Imminent Alien Disclosure?

[Puma]

US could stage some major hits on Russia / take down some of their jets or attack parts of Russia, and say:

the ALIENS did it!!! You can't strike back at us, it was the 'Aliens!!'

That would also add another level of profound stress, hysteria and 'energetic food' to the 'menu' smorgasbord.

But we must not forget Russia's satellite and technological capabilities, such an event would undoubtedly be immediately discredited.

 

[Wandering Star]

I remember perfectly when the whole coronavirus issue began in China and the thread that talks about it was opened here.

The people here took relatively little time to arrive at the truth and when the "closures" began in the countries, all of us already had knowledge of the most important general features of the matter, including vaccines.

Even a protocol to protect yourself.

I have the strong feeling that here we are going again and that already in the first preparations you are/we are trying to see the truth.

The issue is still confusing, but I think that if you have to fight against some elusive interdimensional beings, who appear and disappear, create destruction and you don't know where they are, that would be great for the "terrestrial powers" to take people where they want

If it looks like the setting of the stage is underway.

 

[Wandering Star]

In case it wasn't clear from my previous post, I believe that the "interdimensionals" and the deep state are going to collaborate to create this great farce.

The largest and largest of all false flag attacks.

 

[Liliea]

The issue is still confusing, but I think that if you have to fight against some elusive interdimensional beings, who appear and disappear, create destruction and you don't know where they are, that would be great for the "terrestrial powers" to take people where they want

I agree that it would be once again like their war on drugs, terror, cold war all to disguise heavenly intentions, or what Werner von Braun said to his secretary about the last big lie which was (or is) a war against aliens.... All great farce but with real dead.
Frank Zappa said years ago what covered it best:

“The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it’s profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, they will pull back the curtains, they will move the tables and chairs out of the way and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater.”

 

[Approaching Infinity]

Something I find interesting about the social media/alt media reaction to this UFO stuff: On the one hand you have guys like Tucker who apparently have a genuine interest in the topic, taking the latest revelations for what they're worth, i.e., basically true, as far as they go. On the other hand, except for #UFOTwitter, which is mostly UFO believers, the alt media seem to be reacting with such extreme skepticism as to think it is ALL a hoax. Case in point, Kit Knightly (my comments and nitpicking in [brackets]):

Wait…are they REALLY going to do a UFO psy-op?

Late last week it was widely reported that the United States government had recovered an intact alien spacecraft from a crash site. The supposed revelation comes from one David Grusch, a “for…

off-guardian.org

Wait…are they REALLY going to do a UFO psy-op?Everyone from whistleblowers to the White House is suddenly talking about aliens…but why?​

Late last week it was widely reported that the United States government had recovered an intact alien spacecraft from a crash site. [Correction: multiple spacecraft, not necessarily alien, but apparently non-human.]

The supposed revelation comes from one David Grusch, a “former” military intelligence agent, who turned “whistleblower” and told the press that this supposed craft “distorted time and space”, was “bigger on the inside than the outside” and made some rescue workers ill. [Correction: this is a totally different guy. Get your facts straight.]

Just today, he added more to the story, claiming the Vatican has known about this since WWII, and they helped Mussolini retrieve a downed UFO. [Correction: technically, he didn't "add" anything to the story. It was part of his interview with Coutlhart which aired days before. Zero for three, Kit!]

Now, assuming none of this is true, it’s not an especially noteworthy incident in and of itself. After all fringe figures coming forward claiming to be “whistleblowers” does happen, and they often tell ludicrous stories with no supporting evidence.

These can occur organically or be staged by agencies of the state, and either way the press is always happy to give them air because a) they are distracting and b) they discredit real “conspiracy theories” by association.

But that’s not what appears to be going on here.

For starters, Grusch wasn’t just given space in the media, he was given at least a small amount of credence by them. They allowed him to talk without mockery or even much questioning. [He wasn't given that much space in the media. No NYT, WSJ, USA Today, WaPo, Politico. No MSNBC or CNN. The Debrief is a pro-UFO publication, NewsNation is a new network trying to be competitive, Tucker is just on Twitter, and most of the other outlets that picked it up either just summarized NewsNation (e.g. HuffPost, NYPost) or were negative (e.g. National Review). Ever since Kean and Blumenthal's piece, media have been slightly more willing to place UFO stories without X-Files music, and some networks and outlets have always covered the topic, like the station Knapp works for.]

I mean let’s compare and contrast the coverage of a man claiming a literal TARDIS exists to the coverage of doctors claiming covid vaccines are dangerous or masks don’t work. [Yes, it's called the Daily Mail.]

Corporate “fact-checkers” seemed to have missed a gimme here, don’t they?

More than that, the UFO psy-op didn’t even start with Grusch. The Biden administration was actively feeding the UFO story for months before he came forward. [Correct, but what does he mean by psy-op, exactly?]

In June 2021 the US intelligence community released a report claiming it knew about unknown flying objects in US airspace.

In January of this year the Pentagon released files claiming they knew about 247 “unidentified aerial phenomena” in US airspace in 2021 alone.

Then in February Biden announced a new taskforce to study these UFOs.

What’s noteworthy here is the way the press have picked up the UFO ball and really run with it. It’s everywhere and, again, not in the “ha, idiots believe in aliens” way. They are actually taking it seriously, or at least pretending to. And, again, this attitude pre-dates the “whistleblower”. [Again, good observation.]

In February, the Guardian ran an opinion piece from the head of the British UFO Research Association, headlined “Most UFOs – like the Chinese spy balloon – can be explained away. But what about the other 2%? [He missed what I consider the most interesting, which was the media presentation of the shot-down balloons as UFOs, complete with weird (but false) descriptions. That seemed very deliberate.]

Then, in April, Live Science asked simply, “Are Aliens Real?”.

Later that month it was revealed that six different “UFO whistlblowers” had already spoken to members of congress (presumably Grosch was one of these six, the other 5 remain unnamed).

In May, the journal Popular Mechanics – inveterate, if not shameless, 9/11 truth “debunkers” – published a piece headlined “6 Solid Reasons to Actually Believe in Aliens”. Later that month, NASA’s UFO taskforce released its findings publicly.

Then – would you believe it – the day after Grusch first published his claims, there was a “UFO crash” in Las Vegas Nevada which made international headlines. [Sorry to say, but this was a coincidence. The "crash" happened more than a month before, this was just when Knapp's team aired the finished segment.]

And the day after that The Hill reported that inside sources claimed “that UFO information was inappropriately withheld from Congress” [The only interesting thing here is that the Hill covered the story (which they've been doing in broadcast too - one of their anchors seems very interested in the topic), essentially summarizing the Debrief and Shellenberger pieces - and that the author is a defense analyst.]

Today the Independent endeavors to answer the question that should be on everyone’s lips, “Why everyone is talking about UFO sightings, even though there is still no hard evidence”, while Fox News is hosting interviews with Navy pilots discussing “credible claims” of UFO sightings and calling them a “daily occurence.”

Even voices from the alternative right/conservative sphere, people who you would expect to be somewhat skeptical, have climbed on this bandwagon. [I.e. Matt Walsh and Tucker Carlson.]

The refrain is that these headlines reflect the US “admitting” something they previously denied [Correct, this is wrong, and the government hasn't in fact admitted anything], or that this is leaking out against the wishes of the government (or the globalists who control said government). [This is still an open question. We don't know what percent of all the 'leaks' is or isn't against their wishes.]

This is nonsense. Governments don’t “admit” anything – even undeniable physical realities like buildings falling at terminal velocity. What governments do is use the language of “admission” to seed narratives. [One of the most annoying things about alt media is this type of categorical nonsense. Yes, governments don't "admit" anything, but it's delusional to think that they expertly plan everything, and everything comes out exactly as they planned. I don't think the Church Committee, United States House Select Committee on Assassinations, or the Iran-Contra revelations, for example, were completely stage-managed affairs. That's not to say they revealed "everything", of course.]

Never has this been more obvious than right now. [Kit is a bit of an egotist.]

Consider that Grusch has already been allowed to testify in front of the house of representatives. A privilege never afforded to any serious Covid skeptic or 9/11 truther.

Consider also that Mr Grusch’s former lawyer was Charles McCullough, the first ever Senate-appointed inspector general of the US intelligence services from 2010-2017.

He’s being given the biggest platform in the country, while represented by “former” intelligence officials. [Yes, these are good points.]

Is that how you treat a whistleblower who is embarrassing you or endangering secret plans?

No, it’s how you treat an asset who is part of a story you want the public to hear.

Clearly, this is a narrative roll-out. [Possibly, even probably. But George Knapp, for one, would beg to differ that it is so simple.]

The real question is: Why?

And, honestly, I have absolutely no idea. A distraction maybe, but it’s a weird card to play when we already have “climate change” and a “special military operation” on-going, not to mention residual old pandemics and incipient new ones.

No, the distraction argument doesn’t really hold water, but neither do the standard explanations of money or power. What legislation can UFOs force through? Who could seriously try and levy an alien defense tax? [Good points, IMO.]

It’s possible Grusch is a “suicide bomber” of the type we are all familiar with, who will ultimately self-destruct and be shown to be a charlatan, along with “revelations” that he’s a covid skeptic, climate denier, 9/11 truther or other “conspiracy theorist” – thus making truth movements look foolish, and humiliating anyone who endorsed or believed him.

But even that’s a stretch right now, given the sheer amount of mainstream endorsement he’s got already.

There’s only one other angle I could possibly think of, but it’s pretty out there.

In the Alan Moore graphic novel Watchmen – spoiler warning, I guess – the villain’s master plan is to end the Cold War and save humanity by staging an attack on earth by a pan-dimensional alien life form. His theory is that proving aliens exist and mean us harm will unite the world against a common threat and prevent the US and USSR nuking us all into oblivion.

… given the current level of globalist insanity can we totally rule out that some WEF focus group has wargamed that idea and decided it might work?

…would it actually work?

Who knows, the world stopped making sense a long time ago.

Do alien life forms exist? Have they been coming here and crashing their spaceships for the past 70 years or more?

I don’t know, but I’m fairly doubtful. [Kit hasn't been paying attention.]

But I do know that – true or not – it would never be in the news if it wasn’t serving a purpose. [Typically all news serves a purpose, no?] And I know that basing any of your opinions or beliefs around what the US government – or any government – tells you is both irrational and historically illiterate.

Governments all over the world might suddenly claim that aliens are real…but they all claimed the pandemic was real, too.

How far will they take this story? I don’t know, but I will leave you with this:

Early this month SETI staged an exercise where they mimicked an alien transmission to Earth from Mars. Highly noteworthy, given the historical power of exercises to predict the future.

The supreme irony in all of this is that from now on we so-called “conspiracy theorists” are going to be trying to convince our normie friends that aliens don’t exist.

I'll repeat that last line: "The supreme irony in all of this is that from now on we so-called “conspiracy theorists” are going to be trying to convince our normie friends that aliens don’t exist." This is Pravda syndrome, which I define as: the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't. That may be fine as a general rule of thumb, but it can turn you into an idiot. If anything, this would be one interesting consequence of the "psy-op" - convince the dissidents that "aliens" don't exist, there are no recovered craft, etc., simply by seeding media with claims to the contrary.

 

[SlipNet]

I'll repeat that last line: "The supreme irony in all of this is that from now on we so-called “conspiracy theorists” are going to be trying to convince our normie friends that aliens don’t exist." This is Pravda syndrome, which I define as: the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't. That may be fine as a general rule of thumb, but it can turn you into an idiot. If anything, this would be one interesting consequence of the "psy-op" - convince the dissidents that "aliens" don't exist, there are no recovered craft, etc., simply by seeding media with claims to the contrary.

In my social circle I'm considered as "the alien bloke". I have been the butt of merciless jokes. I'm just glad that I don't socialise so much these days, and won't have to negotiate these looming tedious conversations with normies and boomers. To be honest, I won't be listening too much to this disclosure narrative till it begins to address the concept of bleed-through. Didn't the C's predict that we'd be getting more strange events in relation to this, the thinning of the veil? So many aspects to this phenomenon, but we don't know how much the 3d STS elite know, that's the problem at the mo. The next C's session promises to be essential reading!

 

[Alejo]

I'll repeat that last line: "The supreme irony in all of this is that from now on we so-called “conspiracy theorists” are going to be trying to convince our normie friends that aliens don’t exist." This is Pravda syndrome, which I define as: the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't. That may be fine as a general rule of thumb, but it can turn you into an idiot. If anything, this would be one interesting consequence of the "psy-op" - convince the dissidents that "aliens" don't exist, there are no recovered craft, etc., simply by seeding media with claims to the contrary.

Very good observations!

And I might be too cynical at this point, but as I kept reading your comments on the article, I kept getting the vibe of "oh boy, here's the next 'vaccine' debate over which people will be at each other's throat's on twitter".

Which, doing some futurism, in the event of a potential disclosure, given all the steps that have been taken to establish an "official" truth, and how anything that contradicts it may be censored online, I do wonder if in the future, the Post disclosure future, the same would be true and our tweets and videos about the topic would be removed for not following the World UFO Association (or something) or get a banner with "context from Wikipedia", I mean even Brazilian elections would get those banners and most any other topic now does as well.. so it would stand to logic that an official line on the topic would be established and anyone else would be silenced.

No need for aliens and UFOs, just establish an official line, shift the paradigm and control the conversation, et voila!

 

[Joe]

I'll repeat that last line: "The supreme irony in all of this is that from now on we so-called “conspiracy theorists” are going to be trying to convince our normie friends that aliens don’t exist." This is Pravda syndrome, which I define as: the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't. That may be fine as a general rule of thumb, but it can turn you into an idiot. If anything, this would be one interesting consequence of the "psy-op" - convince the dissidents that "aliens" don't exist, there are no recovered craft, etc., simply by seeding media with claims to the contrary.

It depends on how you apply the maxim "the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't". A more nuanced, and IMO much more useful, application of that maxim is "authorities are always lying and/or spreading half truths and manipulating". That would serve people much better in the scenario of any official claim that "aliens exist".

 

[Joe]

One more from the archives, 1967.

 

[mkrnhr]

I had a funny discussion last evening with a "normie" who was chocked to see the news talking about UFOs and a normalization of relations between the US and China, as if he had awoken to a parallel universe. What was remarkable was that the question was about whether UFOs exist or do not exist. That's a very reductionist question to someone who knew UFOs only science fiction stuff that some uneducated lunatics believe in. For those who know these phenomena exist, such a question is inconsequential. However, given that UFOs exist, the question of what percentage of the military revelations is true is still relevant because often the devil is in the details. Framing the issue as "conspiracy theorist de not believe Aliens exist" is another oversimplification, in addition to the use of the "conspiracy theorist" label in itself. It's like saying that all those do not believe the official COVID narrative believe viruses do not exist. If the military say that Aliens exist, that's true and it's fine to some level. But if 5% or even 1% of the explanation they give are false, that may have consequences (or not) on politics, economics, on society, etc.. Disbelieving the government doesn't necessarily mean beliving the opposite, but it means exercizing caution to detect eventual traps. If TV says it's going to snow tomorrow, I'll not assume it's going to be sunny and go out in shorts and t-shirt. It requires a more nuanced discussion and all we see in the media, including non official media (as was the case on COVID, China, Russia, etc.) is a very black-and-white positionning, which is a trap in itself. OSIT

 

[Natus Videre]

Earth changes are going to disclose aliens, whether TPTB like it or not!
Imagine the look on people's faces when a gigantic saucer gets revealed by a tornado!

"Sweetie, 'wardrobe malfunction' applies to aliens too." —Mother Earth

 

[Approaching Infinity]

It depends on how you apply the maxim "the authorities said it's true, therefore it isn't". A more nuanced, and IMO much more useful, application of that maxim is "authorities are always lying and/or spreading half truths and manipulating". That would serve people much better in the scenario of any official claim that "aliens exist".

That's much better. I'd add a couple questions in there like, "Under what circumstances is a person in a position of authority more likely to be telling the truth?" and "On the scale of lowly functionary to global puppet master, where on the 'authority spectrum' does the source fall?" Also, the manipulation can be as simple as saying something true that a political rival or opponent wouldn't like said, so there's also a scale of how deep or complex the manipulation is.

 

[Alejo]

That's much better. I'd add a couple questions in there like, "Under what circumstances is what a person in a position of authority more likely to be telling the truth?" and "On the scale of lowly functionary to global puppet master, where on the 'authority spectrum' does the source fall?" Also, the manipulation can be as simple as saying something true that a political rival or opponent wouldn't like said, so there's also a scale of how deep or complex the manipulation is.

True, and sometimes the manipulation can be saying something true, that you know people will assume is a lie.

 

[Alejo]

Not sure if this was posted here previously or not, but a coworker mentioned this to me today and I figured it would be worth putting here for the record.

Multiple Witnesses Claim They Saw Fighter Jets Engage With A UFO Over Michigan​

Several witnesses reported seeing a pair of F-16 fighter jets engaged in a “dogfight” with a UFO last week over Bad Axe, Michigan.

Following their UFO sighting, they reported what they had seen to the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC).

“Quiet afternoon no signs of planes it’s, 10 am, in the parking lot of the storage unit across from [Meijer’s grocery store]. Myself, my wife and 2 Co workers were helping move my camper! Suddenly ear shattering afterburner on 2 what I think were F-16 or F-22 were flying together whilst dogfighting something I couldn’t see at first.


“They would circle fast as they could, looking intently for something. Circling the sun around about 2 or 3 times and suddenly there was this white/metallic disc hard to see because it was shining with the sun, it seemed to hide in the sun from the fighters, whom obviously couldn’t see it,” he continued.

“The UAP [Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or UFO] was extremely fast it was capable of overtaking and outmaneuvering the fighter jets with extreme ease. It would overtake a jet, stop suddenly and seemed to turn toward the incoming jet like spin in there direction without moving. The jet would shoot out anti missile flares like it was under direct attack.

“The UAP was also comfortable to just spin again and make the next jet flanking shoot its anti missile flares! There was clear distress. The fighters took off together repeating this attack approximately 3 times before taking off in an ear shattering retreat. The UAP sat in the sun a moment longer and seemed to circle the area almost as in a victory lap, it then departed with absolutely no sound in the complete opposite direction as the fighter jets had flown.

“To be clear, when the UAP was stationary and the jets had flown away every time – the 3 attempts and the retreat – the only clear sound of a airplane was the fighters who seemed to be intercepting this sudden threat. I did not see if the UAP had shot anything I could define as a weapon. And the fact that the dogfight happened almost entirely in the rays of the sun my Galaxy s22 Ultra was not able to get anything other than a blinding glare and noise.”
NUFORC later spoke with two of the witnesses, one who was identified by the Huron Daily Tribune as Christopher Bilbrey.
Bilbrey, who said he was a military veteran, after reviewing photos of types of aircraft, was able to narrow down the identification of the jets to F-16s, not F-22s. He stated that he was familiar with aircraft from his time stationed at the 304th Expeditionary Signal Battalion in South Korea.
Four days after the initial UFO sighting, Bilbrey says the fighter jets returned to the same spot, at the same time of day, firing flares again.
Huron County Sheriff Kelly Hanson said his office received no reports of incident, but if the fighter jets were F-16s, they would have been scrambled from the 180th Fighter Wing in Toledo, Ohio.

Back in February, a UFO was shot down over Lake Huron by F-16 pilots using Sidewinder missiles.

The Pentagon has footage of that UFO being shot down, but refuses to release any of it to the public.

The post Multiple Witnesses Claim They Saw Fighter Jets Engage With A UFO Over Michigan appeared first on BroBible.

 

[Ennio]

I haven't followed Greer to know if it is his style of working. But, the Greer's posted video looks to me like clamoring for some coverage.

Greer's been hard at work spreading his version of Disclosure for over 20 years. As we know, his bringing forward of credible witnesses from different fields has done much to make the topic a reality for many. So he has lots of followers and gaining more all the time. He's also doing this with the expressed purpose of bringing hidden back-engineered technology to the world - "free energy" or "zero point energy" as he calls it - to get off of fossil fuels. And to "dispel" the idea that any ET's have a negative agenda which he considers misinformation.

In Greer's thinking, the reports of trauma and the negative experiences attributed to abductions can be chalked up to simulated abductions that he attributes to elements of the secret government - with the purpose of fooling people into thinking that the ETs have a negative agenda. If there are any real abductions conducted by ETs then people are just misinterpreting it. He states that this negative perception of ETs will feed into an alien invasion hoax that the secret government will use to consolidate more power. Because, of course, all ETs are benevolent.

The elephant in the room seems to be that Dr. Steven Greer is the public face or point man to a Laurance Rockefellar initiative called Project Starlight - to declassify the information that elements of the secret government have on ETs, UFO technology, etc. (more about that below). If and when "the ET's are here to help us" narrative emerges, perhaps with displays of saving lives or whatever, it wouldn't surprise me to see Greer trotted out more publicly to say "see I told you so" - and to get more people on board with the agenda. Its possible that he has been groomed and/or duped with this future role in mind.

From: The Rockefellers Are the Founders of the UFO Disclosure Movement – Why?

Why are the Rockefellers and the Jesuits guiding the UFO Disclosure Movement?

Last week, I came across a video titled Stephen Bassett E.T. Disclosure Conference 2014, and I couldn’t help but notice the reaction counters below it. If they are correct, the information in the video was uncritically accepted by the site’s visitors, and I found that quite troubling. No one paused to think of who might be behind the information being presented or of how it might fit in with the globalists’ transition plan. This being the case, I decided to do a little investigating so I could show everyone what’s really going on with Disclosure.

To begin, let’s look at what Bassett says at the 3:54 mark of the video…

“The Truth Embargo, which I casually refer to, was a massive program in which billions upon billions of dollars were spent not only to keep the research secret, to keep the finances secret, and to keep the media under control, and the philanthropists out of the picture, and the universities pretty much out of the picture…”

To the casual viewer, his mention of “the philanthropists” might sail by unnoticed, but if you’ve researched how the disclosure movement got started, you know he is actually referring to one specific “philanthropist”: the true father of the Disclosure Movement, Laurance Rockefeller…

…This is a portion of an article on the Open Minds: UFO News and Investigations website which was written by Antonio Huneeus. Huneeus has a long history in the Disclosure Movement, has worked with Rockefeller, and testified to Rockefeller’s involvement in the Movement at the Citizen Hearing on UFO Disclosure…

…The video is only 9 min 40 sec long, and if you can suffer through Huneeus’ dry delivery, it is quite informative.

The Rockefeller role in getting the Disclosure ball rolling is something of an open secret among the Disclosure people (the Disclosuristas, as I call them). On Stephen Bassett’s own Paradigm Research Group website, a specific Rockefeller effort referred to as the “Rockefeller Initiative” is openly touted The same effort is also touted on Steven Greer’s Disclosure Project website as “Project Starlight“…

“This letter from The Project Starlight Coalition was the result of the historic Asilomar, California meeting that Dr. Greer organized and Laurance Rockefeller paid for in June of 1995, just before Clinton’s meeting with Rockefeller in August 1995.”

As I continued to examine the Rockefeller family connection to the Disclosure Movement, I came across this MUST SEE video which puts together a number of video clips on the subject. At the 1:54 mark, Steven Greer (the putative head of the Disclosure Movement) speaks of Laurance Rockefeller:

[video no longer available]

In his remarks on Laurance, Greer refers to him as “the philosopher of the (Rockefeller) family,” which is typical of how the Disclosuristas attempt to explain-away Rockefeller family involvement in their movement. They try to paint Laurance as a family maverick who was unlike all the other globalists in the Rockefeller clan. Greer also speaks of a supposed conflict between brothers David and Laurance Rockefeller over whether the UFO secrets should be exposed, and this theme of a supposed rift or divergence of interests among the Rockefellers is also parroted by Grant Cameron in his testimony at the Citizen Hearing on Disclosure (page 90)…

“Basically what the FOIA documents show is that billionaire businessman Laurance Rockefeller had approached the White House to get the government to disclose the truth behind the UFO mystery.There are different Rockefellers; there is Nelson Rockefeller who was the political guy who ran for government; there was David who was the money guy and Laurance Rockefeller was the humanitarian. He had a philosophy degree from Princeton University and was very interested in this phenomenon.”

Unfortunately for the Disclosuristas, this attempt to paint Laurance as a renegade “good Rockefeller” doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

According to Laurance Rockefeller’s bio:

“In 1937, he inherited his grandfather’s seat on the New York Stock Exchange. He served as founding trustee of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund for forty-two years, from its inception in 1940 to 1982; during this time he also served as president (1958–1968) and later its chairman (1968–1980) for twenty-two years, longer than any other leader in the Fund’s history. He was also a founding trustee of the Rockefeller Family Fund from 1967 to 1977.”

So not only was Laurance deeply involved in the financial industry, but he was also among the founders of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Rockefeller Family Fund. These Funds are notorious for advancing globalist aims under the pretense of “philanthropy.” Laurance also served on the Rockefeller Brothers Fund’s Special Studies Project…

“From 1956 to 1960 the Fund financed an ambitious study conceived by its then president, Nelson Rockefeller, to ‘define the major problems and opportunities facing the U.S. and clarify national purposes and objectives, and to develop principles which could serve as the basis of future national policy’.

Nelson recruited Henry Kissinger, who was then on the faculty of Harvard University, as director of the project; he had first met Kissinger in 1955. He also brought on board such luminaries as Edward Teller, Charles Percy, Dean Rusk, John Gardner (president of the Carnegie Corporation) and Henry Luce, along with his brothers Laurance and John D. III. Seven panels were constituted that looked at sweeping issues ranging from military/security strategy to foreign policy, to international economic strategy and defense department and governmental reorganization.”

Of the Special Studies Project’s seven sub-panels, Laurance is specifically mentioned as having served on:

“Panel II – International Security Objectives and Strategy; directed by Henry Kissinger. Panellists included Frank Altschul, Gordon Dean, James B. Fisk, Roswell Gilpatric, Townsend Hoopes, Henry Luce, Laurance Rockefeller, Edward Teller, Carroll L. Wilson, and economist Arthur Smithies.”

The Special Studies Project’s Wikipedia page also had another paragraph that caught my eye:

“The project was finally published in its entirety in 1961 as Prospect for America: The Rockefeller Panel Reports. The archival study papers are stored in the Rockefeller Archive Center at the family estate; portions of the papers are still restricted, over four decades after the report was published.”

Upon reading this, I ordered a copy of Prospect for America, and it is exactly what I expected: a blueprint for using the United States as a tool to help build the New World Order.

Here is a little snippet from page 35:

So as you can see, Laurance was deeply involved in pursuing the Rockefeller family’s globalist objectives. There was no rift or divergence of interests within the family (as is evidenced by the cooperation of the three brothers in the Special Studies Project); there was only a division of labor as they collectively worked to build the multilateral/ multipolar New World Order.

Being an Illuminati family, the Rockefellers were/are involved in all three aspects of the UFO phenomenon: the black budget part, the government coverup part, and the public disclosure part. In pitting disclosure-demanding citizens against secrecy-maintaining governments, the “elite” are creating a conflict that will find resolution when the New World Order and Disclosure are publicly unveiled.

[...]