Your question is perfectly valid; At its core, "Can I Trust This Influence?" is a healthy thing to ask, and it is a question everybody here has spent time coming to terms with. Some of the ideas detailed below helped me in that process. Maybe they can help you...
Think of it this way:
Your particular question is a problem of circular logic. The C's are the ones who introduced the concept of Densities in the first place.
If you believe that concept is a truthful measure of reality, but also believe that they are lying about their position within that same hierarchy, then your belief system is dissonant. If they are liars, then the whole system must be treated as suspect.
If the whole system is suspect, then how do you reduce uncertainty?
You might ask these questions...
If the presumed goal is to misinform in order to slow or outright prevent potential soul growth in people, then the optimal approach would be to provide either no information at all, or enough misdirection to weaken people. As information has been provided, and if the assumption is that it is designed to mislead, then you can measure the effectiveness of that attack by looking at its results. There have been 20 years of practice in what might be called the C's system, enough data points to enable a reasonably strong deduction. That is fortunate for you. In the beginning it was much more difficult.
If the C's are misinformation agents, then they have done a very poor job. I have watched over the last 20 years as people have grown strong, capable, knowledgable and wise under this system, with no end in sight of that trend.
Example:
Under the C's influence, seekers have learned and self-taught that absolute foundations are vital when trying to grow. As such, diet and health have been given enormous, primary focus and energy, with the objective result being that people have become strong and capable and wise, able to tackle the more refined concepts in a way which is not haphazard and self-defeating.
If the goal is to weaken and to mislead, then this was a tactical error, -one inconsistent with the practices of other groups revealed to have been psyops.
The C's also strongly suggest that seekers do their own external research and problem solving, and lots of it, expressly because doing so is the very process by which minds grow strong and capable, -and key- able to discern truth from lies.
This practice has also returned objectively positive benefits. -And it is one which also builds the very tools required to detect if the C's are lying. Regularly promoting such a practice would again be a tactical error for the prospective psyops agent.
As well, baked right into the practice itself, are regular warnings to not take the C's verbatim, to recognize that message corruption is not only possible, but probable, making it incumbent on the seeker to research by exploring information from third parties, to fact check, to do the demanding work required to suss out truth from lies. How many other systems insist on this? Are there any tracts within the bible, for instance, which urge readers to hold the very documents upon which it is based to high critical standards, to say, point blank, that some of the information in its own pages might be wrong and that the only way to know for sure is to leave the embrace of the system, to go into the world and use the tools and information provided by other systems not under its control, and to use those tools to perform critical analysis upon itself?
In short, the C's system has a built-in truth filter. It tells you to test it using whatever means you are able to come up with, to not trust it until you are satisfied. And to remain vigilant. That in the end, your level of awareness it is up to you.
These points, from what I can tell, are fairly unique across the world of esoteric practices.
I hope that provides some assistance in your own quest.
