Way to deal with ALL Tyrants and anything

Ant22 said:
My first thought on Tjijandjewa's response to Laura's question was also the analogy of the house, I saw mentioned on the forum before and it's a very clear way of putting it.

However, let me apologize for making noise here myself by getting drawn into this evidently pointless discussion :-[

No need to apologize or feel embarrassed Ant22. I don' think you made noise in your replies, they were appropriate responses to what Tjijandjewa wrote IMO.
 
Ant22 said:
Dakota said:
Ant22 said:
Judging by the number of posts, we are both very new to the forum, yet I get the feeling we came here with entirely opposite intentions: I joined the forum to learn - you came here to teach (or hypnotise/manipulate?). Well, you don't seem to be generating too much following.
I agree, also there is so many topic just in the Newbies section that is very important to read that Tjijandjewa obviously didn't, but he should.

Also, I don't know about rest of you, but common culture is to respect the house that you visiting. Making noise is just act of disrespect.

My first thought on Tjijandjewa's response to Laura's question was also the analogy of the house, I saw mentioned on the forum before and it's a very clear way of putting it.

However, let me apologize for making noise here myself by getting drawn into this evidently pointless discussion :-[

Dear Ant22, I'm sorry if you misunderstood me. That post was for Tjijandjewa. I think that you point it out very good things in your last post when you nicely explain to Tjijandjewa rules of the House.
 
I don't have time to be throwing words around at anyone - this is obviously getting emotional.

Like I said, the word 'manipulate' is a word that's hard to define. It's a subjective word. Even us talking now trying to clarify things would fall under the the category of 'manipulation'.

I just raised a point and if it's wrong in your eyes, then you show me how to go about it- or what has already been said - simple as that.

And - when we talk about 'Working on ourselves and raising our level of knowledge - so that we will be capable of holding The Signal - would that not fall under that category??

Let's assume that you increase your Knowledge to the point where you can see these programs everyday, see patterns of communication between people, see patterns of how one person goes about their everyday life, or even groups of people - from the way they tilt their heads when they are saying this or that, or patterns to how people curse or bless others with words, in a way that works -- would being able to see see this naturally not increase your level of understanding/awareness of the world and how things in the world work?

Would it not allow you to identify when someone is attacking you using hidden communication principles - of which they may or may not be aware of- and allowing you to defend yourself even?
 
Tjijandjewa said:
I don't have time to be throwing words around at anyone - this is obviously getting emotional.

Like I said, the word 'manipulate' is a word that's hard to define. It's a subjective word. Even us talking now trying to clarify things would fall under the the category of 'manipulation'.

Manipulation involves controlling someone for getting some advantage. Clarification involves explaining oneself for the purpose of being understood by others. After clarification you may understand better what I want to express but whether to agree or accept what I say is up to you. With manipulation, I try to take away that choice from you and make you agree or accept what I want from you.

Tjijandjewa said:
I just raised a point and if it's wrong in your eyes, then you show me how to go about it- or what has already been said - simple as that.

The title of the thread says "Way to deal with ALL Tyrants and anything". The "ALL" is in uppercase which suggests this is not a casual misuse due to oversight. It is like salespeople and marketers do when they try to sell their product, sometimes through manipulation. I cannot know whether you have been reading about and consciously practicing techniques like this but given the context, I would give it a fair chance. It also has far less chance of working in this forum. You are more likely to turn people off when you come across this way.

If I take the "Way to deal with ALL Tyrants" in this context seriously, as in considering the possibility that it is something that you really believe in, then it is dangerous. Dangerous as in it can get someone assaulted or even killed when applied on the wrong people in the wrong circumstances. Wrong people can be predators. Like a predator who is looking at prey as a source to provide materials that they want - money, jewelry, car etc. Or it is a predator who enjoys the process of domination and violence just for the sake of it. Wrong circumstances may be going to a neighborhood where one is not welcome and be told "get out of here right now if you do not want to get your a** kicked". Just leaving without doing anything else gives the best chance to escape unhurt.

Now you can say of course - "I did not mean these techniques would work in those types of extreme circumstances." If so, then good for you. Just do not use "ALL and anything " without thinking. But if you believe that the use of "ALL and anything " is deserved, I would suggest you put in serious research and study on the nature of real violence - both social and asocial, physical and verbal/psychological. A couple of suggested books in this forum dealing with psychological violence are George Simon's "Character Disturbance" and "In Sheep's Clothing".


Tjijandjewa said:
And - when we talk about 'Working on ourselves and raising our level of knowledge - so that we will be capable of holding The Signal - would that not fall under that category??

Do you mean "fall under the category of manipulation?. If so then it is "not even wrong". In short, no, working on ourselves and raising level of knowledge does not fall under the category of learning to manipulate others.

Tjijandjewa said:
Let's assume that you increase your Knowledge to the point where you can see these programs everyday, see patterns of communication between people, see patterns of how one person goes about their everyday life, or even groups of people - from the way they tilt their heads when they are saying this or that, or patterns to how people curse or bless others with words, in a way that works -- would being able to see see this naturally not increase your level of understanding/awareness of the world and how things in the world work?

Would it not allow you to identify when someone is attacking you using hidden communication principles - of which they may or may not be aware of- and allowing you to defend yourself even?

Under some circumstances, yes.

Since you are new here, a few suggestions about how to engage more productively. An alternative way to bring up this topic would be to ask a question like "Do you think conversational hypnosis and covert manipulation techniques can be useful?" Then provide the materials you have found to be useful with specific comments about your experience with such materials.

I was not aware of Igor Ledochowski before. You mentioned "Igor" in another thread as well as this one with perhaps an assumption that people here are familiar about him. Using the search function in this forum and searching his name would show you if he is someone who has been discussed earlier. If not, as in this case, and if you want to introduce his work, it is considerate to provide information about him. Like he was a former lawyer who went into hypnotherapy. He has followed Milton Erickson (whom we are familiar with) and believes he has systematized Ericksonian principles and practices with conversational hypnosis and further enhanced them. He has apparently been around for about a decade teaching this material. Then build a discussion from there.

BTW, since you have not read the Wave series as you mentioned in another thread, you are probably not aware that Laura was a practicing hypnotherapist for decades. She refers to Erickson in her writings. So, even though Igor Ledochowski is not known here, the general topics of hypnotherapy and Erickson are known. Practicing hypnotherapy on a client who wishes to be cured of some ailment is ethically very different from covertly manipulating people without their knowledge. The latter is about power. Not much grey in there as far as I can tell in a general sense.
 
I would like to add my two cents. I spend some time on learning about hypnosis and NLP.

The most known NLP techniques etc. They are just advertising and they frequently work as the forms of making expression on other people or self and can not be use as the tools (without full commitment on different levels) to make any business or social or partner relationship or longterm maintenance of the internal changes.

In the big short, this is a way of planting some suggestions or imaginations in the mind of other person, and if that person do not find confirmation in somebody's personality traits or in the value of the product sold, the spell is broken.

There is nothing like NLP's seduction techniques or seller techniques because nothing like this really exist.

The real power is hidden in the man/woman's inner resources and traits.

Mainly, NLP techniques working only as the form of seeding suggestions in other person mind, it may lead to self-sabotage of the NLPer and induce confusion and chaos in that other person mind if those suggestions will be colliding with reality.

Even if the suggestions which one give to this other person are parallel with the real traits of the person who give those suggestions and / or are parallel, generally with reality, are still meddling with other's mind.

The idea of the Way is to live conscious and use all the capabilities of the human existence cumulative (i.a. subconscious and conscious mind). Maintaining them fully working and with harmony with each other. Giving to the others full freedom of how they want to experience the existence and relationships with other people.

As it comes to the way of the expression of one's personality, healthy forms are those which do not messing with other's minds, do not interfere directly with other's mind and are just indirectly represent one's personality, traits, and capabilities. Hypnotic and NLP techniques are invasive and seek for altering minds of others, what can violate free will.
 
Tjijandjewa said:
Like I said, the word 'manipulate' is a word that's hard to define.

Not really.

manipulate
məˈnɪpjʊleɪt/
verb
verb: manipulate; 3rd person present: manipulates; past tense: manipulated; past participle: manipulated; gerund or present participle: manipulating

1.
handle or control (a tool, mechanism, information, etc.) in a skilful manner.
"he manipulated the dials of the set"
synonyms: operate, handle, work, control, use, employ, utilize
"the workman manipulated some knobs and levers"
alter, edit, or move (text or data) on a computer.
"the pupils can manipulate the data or screen image"
examine or treat (a part of the body) by feeling or moving it with the hand.
"this system of healing is based on manipulating the ligaments of the spine"
synonyms: massage, rub, knead, feel, palpate
"she used her hands to manipulate the muscles of his back"
2.
control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly or unscrupulously.
"the masses were deceived and manipulated by a tiny group"
synonyms: exploit, control, influence, use/turn to one's advantage, manoeuvre, engineer, steer, direct, guide, twist round one's little finger, work, orchestrate, choreograph
"the government tried to manipulate the situation"

I don't see much of a grey area in the term "manipulation" and don't see it as being particularly subjective.
 
The whole "converstional hypnosis" thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. The whole website is based on:
"Master Hypnotist Reveals Forbidden Secret Of How To Control People's Minds (Without Their Knowledge) And Make Them Obey Covert Commands During Normal Conversation!"

Best Part: Subjects won't have a clue what's going on as you quickly and easily put them in a hypnotic trance... implant your specific suggestions... and...direct their thoughts and actions to do exactly what you want all while they are wide awake and talking with you...

That seems completely opposite to an STO approach. I don’t see how controlling someone's mind “for good” vs bad is any different. You’re still imposing an agenda and what about free will? Shouldn’t someone be making their choice out of their own free will? It’s like using this approach removes that option for someone being influenced by it. How can you know what is “good” or “bad” for someone? I’m really curious as to how it can be framed so that it is beneficial to both parties involved when the other has no idea that these techniques are being employed.

Tjijandjewa said:
It's about taking control of this talking part, that happens everyday, and using it for the betterment of whoever or whatever.

The point is in Mastering it as discussed to Embody Love - so that it happens naturally and unconsciously.

Not sure how much you’ve read on Gurdjieff but the one of the things we try to work on is to do things consciously, as much as possible, with the aim to make oneself a better person. As I understand it, things that are done unconsciously are subject to outside influences and mainly a result of mechanical behavior. To try and free oneself from acting mechanically, one needs to be aware of what/why they are doing things and not leave it to the unconscious. OSIT.

Tjijandjewa said:
At the end of the day it's just a suggestion and an organic portal that's proficient in this, can convince you to drop this project without you knowing why you're dropping it, it will feel like it came from your own mind.

Tjijandjewa said:
OK fine, let's just drop this thread.

I'm thinking that maybe this was unintentional, but do you see what you did there? Anyway, I hope you didn’t shell out $200 for the course!

Tjijandjewa] As long as the intention is right??[/quote] As the saying goes – the road to hell is paved with good intentions! [quote author=Tjijandjewa said:
I don't have time to be throwing words around at anyone - this is obviously getting emotional.

Like I said, the word 'manipulate' is a word that's hard to define. It's a subjective word. Even us talking now trying to clarify things would fall under the the category of 'manipulation'.

I just raised a point and if it's wrong in your eyes, then you show me how to go about it- or what has already been said - simple as that.

And - when we talk about 'Working on ourselves and raising our level of knowledge - so that we will be capable of holding The Signal - would that not fall under that category??

Let's assume that you increase your Knowledge to the point where you can see these programs everyday, see patterns of communication between people, see patterns of how one person goes about their everyday life, or even groups of people - from the way they tilt their heads when they are saying this or that, or patterns to how people curse or bless others with words, in a way that works -- would being able to see see this naturally not increase your level of understanding/awareness of the world and how things in the world work?

Would it not allow you to identify when someone is attacking you using hidden communication principles - of which they may or may not be aware of- and allowing you to defend yourself even?

Possibly. You don't need to be "throwing words around" and it's not getting "emotional". If you've looked into this and got something out of it and their methods then provide some details without getting too speculative. Explain what these hidden patterns are and how we can look out for them. How was it useful for you and in which situations did this information protect you? Or are you really asking if this is something you should spend money on to learn in the hopes that it will provide some defence? Thing is, while there may be some information that can provide clues as to when that is occurring, it can’t be applied to every and all situations. Obyvatel gives some good examples of this.

lux said:
I would like to add my two cents. I spend some time on learning about hypnosis and NLP.

The most known NLP techniques etc. They are just advertising and they frequently work as the forms of making expression on other people or self and can not be use as the tools (without full commitment on different levels) to make any business or social or partner relationship or longterm maintenance of the internal changes.

In the big short, this is a way of planting some suggestions or imaginations in the mind of other person, and if that person do not find confirmation in somebody's personality traits or in the value of the product sold, the spell is broken.

There is nothing like NLP's seduction techniques or seller techniques because nothing like this really exist.

The real power is hidden in the man/woman's inner resources and traits.

[...]

Agree. Well the whole thing looks pretty much like a sales pitch to me and though it may work for some in certain situations, it's not the end all be all it claims itself to be. Perhaps spending time to understand how the mind works is a better step to defending oneself against these types of techniques? As a start, you may want to check out some of the recommended books in the Cognitive/Social Science and Neuroscience sections here if you haven't done so already.
 
Tjijandjewa said:
Hi

Wanted to talk about the mechanics of Being a person who is able to Hold and BE Objective Love.

To me, being mechanical means a person is 'stuck' and doesn't get to 'be' or 'hold' anything. They get stuck at the mechanical stage and act like a machine, all the while thinking that they are something else.

Tjijandjewa said:
Considering the fact that almost everyone is under the influence of entities, that run their lives, different programs- STO/STS people, it's not too far fetched to say that everyone can be influenced for good or bad. Everyone including dictators.

STS 'influences', you can call it manipulates if you like and STO accepts something as it is. The terms 'good' or 'bad' are vague, and based on the judgment, and even the orientation of the individual using them. For example something that is 'good' for the psychopath, like lying and the pursuit of money and power among the elite, by involving corrupt dictators, pedophiles and satanists, is not perceived to be 'good' by all. That's why Hillary lost the election because she was exposed as something 'bad'.

Tjijandjewa said:
If there are Patterns in life, patterns in The Matrix, patterns of speech, patterns of behavior, patterns of thinking, fractals patterns, rain patterns - when it comes to humans, then those patterns can be Interrupted.

Yes, they can be controlled, manipulated and influenced by others. That is what STS do. And yes, they do it really rather frequently with NLP.

Tjijandjewa said:
I'm talking about change-work related to the field of hypnosis/nlp - there are direct methods of change/casting out entities. Laura talks about them in the Spirit Release videos on YouTube.

This work is not for the feint hearted or any reality magician who seeks to manipulate. It takes courage, a lot of work and jolly good protection. Not a magic wand and an 'idea'.

Tjijandjewa said:
To BE someone that can Hold Objective Love,regardless, I think you need to become some type of reality magician. A hypnotist who can change reality by his/her intention alone. Someone who can hold a thought of say Love and it manifests in his/her reality or location.

A reality magician as explained in this short article:
_http://conversational-hypnosis.com/articles/a86.html

Requires work, practice, patience and understanding (depends on person, maybe 3 years or less) - yet if the goal is kept in mind, then you Become the scenery upon which Love manifests automatically.

And you'll be able to Hold THE WAVE naturally.

Just my 2 cents.

---

Mod edit: link deactivated

Sounds like a quick fix with some wishful thinking thrown in. Nothing in STO is really that obvious, or that easy.
 
Tjijandjewa said:
Considering the fact that almost everyone is under the influence of entities, that run their lives, different programs- STO/STS people, it's not too far fetched to say that everyone can be influenced for good or bad. Everyone including dictators.

The question there is what makes people suggestible and maleable?

Ruth made a good point about STO accepts things as they are, suggesting someone to do something for "what we thing is good for them" is violating their free will.

To not violate someone's free will is an important element of study for someone who is looking to serve others, but we can't know that unless we understand how the process of polarization works and the mechanics of humans. Let alone conscious polarization.

Service to self, serves the self, but there is no specific protocol, sometimes their actions can become benefical in one context or another on different levels, the only aspect is the awareness of the polarization.

There is a third group, and that is the group that compose most people on this planet, who are unaware of the polarization or their nature, and change as external factors change, this is something Ra explained to some detail.

There is alot of things that can be extracted or asked from what has been said.
 
Manipulate in who's favour and for what purposes - how do you know that one person's purpose is more noble than the other person's purpose? That's what makes the word subjective and grey.

I think the salespage is what's bothering people - looking at the sales page without looking at the product is like judging the flavour of a pie without tasting it.

What's on the sales page is what can be accomplished, among many things, once certain ways of looking at the world are learned.

Also, that's why I posted the links to the articles, so that you don't have to necessarily buy the courses - I'll quote from this article quickly:
_http://conversational-hypnosis.com/articles/a11.html

~~~ The Importance of An Accurate Signal Recognitions System in Hypnosis

There are signs and signals that surround all of us everyday. Some of those signals come from people and others come from objects. There are signals that are concrete. These signals tell us when it is okay to cross the street, when to eat and when we should be sleepy.

There are also signals all around us that are not as obvious; an innocent flirtation, needs and feelings within others they need met and the signals of trance. It is true there are people around you everyday falling in and out of trances. Many times people do not realize the signals that are coming from those in trance.

At the beginning of hypnosis it is vital that you learn to recognize these signals. But before you can easily spot signals coming from others you must first teach yourself a few things.

You need to learn to see the world as it is. Plain and simple. Most people view the world as they want it to be. If you can learn to view things as they actually are you will be opening your mind to the truth of the world. When we see things the way in which we believe, or want to believe, things are we are deceiving ourselves.

As humans we are accustomed to seeing what we expect. We filter out what we don’t want and view the world, our lives and the lives of others in skewed terms. In order to see things as they truly are there are two things you must do for yourself.
The first is to recognize what is actually out there, whether you are viewing the world or your front yard. Keep your view simple and true, factual.

The second thing you need to do is to learn to recognize the signals that come when you are successful in a thing. Look for the signals that tell you are being successful in whatever it is that you are doing.

After you have learned to open your mind and do these two things successfully on a consistent basis you will be able to attune your ‘accurate signal recognition’ even further.

Milton Erickson was practiced and precise in his accurate signal recognition. Erickson was a leading psychiatrist, born in the early 1900’s. He specialized in medical hypnosis and family therapy. Erickson believed as many hypnotists do today that the unconscious was completely separate from the conscious. This included that the unconscious mind possessed its own awareness, interests, responses and learning abilities.

Milton Erickson was so precise in his recognition of signals that he could tell things about a person that they perhaps had only discovered moments earlier. He used his keen sense of signal recognition as he closely watched people and noticed things others would never see.

Erickson could tell a woman was expecting a child in the first weeks of pregnancy just by the tilt of her hips and movement of her hairline. When a woman is pregnant these things change in very small ways. The hair line moves by fractions, so little unless you were keen to the idea you would never notice. There are also changes within the body that affect the pelvis and its structure.

Erickson’s ability to read signals was so attuned he could read signals from subjects that other doctors never even realized. Once a woman visited him and was very skeptical about seeing yet another psychiatrist because no other psychiatrist had recognized her dilemma as of yet. Erickson told her immediately that he needed to know how long she had been a woman for.
He could tell simply from the signals she was sending out that she was really a man. Her body language was that of a girls who had not yet figured out how to work around new breasts. She would bump them as she moved her arms and gestured with her hands.

Many people would just attribute this small signal as something that happens when one is not comfortable in their body. Or many may not have even noticed it at all, depending on the size of her chest I am sure.

Milton Erickson was noted for his signal recognition and it was fundamental in his success as a hypnotist. He knew, as you need to know now, that the smallest signals a person gives off can send a large amount of information your way.~~~

A highly tuned sense of awareness is also what enables you to identify programs/patterns running all over.

Someone who can spot patterns of behavior, cycles that people run on themselves and others etc and has a high sense of awareness sounds like someone who is more OBJECTIVE, about the world.
 
To be honest, I don't think the house will be able to stand against a master hypnotist who has enough time and resources. The foundation seems to be a bit shaky.

Someone who has been tasked with dismantling the group and knows how to read people like an open book, see how they say certain things when saying. The unconscious signals that they give off.

Someone proficient enough to tell stories within stories among many things.

Someone objective enough about reality and could care less about the welfare of the group.

I've had enough of this discussion, take it in whichever way you want and someone please remove me from this group.
 
Tjijandjewa said:
Manipulate in who's favour and for what purposes - how do you know that one person's purpose is more noble than the other person's purpose? That's what makes the word subjective and gray.

[...]

A highly tuned sense of awareness is also what enables you to identify programs/patterns running all over.

Someone who can spot patterns of behavior, cycles that people run on themselves and others etc and has a high sense of awareness sounds like someone who is more OBJECTIVE, about the world.

Tjijandjewa,

Indeed, being objective about observations about the world is something we should all seek to do. I think there is value in learning to read people, programs they are running, motives, etc. This can help us empathize with others, and help them help themselves if they ask for help. This knowledge can also help us recognize when someone is trying to manipulate us, dreaw reactions from us, provoke, or distract. Same goes for learning hypnotic techniques, but for therapeutic purposes, after receiving the request from the person who it will be used on, and not otherwise.

If we try to use the knowledge above to shape their ideas without them being conscious of it, or to get things out of them, or even change them in ways we think "beneficial for the greater whole", we are going against their free will. STS uses these tactics because they don't care for the free will of others, only of their selves. STO doesn't resort to that methodology because it is against the ideal of respecting free will of others, and letting them make a truly informed choice, when and IF they want to. If we seek to make a choice of enforcing our purpose over another's based on which is more noble, we ignore the fact that the enforcing/shaping/manipulating may not be as noble as we think. In other words, the action of manipulation is inherently against the principle of free will, and thinking that our ends jusfify the means doesn't hold water. I think this is an objective way to look at the approach, and isn't quite subjective or gray as you're saying.

T. M said:
To be honest, I don't think the house will be able to stand against a master hypnotist who has enough time and resources. The foundation seems to be a bit shaky.

Someone who has been tasked with dismantling the group and knows how to read people like an open book, see how they say certain things when saying. The unconscious signals that they give off.

Someone proficient enough to tell stories within stories among many things.

Someone objective enough about reality and could care less about the welfare of the group.

I've had enough of this discussion, take it in whichever way you want and someone please remove me from this group.
I'll have to disagree, since the members here are practiced at observing people objectively, and I'm sure they could recognize such intentions.

You are always free to leave, but don't misunderstand disagreements as dismissal or unwelcoming.
 
fabric said:
lux said:
I would like to add my two cents. I spend some time on learning about hypnosis and NLP.

The most known NLP techniques etc. They are just advertising and they frequently work as the forms of making expression on other people or self and can not be use as the tools (without full commitment on different levels) to make any business or social or partner relationship or longterm maintenance of the internal changes.

In the big short, this is a way of planting some suggestions or imaginations in the mind of other person, and if that person do not find confirmation in somebody's personality traits or in the value of the product sold, the spell is broken.

There is nothing like NLP's seduction techniques or seller techniques because nothing like this really exist.

The real power is hidden in the man/woman's inner resources and traits.

[...]

Agree. Well the whole thing looks pretty much like a sales pitch to me and though it may work for some in certain situations, it's not the end all be all it claims itself to be. Perhaps spending time to understand how the mind works is a better step to defending oneself against these types of techniques? As a start, you may want to check out some of the recommended books in the Cognitive/Social Science and Neuroscience sections here if you haven't done so already.

I think I could expand my perspective, as a warning and broaden awareness of those interested in the subject.

The techniques (derived from NLP and Hypnosis) are based on using the emotional store of the other person got through life (as the result of nurture, education etc), by recall of certain imaginations in other person's conscious mind what activates emotion/emotions connected to the images and after merging it through the suggestions with the some thing, event, idea or person of the NLPer/Hypnotizer.

It can be any images induced in any way. The most frequently through the talk on certain subject, which depends on the emotions which somebody want to induce. It may be feelings of love, friendship, pleasure or fear, pain, anger it depends on aim.

If one want to make other person to feel sympathy or positively see some product he can enter into conversation, some history about sympathy between two people or some history about how some product give satisfaction to client, seasoning it by linguistic patterns for accentuate key fragments of the conversation, and while conversation going, connect those imaginations and emotions through the additional impulse like gesture, touch, word with oneself, some thing or situation or idea.

Those connections create the subconscious mind of the other person, create because this is his role. Subconscious mind is automatically probing environment looking for connections between different things and keeping them.

How to defend before it. The best is working on the self to neutralize all of those "little I's" or subconscious emotional programs, in order to none of them could be hooked up, drawn to the surface and used.

An example, in the context of politic, if somebody has in himself some fear, let say, toward other countries what was seeded in him in the childhood in time of the war or it has been seeded by education or culture. If those emotions that one "little I" which is afraid of other countries will be not overworked through conscious work on the self, then those emotional stratums can be used by outer influence like mainstream media, politics, through the Hypnotic and NLP techniques, by hooking them up and make some connections by showing them in the context, like, for example, Russia or Putin.

In subconscious mind we can find different fears, sorrows, complexes but also good memories, pleasures and joys. In hypnotic manipulation all of those emotions and images can be used to redirect and connect with somebody or something, creating the prism or filter through the object who is manipulated will be looking at it. This is not exactly that such person, object of manipulation is completly unaware and doesn't responsible for his actions and thoughts. But if we use those techniques on other person, even if we do not take their control over self we intrusively impose the rose-colored spectacles, without their will, without their requests, we prevail upon someone mind without asking.

In the past I hoped to find a possible way of gentle persuasion looking into Hypnotic and NLP techniques. In fact, using those techniques between people is like to be on drinking party. People have fun with each other, somebody solved the philosophical problem bothering the humanity through ages, but until tommorow he will forget everything after sober, you can learn something other people who spill the beans. But we know how it is with drunk people it could be "cool" and "funny", however they can't do anything productive.

The subconscious keep all of those emotions which give the limitless possibilites. All of those theoretically can be taken and redirected, potentially also for good of other person. The main problem with this is that they are useless in the develop of the real willpower that other person. Instead help other person to self-remember himself that he will be able learn and build his own willpower based on the harmony of the work of all the centers, he is pushing into state of dissociation. As we know sometimes dissociation is a good thing, but maintaining in this state dangerously lead to the increasing of mechanisation. And this is what we can observe nowadays as the NLP and Hypnosis enter into media, publicity, politic, business, management. This the progression of the mechanisation the human relationships.

And this is how it looks like. It is not something to be afraid of or be condemn. Those are just group of principles which ruled our psychic life. If somebody is afraid of NLP or hypnosis, the best is to keep calm and just be aware of emotions and intuitions which one feeling toward different things, people and ideas. Observing and questioning them, those emotions, feelings and views on other people and things. Knowledge of techniques may not be enough.

If somebody thinks about using those techniques based on hypnosis and NLP he should be aware that this is not like have a product and talk about its values, it is imposing rose-colored spectacles on someone's eyes through he will be look through. There are some critical or specific situations when those techniques could be used but it is impossible to build functioning network where people can grown and develop.

It is worth to be familiar with Hypnosis and NLP and all that knowledge and cases of the work of those people, but also worth to remember the most of it is not applicable in the work on the self at the daily basis and can be used to cause some effects in order to show certain aspects of work of the human machine or create some shortcut between other person's subconscious mind for meet that person with the possibilities how subconscious has for him or get some information stored in the subconscious.

The fact that something work in one case, doesn't mean that it will work in other case. And this how often it looks like, by using Hypnosis and NLP, it is leading to inducing imbalance and dissociation, instead of allow for conscious development and harmonious relationship between conscious mind and subconscious in order to both of them complement to each other such that no of them overcoming themselves, but be balanced.

Those are just few words, and if somebody is interested should study this topic. But remember that as there can be find valuable information about functioning human mind, such nowadays a lot of that knowledge is shallowed and corrupted.
 
Hi everyone,

Would like to apologize for overreacting, it was uncalled for and my emotions definitely got the better of me.

Please forgive me?

Having said that, I can see that Free-will is important here and not impinging on it.

In the context of Hypnotherapy, Let's take the case of Dr Milton Erickson, he's famous for helping people help themselves, and doing it in unconventional ways, even he didn't know what was going to happen but it happened. Whatever solution the client found for their problems, was specific to them. It's called putting people into a "The Trance of Infinite Possibilities".

I think you can only reach such a level of proficiency after years of 'practice'?

Does that or does it not infringe on the Free Will of people?
 
Back
Top Bottom