What globe? Flat Earth and Flat-Earthers

Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Kisito said:
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=212&v=P5LzJrVKmBk
Obviously I do not understand all .. I do not have the skills to contradict this video 22 minutes of the flat earth ..

You can leave that to others, but something you can do instead is bring the claims made in these videos to the thread. In other words, extract the claims made by the flat-Earthers and list them here, like this:

Claim 1: Earth is flat because X
Claim 2: Earth is flat because Y
etc.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

ankhepiphan said:
Hello All,

I want to say that the reason I placed the question in the "Ask the C'c" thread, was to avoid controversy and somehow 'cut through the chase' so to speak.

While I understand and accept the physics of our reality as real and logical as any other rational thinker, the idea that came to mind that I wanted to eliminate was the possibility (in an infinite universe), that an STS 4D intelligence effectively billions of years ahead of us, COULD create a technological experiment such as this. And if this was the case for us, then how could we truly detect it if they covered all the bases with their extensive knowledge of human beings, our potential, our psyche, etc, etc? It's a profound existential question that I thought, "if I can imagine it..", must exist somewhere in an Infinite Universe.

I remember a question asked of the C,s a few years ago that went (as best as I can remember it): What is the biggest secret on planet earth, to which the answer was: "You are an experiment".

In my mind I thought: 'As Above, So Below' - A petri dish experiment on a scale orders of magnitude beyond our ability to properly detect or understand; But a situation irrelevant to the Laws governing the progress of the Soul, OSIT.

I just hoped that the C'c would give a definite answer that would settle it in my mind, as NOT the situation WE are in, once and for all.

I didn't want to start any problems or distract from the good work being done here especially at this critical time, and I am sorry if it seem to be the case (intentionally, or vectored). Thank you all for a great learning opportunity.

Hey ankhepiphan,

I could be completely off here and if so, let me know, but I wonder if the question you originally posed may have to do with a session earlier this year:

https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic said:
Q: (ankhepiphan) Okay, I have one more question. My question is am I totally lost [???]

A: You still think you can think your way out of your problems and issues. You can't. When are you going to give up your FEAR and ANGER?

Q: (ankhepiphan) Fear and anger for what?

A: For life not being the way you want it to be.

Perhaps you are struggling with some issue that runs deeper than the opening question. Is this the case? If so, know that you are always welcome to open a thread about it and we'll do our best to help. :hug2:
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Parallel said:
Laura said:
I've given this whole problem some thought and it occurs to me that this is a great opportunity to educate folks. So, let's bring on the claims of the flat earthers and do some work.

That means that those of you who have watched the videos need to bring up the questions that are relevant.
Here are some of observations that have puzzled me, not having considered them before looking into the topic:
If the Earth were truly a sphere 25,000 miles in circumference, airplane pilots would have to constantly correct their altitudes downwards so as to not fly straight off into “outer space;” a pilot wishing to simply maintain their altitude at a typical cruising speed of 500 mph, would have to constantly dip their nose downwards and descend 2,777 feet (over half a mile) every minute! Otherwise, without compensation, in one hour’s time the pilot would find themselves 31.5 miles higher than expected.
From _http://www.mediafire.com/view/l679prcg097ny8u/200_Proofs_Earth_is_Not_a_Spinning_Ball!.pdf

I understand that a plane wouldn’t just fly off into outer space because of atmospheric density, and gravity could be maintaining it at attained altitude, parallel to the curvature. But how does gravity correct the nose dip?.

Gravity does not maintain a plane at a given altitude, it tends to pull it down.

The pilot (actually most of the time the autopilot) adjusts the altitude of the plane (by pushing/pulling the stick) which acts on the wings geometry which transform the horizontal thrust generated by the engine into a partially lifting force.

The Earth being such a huge ball it only requires about 1/10th of degree adjustment every 10 km in order to maintain a constant altitude (i.e. following the curvature of the planet).

It's a similar process when you drive on a highway. It's never perfectly straight so you have to turn the steering wheel a tiny bit right or left in order to follow the road.


200 proofs said:
The Notre Dame Antwerp spire stands 403 feet high from the foot of the tower with Strasburg measuring 468 feet above sea level. With the aid of a telescope, ships can be distinguished on the horizon and captains declare they can see the cathedral spire from an amazing 150 miles away. If the Earth were a globe, however, at that distance the spire should be an entire mile, 5,280 feet below the horizon!

There are many of these examples of objects and landmasses seen at impossible distances, which should be occluded by curvature. Atmospheric refraction would be the answer, but as that is a function of temperature gradients, pressure, and humidity, it does become a lot more impressive how the image of light travels far around the bend, more or less intact through those varying factors along the way?

Refraction mostly depends on air density which mostly depends on altitude (the higher the altitude, the lower the density because of the reduced air column). That's the reason why atmospheric refraction doesn't always distord images. Some mirages and heat hazes show that refraction can heavily distord images:

330px-Swiss_F-5E_at_Fairford.JPG


This message describes how it's possible to observe features located below the line of the horizon.

Polaris, which according to wiki is a temporary pole star (there allegedly was a different pole star before AD, will be different again in some amount of years). The pole star is always visible due north and makes for some pretty pictures with long exposure, in which all the other stars seem to revolve around. The spinning globe travels trillions of miles through space each year, yet Polaris maintains its central position. This is explained by the immense distances to it, which have been extended over the years as to correct the model, and now it’s apparently estimated to be between 1,938,000,000,000,000 - 2,604,000,000,000,000 miles away, a difference of 666,000,000,000,000, over six hundred trillion miles). How does Polaris stay aligned with our globes traveled distances?

Polaris "stays" aligned with the spinning axis of our planet because the movement of the Earth relative to the Sun (2 AU) is neglectable when compared to the distance between the Sun and Polaris (27 million AU). In the same vein the movement of the Sun in the galaxy (about 6 AU) is neglectable relative to the distance bewteen the Sun and Polaris.

To be exact Polaris does move relative to the Earth's spinning axis but it takes eons to be measurable (about 100000 years for a 1 degree shift at the current rate).
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

luke wilson said:
I don't understand why this topic is generating so much interest. This is just one of many conspiracy theories that hold no water. I haven't seen multi-page threads about lizard people, fake moon landings, underground cities, hollow earth theory etc etc... What's so special about the flat earth conspiracy theory?

I mean, I sort of get that it shows that some people ( :D) aren't educated in terms of physics and mechanics but the interest it has generated is quite astonishing.

On a public thread preserved for posterity, it may sometimes be worth putting energy into uncovering the thought process that turns into the kind of belief that moves people. If you can get to the bottom of something, you can lay it out for others who may then have an opportunity to avoid a trap. Maybe this is kind of what Scottie was referring to?

Anyway, there does seem to be more than just simple problems with people's thinking process, and I'm no exception. R.D. Laing and Bateson have gone a long way in helping us to understand the mechanics of how thinking can get twisted and become dysfunctional.

In fact, in II Cybernetic Frontiers, 1974, Bateson, a pioneer in discovering levels of learning, talked about how there is a mysterious reversal somewhere between the levels that causes it all to go screwy. He never found it exactly. Then, in the second part, using an early computer programming analogy, the author states:

One of the hackers wrote a program called "The Unknown Glitch", which at random intervals, would wake up and print out I AM THE UNKNOWN GLITCH. CATCH ME IF YOU CAN, and then it would relocate itself somewhere else in core memory, set a clock interrupt, and go back to sleep. There was no way to find it.

Nice analogy, huh? I'd like to think the efforts here are also applicable to the idea of debugging the universe (starting with man, himself). I think that's why Laura asked to see the basis for the claims.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Truth Seeker wrote:

Perhaps you are struggling with some issue that runs deeper than the opening question. Is this the case? If so, know that you are always welcome to open a thread about it and we'll do our best to help.

Yes you are right, but as you can imagine, it's complex and varied. So much so that I wouldn't know how exactly to proceed without some fear I guess. But I will try.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

ankhepiphan said:
Truth Seeker wrote:

Perhaps you are struggling with some issue that runs deeper than the opening question. Is this the case? If so, know that you are always welcome to open a thread about it and we'll do our best to help.

Yes you are right, but as you can imagine, it's complex and varied. So much so that I wouldn't know how exactly to proceed without some fear I guess. But I will try.
It doesn't have to be perfect. Just do what you feel up to and we'll all figure it out together. :)
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Niall said:
Kisito said:
_https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=212&v=P5LzJrVKmBk
Obviously I do not understand all .. I do not have the skills to contradict this video 22 minutes of the flat earth ..

You can leave that to others, but something you can do instead is bring the claims made in these videos to the thread. In other words, extract the claims made by the flat-Earthers and list them here, like this:

Claim 1: Earth is flat because X
Claim 2: Earth is flat because Y
etc.
These are my poor knowledge of science, that help me to ask me questions that may seem ridiculous.

If the circumference of the Earth is 40 000 km (25 miles), then every 6 miles (8kms) we should see the horizon drop 12 feet (4 meters). Is it always the reflection of the water or the atmosphere are raising objects to over 6 miles (8km) to hide the curvature? For example the Strait of Gibraltar is 20 km, when one is in Spain, it is possible to see the Moroccan beaches, or is it still a mirage? But when I'm in the ocean, I can very well see the disk of the horizon, which seems to bend every 6 miles!
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

ankhepiphan said:
Truth Seeker wrote:

Perhaps you are struggling with some issue that runs deeper than the opening question. Is this the case? If so, know that you are always welcome to open a thread about it and we'll do our best to help.

Yes you are right, but as you can imagine, it's complex and varied. So much so that I wouldn't know how exactly to proceed without some fear I guess. But I will try.
Yes, doing so would help us help you. Fear is just another mechanism to keep you from asking questions. How 'complexed and varied' can your questions actually be?

We are here for you.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

The next point brought up in the video is the concept that most of the motion pictures produced about space travel are fiction. and not really based on or illustrating recent and past real space missions and expeditions. He claims that this is because of a vast conspiracy involving NASA and the government to hide the fact that none of the Moon landings ever took place and almost everything they tell and show us regarding space subjects is falsified because nothing can get through the supposed 'barrier' surrounding the Earth.

While it is fairly certain that NASA does lie about lots of things, it is much more likely that they are hiding other secrets and doing their best to promote certain beliefs about what exists, or does not exist in space, for political and control of the population reasons. While no one can be certain of what they are actually concealing, it sure is not the notion that there is some sort of barrier stopping our ability to pass through it to get anywhere.

We are still receiving data from the Pioneer spacecraft which have now reached the Heliopause (the outer extent of our Sun's influence and the point where one enters Interstellar Space). We have probes which have visited all the planets, some comets and other bodies in our Solar System. If there is some sort of 'barrier', it would have to be awfully far away indeed for us not to have encountered it yet.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Wow - when I first saw this topic, I thought 'you've got to be kidding!!" And now it has morphed to 10 pages! What started as a seemingly ludicrous topic has certainly generated a lot of thought-provoking tangents.

For me: When I was a kid, I wondered if everyone saw grass as green in the same way I did - the concensus was grass is green, but was how did we really know that everyone was really seeing it that way (same for blue sky). I wondered if reality was really REAL - or was I just in some kind of dream state?

When the first US satellite ECHO was launched, my dad would take us out in the yard to look up and spot it moving across the sky. Very little light pollution then, so lots of stars. In fact, my perceived depth of the night sky & the knowledge that space just went on & and on actually scared me. It seemed frightening that so much was out there that we didn't really know much about. And I think the whole UFO situation was increasingly challenging what we all thought was valid & true about our reality - esp when the government pooh-poohed incidents as 'swamp gas'. Perhaps that was the beginning of the disconnect from feeling confident that we knew what our reality was vs what has become 'gaslighting'! Certainly JFK's assassination did nothing to improve this situation!

I'm afraid my formative years took a horrible nosedive & my last 2 yrs of high school took place away from the school I had expected to attend. The one I did attend had a college prep tract that DID NOT include Algebra II or Chemistry! Sadly, by that point in my life, I thought if it wasn't required, why take it - esp as those subjects seemed quite intimidating to me (how many girls fell thru the cracks then & even more so now?). I can't tell you how much I regret not having those subjects & ironically, I scored higher in Science on my ACT than any other subject. I don't recall if Physics was offered at either school. I found Geometry daunting & it didn't help that there was an ongoing 'drama' between one male student & the female teacher. I've heard it said that the order of Math courses presented beginning in Jr High thru High School is incorrect - this by a math teacher many years ago. I guess that didn't help either.

So time goes on & we are all informed that Pluto isn't really a planet. Even when my kids were in grade school & made solar system replicas for school, Pluto was still officially a planet. And then there's all the controversy re the moon landings & NASA - Never A Straight Answer. So nice they coincided w/ the Vietnam War - another challenge to what constitute's 'normal life/reality' - esp on the heels of JFK/RFK/MLK assassinations!

And things have only gotten progressively worst from then. Who would have EVER imagined that the US & the world at large could become so incredibly insane as what we are all witnessing every single day?

But back to the flat earth discussion - and again, ANOTHER
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Well, I'm on a roll here - accidentally posted prematurely & now just lost followup post. I was trying to embed a video (failed) & so was going to copy link when - poof! I'll try to remember what I composed.

But back to the flat earth discussion - and again, ANOTHER lie bites the dust > no, the people of Columbus' time DID NOT believe the world was flat & that ships would just fall off the edge! HOW MANY times was that drummed into our heads!

COSI Science Center Pendulum, Columbus, OH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Px1OO8TI6OI

The pendulum at COSI is a visitor favorite. It demonstrates that the Earth rotates at 790 mph! Science shows that as the Earth moves, it carries COSI with it, and COSI carries the pendulum, giving the illusion that the pendulum is moving in a circle. [Commenter indicates 2 balls are knocked down every 15 min.]
WOULD THIS OCCUR IF EARTH WAS FLAT?

Another commenter mentioned the Coriolis effect - I wasn't familiar w/ that so googled:

In physics, the Coriolis effect is a deflection of moving objects when the motion is described relative to a rotating reference frame. In a reference frame with clockwise rotation, the deflection is to the left of the motion of the object; in one with counter-clockwise rotation, the deflection is to the right.

220px-Coriolis_effect14.png

And I presume this is what makes water go down a drain in the northern hemispheres one way & the opposite way in the southern hemisperes.
Again, WOULD THIS OCCUR IF EARTH WAS FLAT?

One last thought from childhood - weren't we all well aware that if you dug straight down into the earth, you would come out on the opposite side of the world in China! Just kidding - not really & we all knew that. However, we also all KNEW we were digging thru a ROUND earth & not a PLATE!

I guess cognitive dissonance is the name of the game now - more so than ever! And all these wild theories completely play into the DIVIDE & CONQUER
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

OK - apparently hitting all caps is messing me up!

Last paragraph:
I guess cognitive dissonance is the name of the game now - more so than ever! And all these wild theories completely play into the DIVIDE & CONQUER strategy, too, I think. And frankly, I thought it was the HOLLOW EARTH theory that was causing all kinds of ruckus! Flat Earth - NO WAY! No doubt some other wild theory will supercede this one & the populace can continue to ignore all the real life murder/mayhem going on just about everywhere! Yeah, bet those people in Mid-east don't think their reality is an illusion! It couldn't get more real for them.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

Persej said:
Laura said:
If a person just watched one ten minute science video every day, it would add up to a serious education in a few months time!

It seems that we really need a modern version of this Soviet calendar. :)

http://www.1tv.ru/news/social/168459

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,33071.msg590942.html#msg590942

I've had a surge of nostalgia last week and bought my 2016 People's calendar:

2dvl5kh.jpg


It weighs and costs as a box of matches, but it is actually a gold-mine of knowledge. About 400 pages of info about vitamins, minerals (including Alfalfa, nicotinic acid, etc.) and lots of other useful and practical stuff.

It also tells about the first spacecraft to be placed in heliocentric orbit, for example. :)

2cpcjkk.jpg


Luna 1, also known as Mechta (Russian: Мечта, lit.: Dream),[1] E-1 No.4 and First Cosmic Ship,[2] was the first spacecraft to reach the vicinity of the Earth's Moon, and the first spacecraft to be placed in heliocentric orbit. Intended as an impactor, Luna 1 was launched as part of the Luna programme in 1959, however due to an incorrectly timed upper stage burn during its launch, it missed the Moon; in the process becoming the first spacecraft to leave geocentric orbit.

As for the topic of this discussion, it reminds me of the following session:

Laura said:
A: We are not clear about your interesting interpretation there, but it is true that you have an interactive relationship with the wave however, as stated before, you are in an interactive relationship with the wave in a sense, in that the wave is a part of your reality, always has been and always will be. And, of course, it does involve your progress through the grand cycle. And the perpendicular reality, again is, of course, an advancement from the core outward which is yet another reflection of all reality and all that exists. Now, we wish to return to the visual representation as mentioned previously. If you notice the core circle connects with all seven sections to the outer circle. Now, picture that outer circle as being an ever expanding circle, and each one of the seven segments as being an ever expanding line. Of course, now, this will expand outward in a circular or cyclical pattern. Please picture visually an expanding outer circle and a non-expanding inner circle. Contemplate that and then please give us your feelings as to what that represents.

Q: (L) Does it represent an expansion of our knowledge and consciousness?

A: That's part of it.

Q: (L) Does it represent also expanding influence of what and who we are on that which is around us?

A: That is correct.

Q: (L) Does it also represent a more...

A: Oops! We detected a slippage of your visual representation! Contemplate, if you will, the ever-expanding outer circle and the non-expanding inner circle, and, of course, the seven partitions also moving outwardly. What type of shape does that form in your mind's eye?

Q: (L) A wheel?

A: Is that all?

Q: (T) A pie?

A: Keep going.

Q: (L) An eye.

A: Now we are starting to turn it into a sphere! Why would it turn into a sphere?

Q: (L) How can it turn into a sphere?

A: How can it not!

Q: (SV) It is going in ALL directions, not just flat...

A: Is a straight line a straight line or a...

Q: (L) Oh, you're not talking about a circle?

A: We are talking about a circle. What becomes of a circle if you expand it outward forever?

Q: (J) It disappears.

A: It disappears? How can it disappear? Where does it disappear to? We ask you that, Jan? Jan?

Q: (J) Visually, as the outer circle expands, the inner circle becomes smaller and smaller until it disappears. As you continue to expand out with the outer circle, the inner circle disappears.

A: But where does it disappear to?

Q: (J) A black hole?

A: A black hole. Well, that's a possibility. But, we really didn't want you to concentrate so heavily on the smaller circle, now did we? It's the outer circle.

Q: (T) The outer circle is used to encompass more and more.

A: And what shape does it begin to take on? I want you to look at this outer circle expanding outward!

Q: (J) Are we to assume that the seven spokes remain the same size in relation to the circle?

A: Well, answer that question for yourself.

Q: (L) Okay, we are looking at it as a plane representation. As a flat surface.

A: Well, what happens to a flat surface if you extend it outward forever?

Q: (L) Well, we don't know. That, that... (SV) It keeps on going.

A: It keeps on going?

Q: (L) Yeah, bigger and flatter!

A: It does? What happens to a line if you extend it forever and ever?

Q: (Laura and Susan) It keeps on going.

A: It does?

Q: (L) Um hmmm!

A: Where does it go to?

Q: (SV) Forever. (J) Back to itself. (L) We don't know that.

A: Oh, someone said "Back to itself."

Q: (J) Like a snake taking hold of its own tail.

A: Why don't we know that?

Q: (L) Because we don't. It is conjectured that space is curved...

A: "Because we don't know. Now, why don't we know?

Q: (L) Because we haven't been there.

A: Had Columbus been outside of Italy and Spain?

Q: (L) Okay, we are going to assume that if it keeps on expanding it will eventually come back to itself...

A: No, no, no wait! We asked a question!

Q: (L) Well, of course Columbus had an idea that there was something but he hadn't been there, no. But he went and checked it out.

A: Did he have just an idea?

Q: (L) Well, pretty much, I guess.

A: Hmmm. That's not the way we remember it. The way we remember it is that he had instinct and imagination and when he married his instinct with imagination, it became reality. And, when it became reality, he had created a reality which he was fully confident would be manifest in the physical third density reality. It wasn't that he was confident. He knew it to be so. He didn't stop himself by adding prejudice to the equation which is what you are doing when you say: "Well, we don't know what happens because we have never been there!" Think logically, please. We have told you so many times that everything is a grand cycle. If it's a grand cycle, we have told you about circles within circles. We have told you about cycles. We have told you about short wave cycles and long wave cycles. Now, after all this information that you have asked of us, which we have more than happily given to you, would you expect that a straight line would just go out forever and ever and ever as a straight line? How could it possibly do that? What happens if you take, on your third density earth, and you draw a straight line to the East or to the West or to the North or to the South...

Q: (J) It comes all the way back to itself.

A: Right...

Q: (L) Okay, so we're living in a big globe!

A: Are we?

Q: (L) Well, that is what it sounds like, a big circle?

A: Oh, my, my, my. You need more study and learning, my dear. Need more study. Even your Albert Einstein had a theory about what happened.

Q: (L) Yes, but that was just a theory.

A: Oh, well I guess then it must be dropped. We'll never know. It's just a theory. Well, we'll just forget about it.

Q: (T) I'm still expanding the circle... (SV) Me too.

A: Very good, that was the idea. It keeps going and going and going.

Q: (L) Well, mine does too, but it hasn't come back and met anything. So, what's the point?

A: Does there need to be a point?

Q: (L) Of course!

A: Who says? We are trying to help you learn. When do you expect to shut down this process?

Q: (J) Never. (L) Gee, I hope never.

A: Then there never is a point!

Q: (J) Point taken! (L) There is no point. [Laughter.] Well, if you expand the circle outward and continue expanding it in all directions, it pulls the seven spokes with it which encompasses more and more space in a cross section, and then turn that circle, you have a sphere.

A: Precisely. But Laura says that means we are living in a big globe. And, maybe we are.

Q: (T) Well, it wouldn't be a big globe, so to speak, it would only be a big globe within the circle. If the circle continues to expand, it would just continue to go outward and outward and the globe would become bigger and bigger and bigger... (L) You're making me nervous... (T) But it goes outward forever... cause there is no end to going out...

A: There isn't?

Q: (SV) Nope.

A: Well, then maybe there's no beginning.

Q: (T) Well, there wouldn't be a beginning, just a big, open void. An infinite void...

A: If there's no end and no beginning, then what do you have?

Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now.

A: The here and now which is also the future and the past. Everything that was, is and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel, because even though traveling into space in your third density is every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you do, now can you? Imagine going out into space. You'd be lost when confronted with reality that everything is completely all at one? Would you not? Picture yourself floating around in space!

Q: (L) I don't want to. (J) There is also no space! (T) Does the sphere keep expanding... as the circle expands and you turn the circle 180 ', you get a sphere. As the sphere continues to expand it, you take a point on the outer edge of the sphere in order to take the sphere about itself, you get a donut, an ever expanding inner tube. (L) With a black hole in the middle! (SV) Why does it have to be a black hole? (J) It's a spiral. (T) If you take that and twist it, you get an even larger inner tube. It just continues to expand and encompasses more space...

A: And now, when you merge densities, or traverse densities, what you have is the merging of physical reality and ethereal reality, which involves thought form versus physicality. When you can merge those perfectly, what you realize then, is that the reason there is no beginning and no end is merely because there is no need for you to contemplate a beginning or an end after you have completed your development. When you are at union with the One at Seventh density, that is when you have accomplished this and then there is no longer any need for difference between physical and ethereal forms.
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

I had a lot of difficulty w/ the concept of the past/present/future all occurring at once - how COULD the future take place SIMULTANEOUSLY w/ the present?!! A passage in John Keel's Trojan Horse book or Haunted Planet (?) explained it in a way that I could at least grasp that it was possible even if I didn't totally comprehend it. I'm thinking it had to do w/ a drop of liquid on a slide under a microscope?
 
Re: Is the Earth an enclosed technologically created world, and NOT a globe?

The flat solar system would have been a better example to promote, if you need a flat reference. I mean, like the Earth is a grain of sand in the whole and the whole continues to grow.... at the speed of light or faster, as we measure time.

Lots of good information. Time spent not wasted. Thanks!
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom