Will Smith's altercation at the Oscars

nobody watches Oscars:-)
Indeed, the audience for the Oscar ceremony keeps on plummeting and with all the libtard movies produced by Hollywood, I think the audience figures, are overall, gonna get worse. Will Smith is not gonna change this long term trend.

In 2020, the Oscar' ceremony gathered 23 million viewers in the US, which means 93% of the American people didn't watch:

960x0.jpg
 
Couple of thoughts. People get roasted at these things all the time so it is to be expected. It was actually a rather mild joke, and to me even kind of funny and suitable to the occasion as it pulled in another movie title. If she was so (hyper)sensitive about her baldness (for whatever reason), why embrace it publicly like that by shaving her head? I think it is a great look for her, actually. Without the hair, all one sees is her lovely face. I thought, good for her!
I was pretty well bald through my middle school years (because of severe trichotillomania). It was impossible to hide. Other kids were very mean about it. I still have a good sized day-glow pink bald spot on my crown that never grew back. So I kind of get the hypersensitivity on the subject of hair loss.
That's the price of living in the public eye, all manner of attention. This was not handled with grace.
As for Will, don't men usually ask to take these sorts of discussions outside?
Again, I think it was scripted.
 
Maybe this was all a distraction. Here's something interesting that happened today

I reported on the Private Blog that I had a copy of the legislation and I was told it would be introduced today – Monday 28th. That info was correct. Well, here it is!. Reps. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Jesús Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), all Democrats, have introduced the “Electronic Currency And Secure Hardware Act” (ECASH Act) that does far more than just creating a digital currency. This Act cleverly strips the Federal Reserve of its authority to create the money
ECASH is very clever for it is actually transferring the creation of the currency from the Federal Reserve to the US Treasury or in other words the White House. The Treasury will distribute DIRECTLY to the public via a secured hardware device which will be something along the lines of like a vending machine.
Here is the catch, it will be anonymous so it will not be trackable like Blockchain cryptos. People will cheer that, but there will be that infamous Catch 22. Individuals may be restricted to having a maximum of $2,000. That means all money will need to be deposited so it is a covert way of canceling the currency. But they are not dealing with that issue just yet. The end goal here is to force all money to be above board for the purposes of taxation. So it may actually result in creating more of a barter economy.

 
I didn't know the Oscars were still a thing. Will Smith's punch/slap, whatever one calls that gesture, is pretty gentle. I prefer Zidane's headbutt. Personally, if someones publicly makes fun of my wife (I'm not married), I wouldn't be that gentle, television or no television.
It wasn't even a violent joke. And even if it was, IMO responding with physical violence first (next to other options) is responding unconsciously from lower emotional centre. Violence often appears when personality feels threatened, as is the case in this example where personality of husband feels threatened because it's identified with being protector of his wife. So it's not protection of his wife that is the real motive, but protection of his personality. And also since it's a verbal and not a physical 'assault', wife can defend herself on her own. So, going even deeper, seems to me that husband's action in this case would say: "I don't believe my wife can stand up for herself" or "I don't believe that my wife is strong to handle it."

So it's a lack of belief in the wife's capabilities and automatic lower response in order to preserve perception of one's own personality. Just the way I see it FWIW.
 
At the end my question wasn’t to proof or see if it was real or not, I don’t really care about these shows or things that happens in them, the question I had is just reflecting if I were in that situation (not necessarily on live television or as a public figure) what would be the best way to handle the issue? I don’t think I would do something like how will handled it (Pretending that wasn’t staged) but I would be furious too if it were something that deeply is affecting me or a loved one.

As for Will, don't men usually ask to take these sorts of discussions outside?

I agree I think that’s the best approach and the one that would be more considerate towards others, so you don’t make people around you feel uncomfortable and whatever has to be said don’t go to everybody’s ears.
 
Spinoff. Milk it! Milk it!

Jake Paul Offers $15 Million to Will Smith & Chris Rock Each to Face Off in the Ring

Mar. 28, 2022 (Updated: 5 hours ago)

Nov 28, 2020; Los Angeles, CA, USA;  Jake Paul celebrates his knock out against Nate Robinson during a cruiserweight boxing bout at the Staples Center. - Sputnik International, 1920, 28.03.2022

© AP Photo / Joe Scarnici

During the 94th Oscar Awards ceremony of the American Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, actor Will Smith took the stage and gave a strong slap in the face to the presenter Chris Rock for a joke about his wife, who suffers from alopecia (abnormal hair loss).

YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul reacted to Will Smith striking Chris Rock at the Oscars ceremony on Sunday, saying he was willing to arrange a fight between the Hollywood stars and pony up $30 million for it.

“Someone get me on the phone with Will Smiths boxing representative asap,” he tweeted Sunday. “I got $15m for Will Smith and $15m for Chris Rock ready to go.”

The fighter already provided a date, suggesting “August on his undercard.”

Earlier, Jake Paul offered American comedian Pete Davidson and rapper Kanye West (Ye) $30 million each to face off in the ring amid their squabbling over West’s high-profile divorce from Kim Kardashian.
 
Absolutely. Rock leans in just before Smith swings, expecting it. Smith CLEARLY misses rock, and Rock moves his head in the appropriate direction. Classic movie slap. The aftershow was just more acting. Smith's wife is obviously the "male" in that relationship. Smith is in the roll of the "emotional woman". That's why she cheated on him more than once, and he took her back.
That was my first response too - I mean common, they're professional actors, some of the best in the business, and it looked like Rock didn't feel any pain. Will Smith looked like he didn't put any power into that slap. Their verbal exchange after seemed well acted sincerity. I guess the situation does seem plausible...but.. yeah I'm going with probably staged.
 
if I were in that situation (not necessarily on live television or as a public figure) what would be the best way to handle the issue? I don’t think I would do something like how will handled it (Pretending that wasn’t staged) but I would be furious too if it were something that deeply is affecting me or a loved one.
Yep, I would be furious too.

I think most people would react mechanically and emotionally depending on their state of consciousness.

When Will went on stage to collect the Oscar, the actor could be seen visibly moved and he gave a speech full of inconsistencies and hesitation, in which it seemed that he justified himself for what had happened without making a direct allusion to the incident. In the speech he talked about his character, Richard Williams, and how he defended his family and the similarities with his own life. "Richard Williams was a staunch supporter of his family. At this point in my life I am overwhelmed by what God is asking me to do and be," he said, trying to hold back tears.

Will Smith acted according to his emotional center, when his fury passed he did not remember which of his "I's" reacted in such a way. Will Smith said apologetically:

My behavior at the Academy Awards was unacceptable and inexcusable. Jokes at my expense are part of the job, but a joke about Jada's medical condition was too much for me and I reacted emotionally,

When Chris Rock was telling the joke, Will was laughing, suddenly his laugh changed to fury, a "I" felt offended.

Ouspensky wrote "In Search of the Miraculous":
Man in himself is not one, he is not 'I,' he is 'we,' or to speak more correctly, he is 'they.' Everything arises from this. Let us suppose that a man decides according to the Gospels to turn the left cheek if somebody strikes him on the right cheek.
But one "I"decides this either in the mind or in the emotional center. One 'I' knows of it, one '1'
remembers it — the others do not. Let us imagine that it actually happens, that some-
body strikes this man. Do you think he will turn the left cheek? Never.
He will not even have time to think about it. He will either strike the face of the man who struck him, or he will begin to call a policeman, or he will simply take to flight. His moving
center will react in its customary way, or as it has been taught to react, before the man realizes what he is doing.
Prolonged instruction, prolonged training, is necessary to be able to turn the cheek. And if this training is mechanical — it is again worth nothing because in this case it means that a man will turn his cheek because he cannot do anything else.
 
So, the question in my mind would be, at what point defending yourself or your loved one from an insult/joke would get you to act this way? If somebody punches me, I would act back, but when it comes to a bad joke or comment, I'm not sure.

Hard to know what one would do without being in such a situation since much of what we do depends on context.

I have a job where being insulted is a very frequent occurrence and I've developed a thick skin such that most insults just roll off me like water off a duck's back. However, I do have a line when it comes to jokes and insults. Cross the line and I will push back in one way or another. Violence isn't my go to for most situations, but in some situations it's not off the table. As with all things, the devil is in the details.

As for the slap itself, from my experience in martial arts where I've been slapped a few times both on purpose and on accident as part of training, Wing Chun has a technique called Pak Sao or 'slapping hand' that can be used offensively or defensively, as well as my brief and limited experience with stage acting the slap looks real to me. A poorly executed one but real nonetheless.

I'll give my observations of the three main things that lead me to this conclusion.

First, Smith's body posture and movements. The way he turns with his hips into the slap. The way he comes up on his feet and leans back with his head while bringing his non-slapping hand up to protect his face. His tense and rigid posture during the slap. These are all indicators to me that Smith really hit Rock. It ticks all the same boxes of street fights I've watched where the attacker is rigid and awkward because they've not been trained on how to relax the body and plant oneself for a solid hit. The adrenaline shuts down fine motor movement so all of one's movements become more awkward. Which is why Smith stumbles a bit after the hit. Again, it looks like a shoddy slap from a trained eye but still real.

Second, Rock's reaction. His cranial velocity accelerates after impact. It's not like one sees in a stage slap where the head turns at the same speed. There's a clear increase in speed, or a whip of the head, after the hit. He's also leaned forward right up until Smith's hand is coming towards him and only then does he start to pull back as a protective reflex. But note that it's not a turning away as in a stage slap but his whole body is tensing in preparation for impact. If this was him acting it was the single best act he's ever performed in his entire career because that is exactly what people who're about to get hit do. Again, this coming from my experience both hitting and getting hit by people.

Third, black-on-black violence. These people are supposed to be woke AF. Why would Smith agree to portray himself as a violent black man which then perpetuates the stereotype that black men are violent? Why would the Academy agree to the same? It makes no sense from a woke standpoint. Surely they could've come up with a more woke friendly way to get attention if that was their plan.

Those were my main observations, but there's also this guy who is an actor and director who picked up on some of the things I didn't know how to evaluate such as the story aspect. If it was an act then there was a story being told where Smith was playing the part of the heel (as in the wrestling term) and that story doesn't make sense. Here's the video:


Edit: Forgot to mention that when I first saw the video it struck me as a manifestation of societal splintering and the mental breaking of people due to the intensity of pressure that's been building these last few years.

It's possible that in addition to that generalized pressure Smith feels a type of cuckolded rage at his wife sleeping with other men even if he says he's okay with it. If he saw his wife's look after the joke or she gave him a look that was similar and he felt that cuckolded rage, that would certainly explain his over-reaction.

He's also since come out and apologized for the slap. One could read that cynically as further legitimizing an event that was fake, but it's also possible that he's actually apologizing for something he really did. Hard to know for certain but it would be what one would expect in the case that it was real.
 
Last edited:
The slap could be real but the incident staged. It did look a little bit like a movie slap though.

Smith seemed genuinely angry but he is also an academy-award winning actor.
 
This is from Will Smith's memoir:

"When I was nine years old, I watched my father punch my mother in the side of the head so hard that she collapsed. I saw her spit blood. That moment in that bedroom, probably more than any other moment in my life, has defined who I am."

"Within everything that I have done since then — the awards and accolades, the spotlights and attention, the characters and the laughs — there has been a subtle string of apologies to my mother for my inaction that day. For failing her in the moment. For failing to stand up to my father. For being a coward." -Steve Kioko


Just in time when I have thought about it too. This is a post I stumbled in FB from that book. It might be that what caused his action was his trauma and this was his way of "trying to defend/help" someone he loves. Triggers can cause diff emotions or overreaction. Traumas can be addressed in diff ways yet he just chose this manner. 🌷
 
Anthony Brian Logan (YT channel) as done a video about the event (link)

He think it was not fake. Goes into why for years they try to make black people looks good, not fight each other all the time like the stereotype goes and how Will Smith action in this event ruins all that. Says Will Smith is acting on accumulate anger from the action of her wife. So releasing is anger on Chris Rock when he should talke to his wife.

Makes sense to me.
 
The Oscars are Hollywood, the Satanists. Propaganda and distraction. This situation with Willy Smith is so pathetic. It's fake. The victim, his wife, is part of the show. Improvised or not, we are talking about a show (the Oscars) that is totally out of reality, that is fake, that is pathetic and that now shows a decadence, it's a mirror of the USA.

On TV everything is under control, everything is planned, everything is done in advance. It's cardboard. The script is studied, analyzed and put in place. There are no surprises and even the tears in the eyes, if there are any, are crocodile tears, are fake. Everyone at the Oscars is playing a role, they are actors. It's a paper circus. It is distraction from what is really happening, the apocalyptic economic crisis and the war.

I think so.
 
I think Joe is right in saying that it basically focuses everyone's attention again to the increasingly ignored clique of "famous actors". I agree that it was 100% acted.

There's even a guy now who claims he wrote the whole thing -> Comic claims he wrote Will Smith and Chris Rock smack and is 'proud' of response

And look at us still talking about it!

Let me ask you this: Do you remember when Will Smith was funny? For me, it was when I was young and watched Prince of Bell Air, and I remember him being funny in Men in Black. Both are decades ago. Remember when Chris Rock was funny? Well, me neither. Still, here we are... trying to psychoanalyze actors that may or may not have been acting their speeches. It works like a charm.

To me it looks like a desperate play for attention. That's what these people crave after all.
 
This episode coincides with Biden's various intemperate remarks in Poland and the so called "Walk Back(s)".
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom