Tucker Carlson had Ivana Hughes on his show, talking about nuclear weapons and nuclear war.
It was sobering stuff. For instance (starting at 14:20), according to one calculation, a nuclear war between the US and Russia, where they both would release about a thousand warheads against each other, would kill 360 million people immediately, while 6 billion would follow in the next two years from starvation caused by nuclear winter, which would ruin the means to practice agriculture. The effects of radiation and ozone layer destruction would be added on top of that, and in the absolute worst-case scenario, whole humanity (and all of the other species potentially as well) would be wiped out.
She also mentions several examples, where a nuclear confrontation was narrowly avoided, among them the Cuban missile crisis.
(Back then,
Harald Malmgren was the right man at the right place, as he managed to rein in the war hawk general Curtis ”Bombs Away” LeMay.)
There has been some talk on the forum and info from the C’s that a full-blown nuclear war is unlikely to happen, as it would take out 4D STS’s food source. (I guess in a sense, we are ”protected” by them!
)
Regarding the "limited use" of nukes:
Even though the Cs have said "no nuclear war", they have also said that there could be some suitcase nuke type incidents. Also, things can change.
Prouty gives the most compelling argument for why there will be no all-out nuclear war in his book "The Secret Team".
And there were also hints that 4D STS does not want an all out nuclear war on their "farm":
(Perceval) There's something I've been saying to various people, and I'm wondering if it's true or not. The stories in Richard Dolan's books about US nuclear missile sites being disabled by UFOs at various places so that they couldn't fire anything way back in the 60's at the height of the Cold War. Was that a message to the Powers that Be that no nuclear war would ever be allowed? Did 4D STS send a message in that way that nobody would be allowed to push the button because you'd kill everybody. Since this world is like a farm, their cattle would all be killed. Is that anywhere close to the truth?
A: Close.
On the other hand, a lot of people suffering and dying IS a "food source".
Even though the Cs have said "no nuclear war", they have also said that there could be some suitcase nuke type incidents. Also, things can change.
Prouty gives the most compelling argument for why there will be no all-out nuclear war in his book "The Secret Team".
But then again, as Laura mentions, mass-scale dying and suffering would be a food source (from a nuclear war, or due to meteors hitting the earth, etc.).
Moreover, I vaguely remembered reading somewhere on the forum that there had been a nuclear war aeons ago, and after a search, found this:
In this area of human history, 50,000 Kya keep popping up often. As we know from C's
- 58KYA humans are thriving on the planet ( 3 races Kantekanians, Paranthas, Native Americans ) and had inter-planetary travel capability
- 50KYA, there is a nuclear war between Kanteannians and Paranthas in India and destroyed 50% of the land.
- 50KYA, Hindu God Rama is a high priest influenced by good guys fought with lizards(aka psychopathy).
- Atlanteans created structures on Mars 50KYA.
- As per Main stream sources, 50 KYA Denisovans moved to Australia.
Is this move related to nuclear war in India that destroyed 50% of its land? If it destroyed 50% of country , it has to be a pretty big attack and nuclear radiation must have spread all the surrounding area including South East Asia. It must have forced lot of people into some other places including large continent like Australia.
So, a nuclear war seems to have happened in 50 KYA. Possibly it was limited to India, as seek10 wrote, and didn’t cause a total population collapse the world over.
Btw, Laura mentioned "The Secret Team" above; I haven't read the book (yet), so asked Grok about the gist of Prouty's views:
In his book "The Secret Team, Fletcher Prouty gives the most compelling argument for why there will be no all-out nuclear war. Could you tell me what was that argument?
In his book The Secret Team, L. Fletcher Prouty argues that there will be no all-out nuclear war because nuclear weapons are so immensely powerful and destructive that no reasonable nation would ever employ them in conflict. This recognition, as Prouty describes it in the context of Eisenhower-era policy under John Foster Dulles, forms the basis for pursuing lasting peace instead of escalation, shifting global confrontations toward non-nuclear forms like covert operations, proxy wars, and attrition-based strategies managed by entities like the CIA's "Secret Team." He emphasizes that the advent of the atomic bomb fundamentally altered warfare, rendering traditional large-scale engagements "unthinkable" due to the existential threat of mutual annihilation, which outweighs any potential strategic gain.
Golem not Gollum from LOTR. Got it.
ZZzzzz....
