Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection

Yes, and it's interesting when we look at the description of the lance in Holy Grail stories, which we now think that it represents comets:

The Vulgate Cycle (1215-1235) expands the lance’s story significantly. In these texts, the weapon takes on a dual role as both destroyer and healer. The “Estoire del Saint Graal” tells how an angel wounds Josephus (Joseph’s son) with the lance as punishment, but the blood from the lance later heals him.

This cycle also develops the story of how King Pellehan (one version of the Fisher King) received his wound from the lance during the Dolorous Stroke. The Grail Castle Corbenic houses the bleeding weapon, awaiting the coming of a worthy knight who can use it for healing rather than harm.

The Vulgate texts further connect the lance to prophecy—it’s said that the same weapon that wounded the king must also cure him, establishing the quest pattern that Galahad will eventually fulfill.

The Creation of the Waste Land

The immediate result of the Dolorous Stroke creates the Waste Land. When Balin strikes King Pellehan with the lance, the blow causes the castle to collapse around them. The king suffers a blow that won’t heal, but there are constant hints that the weapon that dealt the blow would be the one to heal him, giving significance to its healing properties. In the end, the surrounding countryside becomes barren.

This devastation links the king’s physical condition directly to the health of his land—a concept with roots in Celtic myths where the ruler and realm share a mystical bond. The once-fertile kingdom becomes a blighted wasteland where crops fail, animals die, and people suffer.

This motif of the damaged land echoes medieval fears about failed harvests and famine, while also acting as a metaphor for spiritual emptiness that needs divine intervention to heal.

The weapon that caused the Waste Land becomes the key to restoring fertility and life, creating a narrative of redemption where:
  • What wounds can also heal
  • Suffering leads to eventual restoration
  • Divine punishment contains the seeds of mercy
This duality makes the Bleeding Lance more complex than simply “good” or “evil”—it functions instead as an instrument of divine will that humans must learn to understand properly.


So the same comets that cause destruction can also be a source of renewal via their effect on the electrical charge of the planet.
 
The Bleeding Lance appears throughout Arthurian legends as a mysterious, blood-dripping spear.

The Bleeding Lance exists as a supernatural weapon in Arthurian literature that constantly drips blood from its tip.

Like the Arthurian lance, Luin dripped blood from its tip and held both harmful and helpful qualities.

In Chrétien’s “Perceval” (c. 1180), the Bleeding Lance makes its first literary appearance during the mysterious Grail procession. A youth carries the lance through the Fisher King’s hall as it “bleeds continuously” from its tip, with blood flowing down to the bearer’s hand.

I think I know what this dripping blood is.


 
The other day, I was browsing the channeling sessions of "The Law of One" on llresearch, and I came across mentions of the mechanism of the human-universe connection:

1992
May 3, 1992 - Sunday meditation - L/L Research

Q’uo​


(...)

There has long been upon the surface of your planet populations of entities who have engaged in disharmonious relationships even unto the war, and have, through the heat of the emotions, transferred this heat into the crust, as you call it, of the planet itself, so that as the planetary entity attempts to make its own movement from this density of light into the succeeding density of light there is the necessity for the reharmonizing of the planetary garment that will allow for the release of the excessive heat in a variety of means in order that the planetary entity shall remain and retain in its whole nature;

1981
May 24, 1981 - Sunday meditation - L/L Research

Hatonn​


I am Hatonn, and we would suggest, my sister, that in instances such as the eruptions of volcanoes, the occurrence of earthquakes and other natural phenomena which might be viewed as catastrophic in nature, all these are but repercussions or reflections, you might say, of the consciousness of your peoples ...

... which has been expressed upon your planet for many centuries, for the friction which has occurred between your peoples has, in its very being, and is in its very being, a vibration of a nature which penetrates the planet on which you live.

The forum has written books on the subject, allowing people to learn more about the mechanism.

I thought to myself, "Such information exists in Ra's sessions. In 1981."

Upon reflection, I observe that the human-universe connection is a grand principle that governs much. It's not a minor mechanism, but something fundamental.

I wonder if (and I believe that) there might be more of these important mechanisms yet to be discovered, in the Ra sessions?

When I go through Ra's sessions, there's a lot of new and unexpected information, data that touches on "worlds" unknown to me. Each line represents something my mind has to register. (Same with the C sessions). So it's difficult to perceive when it's a matter of a major mechanism—or simply a less "substantial" description.

☀️🌻🪐
 
So it's difficult to perceive when it's a matter of a major mechanism—or simply a less "substantial" description.

Not sure if you ever read Pierre Lescaudron's book on these matters. If not, have a look at this human cosmic connection.

 
Not sure if you ever read Pierre Lescaudron's book on these matters. If not, have a look at this human cosmic connection.

Yes, that is why I posted here

What I am saying:

"Pierre unearthed the human-cosmic connection, for the whole world to consider it"
"This principle was lying, in the open, in the Ra sessions" - "but buried deep inside"
<>
"Is there anything else that we can find, in the Ra sessions?"
"Something as much interesting, something as important?"
 

In the second part of our precession series we examine Jim Weninger's model in detail. We examine the structure of our local galactic neighbourhood to understand how this structure could hide the clues as to the cause of the precession we observe. Using plasma and electric universe ideas we will try and piece together an event which caused the structure we see today and link this to recorded mythology. We will discover that there is evidence the this information was encoded and implies a knowledge that stems back millions of years.

If this theory is true, it would explain a lot of things.

Q: (L) Ok, now I’ve got this other book here “Lost Star of Myth and Time” – and his theory is about a companion star and the fact that the earth or the solar system is rotating around a common center of gravity, in tandem with this companion star. It is said that it is this orbit that creates the precession of the zodiac. He says that the precession is not a big wobble that the earth goes through, as it proceeds in a fairly direct course through the galaxy, but rather that it is this rotation around this common center of gravity with the companion star that produces the effect of precession. Now, is he on to something with his theory also about the precession of the zodiac?

A: Absolutely!

Q: (L) OK, He points out some interesting effects in here. First of all, he mentioned recording the speed of the Earth’s rotation. They had a fixed telescope with crosshairs and they had a clock that was connected to some kind of super time clock that was extreme accurate, and they were recording exactly how long it took the Earth to rotate in respect of Sirius, Sirius being a fixed point. These researchers discovered that during the period of time, when Sirius B (Sirius’s companion, which is a dwarf), eclipsed Sirius A; it actually slowed the rotation of the Earth. Now, this is what their measurements showed. Something like 50 arc seconds. The slowing began a week before the eclipse, then after the eclipse the Earth actually sped up. By 50 arc seconds. So, there are two weeks of effects on the rotation of the Earth, caused by the eclipsing of Sirius A caused by its companion Sirius B as I remember, though I may have missed the exact time period. Now, the conclusion that he drew from this is that we are affected by being gravitationally connected to Sirius somehow. Anyhow, the conclusion that he draws is…- and he also points out that it seems that Sirius is heading in our direction; we are getting closer to Sirius - so, he theorizes that Sirius is our companion star. Is he correct about that?

A: Not Sol’s companion; but look in that direction for clues to your own little brother.

Session 12 December 2010

 
Anyhow, the conclusion that he draws is…- and he also points out that it seems that Sirius is heading in our direction; we are getting closer to Sirius - so, he theorizes that Sirius is our companion star. Is he correct about that?

A: Not Sol’s companion; but look in that direction for clues to your own little brother.
Regarding this clue, the C's may be referring to the 1678 sighting of a 'nova' (V529 Orionis) by the astronomer Hevelius as a potential sighting of the brown dwarf on its closest approach in the middle of the Maunder Minimum.

The location of this 'nova sighting' is pretty much the closest point on the ecliptic to the location of Sirius, which is not far from the ecliptic too.

The red circle was the V529 Orionis sighting, the blue line is the ecliptic and the big black dot in the bottom left is Sirius:

1000034869.png
 
If this theory is true, it would explain a lot of things.
Most excellent job finding those videos! I've waited for years for something like that and clearly missed them, since they were published in 2018-2019 onwards.

It was exactly the kind of perspective that I wanted depicted, with Birkland currents taken into consideration and all!

🙏 Thank you!

That's the only way I can understand the precession. An isolated motion of Earth wobbling around without any background context, makes NO sense to me.

At minute 12:39, you can see a complete orbit based on our current movement relatively to the Pleaides, and it takes 26 million years to complete. Not far out that the Cs would hint that sol's companion has an orbit of 27 million years or so. Fascinating!

brave_screenshot_www.youtube.com.png

In the graph at minute 12:39, you'll see the Pleaides in the center with Taurus above it, Orion at around 11am.
 
Most excellent job finding those videos! I've waited for years for something like that and clearly missed them, since they were published in 2018-2019 onwards.

It was exactly the kind of perspective that I wanted depicted, with Birkland currents taken into consideration and all!

🙏 Thank you!

That's the only way I can understand the precession. An isolated motion of Earth wobbling around without any background context, makes NO sense to me.

You're welcome Gaby! :flowers: :-)

Yes, I also couldn't understand the precession. That's why I did a lot of research in the previous two years on this topic, but I just couldn't find anything that would give me any definitive answers. Until I finally found these videos that just make sense to my ordinary human mind. Like they said in the video, no advance equations are needed for this, only a good visualization of the movement of the solar system through the galaxy.

At minute 12:39, you can see a complete orbit based on our current movement relatively to the Pleaides, and it takes 26 million years to complete. Not far out that the Cs would hint that sol's companion has an orbit of 27 million years or so. Fascinating!

Yes, and it makes you wonder if there is a connection? Perhaps the orbit of the sol's companion is somehow synchronized with the motion around the Pleiades.
 
Yes, and it makes you wonder if there is a connection? Perhaps the orbit of the sol's companion is somehow synchronized with the motion around the Pleiades.
FWIW, the duration of companion's orbit is also the duration of sol's orbit, both orbiting in fact around common center of gravity or barycenter, AFAIK. Pleiades seem to be a bit too far away to be center of gravity of our binary system, but that's only from our "linear" 3-dim 3D perspective, which could be waaay off when it comes to 'real deal' or hyperdimensional perspective and 4-dim spatial distances.
 
FWIW, the duration of companion's orbit is also the duration of sol's orbit, both orbiting in fact around common center of gravity or barycenter, AFAIK. Pleiades seem to be a bit too far away to be center of gravity of our binary system, but that's only from our "linear" 3-dim 3D perspective, which could be waaay off when it comes to 'real deal' or hyperdimensional perspective and 4-dim spatial distances.

No, I am talking about 3D perspective. Pleiades is not a common center of gravity between Sun and companion. But the spin of companion around Sun and Sun's around Pleiades are perhaps synchronized. They are separate, but synchronized. IF the numbers that this Jim guy and C's gave are correct.
 
No, I am talking about 3D perspective. Pleiades is not a common center of gravity between Sun and companion. But the spin of companion around Sun and Sun's around Pleiades are perhaps synchronized. They are separate, but synchronized. IF the numbers that this Jim guy and C's gave are correct.
Spin of companion around the Sun, as you call it, is in fact spin of companion around the barycenter or center of gravity of our binary system, and therefore also spin of the Sun around the same "point", or around the companion if viewed from that perspective, AFAIK.
FWIW.
 
Spin of companion around the Sun, as you call it, is in fact spin of companion around the barycenter or center of gravity of our binary system, and therefore also spin of the Sun around the same "point", or around the companion if viewed from that perspective, AFAIK.
FWIW.

Yes, and together they spin around other things, such as a center of galaxy and Pleiades (supposedly)...
 
Yes, and together they spin around other things, such as a center of galaxy and Pleiades (supposedly)...
Pleiades are not center of our galaxy, according to official (mainstream) scientific reports.
From Wikipedia:
The Galactic Center is the barycenter of the Milky Way and a corresponding point on the rotational axis of the galaxy. Its central massive object is a supermassive black hole of about 4 million solar masses, which is called Sagittarius A*, part of which is a very compact radio source arising from a bright spot in the region around the black hole, near the event horizon.[6] The Galactic Center is approximately 8 kiloparsecs (26,000 ly) away from Earth[3] in the direction of the constellations Sagittarius, Ophiuchus, and Scorpius, where the Milky Way appears brightest, visually close to the Butterfly Cluster (M6) or the star Lambda Scorpii, south to the Pipe Nebula.

If the Sun, most probably together with its companion, i.e. as a binary system, spins also around Pleiades as suggested, it implies that Pleiades are in some way barycenter of at least that solar 'circular' motion. It thus also implies that the Sun and its binary system, possibly with other objects and systems orbiting the same barycenter, are in some way 'gravitationally' connected to Pleiades, and to those other potential objects and systems.

Haven't checked the videos you posted yet, so maybe it's explained there in more details.
Thanks for posting them anyway, super interesting subject. :flowers:
 
Back
Top Bottom