Despite efforts to present a unified front, tensions between Turkey’s President Erdogan and Prime Minister Davutoglu could soon reach a boiling point, and result in the latter’s resignation.
Tensions Mount? Turkish Power Struggle Could Force Davutoglu to Resign
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160505/1039097700/turkish-power-struggle.html
Fourteen years ago, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan founded the Justice and Development Party (AKP).
Legally, Erdogan can not serve as party head while serving as president, and he personally chose Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to replace him as the party’s chief.
But mounting evidence suggests that Davutoglu is tired of being second-in-command, and Erdogan is none too thrilled about an underling challenging his authority.
The Erdogan administration is currently pushing to abandon the country’s secular constitution, in favor of one that would cement broader powers for the president. Given Erdogan’s imprisonment of academics and journalists, his new sovereignty would likely be used to further Ankara’s clampdown on free speech.
This is one of the issues with which Davutoglu has tried to assert himself. But in his thirst for influence, the prime minister has pursued his own troubling interests. According to Soner Cagaptay of the Washington Institute, Davutoglu is the mastermind behind Turkey’s confused Syria policy.
"This was a foreign policy that was meant to make Turkey a regional star, not only shape the outcome of the Syrian war," Cagaptay said.
Last week, Erdogan launched his own power grab, when the AKP’s executive committee – a body in which the president still maintains influence – voted to remove the prime minister’s authority to appoint local leaders.
"This decision will weaken Davutoglu’s power over the party," said one official familiar with the decision, speaking on condition of anonymity. "Davutoglu’s job will not be easy after this."
On Wednesday evening, both men held an unscheduled meeting behind closed doors. While some experts considered the possibility that Davutoglu would deliver his resignation, no public announcement was made. Other reports suggest that the prime minister may step down at the end of the month.
"While Erdogan and Davutoglu may appear keen to dispel any notions that divisions are emerging between them, the writing on the wall shows that a rift is in fact developing on a number of levels, and it is just a matter of time before this erupts in earnest," Semih Idiz wrote for Hurriyet Daily News.
Despite these clear signs of trouble, the AKP has done its best to downplay the recent decision to remove Davutoglu’s appointing power.
"This authority has been taken back by the MKYK [AKP’s executive committee] so that issues concerning the party can be discussed intensively and in more detail," party spokesman Omer Celik told reporters last Friday.
"It is not right to consider this change as a very radical move."
Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said on Wednesday that Ankara was in a position to send ground troops to Syria if necessary.
Turkey Ready to Send Ground Troops to Syria If Necessary - Prime Minister
http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20160504/1039045879/troops-pm-syria.html
He pointed out that such a move by Turkey would be legal as the UN had made a number of decisions on the fight against Daesh in terms of self-defense and countering terrorism.
"If necessary, we will send troops to Syria. We will take all steps to protect our own country internally and externally, " Davutoglu told the broadcaster Al Jazeera Turk.
Earlier this week, Russia expressed concern over any potential ground operation in Syria, advising against such actions.
A soldier was killed and 6 others were injured in a car bomb attack against their outpost in southeastern Turkey.
Attack in Turkey - one dead, six injured
http://katehon.com/news/attack-turkey-one-dead-six-injured
On Wednesday Kurdis detonated an explosives-packed vehicle outside a gendarmerie station in Mardin province, states the Turkish press.
The attack was blamed on "terrorists" linked to the Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK. Ankara and its Western allies designate the group as a terrorist organisation.
Turkey's southeast plunged into conflict last summer when a fragile peace process between the state and autonomy-seeking Kurdish rebels.
Since then, the army has carried out military operations in pre-dominantly Kurdish districts, displacing tens of thousands of people.
The PKK has waged a decades-long insurgency against the Turkish state in a conflict that has claimed over 40 000 people.
The European Union should be more careful about granting visa-free travel to Turkish citizens as the country is known to have ties with al-Nusra Front terrorists, a French lawmaker told Sputnik on Wednesday.
EU-Turkey Visa-Free Regime Unsafe Due to Ankara’s Links to Al-Nusra – MP
http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160504/1039082801/ankara-nusra-visa-free.html
Earlier in the day, the European Commission put forward a proposal that opens the way for Turkish passport holders to be granted visa-free travel to the EU Schengen Area once certain criteria have been met by Ankara. Turkey has so far met 72 out of the 77 conditions outlined in the visa liberalization roadmap. A decision by the Commission on the matter may come as early as June.
“I think to facilitate visas is OK, but we must stay in control. When we see a relation between al-Nusra [Front] and Turkey, we need to keep in mind that having a Turkish passport does not mean being safe for Europe,” Thierry Mariani told Sputnik.
He stressed that Europe finds itself “in Turkish hands for blackmail.”
Today, the European Union proposed to introduce a visa-free regime with Turkey.
5 reasons why a visa-free regime with Turkey is a bad idea
http://katehon.com/article/5-reasons-why-visa-free-regime-turkey-bad-idea
Formally, the introduction of a visa-free regime has nothing to do with the exchange of migrants between the EU and Turkey but, of course, in reality it does. It is indeed the migrant factor which has played a major role in Europe’s granting of concessions to its once main opponent. Earlier, British media reported that today, May 4th, the EU would decide on the visa-free regime with Turkey only with some reservations primarily relating to Turkey’s political system. The most natural reaction of the European Union to this, however, is troubled, because if the EU refuses to grant concessions to Turkey, then Turkey can refuse the deal on migrants. In this case, the economically weak EU country of Greece would once again witness an invasion of refugees flocking across it to other EU countries. But Europeans need to save face. Thus, under the pretext of inconsistency, Turkey’s political system has been chosen over European standards.
The European bureaucrats probably realize that it is unlikely that this move will bring Turkey closer to European standards. After all, the whole history of post-Kemalist Turkey is that of a rotation between semi-right governments, Islamist attempts at seizing power, and military dictatorships. Now an authoritarian Islamist regime is in power. The EU is most likely introducing the visa-free regime even without Turkey’s democratization because it understands that this will never happen. But what will Europeans face following the introduction of this visa-free regime with Turkey?
1. Islamists will be welcomed. Indeed, the main problem with this deal is security. Turkey is engulfed by a civil war, has transferred ISIS, Al-Nusra, and other extremist militants through its territory to Syria, and the Turkish leadership is closely linked to Islamists. In Turkey, the number of those supporting radical Islam is in fact growing. Now, however, the EU is opening its borders to nearly 80 million Muslims, and the visa-free regime will make it much easier for terrorists to enter Europe.
Even if the Turks’ flirtation with Islamism finishes as a result of a regime-change or the re-orientation of Erdogan’s foreign policy, Islamists will still flock not to the Middle East, but to Europe, where they will be welcomed by liberal legislation and European liberals who consider them to be political refugees.
2. The next problem has to do with the Kurds. Kurdish terrorism is the main threat to Turkey. And it is only natural that Kurdish radicals will now be squeezed into Europe. As a result, tensions between the large Kurdish and Turkish communities will increase. Over the past year, the Turks and Kurds repeatedly lapsed into collisions with each other even within the EU. Now such violence can intensify and even claim indigenous Europeans as victims.
3. The weakness of the EU’s liberal system will be totally exposed. For the first time, an authoritarian country has achieved significant concessions from European liberals, thereby encouraging anti-liberal trends within the EU. European right-wingers are generally opposed to rapprochement with Turkey, and the visa-free regime and problems associated with it will significantly strengthen their position. In turn, the chances of the shaky European bureaucratic structure in Brussels collapsing will increase.
4. The rapprochement with Turkey contradicts the very essence of European identity. For many centuries, Turkey has played the role of the “significant Other.” The effect of the visa-free regime on the common European psychological space will inevitably be a backlash on the part of nationalists and the de-politicized masses. Turkey’s trotting down the path to the EU is undermining any foundations of the possibility of a new European identity.
5. In the background, behind EU statements on the visa-free regime with Turkey, can be heard Turkey’s statements about a possible invasion of Syria. The EU has been led on by Turkey, one of the most irresponsible and radical participants in the Syrian conflict, and the new rapprochement with Turkey will be perceived by Ankara as something legitimizing and supporting its actions. Turkey will thus be enabled to act even more irresponsibly. Thus, by inaugurating the visa-free regime, the EU is adding fuel to the fire of the conflict in Syria.