Bank failures and the coming Economic collapse

Whenever I try to predict what the economy is going to do I remind myself of what the C's said:

A: The economy of our 3rd density world is entirely manufactured. The forces that control it are both 3rd density and 4th density. There are conflicting opinions in the 3rd density sector right now as to when, where, and how to institute an economic depression. This has been "in the works" for quite some "time" as you measure it. So far, the forces arguing against institution of a collapse have prevailed. How long this condition will be maintained is open to many outcomes. Also, please be aware that the state of the economy is entirely an illusion. In other words, the world economy performs solely based upon what the population is told to believe.

I don't see how we will ever know when such a decision has been reached, until we see the results. The BoE just lowered interest rates for the first time in years, 'inflation' has dropped close to the nominal target. People believe that the economic situation is improving, even though the evidence of their own eyes should suggest otherwise.

I still think an economic collapse (more so than a war, which is harder to get going) is the get out of jail card for the ptb should their hand be revealed in an uncontrolled manner.
 
I still think an economic collapse (more so than a war, which is harder to get going) is the get out of jail card for the ptb should their hand be revealed in an uncontrolled manner.
The stock markets are pretty much disconnected from how the real economy is doing. Stock markets are completely manipulated and can go any way they want them to go, just like the C's said.

The thing is that the current debt-based financial system seems to be unsustainable - the US is already paying more for interest on its debt than its exorbitant military budget.

The most likely way they will crash and reset the financial system is through some kind of cyberattack ("cyberpandemic") that will be blamed on Russia, China, Iran or some AI.

And I think that the CBDCs have to be ready to go before they do the crash. The EU plans to have its CBDC ready in 2026, for example.
 
Just saw this article pop up on SOTT regarding the the lowest sales of cardboard boxes in years indicating that shipped goods are on a steep decline:


Just wanted to back this up and say that the freight industry is also seeing a fairly dramatic reduction in demand:


As someone who’s spent decades immersed in the freight and logistics industry, I’ve learned that freight data often tells the story of the broader economy long before traditional indicators catch up. Right now, that data is painting a stark picture: The U.S. economy is entrenched in a goods recession. While consumer spending on services might be holding steady, the movement of physical goods—the lifeblood of manufacturing, retail, and industrial sectors—has ground to a halt. This isn’t speculation; it’s evident in the high-frequency data we track at FreightWaves through our SONAR platform.
...
But 2025 has delivered a gut punch. As the chart clearly shows, freight demand has nosedived again, dropping to levels not seen since the depths of the pandemic. OTVI (Outbound Tender Volume Index, or more simply, demand for trucks) currently sits at around 9,420—far below peak levels and down 18% year-over-year.
...

Why does this matter? Freight is a leading indicator. When trucks stop rolling, it’s because factories aren’t producing, warehouses aren’t filling, and shelves aren’t restocking. The data suggests we’re not just in a slowdown; we’re in a full-blown goods recession that could drag on GDP growth if it persists.

So yeh, the "real economy" indicators are not looking so great right now going into the holiday season :-(
 
Hi guys! I think thats here the right thread for this
(thanks to @Ruth)

On monday 2025 11 03 the polish lairvoyan Krzysztof Jackowski saw two or three companies crashing, which he describes as the pillars of the stock market, and they gonna cause the following crash and finance collaps

so let's play & speculate which companys this could be :-)
my guess is
- NVIDIA
- Meta
- Oracle

happy to hear your thoughts, of course even if you have complete other sight


and btw,
first investors starting to short Palantir and NVIDIA
 
Hi guys! I think thats here the right thread for this
(thanks to @Ruth)

On monday 2025 11 03 the polish lairvoyan Krzysztof Jackowski saw two or three companies crashing, which he describes as the pillars of the stock market, and they gonna cause the following crash and finance collaps

so let's play & speculate which companys this could be :-)
my guess is
- NVIDIA
- Meta
- Oracle

happy to hear your thoughts, of course even if you have complete other sight


and btw,
first investors starting to short Palantir and NVIDIA

Hi Trss, Michael Burry of The Big Short fame has hedged against Nvidia and Palantir. For a guy who saw 2008 coming, its interesting that he has hedged some 80% of his portfolio.

1000010501.jpg



REPO markets. Interbank Lending. This harkens back to Covid era bank bailouts that happened under the guise of Covid emergencies. I have linked an article.

a self fulfilling prophecy systemic collapse and pandemic simulation

All this fearmongering continues today, despite the easing of some measures. To understand why, we should return to the economic motif. As noted, several trillions of newly printed cash have been created with a few clicks of a mouse by central banks and injected into financial systems, where they have in great part remained. The aim of the printing-spree was to plug calamitous liquidity gaps. Most of this ‘magic-tree money’ is still frozen inside the shadow banking system, the stock exchanges, and various virtual currency schemes that are not meant to be used for spending and investment. Their function is solely to provide cheap loans for financial speculation. This is what Marx called ‘fictitious capital’, which continues to expand in an orbital loop that is now completely independent of economic cycles on the ground.

He lays out a timeline for the banking trouble that started before the Pandemic was official. The BIS (Bank for Internation settlements) got on the blower and then it cascaded. Basically the liquidity in the system was drying up and covid was the excuse they needed to bail themselves out. It seems to be happening again with the government shutdown.

In short, there is a big problem of liquidity in the financial system. The fact that banks have had to put up collateral for these interbank loans and all manner of things wont be paid back because of the shutdown. Time is ticking, This could indeed set up the big one and if Michael Burry is betting against it. Hold on tight.
 
I'd also add, that (if I recall that correctly), Jackowski was telling about things that will happen before the crash that are currently manifesting:
  • "currency laverage crisis" - The October's cryptocurrency market dip liquidated a hefty amount of crazily leveraged trades ($20B in total, but the numbers are probably much higher)
  • "cryptocurrencies will lose their steam" - Happening right now, BTC went down from 120k to 100k, the sentiment is bearish as people were expecting bull run (which as always will happen when retail is exhausted)
A lot of people are betting on the AI bubble to pop, so this is highly probable. With such crazy valuations, financial engineering will not hold up long, especially since Nvidia seems to not be "the best of the best". Apart from Chinese, there are domestic players that are far ahead in the technology:
Zrzut ekranu 2025-11-3 o 14.29.59.png

Comparison with NVIDIA H100: The Nvidia H100 GPU accelerator costs approximately $30,000-40,000, making the WSE-3 system roughly 50-100 times more expensive in absolute terms. However, this comparison requires nuance since they represent fundamentally different architectures and scale.

Performance-per-dollar consideration: While the upfront cost is substantially higher, when accounting for performance metrics, a single CS-3 system can replicate the work of GPU clusters requiring dozens to hundreds of devices for certain workloads. For example, a single CS-3 with appropriate external memory can train a 10 trillion parameter model that would require 417 B200 chips arranged across 53 separate DGX systems when using GPU-based approaches.

Power efficiency factor:
The CS-3 operates at approximately 23 kilowatts, providing superior power efficiency that reduces operational costs over time compared to much larger GPU clusters that would consume significantly more electricity for equivalent workloads.
Adding to that the whole general purpose AI fiasco, who sane is betting on such slow and outdated general purpose GPU technology? The market actually demands lightning fast inference using small models and their fine-tuning for the task, like "write me a ClickHouse query that generates a report described by the user as ...", "extract products and prices from given text to JSON" or "given the time series below, spot the anomaly in user's heart rate".
 
To add more to the Nvidia-driven craziness:

Startups are using Nvidia's AI GPUs as collateral to secure loans of up to $10 billion from financial institutions​

(...) Fluidstack is a cloud startup company based in London that's just managed to score over $10 billion in funding according to a report by The Information (via WCCFtech). The company was able to leveridge its currently held supply of Nvidia AI GPUs to secure the loan from multiple financers including Macquarie.

This model of putting cards up for collateral Fluidstack is using isn't unique. CoreWeave, a cloud AI service which just received a massive influx of high-powered Nvidia AI Blackwell Ultra racks, was one of the pioneers of this loan structure. It was able to secure up to $9.9 billion dollars by putting its Nvidia H100 AI GPUs against the loan. Supposedly it used some of that cash to secure this new shipment of hardware, which points at a weird cyclical loan arrangement.
 
I wonder what Michael Burry saw to do something like this...
One thing is certain, very scandalous things could happen next year!

'Big Short' investor Michael Burry deregisters his hedge fund, saying he's moving on to 'much better things'


¿Michael Burry


Michael Burry, the investor of "The Big Short" fame, has closed the doors on his hedge fund, Scion Asset Management.
  • Michael Burry of "The Big Short" fame has terminated Scion Asset Management's SEC registration.
  • Burry posted on X that he's "on to much better things" after betting against Nvidia and Palantir.
  • The contrarian investor foreshadowed the decision, writing the "only winning move is not to play."

Michael Burry of "The Big Short" fame has terminated his hedge fund's SEC registration, signaling that he'll no longer manage money for external clients.
 
Zerohedge has an article (from Daily Reckoning) about banks using depositor funds as loans to NDFIs (non-depository financial institutions -- which include business development, software, private equity and credit, AI, etc.). The disaster scenario is speculation, but it is based on realities woven into the system. The gist of the article:
At first glance, this looks like a healthy banking system. But that placid picture masks a fast-growing vulnerability that could become the next major pressure point for banks and financial markets.

The fastest growing bank asset category is loans to non-depository financial institutions (NDFIs), a corner of the financial system that regulators have struggled to monitor and control, up 7% in Q4 vs Q3 and up 35% YOY to $1.4 trillion at year-end 2025. With growing signs of credit stress among nonbank companies, banks will eventually pull back from lending to NDFIs. The problem is timing. By the time banks tighten lending standards, many private companies dependent on this funding may already be heading toward collapse, and those failures will not stay confined to the shadow banking system. They will hit bank balance sheets directly.

U.S. corporate bankruptcies in 2025 surged to their highest level in 15 years, with over 700 companies filing for protection through November, marking a 14% increase over 2024. A large share of those failures involved private equity-backed firms.

Why is the rapid growth in bank lending to NDFIs a problem? We’re not talking here about mortgage companies with fully secured loans, but instead speculative credit and private equity schemes that are running out of cash.

The growth of private equity and credit is particularly problematic for banks. Many institutions are quietly masking early defaults through loan forbearance. When busted private equity firms cannot pay their debts, many seek to buy time by paying “in kind” with additional equity effectively issuing more of what the market already considers worthless.

But even more troubling than the high rate of growth in bank lending to NDFIs is the huge amount of undrawn loans available to these lightly capitalized companies involved in private equity and credit.

Banks currently have an estimated $2.8 trillion in unused loan commitments to NDFIs or exposure at default of 200% of current advances as defined by Basel III. A non-bank firm can draw on these contracted credit lines and immediately default, causing a massive loss to the bank lender. For every dollar of the $1.4 trillion in bank loans outstanding today to NDFIs, there are two dollars in undrawn loans or a total of $2.8 trillion, as shown in the chart below.

In practical terms:
Banks have $1.4 trillion in outstanding loans to NDFIs
They have another $2.8 trillion in undrawn commitments
That means for every dollar already lent, two more dollars are waiting to be drawn.

And a nonbank borrower can draw on those lines and default immediately, leaving banks with the loss.
Total potential exposure: roughly $4.2 trillion.
 
Zerohedge posted a follow-up article to the NDFI red flag: JPMorgan Limits Lending To Private Credit Groups After Marking Down Loan Collateral. "The barrage of negative private credit news, now that the $1.8 trillion bubble has burst, is coming hot and heavy."

In short, JPMorgan has "clamped down on its lending to private credit groups, with bankers looking to cut risk as concerns mount over the credit quality of companies in their stables."
"According to the report, the bank informed private credit lenders that it had marked down the value of certain loans in their portfolios, which serve as the collateral the funds use to borrow from the bank. The loans that have been devalued are to software companies, which are seen as particularly vulnerable to the onset of AI and which account for the bulk of private credit loans made in recent years.

"The problem is that much of the new issuance was rubberstamped by captured rating agencies at artificially inflated ratings, and as the new reality of reduced cash flows emerges, some banks are repricing their loans - carried until now at par - sharply lower and in some cases all the way to zero.....Additionally, that debt is maturing in the coming years and much of it faces a dramatically different outlook.
 
Back
Top Bottom