The fact that there is a relatively good dilemma, a story, "act or not to act? how to react?", could be indicative that this was staged. Otherwise, without it, the stunt would land flat in the eyes of the audience and appear unbelievable.
All other secondary narratives, like the "prime-time TV violence", "male violence", "Oscars ratings" and whatever we can come up with, have been relegated or obscured in favor of the first one. But again, who benefits?
All other secondary narratives, like the "prime-time TV violence", "male violence", "Oscars ratings" and whatever we can come up with, have been relegated or obscured in favor of the first one. But again, who benefits?