'Died Suddenly' earned itself an official debunking from the British Ministry of Truth itself. So, I am planning to watch it.


It landed on niche video-sharing platform Rumble on Monday and began to spread. By Wednesday morning it had been viewed more than 4 million times on Rumble and at least 1.5 million times on Twitter.
The claims made in the video quickly fall apart under scrutiny. Vast amounts of evidence from different independent scientists all over the world, as well as the experiences of billions of people, have shown that serious Covid vaccine side effects are rare.
 
All in all, I think things are broken and can't be fixed. We're in the end game now!
I often get the opposite impression too, though. As if the control system is often baffled by humanity's resilience that they have to keep throwing them breaking factors to see if they finally break once and for all.

In a EU country there's shortage of paracetamol, ibuprofen, amoxicillin, inhaled cortisone medications... Really basic stuff, you don't hear that happening in countries like Africa or South America. It makes you wonder why now. Of course, they blame the lockdown and lower production. In the time being, the syncytial respiratory virus is affecting practically all children, while mainstream media remains for the most part silent.

There's definitely flu like there hasn't been in the last couple of winters, people having shivers, body aches and fever up to a 40 C and the darn COVID test is always negative.

A smorgasbord of viruses out there right now, and people can't even have a proper heating system at their jobs or homes. And yet, people just keep going, despite everything being thrown at them.
 
'Died Suddenly' earned itself an official debunking from the British Ministry of Truth itself. So, I am planning to watch it.

Not everyone in the "health freedom" community (or whatever they're calling it) is happy with the film. See this criticism for example:


Sounds like it's at its best when covering the mortician data, and interviewing some of the big names, but mixes in a bunch of bad data.
 
I often get the opposite impression too, though. As if the control system is often baffled by humanity's resilience that they have to keep throwing them breaking factors to see if they finally break once and for all.

In a EU country there's shortage of paracetamol, ibuprofen, amoxicillin, inhaled cortisone medications... Really basic stuff, you don't hear that happening in countries like Africa or South America. It makes you wonder why now. Of course, they blame the lockdown and lower production. In the time being, the syncytial respiratory virus is affecting practically all children, while mainstream media remains for the most part silent.

There's definitely flu like there hasn't been in the last couple of winters, people having shivers, body aches and fever up to a 40 C and the darn COVID test is always negative.

A smorgasbord of viruses out there right now, and people can't even have a proper heating system at their jobs or homes. And yet, people just keep going, despite everything being thrown at them.
I am in Spain and I am quite surprised. People are still wearing masks in public transport 😐

In any case, I get the impression that health is declining and I am not sure how long the resilience can last!
 
Signs of rebellion in China lead government to declare new lock down.

A: The virus did not appear first in China. There were experiments at Fort Detrick regarding the creation of a vaccine that would make humans more controllable. This vaccine had unexpected effects and in some cases did the opposite of what was intended. The strain escaped into a population and further mutated. Indeed it was carried to China by US soldiers. China soon knew the type and origin and launched a massive campaign to control the situation. This was seen by Western powers as a good model to follow with additional add-on factors. In the meantime further mutations have occurred, some engineered via STO forces by virtue of the virus taking hold in certain persons whose spiritual force was able to direct the progression. At this point, there are two major strains. The elite need to stop the spread of that which they "created".

(L) Probably they were taken into a meeting and told that this virus got out and it's going do things that are going to cause you lots of problems if you don't do things now.

(Joe) Were they told that?

(L) Is that what they were told?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) They were not told it was deadly. They were told it would cause social chaos. To keep their positions, they implemented total lock down.

(L) Yeah.

A: Yes


 
Signs of rebellion in China lead government to declare new lock down.

A tweeter who appears to have more knowledge on the situation in China provides insight into these 'rebellion' images that are doing the rounds. In short, he says: ''the protest is not about pandemic control policies, though it's one of the contributing factors The main problem here, is Foxconn is accused of changing their temporary employment contracts, and not honoring their advertised pay'

There's more details in the users thread.


Added: more footage


In other news, not sure if this has been posted already, but a supposedly scientific paper published in BioMedicine in August 2022 claims that all these heart issues and sudden deaths and what not, is actually because of anti-vaxxers 'fear-mongering' that causes the vaccine recipient stress, as well as a placebo effect, resulting in the plethora of side effects reported, including death!

The paper can be found here, excerpt to follow and in the Tweet below:


In the era of Covid 19 and mass vaccination programs, the anti-vaccination movement across the world is currently at an all-time high. Much of this anti-vaccination sentiment could be attributed to the alleged side effects that are perpetuated across social media from anti-vaccination groups. Fear mongering and misinformation being peddled by people with no scientific training to terrorise people into staying unvaccinated is not just causing people to remain susceptible to viral outbreaks, but could also be causing more side effects seen in the vaccination process. This brief review will offer data that may demonstrate that misinformation perpetuated by the anti-vaccination movement may be causing more deaths and side effects from any vaccine. A mini review of published literature has been conducted and found that mental stress clearly causes vasoconstriction and arterial constriction of the blood vessels. Therefore, if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine. This biological mechanism (the constriction of veins, arteries and vessels under mental stress) is the most likely cause for where there has been blood clots, strokes, heart attacks, dizziness, fainting, blurred vision, loss of smell and taste that may have been experienced shortly after vaccine administration. The extreme mental stress of the patient could most likely be attributed to the fear mongering and scare tactics used by various anti-vaccination groups. This paper does not aim to rule in or out every side effect seen, but it is highly likely that many apparent side effects seen shortly after a subject has received a vaccine could be the result of restricted or congested blood flow from blood vessel or arterial constriction caused by emotional distress or placebo based on fear around vaccines.

 
Last edited:
A tweeter who appears to have more knowledge on the situation in China provides insight into these 'rebellion' images that are doing the rounds. In short, he says: ''the protest is not about pandemic control policies, though it's one of the contributing factors The main problem here, is Foxconn is accused of changing their temporary employment contracts, and not honoring their advertised pay'
Yep it is not about Covid but the chinese government uses repression as a way to quell protests at Foxconn's iPhone manufacturing plant and the pretext is the zero covid policy.

 
Not everyone in the "health freedom" community (or whatever they're calling it) is happy with the film. See this criticism for example:


Sounds like it's at its best when covering the mortician data, and interviewing some of the big names, but mixes in a bunch of bad data.

Watched it, and basically agree with the article. It's useful maybe as an inspiration for more research and compilation of information sources. The presentation style would probably put off anybody who wasn't basically already inclined to distrust the narrative. I wouldn't recommend this video to anybody on the fence at all, as it says in the article.
 
Watched it, and basically agree with the article. It's useful maybe as an inspiration for more research and compilation of information sources. The presentation style would probably put off anybody who wasn't basically already inclined to distrust the narrative. I wouldn't recommend this video to anybody on the fence at all, as it says in the article.
They probably have Stew Peters compromised, as he does have criminal convictions for theft and disorderly conduct, and are using him to play the role of the typical conspiracy theorist nutjob spreading false information with the truth in order to turn people off from the truth.
 
Not everyone in the "health freedom" community (or whatever they're calling it) is happy with the film. See this criticism for example:


Sounds like it's at its best when covering the mortician data, and interviewing some of the big names, but mixes in a bunch of bad data.
I agree with this article on SOTT. I had similar feelings while watching it. The clips and images of bigfoot, moon landing etc. in the intro were a completely unnecessary distraction, and I think there's a big chance that those were put there intentionally to 'tar the baby'. The question is, which of the producers wanted those thrown in there. Was it Peters or some of the other ones?

Peters' track record is poor and I have no trust in this guy. He might be controlled opposition but my take is that he's more like one of those guys who acts before he thinks, 'running' with things without checking, 'thinking' with his emotions believing that he's doing a great service to humanity, and also enjoying the attention and fame. Basically, an ignorant individual who's probalby being played by smarter shenaningans.

Having said that, I agree that those close-ups of pulling those yucky things out of the arteries were shocking and 'effective'.

All in all, this documentary is a mixed bag in which various players have probably inserted their own little manipulations.
 
This is quite cool. He's shocked and apologises for having been naive and having trusted top scientists. I like how honest he is. He's got quite a following and as you probably know he's been speaking about covid from the start (and I always found his trust in manipulated journals to be naive). But it's cool to see his honesty.
 
I agree with this article on SOTT. I had similar feelings while watching it. The clips and images of bigfoot, moon landing etc. in the intro were a completely unnecessary distraction, and I think there's a big chance that those were put there intentionally to 'tar the baby'. The question is, which of the producers wanted those thrown in there. Was it Peters or some of the other ones?

Peters' track record is poor and I have no trust in this guy. He might be controlled opposition but my take is that he's more like one of those guys who acts before he thinks, 'running' with things without checking, 'thinking' with his emotions believing that he's doing a great service to humanity, and also enjoying the attention and fame. Basically, an ignorant individual who's probalby being played by smarter shenaningans.

Having said that, I agree that those close-ups of pulling those yucky things out of the arteries were shocking and 'effective'.

All in all, this documentary is a mixed bag in which various players have probably inserted their own little manipulations.
Robert Malone chimed in with basically the same take:

At the moment, there is a very active discussion regarding the increasingly viral video “Died Suddenly”. Other commentators (for example “The Daily Skeptic” and Josh Guetzkow) have appropriately noted that the (generally well funded and produced) video includes segments which are misleading at best, falsely imply one or more cause-effect relationship between a sudden death event and vaccine administration, or otherwise employ cinematic license to stoke outrage. I have previously written regarding the business model of Stoking Rage for the up and coming podcaster, and in my opinion this strategy is fundamentally the same as the “fearporn” business model of corporate media - and in particular CNN.

For what its worth, I hold “our side” to higher standards than I have come to expect from corporate (broadcast and published) media. I reject the assertion that, on the battlefield of the current 21st century unrestricted media and information war which we are immersed in, it is acceptable to employ the tactics of our opponents. I have heard others in the medical resistance community advocate the schoolyard “logic” of “they are doing it to us, and so we have to do it to them”. I firmly reject this. Any “win” on the information war battlefield which is based on this type of rationale will be transitory and self defeating. It is not a win if we become one with the ethics of our opponents.

This is not just an information war, it is a battle over what is right and good versus what is fundamentally evil. Our opponents clearly believe that the ends justify the means, and that ethics - right and wrong- are completely situational and subject to the same logic widely accepted by the “Virtuals” caste; that there is no objective truth or reality, and reality and ethics are whatever one believes it to be. The ultimate derivative of the logic of “cultural relativity”. The logic from which springs the transsexual movement denialism of the genetic/biologic basis of gender.

As I have said so many times, in so many lectures, our opponents in this information war, this war on truth and integrity, have no ethical guardrails. Ethics are entirely situational in their world. [cont'd]
 
Back
Top Bottom