Session 28 June 2025

It is only to be aware of it and to not be unconsciously aligned with it. And that is where it should stop.

Well said! I may be wrong, but I don’t believe that any of us are all the way through working on ourselves in this area.
And I wonder why it seems especially silly to talk about it - sure, too much fixation is negative. I just like seeing it addressed in general.

From my little narrow view of the world, women are out-performing men in the business world, especially the generation now in their 20s and early 30s. They get more support, and a lot of companies have programmes to fast track women to senior positions. Just observations 🤷

It's not to say guys are victims or whatever, I just think the set of challenges we face are different and I do thinks guys, especially young ones, are being faced with an emergent and unique set of challenges that they need to adapt to and evolve to overcome. A lot of guys may be lashing out with anger and resentment, cries of victimhood, but I don't think this will result in anything positive.

I see this as well, SOTTREADER, which is great for me, being a woman who managed to go from temporary line worked to buyer in the office without any college debt.

Unfortunately my husband is experiencing a lot of stress on the production floor (where are supervisors and the plant manager are women.) He tends to run his experiences past me, since I was a supervisor once, for reassurance. Usually he is afraid that he might be on thin ice because he’s getting talked to a lot about his “approach.” But he works by himself at his job, and he makes better rate than anyone else with good accuracy. Sometimes they just don’t like how he sounds, or what he says.
And so I listen, and it has been the case each time that nothing has been done worth documenting. Company policy has not been violated.
It wears on him. I think I will need to adapt along with him, to the new ways of earning a living.
 
Also watch this video (thank I linked in my first post here) which simplifies the point I'm trying to make, the main point at the end of the video : "and that's why feminine energy can't be in the charge of masculine, or the battery (of society) dies". And then hard times follow (created by the weakened/drained/de-empowered men).


I took the time to watch this video. There are bits I like and there are bits I don't quite like.

In general, yes, the world has changed and women now do have a highly prominent place in the social economic ladder. In fact, younger women are outperforming younger guys economically speaking on average - I can see this with my younger sister, she's in her mid twenties and earning 3-4 times what I used to earn at that age. It's just a different reality now for young females who want to get ahead in life and aren't relying on handouts.

What I don't agree with is that "effort" from men counts for nothing and somehow our effort is subsidising women. I'll speak from the perspective of the UK, at least here, tax isn't gender specific (but happy to be corrected). I'm finding it hard to see exactly where my effort is subsidizing women, but the effort of an equivalent woman is not doing exactly the same?

Personally, I think in the modern world, people expect too much too soon. People in their 20s, men or women, are expecting to be financially secure from their first job, and if it doesn't happen, then the system is broken somehow. Building experience and know-how, building grit and resilience, building intelligence forged from hardship and challenge, these are completely alien concepts.

I do think that women in general, at least to a higher degree can be more laser focused on economics, and so deploy themselves more effectively at getting the best grades and landing the best job situation than guys who on average may adopt a go-lucky attitude. I'm not saying guys are not ambitious or laser focused but in my experience, even from school, the ladies who had their eye on the prize were formidable in their focus.

A lot of videos I watch in this space tend to imply women are somehow less capable but in my world and work environment I just don't see it. Instead what I see, is that, on average, the more opportunities someone with the right mindset gets, including guidance and mentorship, that person will on average gain more tools and know-how to outperform others. It doesn't matter if the person is a woman or a man - I'm not talking about physical jobs, being a soldier, football player etc.. just jobs that require some use of the mind, not necessarily the physical body.

Women, especially the good ones, do have something on average that men don't, and that is emotional intelligence. I have found that in high stress volatile environments at least in my little universe, some of these hyper successful and super talented women are just better at reading the room and skillfully helping everyone navigate the whole situation.

I think what a lot of guys ultimately fail on is simply believing that men are better than women, and the only reason women can be outperforming guys is because of handouts or the guys being put down.

The only other thing I wanted to say, is that, I do think time is gentler on guys, in that, as long as you don't work yourself to an early grave in your 20s (drugs, alcohol, partying, video games etc), really, your body and mind should be coming to full strength in your middle ages.

So whilst on average guys will fall behind to females in young adulthood, they should be making up that ground later on once they let-go of their "go lucky" attitudes and actually realise the depths of what they can endure without breaking. There are levels of strength and endurance that I believe men can access psychologically that I don't think on average women can - in the long-term, if a guy doesn't put himself out of the playing field i.e. rage quits early on in life because #unfair, he should see that down the stretch he gets stronger whilst the ladies around him aren't able to draw from the same pool of strength and endurance - on average of course. Basically, the older a guy gets, the more he's likely to find he gets his sh*t together, assuming he didn't rage quit earlier.
 
Last edited:
Well said! I may be wrong, but I don’t believe that any of us are all the way through working on ourselves in this area.
And I wonder why it seems especially silly to talk about it - sure, too much fixation is negative. I just like seeing it addressed in general.



I see this as well, SOTTREADER, which is great for me, being a woman who managed to go from temporary line worked to buyer in the office without any college debt.

Unfortunately my husband is experiencing a lot of stress on the production floor (where are supervisors and the plant manager are women.) He tends to run his experiences past me, since I was a supervisor once, for reassurance. Usually he is afraid that he might be on thin ice because he’s getting talked to a lot about his “approach.” But he works by himself at his job, and he makes better rate than anyone else with good accuracy. Sometimes they just don’t like how he sounds, or what he says.
And so I listen, and it has been the case each time that nothing has been done worth documenting. Company policy has not been violated.
It wears on him. I think I will need to adapt along with him, to the new ways of earning a living.
My reply is not to imply that I know what I'm talking about 😅.

Basically the thought that comes to my mind regarding your husband and his experience with his female superiors is that at work, results are almost as important as appearance. By appearance, I mean, doing your work in a way that largely aligns with how management expects that work to be getting done. Demonstrating the right behaviours and culture expected from your specific employer.

You can be doing a perfectly good job, but if you are completely out of step with your superiors, more often than not, they'll assess your performance as unsatisfactory - they'll be something that they'll find to pin on you !

One thing I have found with people who are really highly technically capable but somehow get "stuck" in their careers is that they lack the ability to understand the wider context they work in. That is, there is a game to play, usually unspoken and you must play it if you expect to get anywhere meaningful.

It doesn't matter that his supervisors are women, in my view, he should be extracting the "common theme" in the feedback he's getting, and looking to make adjustments to demonstrate that he's acting on the feedback whilst not letting his technical performance decrease.

As I said, don't take the above to mean I know what I'm talking about 😅
 
people who are really highly technically capable but somehow get "stuck" in their careers

there is a game to play, usually unspoken and you must play it if you expect to get anywhere meaningful.
This is a very sad and terrible way of thinking in my opinion.

Well, when you get to your destination...

Or maybe there is no destination, because you always have to keep going.

A hamster on his wheel forever, going nowhere.
 
This is a very sad and terrible way of thinking in my opinion.

Well, when you get to your destination...

Or maybe there is no destination, because you always have to keep going.

A hamster on his wheel forever, going nowhere.
It's life though 🤷.

We are born into worlds and environments that existed before us, and will exist after us. Whilst nearly everyone thinks they are special or unique, by definition, the chances are we are "average" on the bell curve. People think they can come into a system and transform it, change it etc... why? because I'm special and know best? 🤪

The most likely outcome is a person either falls in-line, at best perhaps influence something that was already in motion, otherwise more often than not if the person thinks they are special, they will expend so much energy trying to transform/change the system and in the end they'll be spat back out, total rejection.

What I'm trying to say is we can't escape the games that must be played.

Putin also plays a game... You think when he was endorsing Kamala for presidency that wasn't him playing a game? 🧐

 
My reply is not to imply that I know what I'm talking about 😅.

Basically the thought that comes to my mind regarding your husband and his experience with his female superiors is that at work, results are almost as important as appearance. By appearance, I mean, doing your work in a way that largely aligns with how management expects that work to be getting done. Demonstrating the right behaviours and culture expected from your specific employer.

You can be doing a perfectly good job, but if you are completely out of step with your superiors, more often than not, they'll assess your performance as unsatisfactory - they'll be something that they'll find to pin on you !

One thing I have found with people who are really highly technically capable but somehow get "stuck" in their careers is that they lack the ability to understand the wider context they work in. That is, there is a game to play, usually unspoken and you must play it if you expect to get anywhere meaningful.

It doesn't matter that his supervisors are women, in my view, he should be extracting the "common theme" in the feedback he's getting, and looking to make adjustments to demonstrate that he's acting on the feedback whilst not letting his technical performance decrease.

As I said, don't take the above to mean I know what I'm talking about 😅

No worries- this is why the parsing of it all is worth the effort, in my opinion. In the case of my husband, he’s not resentful to the fact that he is doing what he is doing. Generally, his position is exactly where he prefers to be.

I can give one example: he cuts wires and conduit that feeds areas throughout 3 plants. He knows what needs cutting and when based on work orders placed by operators in each area.
The other day his supervisor brought him a note from an area that only received half of the conduit and wire needed. The note said “you didn’t cut enough for our order. Please fix.”

Not a big deal, necessarily, but the brief wording made his supervisor assume he made a mistake.

When the original order was reviewed, it turns out that the order was for exactly what he cut. The operator who ordered had made the mistake.

He asked that this be communicated to the plant manager who sent the note, because if the training has to happen anywhere, it is within her realm.

His supervisor (and this is where I see a problem) told him not to worry about it. It wasn’t a big deal. So then he didn’t feel good about the situation. Because he got all of the downside without any resolution, or any reason to think that this will not continue happening.

It is not this one time thing that ruins an employee’s morale. It is when it become a part of everyday, that one is being made to look at “mistakes” that they are not making, and then the person who actually causes the disruption (through oversight, lack of training, or whatever) doesn’t need to be addressed.

That’s the sort of ever-present pestering that wears on him.

And I agree that emotional intelligence is something that women are very skilled at, generally. When I think of my time at that company, however, my favorite boss is the guy I work for now. When I have made mistakes in my new role, another man in leadership has made it extra awkward (as he seemed to be both avoiding eye contact and walking on eggshells.) Other women in leadership above me have been unable to hide a sense of anger or disappointment.
My boss, a man who came here from China, was able to tell me without any emotional charge one way or another, “this is a mistake and they happen. We have faults in our systems that leave us open to this. Here is a note you can take for the next time a situation like this arises. It is not a reflection of you.”

That was maybe the best thing that could have happened to me at work - it was the first time I was shown an example of how to remove emotion from a situation to see it better. And it made me feel better equipped to continue in the role.

I’m not saying it is because they are men or women. But I can’t help but notice either 😄

As to the video, I think what hoe_math is driving at is that, while men and women are taxed equally, the taxes are being used for programs that women tend to support more than men do. That feels like a broad statement, but as an example, I have seen the pay rate for people who are called in to a workplace to give a lecture on racial sensitivity, or gender sensitivity or whatever. And we know how well that works, right? And if we multiply that sort of thing across government agencies and so on and so forth, I don’t think we can deny there is a bubble, if not a direct wealth transfer happening.

This is not to say that I feel it is my duty as a woman to shoulder the blame for it either. But it sure helps me understand why a broader focus on Social Emotional Learning at work, at schools, etc upsets people, and how it can be attributed to women.
 
people who are really highly technically capable but somehow get "stuck" in their careers

there is a game to play, usually unspoken and you must play it if you expect to get anywhere meaningful.

This is a very sad and terrible way of thinking in my opinion.

Well, when you get to your destination...

Or maybe there is no destination, because you always have to keep going.

A hamster on his wheel forever, going nowhere.
That's the general business philosophy that's been around forever. My very first manager at IBM in the early 1980s had to call me into his office and tell me that the squeaky wheel gets the grease; in other words I wasn't playing the game. He hired me permanently because of my technically excellent summer work but I was making it difficult for him to give me raises/promotions because I didn't squeak right or something. I do not have the right personality for political stuff. When IBM started doing layoffs, I was kind of an obvious target and I got laid off at age 40 and never worked again. Interviewing isn't a fit with my personality either; the IBM summer job I got was just via my college grades with no interview.
 
That was maybe the best thing that could have happened to me at work - it was the first time I was shown an example of how to remove emotion from a situation to see it better. And it made me feel better equipped to continue in the role.
A few of us at my place were offered some individual coaching opportunity for an external consultant to help us overcome a few things unique to each individual. Anyways, during my sessions with this lady, one of the things that she said that will stick with me is, "it is more often than not about the "thing", not about you"... this was in the context of dealing with volatile people who are superior to you whereabouts their emotions can act to destabilise you whereby you shift to fight / flight. She basically said to focus on the "thing" because usually in these situations I'd more focus on myself, my emotions and the sense of perceived threat.

More often than not, the problem is not necessarily you, it's more about the "thing" than it is about you. Of course, this doesn't apply in all situations so judgement is important. 😊

I think this is why for example you might see "players" in opposing teams go hard at each other during a game, but after they are at the bar chatting and having a good time together i.e. they have an understanding that when in the game, it's about the game and they are on opposing sides, but once the game is over, they are basically friends. 😵‍💫
 
Last edited:
@irjO On the topic of frequencies, I have been feeling much better recently by using frequency healing.

I have been working with a BioAcoustic practitioner trained by Dr Sharry Edwards for the last 6 months.

There was lots of improvement in my condition esp since I had mold illness and mold in the bedroom.

For additional detail i have made a post in an old thread that discussed Dr Sharry

"Poltergeist" removed through energy healing
 
My cynical mind takes the answer about Grok being a pattern recognition tool mostly. Probably Siri and other machines also.?
That this is a collection of the thoughts of the masses! The next step to mind reading?
What to be used for is the question?! Targeted advertising? Or worse…
Somewhat the last thing our governments want to police. Our thoughts. Crimes for thinking…
During the COVID plandemic, here in Australia, the police used Facebook and social media to silence dissenting voices and effectively fined people for their thoughts and not actions.
Laws have been changed around the west to allow this “thought policing”.
Orwellian or what?!
Anyway. My cynical mind 🧐
 
I found this session very interesting because they touched on matriarchy. I would love to learn more. I am doing my dissertation using decolonial feminist theory, and it is hard for me to accept that the disadvantages and suffering that women have endured, let's say, since the "New World," are justified because they massacred men. I understand the karmic and genetic part, but the C's said it was partly it. There must be more to this background, and it's surely worth discussing. Why did I think that in matriarchies, there was more peace and justice in society and towards Mother Earth? Anti-feminism is going to the other extreme. My understanding is that we have been both male and female in our journey, so we need to solve this divide for our own good.
Nature takes its course and the lessons continue.
The Pendulum swings. 😊
When we make it to 4th and change to STO will we then find an understanding balance?
Best wishes on your dissertation 👍
 
In the transcripts is stated that :
Session 27 May 1995 :
(...)
Q: (L) The illusion is that there is no link between consciousness and matter.
A: Yes.
------
So both matter , inasmuch as we perceive them apart , but there's always balance so the inertia / momentum of " either " could be a spring / feedback for both. As well for for the supposed dichotomy of central nervous system vis a vis a periphery system of it. ( fwiiw / imo/ blah )

That's it. It's from the work of Political Ponerology, Dr Karen Mitchell's and other work into dark triad/tetrad personalities. Thing is, those that fall into these categories see their way of being as an adaptive advantage that gives them superiority over normal people and do not think they should change or heal. Their physiology doesn't respond the same under stress and mistaking them for wounded people could be dangerous, but it's something they'll play on in order to advance their agenda.

I'm curious about their differences and understanding ways of identifying them. In interviews with Porges on youtube, he is sometimes asked about dark personalities and there is a particular way that he directs the conversation away from that line of enquiry that has me wondering if he knows something, but is not willing to talk about it. If Mitchell is right about academia, then Porges has certainly come across them.

All Knowledge is valid, so I see no reason for the either/or approach you're positing here. Understanding both the neurological science and its behavioural correlate is mutually beneficial. I've had many a-ha moments when reading about neurology, such as how dopamine works. this has helped me to use my dopaminergic system more effectively in daily life. Same with using vagal tone exercises. It's also helpful to take certain supplements to recharge and rebalance the nervous system after trauma flashbacks. Etc.

Anyways, in the case of some psychopaths, understanding their neurology is important. Some are made that way through childhood trauma, some choose to be that way because 'it works', and some are simply born evil - it's a result of brain structure and wiring, IIRC.

Hello, my words probably sounded exclusive of physiological knowledge of the brain and the nervous system versus knowing its practical application in our lives.

The truth is, I love all information about neuroscience. In fact, I study it with great interest and curiosity.

I didn't mean to propose an exclusive approach. What I wanted to tell you is that along my path, I've seen a huge gap between mere theoretical knowledge and practical application. And I just want to urge you to apply knowledge, discover how it manifests itself, and not just think about it. It's probably more of a reminder to myself, since I've done the exact opposite in my life.

I have been a staunch (I don't know if that word will be translated correctly by the translator I use for this post) defender of the acquisition of theoretical knowledge. For many years, I minimized or devalued the practical application of my knowledge. On this specific topic, I didn't value emotions and the body, much less personal relationships and connections. I placed more importance on my understanding of the world through intelligence than on experiencing life.

But life disappointed me and shattered my hopes.

Thanks to this forum, I discovered neuroscience and somatic trauma healing therapies. In the former, I discovered the laws that govern our human nature. From the latter, I learned how those laws work, gaining a better understanding of myself and the world.

I've read about ponerology and psychopathy. I believe it's fundamental knowledge for understanding our world. But I think we view psychopathy with a certain disdain and arrogance. We treat this issue as "they're the bad guys and we're the good guys."

However, we too carry the seeds of evil, and perhaps we've been watering them.

I discovered that I have a pattern of dissociation, which disconnected me from emotions so I wouldn't rise when things got difficult. But that disconnection led me to lack empathy, to take actions that harmed or damaged others, and to behave narcissistically. For example, several girlfriends I've had have labeled me as a narcissist ("you only care about yourself") or autistic.

A trauma counselor told me I had the characteristics of a traumatic dissociative personality. At the time, they were just words, but today they hurt because I see that I normalized not feeling to protect myself, but I disconnected from myself, from the people who needed me, and I also disconnected from God.

On my journey of self-discovery, I understood that my role in this world isn't to go out with a sign pointing a finger at Netanyahu, but rather to see the Netanyahu within me and try to be something better, something different, every day.

Perhaps that's why Porges hasn't spoken directly about dark personalities, because we can't change them, but we can understand how they operate. But we can change. Perhaps Porges wants to emphasize "saving" people from their own inner demon.

Until we defeat the "Fucking Little Tyrant" inside us, we will never be able to defeat the "Fucking Tyrant" out there.

Otherwise, we will continue to be the one who constantly tries to do good, but does evil.
 
(...)

However, we too carry the seeds of evil, and perhaps we've been watering them.

I discovered that I have a pattern of dissociation, which disconnected me from emotions so I wouldn't rise when things got difficult. But that disconnection led me to lack empathy, to take actions that harmed or damaged others, and to behave narcissistically. For example, several girlfriends I've had have labeled me as a narcissist ("you only care about yourself") or autistic.

A trauma counselor told me I had the characteristics of a traumatic dissociative personality.
Nonsense , there's always choice :P , as for dissociation , there is plenty of tools within the tradition to help.

Post by @BrendaH , here may be of use , else , dissociation @ Searchable transcripts

Session 26 July 2014 :

(...)

(L) You have to get awake, you have to wake up, and you have to stay awake... all the time, about EVERYTHING. Any minute you allow yourself to sleep, you're putting your conscience to sleep. Dissociation is putting your conscience to sleep. Okay, that's all I wanted to ask about that. Go ahead.

(...)

--------------------------------------

Session 29 August 2015 :

(...)

A: Meditation would benefit you as well. But notice that when properly done, it is far from dissociation.

(...)
 
@irjO On the topic of frequencies, I have been feeling much better recently by using frequency healing.

I have been working with a BioAcoustic practitioner trained by Dr Sharry Edwards for the last 6 months.

There was lots of improvement in my condition esp since I had mold illness and mold in the bedroom.

For additional detail i have made a post in an old thread that discussed Dr Sharry

"Poltergeist" removed through energy healing

I was kinda looking through that information and I have my doubts, the program you mention has a set of different frequencies standard for everyone, which is not taking into consideration that not everyone is the same, specially genetically speaking. But maybe there could be some sort of standard sounds that might work with the majority?

You posted this on that thread:
I was taking a lot of supplements just to maintain my health and not be in severe pain. In march 2025, I bought the frequencies as replacement for the supplements, and after a month or two, i stopped taking the supplements slowly and gradually even though i was scared that my health would get worse.
If it worked for you and helped health wise, good for you! But I wouldn’t promote something as the ultimate type of solution depending on the condition/s, again, not everyone is the same, however, its always good to experiment and maybe help the supplements to act in our favor by listening or being exposed to certain sounds? like maybe there are certain sounds that can help the supplements/vitamins acts better in a certain way? That could be something more likely. I will look more into this, although is not the only type of program I’ve seen mentioning this types of things. Thanks for bringing this up.
 
I was kinda looking through that information and I have my doubts, the program you mention has a set of different frequencies standard for everyone, which is not taking into consideration that not everyone is the same, specially genetically speaking. But maybe there could be some sort of standard sounds that might work with the majority?

You posted this on that thread:

If it worked for you and helped health wise, good for you! But I wouldn’t promote something as the ultimate type of solution depending on the condition/s, again, not everyone is the same, however, its always good to experiment and maybe help the supplements to act in our favor by listening or being exposed to certain sounds? like maybe there are certain sounds that can help the supplements/vitamins acts better in a certain way? That could be something more likely. I will look more into this, although is not the only type of program I’ve seen mentioning this types of things. Thanks for bringing this up.


Hi @irjO, thanks for taking the time to read my post. While I shared a lot of info on the standard set of frequencies for certain conditions, those are for temporary relief. The hit/miss ratio is not that great, i did purchase many of them but I found it useful as my condition was acute and any relief was worth it. For instant my headache never went away with the general (for anyone) playlist. There was improvement with the custom sounds though.

Honestly, i want the forum to guide me in sifting fact from opinion, as the substantial relief has colored my views on this science.

I did mention that custom voice analysis and custom sounds are given (as the major treatment option). I did not elaborate on it though.

I gave my first vocal sample in jan 2025, jeff analysed it and when i asked for a test, he gave me a few sample sounds and shared an image of the conditions he had detected (which he said could not be taken as diagnoses as he was not a doctor)

I have attached the foll images:
rishi frequency analysis 2.png
rishi frquency analysis.png


I felt some shifts in my body somatically and i decided to purchase it as dr sharry's website seemed legit in my personal opinion.

All of this seemed too specific and on point for it be a total scam, and the effectiveness short/long term could be tested. Also with a moldy brain on fire and my previous failed attempt at hiring a functional med practitioner in oct 2024, i was quite open to it.




001 - Rishi Agarwal - protein - early growth response protein 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
002 - Rishi Agarwal - protein - early growth response protein 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
003 - Rishi Agarwal - protein - early growth response protein 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
004 - Rishi Agarwal - protein - early growth response protein 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
005 - Rishi Agarwal - muscle - thumb - opponens pollicis - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
006 - Rishi Agarwal - muscle - thumb - opponens pollicis - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
007 - Rishi Agarwal - muscle - thumb - opponens pollicis - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
008 - Rishi Agarwal - muscle - thumb - opponens pollicis - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
009 - Rishi Agarwal - element - strontium - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
010 - Rishi Agarwal - element - strontium - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
011 - Rishi Agarwal - element - strontium - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
012 - Rishi Agarwal - element - strontium - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
013 - Rishi Agarwal - gdf 8 - myostatin - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
014 - Rishi Agarwal - gdf 8 - myostatin - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
015 - Rishi Agarwal - gdf 8 - myostatin - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
016 - Rishi Agarwal - gdf 8 - myostatin - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
017 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
018 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
019 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
020 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
021 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
022 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
023 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
024 - Rishi Agarwal - NO MATCH - NO MATCH - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
025 - Rishi Agarwal - myosin, heavy polypeptide 13, skeletal muscle - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
026 - Rishi Agarwal - myosin, heavy polypeptide 13, skeletal muscle - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
027 - Rishi Agarwal - myosin, heavy polypeptide 13, skeletal muscle - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
028 - Rishi Agarwal - myosin, heavy polypeptide 13, skeletal muscle - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
029 - Rishi Agarwal - laminin alpha 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
030 - Rishi Agarwal - laminin alpha 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
031 - Rishi Agarwal - laminin alpha 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
032 - Rishi Agarwal - laminin alpha 1 - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav
033 - Rishi Agarwal - medication - albuterol - Repeat ON 35-180 min.wav
034 - Rishi Agarwal - medication - albuterol - Repeat ON 35-180 min - base.wav
035 - Rishi Agarwal - medication - albuterol - Repeat ON 35-180 min - recip.wav
036 - Rishi Agarwal - medication - albuterol - Repeat ON 35-180 min - silence.wav



As far as the supplements go, I realize this is too far out there, but i dont need them anymore, its a replacement for the supplements that my general quality of life depended on. I still take digestive enzymes, as i cannot the freq for one of the enzymes, and magnesium as i still have constipation. The custom sounds for GERD, colitis and IBS were not that successful, and i have asked him to take mold illness into account as the results were not there in his previous approach.


custom sounds x 4 times


custom sounds for specific issues:
Adiponectin
Healthy Fats
Sinusitis
GERD
Colitis
Vitamins
GERD
Muscles
Wellness
Glutathione
Detox
Pathogens
Mold pathogen
air pollution and ammonia
gads and depression
hives and hearig loss and seizures
sarcopnia and hypoxia and collagen


Genreral Playlists
Alzheimers/neuro degenerative


In terms of symptomatic relief, it has been exceptional, i could not stand for more than 10 minutes without extreme fatigue. The mold in my bedroom was aggravating me and the frequencies for mold helped me enough that without any other treatment i am pain free.


I have also attached a screenshot of the nutrition analysis of my voice sample. There is a free trial of the analysis software that can detect issues in your vocal sample. There are two templates available for free - nutrition and muscles.

Lastly, I am not making any claims or promotions of any sort. If it comes across that way, i apologize and will do my best to reword my communication in the future. I have no frame of reference of any of this technology and all my knowledge about health is from this forum since 2012, i have read all the books on health in the recommended reading list and many more, but my challenges reqd a practitioner and i had barely any relief until this attempt. I had shared my experience in the newbie thread in 2023.

PS: I know most of this is unverifiable or cannot be experimented upon easily without access to the frequencies, but i am sharing what helped me and whether someone can help me figure out if it is legit and will work for others as well.

Sincerely, Rishi
 

Attachments

  • rishi frequency analysis 2.png
    rishi frequency analysis 2.png
    150.2 KB · Views: 7
  • rishi frquency analysis.png
    rishi frquency analysis.png
    271.2 KB · Views: 7
  • screencapture-my-soundhealthportal-Default-aspx-2025-06-05-17_18_24.png
    screencapture-my-soundhealthportal-Default-aspx-2025-06-05-17_18_24.png
    175.2 KB · Views: 7
Back
Top Bottom