Trump era: Fascist dawn, or road to liberation?

I came across the January 11, 1995 session and arranged in order all the quoted words that the Cs had in that session. This is what came up:

resident., Thump., step by step process., union., draw on our energy., effortless, born, time., up, awake, years., Time, on, see, Lizzie, eat., The fallen Angel., Brotherhood, do, letting go, Millenium, time.

It may be coincidence, but "resident Thump" sounded similar phonetically to President Trump. It seems to imply that he draws on "our energy" (perhaps Cs or STO influence via union on some level? Then there's the blurb about "seeing the Lizzies eat the fallen fallen Angel & Brotherhood" and letting go in the Millenium era.
@pecha ,

I am not sure the words you isolated are from that session. It is the words put in quotes as the Cs answers they were talking about.

I also do not know if only isolating the words and arranging them in order gives the full meaning of what they intended either.

Here are the quotes by the Cs that I found in the January 11, 1995 session:

A: Remember warnings about false prophets in the "desert."

A: No. The "antichrist" is not an individual, but consortium.

A: No, absolutely not! In fact, the STS cannot conceive of "losing" but instinctively feel pressure building upon them, that is the reason for the impending turmoil.

A: Close. When we said "close" we meant concept was "close" to reality. Not close in terms of time or distance.

A: Infrequently, they use "agents" to do most of their tasks on 3rd level.

A: Agents of the Lizards, more disinformation. Who is not receiving disinformation, then, you ask? Well, you will know when you have opened your mind and have received much information; now message to you: Konicovs, we are aware of your work, and you are close to a major "breakthrough," however, beware that STS forces are trying to defeat you, and we would suggest you slow down your battles against STS forces a little, so as to prevent too much heat from them coming down upon you!!

A: Had to do with "business" but was ruse.

A: He will understand delays better, no one can blame you for wanting best "deal."
 
@pecha ,

I am not sure the words you isolated are from that session. It is the words put in quotes as the Cs answers they were talking about.

I also do not know if only isolating the words and arranging them in order gives the full meaning of what they intended either.

Here are the quotes by the Cs that I found in the January 11, 1995 session:
I apologize @goyacobol, the section I was referring to wasn't the one on the 11th, but the January 7th, 1995 session.

I only do this since the Cs have said this and wanted to see if I can learn/share anything from this endeavor:

Session 22 June 1996 said:
Q: (V) I am wondering about the significance of the quoted words. Is it some kind of code?

A: Maybe you should go back to the beginning, and arrange all our quoted statements in sequential order?

Q: (L) Do you mean ALL the transcripts?

A: Yup!

Q: (F) Well, they mentioned twice to be careful about putting in the designated quotes. (L) One of the crop circles you interpreted was an "astronomical twin phenomenon." What is an astronomical twin phenomenon?

A: Many perfectly synchronous meanings.

Of course, it could mean either arranging the quoted words themselves, or arranging the statements containing the quoted words. I'm leaning towards the former since I feel like quoting the entire statement often requires the context of the question that was asked.

Here's another curious one from the November 27, 1994 transcript:

Bringers of the Dawn, cc, takes two to tango.

Perhaps giving advise to Laura to contact the author of "Bringers of the Dawn", which I'm sure she has.
 
Last edited:
Of course, it could mean either arranging the quoted words themselves, or arranging the statements containing the quoted words. I'm leaning towards the former since I feel like quoting the entire statement often requires the context of the question that was asked.


@pecha ,

I am leaning towards the idea that the quoted words present more than just a kind of coded message but do require the context of surrounding questions. I have been working at doing that for quite awhile. Hopefully I can finish it before I am 101 years old.

I am not saying your method is wrong but it does not seem to apply to every quoted word for some shorter answers.

I think if the quotes are presented more contextually there is a thread or progression of sequential conceptual development. Maybe both concepts have validity.
 
@pecha ,

I am leaning towards the idea that the quoted words present more than just a kind of coded message but do require the context of surrounding questions. I have been working at doing that for quite awhile. Hopefully I can finish it before I am 101 years old.

I am not saying your method is wrong but it does not seem to apply to every quoted word for some shorter answers.

I think if the quotes are presented more contextually there is a thread or progression of sequential conceptual development. Maybe both concepts have validity.
I've just finished arranging the quotes from the 1994 sessions and hope to post all of them at a later point. It has been slow on my end too, but I try to do chunks of it at a time when I have time. There are many that don't make sense to me, but there's a particular synchronicity that I saw that seemed to apply to the situation with a family member, which was utterly strange to me. Maybe others may have some interesting connections to be made too?

If anything, I think both methods are valid and we can cover more ground that way.
 
Last edited:
@pecha,

I've just finished arranging the quotes from the 1994 sessions and hope to post all of them at a later point. It has been slow on my end too, but I try to do chunks of it at a time when I have time. We can cover more ground if we pursue each method. Perhaps some interesting connections can be made from doing these

I like the idea of "We can cover more ground if we pursue each method."

Since this covers more than just this session maybe we can continue this idea in a thread that is already started and you have posted there I see.

Compilation of the Cassiopaea Contact's quoted statements.

You can pursue your concept of using the words individually to see if there is a pattern or message that can be found. I can continue to work on the contextual idea of including the prompting questions and prior discussion that prompted the answers.

If we move the discussion there I will try to give you more of what I have collected to speed up your research.
 
@pecha,



I like the idea of "We can cover more ground if we pursue each method."

Since this covers more than just this session maybe we can continue this idea in a thread that is already started and you have posted there I see.

Compilation of the Cassiopaea Contact's quoted statements.

You can pursue your concept of using the words individually to see if there is a pattern or message that can be found. I can continue to work on the contextual idea of including the prompting questions and prior discussion that prompted the answers.

If we move the discussion there I will try to give you more of what I have collected to speed up your research.

Thanks for reminding me @goyacobol, I totally forgot that thread existed. Yes, it would be better to continue this discussion there and perhaps the mods can move it there if they deem it fit? I've been collating quotes in a spreadsheet that I'd like to share when I've done more sessions.
 
Frustrated Alex Jones calls Donald Trump a ‘dumbass’ after he recommends taking Covid vaccines
Orange Man Sez:
“Now, that’s OK. That’s all right. You got your freedoms,” Trump said in response. “But I happen to take the vaccine. If it doesn’t work, you’ll be the first to know. OK? I’ll call up Alabama and say, ‘Hey, you know what?’ But it is working.”
Yeah, buddy.. I don't think so! Look what became of Komrade Putin after he took the Vaxx!

I think this is good news. No wonder that Nathalie reported:
- If Putin has agreed to vaccinate people, it's strange, it's not normal, I see black energy around him and Russia
So this means, if President Trump decides to take the Clot-19 Killshot for real - not just some distilled vitamin water solution on TV - then the DNA-destroying poison in the jab will progressively eat his tissues away effectively turning him into a 5G Remote Controlled Vaxx-Zombie Automaton.

At least we can drop him as future hope from our 'Hope Train' as well. If the Vaxx Blight was shown by doctors around the world to cause massive organ & brain damage - which surely leads to progressive demise with the poisoned tissue causing poisoned Spirit? - , then why exactly are we supposed to take any Vaxxed politician as a Moral Image Exemplar? Why should we follow him or pay him attention, except noting their progressively weakening signal on the great radar screen of history?
 
Frustrated Alex Jones calls Donald Trump a ‘dumbass’ after he recommends taking Covid vaccines
Orange Man Sez:

Yeah, buddy.. I don't think so! Look what became of Komrade Putin after he took the Vaxx!

I think this is good news. No wonder that Nathalie reported:

So this means, if President Trump decides to take the Clot-19 Killshot for real - not just some distilled vitamin water solution on TV - then the DNA-destroying poison in the jab will progressively eat his tissues away effectively turning him into a 5G Remote Controlled Vaxx-Zombie Automaton.

At least we can drop him as future hope from our 'Hope Train' as well. If the Vaxx Blight was shown by doctors around the world to cause massive organ & brain damage - which surely leads to progressive demise with the poisoned tissue causing poisoned Spirit? - , then why exactly are we supposed to take any Vaxxed politician as a Moral Image Exemplar? Why should we follow him or pay him attention, except noting their progressively weakening signal on the great radar screen of history?

Now, I wouldn't count him out just yet. In the recent Cs transcription, getting the vaccine is not the end of the road:

Laura said:
Session 17 July 2021

[...]

Q: (Joe) So there are things that the body can do or produce that can be switched on by these strange waves that are received by nanoparticles in the vaccine.

A: DNA can be upregulated in specific regions and perform specialized functions.

Q: (Andromeda) What's the difference between the people this works on and the people that it doesn't?

A: Usually DNA damage.

Q: (L) But not always.

(Joe) That's weird.

(Andromeda) So it's kinda paraphysical. It changes the DNA for us, but...

(Joe) It's creating superpowers in a certain sense in individuals. Not very cool superpowers, but...

(L) Well, I guess it's like some of those people you've read about. They have spoons stick to them all over their body and so on. It's probably because of their DNA. It's active in them for some reason just spontaneously.

(Chu) But that would assume that the pharmaceutical companies producing them are aware of this technology? Or is it a byproduct?

A: Byproduct partly.

Q: (Andromeda) So maybe they were intending to cause some change in the DNA for control, and it just so happens that it's the same function that does this magnetic thing.

(L) They may have intended one thing, but it's actually being used in another way by 4D critters. Maybe they were induced to construct the vaccine the way they did for these other reasons without necessarily knowing the full implications of what they were doing.

(Pierre) Like a back door.

A: Yes

Q: (L) A back door, exactly.

(Joe) The nanoparticles that are used in the vaccine, there's been talk of graphene oxide. Is that one of the types of nanoparticles that are used?

A: One but not all.

Q: (Gaby) Will the group members that will be or have been vaccinated with this technology, can they do something else to protect themselves?

A: Your program is good if combined with knowledge and awareness. Knowledge itself changes DNA.

Q: (Joe) So if the ultimate reason for this technology being used in 12% of the vaccines is to influence people at some point in the future, it's only people who would be inclined to act in that way anyway who would be susceptible to it. It won't work in people who aren't of that nature.

A: Yes


[...]

I think it's similar to his posturing from before when he must concede certain efforts by the PTB in order to continue doing what he is doing. You are going to alienate a lot of society if you go hard in either approach. Putin does the same thing, saying that you should get the vaccine, but in the end, it is your choice. It is the safest that way, and allows him the energy and shielding to do things of great importance with good timing.
 
How is this MAGAing?
Donald Trump, son to provide commentary on Evander Holyfield-Vitor Belfort alternate telecast
5:04 PM PT
Mike Coppinger

Former President Donald Trump has signed a contract to provide commentary on a "gamecast" of Saturday's boxing event headlined by Evander Holyfield vs. Vitor Belfort, Triller told ESPN on Tuesday.

His son Donald Trump Jr. will join him at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood, Florida.

"I love great fighters and great fights," Donald Trump Sr. said. "I look forward to seeing both this Saturday night and sharing my thoughts ringside. You won't want to miss this special event."

The Trumps will call the entire four-fight telecast that also includes Anderson Silva-Tito Ortiz and David Haye-Joe Fournier, according to Triller.

Holyfield, the 58-year-old former heavyweight champion, stepped in on short notice as a replacement for Oscar De La Hoya, who tested positive for COVID-19.

Belfort, 44, is a former UFC light heavyweight champion.

Trump, 75, is a veteran of the fight game, having hosted many boxing matches in the 1980s and '90s at his casinos in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

Triller has dabbled with celebrity commentators before. Snoop Dogg was a part of November's Mike Tyson-Roy Jones Jr. telecast and also the April fight between Jake Paul and Ben Askren. Pete Davidson, too, was a part of April's telecast.

Jim Lampley, the longtime blow-by-blow man for HBO, will call the main telecast alongside former champion Shawn Porter. Viewers will have the option to purchase either the main telecast or the Trump "gamecast" for $49.99.
 
Back
Top Bottom