alkhemst said:...
Behind the Dictators - A Factual Analysis of the Relationship of Nazi-Fascism and Roman Catholicism
L. H. LEHMANN, 1942
Full PDF _http://arcticbeacon.com/books/Lehmann-Behind_the_Dictators-Relationship_of_Nazi-Fascism_and_Roman_Catholicism(1945).pdf ]
alkhemst,
Thanks, for the link to the PDF. Many of you may have already read some of the material that I am just catching up with so feel free anyone who has done previous research to chime in. If we can just sample some of the "flavor" of these documents maybe it will save some "time" that we may not have to go on wild goose chases.
After just getting started looking at the Sabbatean heretics I get the feeling already that they are just one more scapegoat to misdirect attention away from the main players.
Alkemst, I guess since you stated this thread I would ask whether your original request for feedback is going in the right direction and if so what do you think we should concentrate on at this point?
Here is your basic request:
One idea I thought worth putting on the table in regards to that question leads to a bunch of orders that are said to stem back to the Vatican. There's a lot of information junk in telling that story, and if it's true, you'd expect that would be the case. I came across an article that covers some of this on Bibliotecapleyades: _http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/vatican/esp_vatican37.htm .
There's no definitive list of membership I can find but apparently there's a few hundred or so 1st class members or Knights of Justice of the Sovereign Military Hospitaller, Order of St John of Jerusalem of Rhodes and of Malta, or “Sovereign Military Knights of Malta”. For lack of a better term this might be the visible "Illuminati", who would have first dibs on what the BIS should be doing. As the above article speculates, the Jesuits then tell them what to do. What's interesting about these orders is the amount of diplomatic immunity they have, just like the BIS. These orders are "legally" sovereign nations with all the privileges which that entails. You have one of those passports and forget about being patted down at the airport!
If this has some merit, it wouldn't be a dissimilar answer to the question "who controls MOSSAD?" It's difficult for me to say how much merit this idea has and whether or not it's a purposefully added distraction - because there does appear to be a lot of disinformation around this topic, so I'm wondering what the feedback of this forum would be.
clerck de bonk said:alkhemst said:clerck de bonk said:Forgery or not, it shows certain "people's" way of thinking.
If You compare it to the existing state of the world, how does it "taste"?
Tastes bad I'd say.
I think it tells a lot more about the authors actually.
My point is this; It doesn't matter 'who' wrote it because as a template it works (with ponerology in mind). And of course it tells a lot about the authors (and their wishful thinking). IMO it "tastes" the same as the world reek at this particular moment in time...
clerck de bonk,
I think many of us feel nauseous after "tasting" the stew of deceptions and lies that we research trying to analyze what ingredients went into the recipe. I don't know how far we need to go in this taste test before we get really sick of it. I agree that reading the Protocols tells volumes about the authors and their "wishful thinking" and ponerology. It sounds like maybe you have had enough already and don't see the point of going further. Maybe I am just projecting here, since I am also a bit weary of the wild goose chases. I think I know more how Laura feels now when she tries to wade through such a garbage pile of history.