So to me it looks like this is a game - the guys on the right are being used to create a situation where certain measures are needed and the guys on the left will provide the support for those measures to be put in place. Both will lose when all the chaos settles down because they'll have to live in the same society with tighter controls where in the next pandemic (and such) we'll all be at the mercy of the government.
What a game.
The people on the right are also being made an example of, in order to delegitimize the debate on immigration, which came into the centre of the overton window since the election was called. Once this is dealt with and plenty of people are jailed, they will be too scared to mention the topic again, and the government can keep the floodgates open and bulldoze through their WEF-style agenda. At least, that's what they hope.
Regarding the uprising itself, although genuine, it is clearly being managed with some purpose, from the gaslighting from the Prime Minister, to the police not releasing the info about the attacker, and possibly, all the way back to the orchestration of the attack, in an MKULTRA fashion. Things are playing out quite too perfectly for the establishment.
It was obvious since even before the election that the Starmer regime has been, very transparently, looking to implement some kind of a police state. The Labour manifesto leaned heavily into the law and order schtick. A prosecutor himself, the very first thing he spoke about after winning, was prisons.
They immediately sentenced
JSO protestors, who have now outlived their usefulness to the regime. They have
charged Pro-Palestine activists with organized crime laws (a first). They have set up expedited sentencing procedures for those involved in the "far right" rallies on the weekend. Watching the
sentencings today, some are legitimate scumbags, but others are being handed lengthy prison sentences for simply being present, disorderly and saying some mean words. See the case of
Liam Riley, who had no prior convictions, did not throw projectiles, nor commit any arson or vandalism, yet received 20 months in prison for calling the police "traitors", "Muslim-lovers" and "rapists".
Now we are being told that even simply sharing information about "riots" (read: protests) online could lead to a knock on the door. Maybe this will also include saying anything at all about immigration online?
It all does remind of the Martin Niemöller poem:
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
As for Starmer himself, as he continues to make video appearances to gaslight the population, it is clear that there is nothing at all behind those empty eyes. He is creepy, in a slimy, humourless, puritanical, inquisitorial way, and he will be quite happy to lock up as many people as possible.
David Starkey has a lot to say on the man, and his handler Sue Grey, having being targeted by Starmer personally in the past.
Sir Keir Stasi: David Starkey on Labour’s Police State in Britain:
When all this is done, people are really going to miss good old boy Tory corruption. At least they simply left the country to rot while they enriched themselves, and were generally indifferent to the people.
This new regime has a different flavour altogether. They are coming for you; they are very motivated and they enjoy it. God help the people of the UK when the next lockdown comes.
:
lock down the internet LOL. The UK are really in trouble!!
. Bring on the comets!
.
