Iranian official. So the new video of the US Capitol burning could be an attempt to "save face" after the embarrassing Zarif leaked interview ordeal, and to return to the usual bellicose threats."
 
BREAKING:

Explosions have been reported near the cemetery where Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander Qassem Soleimani is buried.


Apart from being a clear message to Iran from all know whom, it seems also quite symbolic with the two powerful blasts, including that if not for the deceased commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Major General Qasem Soleimani, the Nord Stream 2 pipeline would not even have been built...

КАК КАСЕМ СУЛЕЙМАНИ СЫГРАЛ РЕШАЮЩУЮ РОЛЬ В ЗАПУСКЕ ПРОЕКТА «СЕВЕРНЫЙ ПОТОК -2»
(How Qasem Suleimani played a decisive role in the launch of the "Nord Steam-2" project)
 
A bloody event. A lot of victims.
The head of Iran promised to punish the customers of the terrorist attack, where 200 people were killed

The customers and perpetrators of the terrorist attack, in which 200 people were killed and about 190 injured, will be identified and punished. This was reported in the Telegram channel of the IRNA agency with reference to a statement by Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi.

"There is no doubt that the organizers of the Kerman bombings and those behind them will be identified and punished," Raisi said.

Iranian Interior Minister Ahmad Vahidi also announced a strong response.

"This terrorist attack will be followed by a decisive ... response in an expeditious manner by the security forces and the armed forces," he stressed.

Earlier it was reported that the Iranian authorities declared Thursday, January 4, a day of universal mourning for the victims of the terrorist attack on the way to the cemetery in the city of Kerman, as a result of which, according to the latest data, more than 200 people died.

Recall that on the afternoon of January 3, during a crowded funeral procession, several explosions occurred on the road to the cemetery in the city of Kerman. It was reported that unknown persons left two bags of explosives near the entrance to the cemetery, it was probably activated remotely. The Government of the republic qualified the incident as a terrorist attack.
Глава Ирана пообещал наказать заказчиков теракта, где погибли 200 человек
 
Back
Top Bottom