S
seekingObjectivity
Guest
To have understanding within and to have understanding without and know its difference exactly. In order that thought and action have zero temporal division.
Can you elaborate on why this is oxymoronic? The meaning of most people's lives, as far as they know, doesn't go much beyond their jobs, families, and other immediate goals and purposes. Some people also believe fairy tales of God and Heaven to supposedly create greater meaning, but in reality just make it worse because they make it all up. So personally when I say "meaning of our lives" I am talking about a potentially greater meaning beyond the earthly personality, beyond the physical shell - who we are, why we exist, and where we're going and why we're going there, etc.RML said:“Meaning of our lives
Oxymoronic, eh?
It is only an oxymoron if you take it literally. Maybe a part of us needs to die so that another part can live? Then it would make sense. Have you read esoteric literature available on this site?RML said:Are we here to understand Paradox?
To die in order to live?
Well STO is "service to self through others". You cannot fully escape the service to self part - you need to exist and to have knowledge in order to assist others. But yet, STO is not STS. There is a fundamental difference in the approach. STO does not serve self, it serves all, including self. STS serves self, and only serves others if it gains something from it. You could phrase it any way you want, but again you seem to be looking at the literal semantics and not the underlying meaning that may be expressed.RML said:To be desire-less in order to get what you really want?
One possibility: to understand the true nature of time and space (or lack thereof), which may require a higher-level non-linear awareness. So while we might not TRULY grasp how a timelses existance works right now, it is possible that if our awareness undergoes a "quantum leap", we may be able to understand. That's one possible meaning of that statement. But even on this level, there is such a thing as "seeing the unseen". It is similar to "reading between the lines", which I'm sure you understand the meaning of. Clearly there is nothing but paper between lines of text, but it is not a statement to be taken at face value and literally as you know, and neither are the other ones. Another example: A magic trick. It relies on our assumptions and redirecting our focus. Most people won't see how it works, and to them it will look impossible or magical. Others, if they are perceptive enough, can see the trick. On a global scale, it would mean understanding the true nature of those in power, the true nature of what they do and why they do it, even if at the surface what they present is the direct opposite, which fools many people. Do you know how psychopaths function in our "society" and why they remain undetected? My point is that the devil here is in the meaning, which for esoteric literature is often not literal and therefore not obvious. As for alchemical literature, it's even more so. Green language? Forgetitski! If you limit what you see to the "obvious" and refuse to think or look beyond this, then you'll not see or understand many things that speak on a slightly (or significantly) "deeper" level. And there are a LOT of such things in life, not just esoteric things - but even more common literature that while might not necessarily offer clues to "higher truths", if the author is clever, can speak on many levels as well.RML said:To understand what can’t be comprehended? To see what can’t be perceived? We all know the list.
Those phrases are blinders if the meaning is distorted, as it often is, but also they can be of great help if the true meaning is understood, assuming there is a true meaning and the phrase isn't nonsense to begin with. For example, the new age phrase "we're all one" isn't necessarily false on some level, but the way it is used and interpreted by new agers is false as it is mostly inapplicable on our level and it's therefore counterproductive and illogical to use that phrase for the things it is used for. Kinda like politicians toss around the word Freedom, but the meaning of it is completely flipped on its head and used to justify absolutely anything, if you can somehow twist that word and adapt it to your nefarious purposes. Those who are uncritical will not see the change. Those who are critical will. This leads to "seeing the unseen." Nothing terribly "mystical" about it, just a short-and-sweet way to express a concept for those who understand the concept.RML said:I’ve been meaning, though, to punch-out the guy who hard-wired us with all of this enigmatic blinders-on-the-road-to-enlightenment cross-hatched, oxymoronic, Tai Chi duality stuff.
Can you elaborate on that? It falls under "wishful thinking." What is your view of "paradise?"BoyTheo said:To rebuild paradise.
No it doesn't fall under wishful thinking. Thinking that paradise is not going to be rebuilt is wishful thinking, what I am thinking of is inevitable. It can only happen, it can not not happen.Zadius Sky said:Can you elaborate on that? It falls under "wishful thinking." What is your view of "paradise?"BoyTheo said:To rebuild paradise.
okaaay...BoyTheo said:and what would there be to do? Simply, to have fun! To go on wild crazy magic adventures, or do whatever you like.
I'll probably spend a lot of time flying around, having parties and generally being good and kickass
did you see my response on the other thread?BoyTheo said:We'll develop a culture and civilisation that builds stuff that does NOT trample nature or the environment, instead encourages it. For a start, we'll build our cities with no roads, and the house walls touching the trees, thus clearing as little trees as possible for our civilisation. And all buildings will be grand and beautiful, not cheap like too many modern houses.
When you understand the basics of existance, you'll see how this is NATURAL.
What is unnatural, is our way of living today. Of mundaness, boringness, growing old, brutality of life to life, lonliness, and the sheer stupidity of human existance.
That is what is unnatural. Paradise is natural. Understanding the basics leads to this conclusion.
You see, the assumption that a certain future is inevitable is precisely the definition of wishful thinking. As Vinny said, you're missing some very fundamental understandings, and making a tonload of assumptions about what you can do, and how the universe and everyone in it will end up under your authority. But hey, good luck with that, just count me out.BoyTheo said:Thinking that paradise is not going to be rebuilt is wishful thinking, what I am thinking of is inevitable. It can only happen, it can not not happen.
Yeah, but *learning* is fun. Again, you're missing some fundamental concepts. The universe is already created. It already has a point, always did, always will. Neither you, I, nor anyone can redefine the universe to how we want it to be, nor can we control the universe and everyone in it. This is called having a "staring contest" with the universe. Many have played that game and many play that game. Again, feel free, but count me out. I guess I could even say that the outcome of such a staring contest IS inevitable, although in this case saying "inevitable" does not constitute wishful thinking, if you think about it.BoyTheo said:And what would there be to do? Simply, to have fun! To go on wild crazy magic adventures, or do whatever you like. I'll probably spend a lot of time flying around, having parties and generally being good and kickass.
How boring!Boytheo said:And what would there be to do? Simply, to have fun! To go on wild crazy magic adventures, or do whatever you like. I'll probably spend a lot of time flying around, having parties and generally being good and kickass.