Using Women to Destroy Men via Leftist Feminism and Liberalism

Shamefully - sick! I'm totally embarrassed! The featured 3 minute video is immature, degrading and disgusting!

A feminist theater play with a telltale name "Salon Vagina!" expected to enlighten school kids about "the pussy" has caused many angry reactions among ordinary Swedes.

17.10.2018 - Swedes Cringe as Feminist Theater Teaches School kids about Female Genitalia

Swedes Cringe as Feminist Theater Teaches Schoolkids About Female Genitalia

The cultural institution Skolscen sydost (School Scene Southeast), which organizes performances in kindergartens, elementary schools and high schools, has presented the feminist play "Salon Vagina!" to be staged in Blekinge County's schools next year, Swedish Radio reported.

The performance shows three feminist actresses singing about female genitalia while spreading their legs. An excerpt from the play posted on YouTube shows them chanting "pussy, fanny, muff, beaver, slit" while standing on their heads with legs spread wide open. "I want to call mine a canary bird. It's nothing unusual," one of the actresses says in the show.

Our play is a peppy humor show about female genitals. It feels great to do theater for children in the upper secondary school, something we felt was needed," actress Malin Karlsson told Swedish Radio.

On its website, "Salon Vagina!" is described as a "playful and humorous take on stigmatized female sexuality," which also "explores the cultural history of the vagina, its symbolic, scientific, religious and everyday role."

"With singing, dancing, motion and humor, we explore norms and taboos. We investigate and cross the boundaries of how a woman should be," the feminists write on their website.

The performance, which is set up in collaboration with the Swedish Association for Sexuality Education (RSFU), is about 60 minutes long and is followed by another 30 minutes' "aftertalk." The regular price is SEK 150 per student ($16).

The trailer posted on YouTube has gathered a plethora of negative reactions from Swedes, with comments ranging from "decadence and nihilism" to "child abuse" and "utter madness." Some ventured that if a similar play was made by, for and about men, it would have instantly triggered accusations of patriarchy and male chauvinism.

"[Swedish Radio journalists] finally get to write about "pussy" while at work, and you're paying for this," columnist Jan Sjunnesson tweeted wryly.

The topic of female sexuality has of late received a lot of attention in the Swedish media. Recently, the Menstruation Association (Mensen) received a SEK 500,000 ($56,000) contribution from the newly established Gender Equality Authority for a project aimed at "breaking the taboo around women's periods" and create a "period-friendly" work environment, which has raised many eyebrows in Sweden.
CRAZY SWEDES. today, they have the moslems. and shame on these "performing" females...
 
OK. You are in control of how you feel though. People don't exist to make you happy. Have you thought about taking control over your feelings and not letting your day be ruined? Go outside, touch grass, and come to the realization that you are allowing yourself to be miserable for no reason.

OK. What is the practical result of that feeling? Are you going to go around acting like a crazy person towards every woman you encounter? Treating a person poorly because of something they can't control is the way children act. This post reads like something an immature child would write.

A lot of that is status-related, women competing with each other. It's not necessarily done for you or men in general.

Makow has been discussed, not favorably. You appear to have been captured by the social engineering pitting men against women (and vice versa). Your enemy is not women, it's the psychopaths who created feminism as a social contagion. The issue is that you are unable to get out of your own head and realize that's what is happening. You allow yourself to be captured by them.
makow has not been discussed "favorably". so what???? i appreciate reading makow
 
The more fundamental question is what happened @heinrich to trigger your outburst/post above?
dear sottreader, i am glad you asked the question. so:
- the news speakers at arte, all female, all anorexic but all eating the second half of any word, high pitched voices, making mimics as if they were to understand what they speak, and as if they were to find any logic in what they were saying.
- 40 y ago, i read that orders to a pilot to shoot was given to a pilot by a "female" computer voice, so as to have his attention. what a perversion... do dei pilots now have complementary dei voices???
- dei females in high, believed high, positions, uttering their positions in, to them, foreign english. unbearable.
- us females, scattering their us slang worldwide without any consideration that not everyone in the educated world might want to be fluent in the latest us slang...
- uneducated females elected by even less educated voters believing that this has confirmed their competence
- etc. of course, i will not give names.
this being said, i can only wholeheartedly endorse trump and his team. salvation might be on the way as announced in the julie green prophecies, separate thread...
 
Not all females are like as you say @heinrich. In fact a lot of the working ones are doing it out of necessity and would happily go back to raising a family and running the household, leading to better raised children and better socities. Its the system we are in, that has been co-opted to push extreme feminism, which is also capturing the deranged females and catapulting them to the top. Its quite terrible actually if you spend some time browsing the X.

But the blame does not lie with females. They or anyone including males for that matter are reacting to the system and trying to survive in the best way they can. To use your observation about the elected ones, its the system or the magician behind the curtain who elected them there. What you are observing is the effects. It holds true for both men and women and there are good examples of really terrible men elected to top positions! Fwiw!
 
One of the main reasons why extreme feminism has been pushed by the pathocrats is the classical "divide and conquer". Creating divisions and conflicts between men and women in general makes humanity weaker and easier to control or to completely conquer.

Attitudes or beliefs that women in general are to be blamed or "more guilty" than men actually helps the pathocrats in their takeover of humanity. Is that what you want, @heinrich?
 
CRAZY SWEDES. today, they have the moslems. and shame on these "performing" females...
@heinrich: You did realize, that you are on a forum, where we do not put blame or shame on anyone per se (like "Swedes", "Moslems", even "trans women"...), we like to differentiate and look on deeper roots of "problems"; we also do the work. I think the unrecognized core (or gist?) of this male/female antagonism crisis now is the understanding what patriarchy and matriarchy truly means. Modern feminists often think, that Patriarchy is males up and females down. THEIR vision of Matriarchy is the opposit, females up, males down. And there lies the misunderstanding. Matriarchy is a totally different form of "system" (in lack of a better word), in a patriarchy ALL are patriarchic, even women, look at our female politicians. In a Matriarchy men also would be martiarchalic. that does not mean female, but the result would be a form of anarchy (the throne is empty) instead of patriarchy, where the throne is taken by a winner, a leader, who can be male or female, it will always be a hunt for the throne.

(if this reads clumsy, note I am german)
 
Last edited:
I have been watching several podcasts on the subject. Someone was also talking about the destruction of the family with the advent of modernity and postmodernity, not only that but also about the ties that used to exist in extended families and that before there were more siblings, more cousins, grandparents and great-grandparents because the couples were younger than now. Now the grandparents are either gone or too old. With the advent of free divorce, feminism, the incorporation of women into the labor market and all that has resulted in fewer and fewer children and subsequently more mental health problems. At the same time, they succeed in dividing us, being at odds with each other and knowing less and less about each other, we have also lost a lot of rich traditions and values, of course.
 
I have been watching several podcasts on the subject. Someone was also talking about the destruction of the family with the advent of modernity and postmodernity, not only that but also about the ties that used to exist in extended families and that before there were more siblings, more cousins, grandparents and great-grandparents because the couples were younger than now. Now the grandparents are either gone or too old. With the advent of free divorce, feminism, the incorporation of women into the labor market and all that has resulted in fewer and fewer children and subsequently more mental health problems. At the same time, they succeed in dividing us, being at odds with each other and knowing less and less about each other, we have also lost a lot of rich traditions and values, of course.

Do they happen to mention Mary Eberstadt and her research?
The old adage, "correlation does not entail causation", probably holds true here as well. Unwin makes it clear that he does not know why sexual freedom directly leads to the decline and collapse of cultures, although he suggests that when sexual energy is restrained through celibacy or monogamy, it is diverted into more productive social energy.

Perhaps, but I find it difficult to accept it as a primary cause. Mary Eberstadt's recent research into mass killings, the substantial rise in mental health issues including depression, and the explosion of identity politics is a "primal scream" due to the loss of identity that was once provided by growing up in a long-term, immediate family with siblings and a sizable group of cousins, aunts and uncles, all of which provided identity — essential for well-being. Eberstadt shows and documents from various studies that this decimation of the family was a direct consequence of the sexual revolution at the end of the 20th century.[11]

Her research indicates that increased sexual freedom led to the decimation of the family, which resulted in the loss of family identity, which produces Eberstadt's 'primal screams' — a massive increase in mental health issues, mass killings, and the rise of extreme identity groups at war with each other ... all symptoms of a society rapidly spiraling into collapse. This appears to have greater explanatory power than Unwin's psychological suggestion, although the two may actually be closely related, given what Eberstadt shows.

Both Unwin and Eberstadt provide substantial evidence that a sexual revolution has long-term, devastating consequences for culture and civilization. As Unwin states, "The history of these societies consists of a series of monotonous repetitions," and it appears that our civilization is following the same, well-travelled road to collapse.


Continue...
 
I have been watching several podcasts on the subject. Someone was also talking about the destruction of the family with the advent of modernity and postmodernity, not only that but also about the ties that used to exist in extended families and that before there were more siblings, more cousins, grandparents and great-grandparents because the couples were younger than now. Now the grandparents are either gone or too old. With the advent of free divorce, feminism, the incorporation of women into the labor market and all that has resulted in fewer and fewer children and subsequently more mental health problems. At the same time, they succeed in dividing us, being at odds with each other and knowing less and less about each other, we have also lost a lot of rich traditions and values, of course.


The old adage, "correlation does not entail causation", probably holds true here as well. Unwin makes it clear that he does not know why sexual freedom directly leads to the decline and collapse of cultures, although he suggests that when sexual energy is restrained through celibacy or monogamy, it is diverted into more productive social energy.

Perhaps, but I find it difficult to accept it as a primary cause. Mary Eberstadt's recent research into mass killings, the substantial rise in mental health issues including depression, and the explosion of identity politics is a "primal scream" due to the loss of identity that was once provided by growing up in a long-term, immediate family with siblings and a sizable group of cousins, aunts and uncles, all of which provided identity — essential for well-being. Eberstadt shows and documents from various studies that this decimation of the family was a direct consequence of the sexual revolution at the end of the 20th century.[11]

Her research indicates that increased sexual freedom led to the decimation of the family, which resulted in the loss of family identity, which produces Eberstadt's 'primal screams' — a massive increase in mental health issues, mass killings, and the rise of extreme identity groups at war with each other ... all symptoms of a society rapidly spiraling into collapse. This appears to have greater explanatory power than Unwin's psychological suggestion, although the two may actually be closely related, given what Eberstadt shows.

Both Unwin and Eberstadt provide substantial evidence that a sexual revolution has long-term, devastating consequences for culture and civilization. As Unwin states, "The history of these societies consists of a series of monotonous repetitions," and it appears that our civilization is following the same, well-travelled road to collapse.



Primal Screams: How the Sexual Revolution Created Identity Politics, Mary Eberstadt,

In Primal Screams, Mary Eberstadt, a Senior Research Fellow at the Faith and Reason Institute in Washington DC, observes that sexual identity, racial identity and ethnic identity have become essential to the politics of the left, but in addressing the issue she hopes to engage people across the political and cultural spectrum.


“The Great Scattering”


Her starting point is that “the modern clamour over identity cannot be understood without grasping the massive, radical and largely unacknowledged communal dislocations” (p.9) incurred by the human race in the West since the 1960s. The unprecedented degree of familial dispersion witnessed over the past six decades is dubbed “the Great Scattering” and attributed to the sexual revolution.


Dr Eberstadt argues that the de-stigmatisation of nonmarital sex in all its varieties and the sharp rise in behaviours that were previously rare and/or stigmatised have brought destruction on humanity. In making this assertion she stresses that she is not concerned with the choices that individuals make about how to lead their lives, but rather with the collective environmental impact of millions of such choices taken over the course of many years.


As a result of the sexual revolution, increasingly people no longer define themselves and their purpose with reference to their immediate family, extended family or real-life larger communities. Radical individualism is marked by an unparalleled atomisation and estrangement from family members, leading to a breakdown of social learning which is one of the family’s primary functions. Eberstadt remarks on the irony that “the most sexually practised generation of humanity may also be the most sexually illiterate” (p.11). She represents the current clamour over identity as an authentic “scream” for answers to questions of belonging – hence the title of the book. Her primary argument is that such unrest did not spring from nowhere, but is the product of family liquidation.


In asking what the current non-stop obsession with identity is telling us about ourselves, our society and our civilisation, Dr Eberstadt is careful to emphasise that post-1960 levels of fatherlessness, divorce, shrinking families and abortion are not the only phenomena propelling identity politics and acknowledges that real crimes and injustices have been committed against sexual, racial and other minorities. However, she maintains that: “The fact that racism and sexism exist does not make the crackup of the Western family any less integral to the post-1960s human story.” (p.15)


The familial dimension


The opening chapter of Primal Screams offers an overview of the debate surrounding identity politics to date. Eberstadt cites the American historian, social critic and public intellectual Arthur M Schlesinger, who in his bestselling book The Disuniting of America: Reflections on a Multicultural Society, wrote: “The more people feel themselves adrift in a vast, impersonal, anonymous sea, the more desperately they swim toward any familiar, intelligible, protective life-raft; the more they crave a politics of identity.” (p.22) Various attempts have been made to identify the root cause(s) of identity politics, but in this book Mary Eberstadt focuses on the familial dimension which has hitherto been largely overlooked by social commentators.


In Chapter 2, Dr Eberstadt advances “A New Theory: The Great Scattering”. Prior to the middle of the twentieth century, most children and young people grew up with the general expectation that they would marry and have a family, and that their immediate and extended family would remain their primary community. However, “the post-1960s order of sexual consumerism has upended every one of these expectations” (p.38). Erotic leanings and ethnic claims have now become substitute answers to the question, “Who am I?”


As a result of the sexual revolution, more and more people in the West are living in an unnaturally detached way. There is a direct link between recreational sex and the loneliness of the elderly. Eberstadt writes:


Not only have divorce and cohabitation loosened the gravitational pull of family; simultaneously contraception and abortion have also shrunk the nucleus further. The result is a new generation of elderly, some of whom reach the end of their years not only sans teeth and sight, but sans spouse, sans children and grandchildren…
ubstantial numbers of older people now hail from small, broken, isolated and distant families. (p.55)





She therefore concludes that, “the diminution and rupture of the human family and the rise of identity politics are not only happening at the same time”, but “[t]hey cannot be understood apart from one another” (p.61). Having advanced her basic thesis, Dr Eberstadt presents the supporting evidence in four brief chapters.





Survival strategies





In Chapter 3 (Understanding the “Mine!” in Identity Politics), she observes that “some people, deprived of recognition in the traditional ways [i.e. within the family], will regress to a state in which their demand for recognition becomes ever more insistent and childlike”, leading to an “infantilised expression and vernacular” (p.64). This “chronic regression to preadolescent language and behaviour” testifies to the “prerational origins” of identity politics (p.69).





Chapter 4 (Feminism as Survival Strategy) focuses on the vulnerability of women as a result of the sexual revolution and the way in which identity politics amounts to a survival strategy within that context. Dr Eberstadt writes:





The sexual revolution reduced the number of men who could be counted on to serve as protectors… Broken homes put father figures at arm’s length, at times severing that parental bond for good. The ethos of recreational sex blurred the line between protector and predator, making it harder for many women to tell the difference. Simultaneously, the decline of the family has reduced the number of men offering affection and companionship of a nonsexual nature – fewer brothers, cousins, uncles, and others who could once have been counted on. Also simultaneously, the overabundance of available sexual partners has made it harder to get the attention of any one of them…





[W]omen, for all their empowerment on other fronts, are also now more vulnerable than before, thanks to the changes wrought by the very revolution that feminism embraces… Many women are now exactly what feminist identitarians say they are: victims – only not in the way that feminism understands. (pp.74-76)





In Chapter 5 (Androgyny as Survival Strategy) the focus moves to the way in which “the Great Scattering has increased pressure to gravitate away from the traditionally masculine and feminine and instead toward a more ambiguous, androgynous mean” (p.82). Eberstadt argues that “the new androgyny” which pervades Western culture is driven by the collapse of family and community. She writes of:





…a cultural incentive system that has increased the rewards for women to behave in stereotypically male ways and reduced the social approbation for those who would persist in traditional female ways – marrying, raising a family of size, devoting time and talent to what used to be called domestic arts, volunteering, and otherwise contributing to the world apart from the paid marketplace. (pp.84-85)





“The collective human howl of our time”





Finally, Chapter 6 (How #MeToo Reveals the Breakdown of Social Learning) reflects on how many women have been socialised ideologically to believe that they do not need any protection at all – from a father, husband, brother, or any other male relative. Dr Eberstadt writes:





In sum, #MeToo suggests that the world after the sexual revolution is one in which many women, thanks to family shrinkage and breakup, have fewer ties to men who are not potential predators; in which many men, thanks to the same forces, have little or no intimate but nonsexual knowledge of the opposite sex, and unsound sexual tutelage in the form of pornography; in which fundamental truths about disparities of size and strength are denied for ideological reasons; and in which the question of romantic identity for many is confounded by all of the above. (pp.100-101)





She concludes that the hysteria of identity politics is nothing more or less than “the collective human howl of our time, sent up by inescapably communal creatures trying desperately to identify their own” (p.109).



In most cases, none of these groups or collectives can fully satisfy the individual's need for validation and acceptance (which can occur in a sufficiently functional and extended family), so the question of who I am is extremely difficult to answer at a level that the individual deeply believes and fulfills.
 
Last edited:
Do they happen to mention Mary Eberstadt and her research?



Continue...
If one adds Andrzej Lobaczewski's work to Eberstadt's and Unwin's findings from the above article one would get a complete picture of the current situation in the Western society.

The sexual freedom and the destruction of the family as a nucleus for small communities and local networks are symptoms of the ponerization of a society by pathological entities. It's like a tumor that's spreading throughout the whole body, eventually destroying it.

Just a few thoughts.
 
If one adds Andrzej Lobaczewski's work to Eberstadt's and Unwin's findings from the above article one would get a complete picture of the current situation in the Western society.

The sexual freedom and the destruction of the family as a nucleus for small communities and local networks are symptoms of the ponerization of a society by pathological entities. It's like a tumor that's spreading throughout the whole body, eventually destroying it.

Just a few thoughts.

I wonder how the sexual revolution aspect of civilisational collapse fits into the overall concept of the hysteroidal cycle.

We can clearly see that much of it is orchestrated and helped along by the psychopaths in charge - like the CIA funding libtard movements to intentionally break up families and communities and so break up people’s internal sense of self and of belonging and culture.

I think psyops like these only really have a shot at flourishing though in times of great prosperity, when people have spare time, easier lives, disposable incomes. Under these conditions, they become weak and lazy and narcissistic, and that makes it easier to change their sexual moral programming to a more hedonistic, short-term, promiscuous kind.

So I don’t think these changes in sexual attitudes are a cause of civilisational collapse, but just another symptom. Albeit a useful one to take note of because it raises the red flag nearly a century before the whole thing collapses.
 
Do they happen to mention Mary Eberstadt and her research?



Continue...
Well I was referring to some podcasts in my country from the so called red pill community. Although with some nuances since these podcasts talk about traditional values and do not promote promiscuity (although it is said that it affects women more negatively). In any case it is much better than mainstream western culture in general.
Most of the time they invite all kinds of people, including feminists, only fan content creators, transsexuals, etc. to confront ideas.
 
Back
Top Bottom