Venezuela Oil: US Declares War on 'Narco-Terrorism'

Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador reappears on social media to send a message to President Trump.

I am retired from politics, but my libertarian convictions prevent me from remaining silent in the face of this arrogant attack on the sovereignty of the Venezuelan people and the kidnapping of their president. Neither Bolívar nor Lincoln would accept the US government acting as a global tyrant.

President Trump: do not fall into complacency or listen to the siren song. Tell the hawks to go to hell; you have the capacity to act with practical judgment. Do not forget that today's fleeting victory can be tomorrow's resounding defeat. Politics is not imposition.

Remember that "respect for the rights of others is peace," as Benito Juárez taught us in the 19th century. I am a proud Mexican, but also a Latin American. I unconditionally support my president, Claudia Sheinbaum.

For now, I will not send you a hug.

AMLO

It is curious that at the end of the message he mentions his support for President Sheinbaum. It is also a warning to Trump. In the past, Obrador has already stated:​
AMLO stressed that he would only take to the streets for three reasons:

● "if they attack democracy"
● to defend Claudia Sheinbaum's presidency.
● If there are attempts at a coup d'état.

AMLO said, "If they harass her, then yes, but I don't think that will happen; and to defend Mexico's sovereignty, because our country is free, independent, sovereign, we are not a colony of any foreign country."

Some people in Mexico City have gone to the U.S. embassy to attack it.

 
Venezuelan oil industry is down from 3.5 million b/d to 1 million b/d. I asked Grok how long it would take and it said that they could it somewhat up in the relatively short term BUT that a return to 3 million b/d could take 8-10 years. It said that it took 8 years to get Iraqi oil industry back to 2003 levels. So while Trump thinks instant gratification, oil and money then the reality is different. So if Iran blocks the Hormuz strait, then Venezuela is not going to be what will help the US keep afloat with oil in the short term. That is not even adding some resistance in Venezuela from such a US oil grab into the equation or instability in the US in the time frame of 8-10 years.
Out if curiosity i've asked Alter AI the same question, the answer I've got is pretty interesting, that is, for the US to start extracting significant amount of Venezuelan oil it would take from 18 to 24 months and up to 5 years to reach the maximum extraction capacity up to 3 mln b/d.

So to me the theory that one of the reasons why US kidnapped Maduro was to reach an "agreement" regarding the management of the Venezuelan oil reserves in face of an upcoming worldwide oil crisis caused by the closing of the strait of Hormuz by Iran due to it being attacked by Israel, is pretty plausible. Another simpler reason may be that the US just wants the Venezuelan oil for itself thus limiting the access to it to China and its influence in the US's backyard.

However, If you look at the timeline related to geopolitical events in the last few weeks you get the impression that all the pieces of the puzzle had fallen in place and now Israel is ready to make its next move against Iran. I hope to be wrong, though.

BTW, here below the Alter AI's answer regarding how long it will take the US to extract significant amounts of Venezuelan oil:

# Request:

If US were to invest in the Venezuela's oil production infrastructure how long it will take to start extracting significant amounts of oil?

# Response:

Good question — and one with both technical and political depth. Let’s break it down into **phases**, because oil production doesn’t just “flip on” after an investment; it depends on infrastructure condition, reserves accessibility, and regulatory dynamics.

---

#### ⛽ 1. **Infrastructure Reality Check**

Venezuela’s oil production has collapsed from around **3.2 million barrels/day (bpd)** in the late 1990s to roughly **700,000–800,000 bpd** in the mid‑2020s. This wasn’t because the reservoirs ran dry — Venezuela still has **the largest proven oil reserves in the world**, about **300 billion barrels**, mostly in the Orinoco Belt.

The *real* problem is:
- Rusted, sabotaged, or cannibalized infrastructure (pipelines, compressors, upgraders, refineries)
- Crude so heavy (8–12° API) that it needs diluents and specialized upgrading before export
- Massive corruption and expert exodus from PDVSA (the state company)
- U.S. and EU sanctions limiting spare parts, catalysts, and financing

---

#### 🏗️ 2. **Phased Restoration Timeline**

If the U.S. (or U.S.-backed companies) were to invest heavily right now — *assuming sanctions relief and political openness from Caracas* — the tentative timeline would look like this:

| **Phase** | **Duration** | **Main Tasks** | **Output Impact** |
|------------|--------------|----------------|-------------------|
| **Assessment & Cleanup** | 6–12 months | Survey existing wells, repair pipelines, replace compressors, restart upgraders | Production rises modestly to **1–1.2 million bpd** |
| **Refurbishment & Drilling Resumption** | 12–24 months | Major upgrading of Orinoco facilities, import new diluents, restart refineries | Could reach **1.8–2.2 million bpd** |
| **Expansion & Stabilization** | 3–5 years total | New wells, additional upgraders, partial modernization of PDVSA operations | Sustainable production at **2.5–3 million bpd** possible |

So **approximately 18–24 months** are required to see *significant* increases (above 1.5 million bpd), assuming full investment and political cooperation.

---

#### 💰 3. **Capital Needs**

Estimates vary, but credible independent assessments suggest:
- **\$15–25 billion** for rapid rehabilitation and restarts
- **\$50–70 billion** for a 5‑year modernization campaign

This could be partially private if structured through joint ventures, similar to pre‑sanction deals with Chevron, TotalEnergies, and Repsol.

---

#### 🧩 4. **Invisible Obstacles** (usually ignored in mainstream outlooks)

- **Corruption and military involvement** in PDVSA would siphon off a portion of the investment unless ironclad transparency mechanisms are imposed.
- **Diluent and upgrading capacity** are the choke points — Venezuela’s crude is almost tar. Without light oil blending or refinery upgrades, even extracted barrels can’t reach market.
- **Electricity reliability** — the oil operations rely on a grid that collapses regularly.
- **Environmental sabotage & poor safety** will delay or inflate costs.

---

#### 📈 5. **Summary Forecast (Realistic)**

Assuming optimal cooperation and \$30B initial capital:

| **Year** | **Likely Production (bpd)** |
|-----------|-----------------------------|
| Year 1 | 900k – 1.2M |
| Year 2 | 1.5M – 1.8M |
| Year 3 | 2.2M – 2.5M |
| Year 5 | 2.8M – 3.0M (max sustainable) |

---

So in plain terms: **it would take roughly 18–24 months to significantly impact global oil markets** if U.S. investment started today, **and 3–5 years** to fully modernize production capacity to meaningful pre‑collapse levels.

Would you like me to outline the *political prerequisites* and likely *agreements required* (between Washington and Caracas) for such an investment to even be feasible?
 
Maybe, although Trump did also boast of exotic tech used to 'knock out power' in Caracas, so perhaps the US deployed electronic warfare measures the Venezuelans couldn't counter.
It must have been something very good and new, apparently none of the nearly 5000 Russian Manpass Igla-S rocket launcher missiles that Maduro boasted about a couple of months ago were launched, they are guided by infrared of two different bands and have strong measures against electronic interference and other heat systems such as flares and IRCM systems, although they are apparently somewhat vulnerable to direct infrared countermeasures such as aiming a laser at the missile's sensor.
@Niall This difference may yet prove significant, indicating that Trump's vision for Venezuela's future is not identical to 'the globalists'/Israel's.
I don't think he knows much anyway, but Machado matters very little in terms of being part of the plan or whether his announcement to move the embassy has an impact that should be taken into account by both Israel and the USA. What he does know, and it's obvious, is that Machado simply has no support, so it's unfeasible for now, no matter how you look at it.
 
Last edited:
They have moved to the next phase which is to control the information field



 
I'd say Syrian scenario again. Probably Russians told Maduro to do nothing and to surrender peacefully, thus "save people of Venezuela". He probably will show up in Moscow in short time. Now, we can expect Israeli attack on Iran soon, and Russia and China will help the same way they helped Syria or Venezuela. Probably the very harsh protesting phone calls from Lavrov will ensue . . . .

The question is what did Russia get in this new deal in the world? Its crazy if it is just Ukraine. Ukraine is just peanuts comparing to the whole cake. Maybe Africa?
 
One obvious point to note about the US 'operation' is that normally regime change goes like this: Lots of air bombing with long-range missiles fired from high-altitude jets or warships for a few nights in a row, and then they go into whatever next phase there is. This time, the Apache and Chinook helicopters just 'walked' right into Caracas and no one shot not even a hand gun at them. Which means that the Americans were well confident that they didn't need to fear any air-defenses, which hints at treason and/or bribery of at least some of the Venezuelan armed forces in cahoots with the Americans.
Maybe, although Trump did also boast of exotic tech used to 'knock out power' in Caracas, so perhaps the US deployed electronic warfare measures the Venezuelans couldn't counter.
The consensus on X seems to be that this was pulled off so smoothly due to a stand-down order, presumably from Maduro himself, thus he left the country willingly.
One thing that stands out to me is Maduro's seemingly 'overly-casual' attitude throughout the previous month to the increasingly hostile US actions against Venezuela (bombing boats, affecting air traffic, blockading and pursuing tankers etc). There are two main possible explanations: he was incredibly naïve, or he planned to capitulate in the event that the US launched a regime-change op. Given there was a lot of lead-up time and discussions, even between Trump and Maduro directly, behind the scenes, it's unlikely that both sides hadn't thought through how this was going to play out.

The presence of a Chinese delegation on the day of the raid suggests that Trump either timed this deliberately, or used it opportunistically to send a message to China, perhaps as PoB suggests, as 'payback' for the "fuel impurities" that caused the US fighter jet crashes just prior to Trump's visit to Xi. It's also possible that the Chinese were aware that the US was going to move on Maduro and sent the delegation as an attempt to prevent the situation escalating. This would also potentially tie-in with their blockade drills on Taiwan that began on December 29th. If so, the message from the US is clear and umambiguous: "don't f*ck with our backyard."

The extensive power outages, presumably linked to electronic warfare, may have been the trigger for Maduro to activate his capitulation plan. Given the Russian (and presumably Chinese) tech supplied to Venezuela for its AA/AD systems, it seems likely that they could have repelled a small-scale incursion if the will was there. At that point, when unable to reach his "safe room" with his wife, Maduro might have given the stand-down order. This might explain why there were casualties reported on the Venezuelan side and injuries on the US' - the raid was real, the US did go in 'guns blazing', but once Maduro activated his contingency plans (or the 'dead man' protocols kicked in), everything went smoothly from there.

The interim leader, VP Rodriguez, to the Venezuelan population:

"[this action] undoubtedly has a Zionist tinge..." [..]

Rodriguez's father was tortured to death by the intelligence service of the old regime (from which Machado is descended, and which was undoubtedly created by, or aligned with, the CIA).
Another point in favour of a capitulation plan. If the US had attempted to go full 'regime change' there probably would have extensive bombing and decapitation of the entire political and military leadership, as Windmill Knight pointed out. Trump seems to like these targeted 'surgical' strikes (eg Syria, Iran etc), so he probably figures that with Maduro gone, the Venezuelan government will be more 'malleable' to US pressure.

Leaving her in aims to prevent mass protests and the need for US forces to put them down. Leaving her in power allows for the appearance of a legitimate leader, although clearly she won't be there long if she does not betray her loyalties, which for now she seems disinclined to do. It's a crass attempt, and it remains to be seen if it will work.
Yep. Keeps any potential US casualties to a minimum and allows the opposition forces (eg. Machado) the opportunity to 'rise to the occasion', or the popularist majority to 'make a deal'. The shafting of Machado might also have been Trump's way of returning the Nobel Prize committee's sentiments, 'in kind'.

As for a deal between the three 'new' great powers, I don't think there was one as such, but there could have well been a sort of tacit understanding in the sense of: Ok you Russia are about to get Ukraine, and you China want Taiwan, so I'm going to take the liberty of taking Venezuela which is in my 'sphere of influence' so we can all assume we are 'even'.
This makes sense. Rather than there being any explicit agreement, it's more likely that calculations were made about Ukraine and Taiwan both falling, and it being potentially more advantageous to the US to dispose of the last wispy gossamers of international law in order to secure Venezuela's natural resources in advance of those events, even if allows Russia and China to use that precedent to accelerate their own consolidation of their spheres of influence. With new 'facts on the ground', it challenges Russia and China to 'take their chances while they can', especially Russia, due to the flagrant terrorist actions of Zelensky's regime by attacking Putin directly and massacring Russian-aligned civilians in Kharkov. We are yet to see Russia's response, but according to Lavrov, it is allegedly already scheduled.

Wrt to China, it seems that peaceful reunification via Taiwan's political capitulation is the preferred approach. However, the US has again upped the stakes: "Act now, decisively, or risk greater entanglements later." This in itself is a form of provocation, so China will need to carefully consider their response. It's almost certain that Russian and Chinese senior leadership will consult with each other and coordinate their responses before taking action.

I don't think China would have explicitly agreed to let the US take Venezuela because China gets (until now) a lot of its oil from that country. Now that's going to stop.
Well, Trump seems to be open to "making a deal" with China regarding the oil and there could be some wishful thinking involved there as apparently Venezuela only supplies 6-7% of China's oil, so it would probably be easy for China to re-pivot logistically in the event that the US double-crosses them at some point in the future.

As for the future of Venezuela, I'm afraid it can only be chaos and for quite a number of years, if history teaches us anything (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria).
I don't think we'll see that scenario. For all the Venezuelan government's bluff and bluster, I suspect crass self-interest will rapidly deliver a more compliant regime. Unfortunately, it appears the Chavista movement is on its last legs.

I don't think China and Russia can realistically do anything. They are on the other side of the globe and they don't have hundreds of bases nor the military reach of the US. Also, their national interests are above all, and it would be way too costly and dangerous to sacrifice so much for Venezuela.
Yep, I agree.

If Trump capitulates to Israel and attacks Iran for a second, and probably much more intense time, one very likely outcome of such a conflict (as has been mentioned here previously) Iran's closing of the Strait of Hormuz - which would have some big knock-on effects and ultimately send energy prices and inflation higher in the US (among many other places).

You have to wonder if, as part of the administration's calculations, "getting our oil back" from Venezuela - is in some way an effort in mitigating what they see as an inevitable outcome of a new and larger attack on Iran; taking Venezuelan oil being a way to help keep the US afloat as energy shortages and higher prices for everything would very likely hit home and anger Trump's base even further.
🎯🎯🎯 This is spot-on, Ennio. The protests in Iran at the moment (the usual colour revolution tactics) and Netanyahu's visit to the US seem to be telegraphing that something may be in the works. Andrew Korybko, in his commentary, pointed out that Ayatollah Khamenei is watching closely. Indeed, if Iran don't protect themselves, they will likely suffer the same fate as Venezuela. The only wildcard regarding that might be the higher likelihood of Russian or Chinese intervention due to the regional and strategic significance of Iran to them.

In a certain respect, Trump's action insulates the US from Israel a little by reducing the US' dependence on Middle-Eastern oil. Thus, it gives the US greater freedom to withdraw from any extensive Israeli-Iranian conflict if the Strait of Hormuz was closed. However, there are always those hidden Israeli nukes to contend with. Maybe Trump is hoping on some level that if sufficient support is given to Israel, the Iranians will eventually take care of that problem for him.

Venezuelan oil industry is down from 3.5 million b/d to 1 million b/d. I asked Grok how long it would take and it said that they could it somewhat up in the relatively short term BUT that a return to 3 million b/d could take 8-10 years. It said that it took 8 years to get Iraqi oil industry back to 2003 levels. So while Trump thinks instant gratification, oil and money then the reality is different. So if Iran blocks the Hormuz strait, then Venezuela is not going to be what will help the US keep afloat with oil in the short term. That is not even adding some resistance in Venezuela from such a US oil grab into the equation or instability in the US in the time frame of 8-10 years.
Out if curiosity i've asked Alter AI the same question, the answer I've got is pretty interesting, that is, for the US to start extracting significant amount of Venezuelan oil it would take from 18 to 24 months and up to 5 years to reach the maximum extraction capacity up to 3 mln b/d.
Yep. I think if sufficient motivation was there, the US could probably start significant extraction operations relatively quickly, but they are almost certainly wishfully thinking about the consequences to themselves of trying to remove the government of the Ayatollahs once and for all.

At this point, it does seem like they will try though, because Trump is utterly and completely under Israel's thumb.
 
This makes sense. Rather than there being any explicit agreement, it's more likely that calculations were made about Ukraine and Taiwan both falling, and it being potentially more advantageous to the US to dispose of the last wispy gossamers of international law in order to secure Venezuela's natural resources in advance of those events, even if allows Russia and China to use that precedent to accelerate their own consolidation of their spheres of influence. With new 'facts on the ground', it challenges Russia and China to 'take their chances while they can', especially Russia, due to the flagrant terrorist actions of Zelensky's regime by attacking Putin directly and massacring Russian-aligned civilians in Kharkov. We are yet to see Russia's response, but according to Lavrov, it is allegedly already scheduled.
I will draw your attention to one thing. Two days ago, the US State Department issued another warning for US citizens staying in Russia to leave it urgently. The seriousness of this circumstance is proved by the fact that the previous similar warning was issued in the 22nd year, a few days before the start of SMO. Obviously, if there were any agreements, there would be no need for such warnings. On the other hand, there are already voices in the Russian information field calling for "creating an exchange fund" (I apologize for using such a "ukrops" term, they often use it) and using it to exchange Maduro.

Я обращу ваше внимание на одно обстоятельство. Два дня назад госдеп США выдал очередное предупреждение для граждан США, находящихся на территории России, срочно ее покинуть. Серьезность данного обстоятельства доказывает то, что предыдущее подобное предупреждение было выпущено в 22 году, за несколько дней до начала СВО. Очевидно, что в случае существования неких договоренностей необходимость в подобных предупреждениях отсутствовала бы. С другой стороны в Российском инфополе уже звучат голоса, призывающие "создать обменный фонд" (я извиняюсь за такой "укропский" термин, это они часто его используют) и с его помощью обменять Мадуро.
 
It must have been something very good and new, apparently none of the nearly 5000 Russian Manpass Igla-S rocket launcher missiles that Maduro boasted about a couple of months ago were launched, they are guided by infrared of two different bands and have strong measures against electronic interference and other heat systems such as flares and IRCM systems, although they are apparently somewhat vulnerable to direct infrared countermeasures such as aiming a laser at the missile's sensor.

I don't think he knows much anyway, but Machado matters very little in terms of being part of the plan or whether his announcement to move the embassy has an impact that should be taken into account by both Israel and the USA. What he does know, and it's obvious, is that Machado simply has no support, so it's unfeasible for now, no matter how you look at it.
Just to remind you, in 2019 and other years there were serious power outages in Venezuela. Although these were mainly attributed to infrastructure failures due to lack of maintenance, Maduro at the time claimed they were caused by an electromagnetic attack carried out by the USA (in the Venezuelan cartoon, "Super Bigote" was a drone that carried out the attack).
They also banned drones last August for 30 days due to tensions with the USA.
 
I will draw your attention to one thing. Two days ago, the US State Department issued another warning for US citizens staying in Russia to leave it urgently. The seriousness of this circumstance is proved by the fact that the previous similar warning was issued in the 22nd year, a few days before the start of SMO. Obviously, if there were any agreements, there would be no need for such warnings.
Спасибо, this is extremely interesting and points to the anticipation of long-term diplomatic difficulties with Russia by the United States. I don't think Trump expects such difficulties over Venezuela (he probably thinks that Putin will respect him for his actions), so why would such a warning be issued? Again, this points, potentially, to Iran or Europe (or both), if we take into account the French health minister's directive that hospitals in France should be prepared for 'major military actions' by March this year.

Alexander Dugin posted a concise summary of his position regarding the possibility of "World War III", and while I have found Dugin's perspective to be somewhat alarmist in the past, his reading of global geopolitics appears to increasingly reflect reality. Whether the shift to multipolarity will be accompanied by a "World War" or not is difficult to say; the Cassiopaeans have indicated that cosmic factors are influencing the European elites' push for a wider war so things will probably get worse before they get better.

On the other hand, there are already voices in the Russian information field calling for "creating an exchange fund" (I apologize for using such a "ukrops" term, they often use it) and using it to exchange Maduro.
This is likely a viable option; Trump does love to do deals and I think his ideological spat with Maduro will probably evaporate as the US establishes firmer control over Venezuela's resources. I can see a scenario where Maduro spends a few months in a 'resort' jail and then goes quietly into exile/retirement in Russia, possibly sooner if Putin and Xi actively intercede for Trump's clemency.
 
The narrator says antifa isn't really a thing but an idea of different things so essentially what he's done is designated certain ideas as terrorism.
That's something leftists who either don't know what they're talking about, or want to obfuscate, say. Even sympathetic researchers acknowledge antifa is a real group composed of real people for political purposes (e.g. see Vysotsky's American Antifa). Andy Ngo's book is a lighter, journalistic account, but demonstrates the same thing. They are a terrorist organization.
 
Thanks, bad weeds never die, haha, a little humor for the big, big scare.

Greetings,

Thank you so much for taking the time to translate, Miguel. 🙏

Well, I haven't slept since 2 a.m. when the attacks started. I heard the planes fly by, and then the power went out. A few seconds later, the shockwave hit, followed by reflections and red flashes on the concrete of the surrounding buildings. You've already seen the rest in the videos. My body is still buzzing with adrenaline, and I'm mistaking birds for planes in the distance especially after seeing a missile right over my head. Sorry, it wasn't a UFO; it's just that being under a missile was much less likely, until now!.

As the day progressed, few people went out to buy anything at the five small shops where you could get some vegetables and refill your drinking water. Then the atmosphere became very tense again, despite the beautiful day. Because I had a bad feeling about the obvious possibility of more attacks—something that was confirmed when I was able to connect to the internet—I made the decision to explain to my mother that we should leave our home and the less important things behind for a while.

Currently, I'm with the rest of the family, there's no place like home? Funny.

We're far from areas vulnerable to nearby attacks, but well, there's no safe place if they decide to attack much more forcefully and with much more destructive weaponry.

Getting down to brass tacks,

Yes, Venezuela didn't defend itself at all! The radar was off, or rather, they simply opened the gates for them.

Maduro was betrayed, and I don't think that should be a surprise. Remember when Chávez was already packed up and ready to be sent to the US, but some loyal military personnel rescued him? Well, Maduro didn't count on that loyalty.

We should ask Padrino López, who kept the population entertained by showing us the civic-military exercises and assuring us that Venezuela had the best Russian, Chinese, Iranian, Martian, and futuristic weapons in every corner of the country, the best defense, but when it came down to it, nothing happened.

"A war foretold doesn't kill soldiers," they say. Unfortunately, the soldiers killed were never warned. They were simply fulfilling their role as night guards; they were killed while simply on duty! They weren't expecting any combat. So far, 40 dead at one of those bases; surely there are many more counting the different states of the country that were attacked.

They had nothing prepared to respond. What happened to the "Bolívar 200" military deployment? It was a blatant lie.

We must also remember that Padrino López was offered a sum of money to betray Maduro and many others. Why isn't Padrino López, who claimed that "Venezuela is impregnable territory," being questioned or dismissed? Padrino López also reported days ago that Venezuela would possibly be attacked, but he didn't give details; this is no coincidence. He wasn't the only one "tempted" with enormous sums of money.

How is it possible that the person primarily responsible for the country's defense allowed this to happen and has said nothing about it, nor has anyone asked for explanations?


Marco Rubio says he met with Delcy Rodríguez to reach agreements that, ridiculously, were the same ones presented by Maduro. Marco Rubio says that Delcy accepted these agreements, but contradictorily, Delcy Rodríguez, instead of agreeing, appeared on television calling for popular resistance and an armed uprising. Later, they say a new law has been drafted that militarizes public officials, that is, obligates them to defend the homeland, or, to put it more bluntly, to be cannon fodder.

"Public employees, as part of the people, are incorporated into this comprehensive defense structure, becoming part of the combatant corps of the Bolivarian Militia, receiving strategic training and practical skills for national defense."

Just replace "cannon fodder" with "comprehensive defense structure" and it sounds more "democratic and patriotic."

I think they're just playing at creating more division to avoid support from the people who still believe in them. They portray Delcy as having negotiated Maduro's surrender, when the main suspects are sitting right next to him, but they always use the slogan "unity first" to expose them anyway. It's obvious there's nothing left to do.

It's worth noting that they haven't only betrayed Maduro, they've also morally betrayed everyone who believed in them, from the military levels, and once again it's proven that "the military makes and breaks presidents."

Maduro was never popular with a majority in Chavista circles. Many important figures who surrounded Chávez distanced themselves from Maduro and later even attacked him. These were the first signs of the revolution fracturing, and today we see the consequences. Not to mention the corruption scandals and deals with mafias to ensure their support for the government—in other words, "take your cut, but don't screw us over, don't mess with your country." Many today say, "They brought this on themselves," and they're not far from certain of it.

People aren't going to take up arms against defenses that were blatantly dismantled to sell out Maduro. People are terrified and disappointed, terrified enough to accept whoever governs as long as it allows them to continue with their normal lives, because ultimately, life goes on, and all that will be left is to work as always and save themselves.

It's up to the few remaining remnants of the revolution who are calling for resistance to prevent a second wave of US intervention. Unfortunately, all that's left is to accept reality and negotiate what Trump proposes to avoid a complete breakdown of the institutional order by keeping Delcy and not Maria Corina. But Marco Rubio surely wants the opposite.

Trump has definitely proven that he can finish something if he sets his mind to it, and do it well—better than Russia did with Zelensky. He has a fine trophy now.

It's sad that in more than 20 years of revolution, so many shouted "unity," and Maduro has ended up a sellout, with only his wife in prison, and once again, a people betrayed from within. Although, as I mentioned before, Maduro was going to end up dead or in prison. It was just a matter of time.

Furthermore, the mountain barracks where Chávez's remains are located were never actually attacked, or at least not from the front, which is the side bearing the 4F symbol and the main flame facing the city. Miraflores Palace was also not destroyed.

I live across from the mountain barracks, and I actually thought it had been attacked, but when I went outside to see where the attacks had taken place, I saw that the barracks remained intact with the 4F symbol and the flame still burning.

Around 6:00 a.m., at dawn, a reporter published images confirming that the mountain barracks remained intact. A few minutes later, a group of "colectivos" were filmed, supposedly defending the mountain barracks. These groups are generally known for their antisocial behavior. There is quite a bit of information about them and their abuse of power.

But my surprise at 8 a.m. came when I realized they had removed the symbol of February 4th and extinguished the flames. It's a place primarily occupied by the military.

The message is clear: the flame of the revolution has been extinguished.

Vance confirms that Delcy Rodríguez is in Russia

According to the Spanish news La Sexta, Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez is in Russia.

Calling for the people to take up arms... from Russia?... I don't think they'll be able to criticize Maria Corina now for calling for intervention in Venezuela from Spain, for example.

That's outrageous. The interpretation is, "Oh, wow! She's safe in Russia and wants us to kill each other!"

Wearing a vest and helmet, Diosdado Cabello appeared after the capture of Nicolás Maduro by the United States.

"We have now had 28 weeks since the first threats, and today they carried out a treacherous and vile attack against a people who were asleep. They cowardly attacked our people," Cabello added.


On this occasion, it's impossible not to acknowledge that the US definitely performed a surgical operation, an extraction. There were no indiscriminate civilian casualties, which is surreal. Independent media tried to show some collateral damage to create a matrix of opinion, but they were not as large as expected to create a global impact about the bombing.

No plane appeared, no large numbers of soldiers or police officers showed up to guard anything, there was no immediate response of any kind, only silence and total abandonment by the Venezuelan defense forces and the public perception is that they were left looking inept, unable to defend the Venezuelan president after so long claiming victory in imaginary battles.

It's a desperate attempt to expect people who aren't even military personnel to throw rocks at missiles while demanding that Maduro be brought back to them.

As long as they continue to call for resistance, a resistance that I do not believe is possible, they will be the ones who actually lead the people to an unnecessary massacre.

The US played its cards well, China and Russia sent what was due under the military agreement, and that was all. They provided support with weapons; that they betrayed each other is nobody else's problem.
 
Leaving her in aims to prevent mass protests and the need for US forces to put them down. Leaving her in power allows for the appearance of a legitimate leader, although clearly she won't be there long if she does not betray her loyalties, which for now she seems disinclined to do. It's a crass attempt, and it remains to be seen if it will work.
Yup, keeping up appearances is a priority so that the betrayal and sell-out isn't too obvious for the masses. I could be wrong, but I suspect that what happened is that the 'octopus' (US, CIA, Zios etc-) managed to bribe, manipulate, threaten, and pressure key Venezuelan individuals (maybe Maduro himself) to join the 'Dark Side'. And the US 'Golden Operation' was also needed to camouflage this palace coup.
 
I think we have crossed the threshold of strangeness. By flouting Venezuela's sovereignty, the United States has opened Pandora's box and perhaps that of World War III. By committing this transgression, they are giving Israel the right to strike as it sees fit! Many reasonable and clear-headed French politicians (notably the RN) have denounced this madness. We have entered another dimension, and references to galactic war are becoming more frequent as polarities become more pronounced. Resistance will grow in the rest of the world, and the earth will react.
 
Back
Top Bottom