K
Kieran
Guest
Laura,
Thank you for putting together the various Cassiopaea/911 transcripts.
Very interesting.
I have copied and re-formatted it in Word and printed it out (25 pages) for ease of reading. I want to think over the information given and maybe post back with some more queries.
One thing that did interest me immediately, however, … because it is something I have bounced up against before … was the reference to the Navy. I immediately recalled a number of things I have come across about ONI – the ‘Office of Naval Intelligence.’
I’m afraid I haven’t kept any of the info links of the things that came to my earlier attention and made me ponder the role of ONI, so I will just comment from memory.
First of all, here is the reference to the Navy (ONI) in the transcripts posted:
If you mention to someone in conversation CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, KGB, most people will recognise instantly the intelligence services you are referring to, will know what countries they (at least ostensibly!) belong to, and the sort of things they get up to.
But on the few occasions I have mentioned ‘ONI’ or ‘Office of Naval Intelligence’ to people they have looked at me blankly and I have needed to give a quick explanation.
Anyway, as I said above, I have not kept links and references, so the following is what I have picked up about ONI along the way. They should perhaps more be considered as points for further research by anyone interested.
1. ONI is the oldest US intelligence service.
2. It is believed to have an incredibly large data base of information of all manner of things, events and people the world over – the navy travels to distant lands remember! – and not just the USA. Its records and info go back for hundreds of years. It is second to none of the other US intelligence services, nor probably the other ‘alphabet’ intelligence organisations worldwide either.
3. Allen Dulles and J Edgar Hoover were apparently ‘very wary’ (even afraid?) of ‘crossing swords’ with ONI.
4. ONI is reputed to hold intimate and detailed data on everyone in positions of power and government, and also their family ‘skeletons in the closet’ going back for hundreds of years. Hence the wariness mentioned in 3 above.
5. ONI is a very WASP-style organisation. Fiercely patriotic it has not opened its inner intelligence ranks to foreigners, ‘neo-cons’ or Zionists, and maintains it’s distance from the influences of such as MOSSAD. This reputedly is a sore point with MOSSAD who are generally considered to have infiltrated – and even control in some cases – all the other major intelligence networks in the world.
6. I did read somewhere that the section of the Pentagon that was being renovated contained planned new offices of ONI, and that some very high-tech computer equipment had already been installed by them. So the hit where it came in the Pentagon may also have been a ‘veiled warning’ to the ONI hierarchy. If so, it was probably a very foolish thing to have done.
7. ONI may yet prove to be ‘the joker in the pack’. It seems to operate with a mind of its own.
As I said, the above are memories of information I came across over the years since 911. As I was focussing on 911, and many other possible ‘cataclysmic world events’ to come, I noted the occasional references I stumbled over about ONI as interesting asides. I have not tried to research it in a coherent, data-gathering fashion.
However, it was interesting to me to find the Cs remarks quoted above about the Navy.
_http://www.nmic.navy.mil/
Predictably the website does not really give much away at all!
And note the patriotic ‘Wasp’ flavour I referred to above. No beaming, smiling, groups of happy multi-cultural faces from every race, nationality, creed and colour here!
They are an interesting phenomenon.
Kieran
Thank you for putting together the various Cassiopaea/911 transcripts.
Very interesting.
I have copied and re-formatted it in Word and printed it out (25 pages) for ease of reading. I want to think over the information given and maybe post back with some more queries.
One thing that did interest me immediately, however, … because it is something I have bounced up against before … was the reference to the Navy. I immediately recalled a number of things I have come across about ONI – the ‘Office of Naval Intelligence.’
I’m afraid I haven’t kept any of the info links of the things that came to my earlier attention and made me ponder the role of ONI, so I will just comment from memory.
First of all, here is the reference to the Navy (ONI) in the transcripts posted:
I am always impressed at how unknown (outside the US at least) ONI – the US Naval Intelligence Service – is.
If you mention to someone in conversation CIA, FBI, MI5, MI6, MOSSAD, KGB, most people will recognise instantly the intelligence services you are referring to, will know what countries they (at least ostensibly!) belong to, and the sort of things they get up to.
But on the few occasions I have mentioned ‘ONI’ or ‘Office of Naval Intelligence’ to people they have looked at me blankly and I have needed to give a quick explanation.
Anyway, as I said above, I have not kept links and references, so the following is what I have picked up about ONI along the way. They should perhaps more be considered as points for further research by anyone interested.
1. ONI is the oldest US intelligence service.
2. It is believed to have an incredibly large data base of information of all manner of things, events and people the world over – the navy travels to distant lands remember! – and not just the USA. Its records and info go back for hundreds of years. It is second to none of the other US intelligence services, nor probably the other ‘alphabet’ intelligence organisations worldwide either.
3. Allen Dulles and J Edgar Hoover were apparently ‘very wary’ (even afraid?) of ‘crossing swords’ with ONI.
4. ONI is reputed to hold intimate and detailed data on everyone in positions of power and government, and also their family ‘skeletons in the closet’ going back for hundreds of years. Hence the wariness mentioned in 3 above.
5. ONI is a very WASP-style organisation. Fiercely patriotic it has not opened its inner intelligence ranks to foreigners, ‘neo-cons’ or Zionists, and maintains it’s distance from the influences of such as MOSSAD. This reputedly is a sore point with MOSSAD who are generally considered to have infiltrated – and even control in some cases – all the other major intelligence networks in the world.
6. I did read somewhere that the section of the Pentagon that was being renovated contained planned new offices of ONI, and that some very high-tech computer equipment had already been installed by them. So the hit where it came in the Pentagon may also have been a ‘veiled warning’ to the ONI hierarchy. If so, it was probably a very foolish thing to have done.
7. ONI may yet prove to be ‘the joker in the pack’. It seems to operate with a mind of its own.
As I said, the above are memories of information I came across over the years since 911. As I was focussing on 911, and many other possible ‘cataclysmic world events’ to come, I noted the occasional references I stumbled over about ONI as interesting asides. I have not tried to research it in a coherent, data-gathering fashion.
However, it was interesting to me to find the Cs remarks quoted above about the Navy.
And I have always been impressed as to how ‘unknown’ they remain to the general public. At least, as I say, outside the USA. Even though they do have their own website!
_http://www.nmic.navy.mil/
Predictably the website does not really give much away at all!
And note the patriotic ‘Wasp’ flavour I referred to above. No beaming, smiling, groups of happy multi-cultural faces from every race, nationality, creed and colour here!
They are an interesting phenomenon.
Kieran
