Dorothy Minder
Padawan Learner
Shane, I think you misinterpret me. Or perhaps I wasn't clear. I'll try to clarify, and then let's check again. Please bear in mind that early in the same post that Anart quoted, I said, "Cynicism is a good place to start and a lousy place to end," just as you indicated.
Anart rightly disagreed with my use of the adjective "heartless" to describe cynics. That was careless on my part. Then I said that I was "trying to indicate that cynics are afraid to identify beyond themselves."
You seem to have interpreted that as though I said cynics "do not see beyond themselves." I agree with you that they do indeed see beyond themselves and that is often the reason for their cynicism. And again, I agree that they also, to an important extent, feel for others. As anart said, "If one feels nothing, there is no reason to be cynical." I concur, and that's why I immediately withdrew my "heartless" characterization as hasty and inaccurate.
In my own experience (I too was a cynic), there is a big difference between "seeing" beyond oneself and "identifying" beyond oneself. I tried to illustrate that distinction when I said
[quote author=Dorothy Minder]Part of what makes it so difficult to move past cynicism, however, is that seems oh so intelligent, and as miserable as cynics generally are, it feels more stable to live in critical rejection of everything than to live for something and risk failure.[/quote]
Maybe it would help to put it this way: Cynicism is an intellectual posture that is highly critical of others' motives. Many adopt this position because they see very clearly that people apparently believe and promote their own rationalizations. Many cynics are unhappy to hold this position, but because it gives them the first right of rejection, it offers a kind of stability and superiority that can be attractive, as Luke just described.
Two more important points about cynicism:
First, it is reflexive. It generally does not seek to discern, rather it seeks to condemn. Example: "He's probably only being nice to her so he can get in her pants." Well, he might be, and he might not.
Second, it is scornful. There is a value judgment. And this means that the cynic wishes that things were otherwise. And which way would that be? His way.
Now, if a cynic begins to identify beyond himself, he won't dismiss virtue so casually. He will examine it to see if it is counterfeit. He won't waste his energy wishing for another world. He use that energy to better this one, starting with himself.
Is that more clear? I seem to get myself in trouble with short posts, but at the same time, I don't want to take over the thread.
Dorothy
Anart rightly disagreed with my use of the adjective "heartless" to describe cynics. That was careless on my part. Then I said that I was "trying to indicate that cynics are afraid to identify beyond themselves."
You seem to have interpreted that as though I said cynics "do not see beyond themselves." I agree with you that they do indeed see beyond themselves and that is often the reason for their cynicism. And again, I agree that they also, to an important extent, feel for others. As anart said, "If one feels nothing, there is no reason to be cynical." I concur, and that's why I immediately withdrew my "heartless" characterization as hasty and inaccurate.
In my own experience (I too was a cynic), there is a big difference between "seeing" beyond oneself and "identifying" beyond oneself. I tried to illustrate that distinction when I said
[quote author=Dorothy Minder]Part of what makes it so difficult to move past cynicism, however, is that seems oh so intelligent, and as miserable as cynics generally are, it feels more stable to live in critical rejection of everything than to live for something and risk failure.[/quote]
Maybe it would help to put it this way: Cynicism is an intellectual posture that is highly critical of others' motives. Many adopt this position because they see very clearly that people apparently believe and promote their own rationalizations. Many cynics are unhappy to hold this position, but because it gives them the first right of rejection, it offers a kind of stability and superiority that can be attractive, as Luke just described.
Two more important points about cynicism:
First, it is reflexive. It generally does not seek to discern, rather it seeks to condemn. Example: "He's probably only being nice to her so he can get in her pants." Well, he might be, and he might not.
Second, it is scornful. There is a value judgment. And this means that the cynic wishes that things were otherwise. And which way would that be? His way.
Now, if a cynic begins to identify beyond himself, he won't dismiss virtue so casually. He will examine it to see if it is counterfeit. He won't waste his energy wishing for another world. He use that energy to better this one, starting with himself.
Is that more clear? I seem to get myself in trouble with short posts, but at the same time, I don't want to take over the thread.
Dorothy