Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection

Current "opinions" from past and contemporary monitors of Planet X touch many of the posts on this thread.

No fear, as the Cs said; It is the soul that counts.

Planet X: NASA’s Tracking, Future Trajectory, and Global Reactions
Jul 25, 2024
From Coast Insider Archives, enjoy a comprehensive show featuring various guests discussing Planet X: NASA’s tracking since 1982, future trajectory predictions, hidden celestial evidence, potential pole shifts, ocean rise fears, and global underground base preparations.




Ev Cochrane: Turquoise Sun – Prequel to Discovery | Thunderbolts
Apr 21, 2024
Second episode in the Turquoise Sun series. A prequel story of personal relationships and events which culminated into the recent book "The Case of the Turquoise Sun: A Natural History of Creation" written by Ev Cochrane.

In a series of collaborative articles in the mid-1980s, Dave Talbott and Ev presented evidence of Venus’s comet-like history, and its association with the Saturn-Venus-Mars polar configuration in prehistoric times—well before the events circa 1500 BCE as described by Immanuel Velikovsky in "Worlds in Collision" (1950).

A core principle of their research found primary mythological motifs reflected in ancient art such as Venus and the Eye of Horus—as described in Egyptian Pyramid Texts—rampaging about the sky in serpentine form and threatening the world with destruction.

A respected comparative mythologist, veteran Thunderbolts contributor Ev Cochrane is the author of Martian Metamorphoses (1997), The Many Faces of Venus (2001), Starf*cker (2006), On Fossil Gods and Forgotten Worlds (2010), and Phaethon (2017).


Saturday, Jul. 27, 2024
MAJOR FARSIDE SOLAR FLARE: The biggest flare of Solar Cycle 25 just exploded from the farside of the sun. X-ray detectors on Europe's Solar Orbiter (SolO) spacecraft registered an X14 category blast:


Solar Orbiter was over the farside of the sun when the explosion occured on July 23rd, in perfect position to observe a flare otherwise invisible from Earth.

"From the estimated GOES class, it was the largest flare so far," says Samuel Krucker of UC Berkeley. Krucker is the principal investigator for STIX, an X-ray telescope on SolO which can detect solar flares and classify them on the same scale as NOAA's GOES satellites. "Other large flares we've detected are from May 20, 2024 (X12) and July 17, 2023 (X10). All of these have come from the back side of the sun."

Meanwhile on the Earthside of the sun, the largest flare so far registered X8.9 on May 14, 2024. SolO has detected at least three larger farside explosions, which means our planet has been dodging a lot of bullets.

The X14 farside flare was indeed a major event. It hurled a massive CME into space, shown here in a coronagraph movie from the Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO):

farsideCME2.gif

The CME sprayed energetic particles all over the solar system. Earth itself was hit by 'hard' protons (E > 100 MeV) despite being on the opposite side of the sun.

"This is a big one--a 360 degree event," says George Ho of the Southwest Research Institute, principal investigator for one of the energetic particle detectors onboard SolO. "It also caused a high dosage at Mars."

SolO was squarely in the crosshairs of the CME, and on July 24th it experienced a direct hit. In a matter of minutes, particle counts jumped almost a thousand-fold as the spacecraft was peppered by a hail storm energetic ions and electrons.

"This is something we call an 'Energetic Storm Particle' (ESP) event," explains Ho. "It's when particles are locally accelerated in the CME's shock front [to energies higher than a typical solar radiation storm]. An ESP event around Earth in March 1989 caused the Great Quebec Blackout."

So that's what might have happened if the CME hit Earth instead of SolO. Maybe next time. The source of this blast will rotate around to face our planet a week to 10 days from now, so stay tuned

World's largest optical telescope takes shape
Jul 1, 2024
This drone footage shows ESO's Extremely Large Telescope taking shape in the Chilean Atacama Desert. We can see the insulating cladding being used to dress the dome and the white lattice structure at the centre — now almost complete — that will support the ELT’s 39-m primary mirror. Around the 1:30 mark, we can also see two arc-shaped tracks, currently protected with tan wooden plates, bracketing the white lattice. These tracks will allow the telescope to move in altitude. The grey beams at opposite sides of the lattice, seen more clearly at the 2:15 mark, will support the so-called Nasmyth platforms –– two tennis-court-sized areas where the scientific instruments will rest.

on Jul 26, 2024 at 12:10 pm


July 10, 2024

Park Fire emergency pop-up edition (07/26/2024)
Started streaming July 27 2024
The latest in a recurring series of live, virtual, & interactive "office hours" hosted by Dr. Daniel Swain on various topics related to extreme weather and climate.Park Fire emergency pop-up edition: The Park Fire in northeastern California is exhibiting extraordinarily rapid and extreme fire behavior. I will give some updates, including which communities might face risk overnight with little warning.
 
Perhaps this new telescope will give us some answers.

Amid controversies and diverging opinions, all of the researchers agree on one thing. A new wide-angle telescope currently under construction could soon put the debate to rest, once the US National Science Foundation and Stanford University researchers start scientific operations in late 2025. Called the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, it has the largest digital camera ever built and sits atop an 8,800-foot mountain in northern Chile.

This is a next-generation telescope that will search the entire available sky every few days,” Batygin said. “It might just find Planet Nine directly, which would be a fantastic conclusion to the search and open up a new chapter. At the very least, it will find a ton more Kuiper Belt objects. But even if it doesn’t discover a single new object, it will be enough to confirm the Planet Nine hypothesis, because it will test all of the statistics, all of the patterns that we see with an independent survey.”

Rice agrees that the telescope will go a long way to settling the debate, and clearly address the question of the statistical significance of the alignment of trans-Neptunian objects — the key point of evidence for Planet Nine.

If the Rubin telescope finds a super-Earth, Rice said, that would be exciting because these celestial bodies, between the sizes of Earth and Neptune, are a common type of exoplanet.

“We do not have one in the solar system, which seems really strange, and has kind of been an outstanding mystery because we find so many of them in systems around other stars — it would be incredible to actually study one up close, because exoplanets are so far away that it’s very difficult to get a real grasp on exactly what they physically look like,” Rice said.

Finding a smaller planet would also spark excitement, Rice added, because every solar system planet is immensely useful for extrapolating information about the thousands of comparable exoplanets that researchers are uncovering across the galaxy.

And what if nothing shows up at all? It would still be useful to know for sure how many planets there are, Rice said. “I think not even knowing the number of planets in our own solar system is very humbling.”

That means that even the facts that many people learned from textbooks as children can change, as scientists discover more about the universe.

“That’s actually a wonderful thing,” she added. “Human knowledge is continually moving — sometimes it’s huge shifts, sometimes it’s just a back-and-forth debate. It’s a fun, emblematic example of the scientific process.”

 
Perhaps this new telescope will give us some answers.
Perhaps, but I won't be holding my breath on that, because it will be usually sweeping across the sky too fast/quickly (to be able to cover the whole sky in such a short time) to pick up the faint Sun twin's trail, at least to my knowledge of the LSST project (now called V. Rubin Observatory) and how the LSST camera and its software are supposed to operate.

https://survey-strategy.lsst.io/ said:

Vera C. Rubin Observatory Survey Strategy​

The survey strategy for the Vera C. Rubin Observatory is the result of balancing the four primary science drivers for the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST):
  • constraining dark energy and dark matter,
  • mapping the Milky Way and Local Volume,
  • exploring the transient universe, and
  • cataloging the Solar System,
while also attempting to include as much science for the entire astronomical community as possible.

https://survey-strategy.lsst.io/baseline/index.html said:

Baseline Strategy​

The current baseline survey (v3.4) consists of :
  • “The Main Survey” - the Wide Fast Deep (WFD). This is the bulk of the survey, and is designed to achieve the core science goals of the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). The WFD could use up to 90% of the total survey time.
  • “Mini” and “Micro” Surveys. These are small sub-surveys that cover a different area on the sky (such as the North Ecliptic Spur, Dusty Plane, or South Celestial Pole) or operate in a different observing ‘mode’ (such as the near-sun twilight survey). Minisurveys could use between 3-10% of the total survey time, while microsurveys might require 1-3% of the total survey time.
  • “Deep Drilling Fields” (DDFs). These are single pointings (about 10 square degrees each), which receive intensive observations on a regular basis. Each DDF will reach at least 1 magnitude deeper than the WFD coadded depths.

https://survey-strategy.lsst.io/baseline/wfd.html said:

Wide Fast Deep (WFD)​

The Wide Fast Deep (WFD) composes the bulk of the survey visits. The WFD sky includes low-dust extinction area, useful for extragalactic science, as well as higher stellar density areas (with higher dust extinction), useful for galactic science. The total area in the WFD is approximately 19.6k square degrees.
 
Perhaps this new telescope will give us some answers.
Perhaps, but I won't be holding my breath on that, because it will be usually sweeping across the sky too fast/quickly (to be able to cover the whole sky in such a short time) to pick up the faint Sun twin's trail, at least to my knowledge of the LSST project (now called V. Rubin Observatory) and how the LSST camera and its software are supposed to operate.

No doubt it may prove interesting - with the caveat on "I won't be holding my breath" as a telescopic-reality.

Have a look at this old thread and read the paper that @mkrnhr provided (never forgot it) in relationships to what the C's had said:

(Ark) Okay, so let me ask a further question: Why thousands of astronomers, professionals and amateurs, are not seeing the planetary orbits changing?

A: These changes are miniscule but significant nonetheless. The instruments that are capable of measuring are tightly controlled.
 
I gathered a couple of quotes about gravity waves:

Q: (L) Assuming there is a fleet of spacecraft riding a wave, and approaching from the vicinity of Zeta Reticuli, what does it mean to say that the space time warp is indefinite in terms of arrival? Why is this? Please specify.

A: Mass affects electromagnetic transfer within gravity wave.

Q: (L) In other words, if there is a large mass you are trying to transfer, is the problem partly because the mass itself spreads out over such a large area of space/time and must be transferred in stages or something along that line?

A: Close.

Q: (L) Can you help us out anymore here?

A: Mass affects time cycle: small equal short cycle; large or dense equals long cycle.

Session 5 October 1994

Q: (L) What would make a gravity wave unstable?

A: Utilization.

Session 15 June 1996

A: No. Realm Border is traveling wave.

Q: (L) Okay, you say "traveling wave," and then you say that antimatter is the highway. Does this mean moving through antimatter or interacting in some way with antimatter via the impetus of the traveling wave, or realm border?

A: Bends space/time, this is where your unstable gravity waves can be utilized.

Q: (L) Utilizing antimatter by creating an EM field, which destabilizes the gravity wave, allows antimatter to unite with matter, creating a portal through which space/time can be bent, or traveled through via this "bending." In other words, producing an EM field, bringing in the antimatter, IS the bending of space/time? Is that it?

A: Yes.

Q: (V) Is there a portal for each person, or one large portal?

A: No.

Q: (V) So we move through a portal in masses?

A: No.

Q: (L) Is this generating of EM fields to destabilize the gravity wave what the HAARP assembly is designed and built for?

A: No.

Q: (V) If there are not personal portals for one person, or portals for groups of people...

A: Portal is where you desire it to be.

Q: (V) So it could just be a state of mind?

A: No. With proper technology you can create a portal where desired. There are unlimited options.

Q: (L) Proper technology. Unstable gravity waves. And once you told us to study Tesla coils.... antimatter... destabilizing the gravity waves through EM generation allows the antimatter to interact with matter which then creates a portal... is it in the antimatter universe that all this traveling back and forth is done by aliens when they abduct people?

A: Close. They transport through it, but most abductions take place in either 3rd or 4th density.

Session 22 June 1996

A: The gravity wave is merely a "ripple" in the omnipresent fabric; the base energy facilitator.

Session 31 May 1997

Q: (A) I want to go back to this Russian experiment. I asked what was the nature of the effect that they observed, and the answer was that it was a gravity wave that they expected. And it was the result of impact of a comet on Jupiter. Now what was so particular about this impact? Does every impact create a gravity wave?

A: There was nothing so particular about that, except that their instrumentation was trained on the event.

Q: (A) Does it mean that every impact creates a gravity wave?

A: Every outburst of energy.

Q: (C) Creates a gravity wave?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Where does energy burst out of?

A: Collision.

Q: (L) Collision between what and what? (C) Physical bodies?

A: And/or atomic particles. Remember your microdynamic/macrodynamic matrix. Laura was approaching the concept in the "Noah Syndrome."

Q: (L) Approaching doesn't get you there! So, when there is an approach between bodies, there is an interaction or exchange, and this exchange produces a gravity wave?

A: What happens when you strike two rocks together?

Q: (L) There is a vibration. A jarring. Depending on the rocks, one may crush the other. There is heat. There can be sparks, depending on the rocks. (C) You tear off, or knock off some particles. (L) Yeah, electrons.

A: Hmmm... magnetization... hmmm...

Q: (C) We're making them think! (L) Sure we are. (A) Well, when you are striking rocks together, some atoms come pretty close one to another and they try to interpenetrate and probably... (C) Well, does it produce a gravity wave? Sounds like a collision to me. They said any collision.

A: Supercollider...

Session 12 September 1998

Q: (Pierre) I have a question. It was reported that the speed of light was having variation between the twenties and the forties.

(Andromeda) 1929 and 1945.

(Pierre) And what is the cause of this variation?

A: Variations in density subjugation.

Q: (Joe) So does that mean the extent to which planet Earth 3D was subjugated to the influence of higher densities?

A: Density.

Q: (Pierre) And does density have something to do with gravity?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) Does this variation in the speed of light affect our connection to the information field?

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) So it suggests that in 1929, there was a variation in the density subjugation. Does that imply an increased control of...?

A: Gravity wave.

Q: (Joe) Does it have anything to do with the 1929 Great Depression? That's the question.

A: More or less, yes.

Q: (Joe) And you were saying that was about 20 years, and what did you compare? The Great Depression and today?

(L) Yeah, but, and not necessarily because I thought anything was, because I don't know anything about any speed of light variations now or anything like that. I just noticed that there was a period that was the Great Depression. It started right before the war. Yeah. I mean, 1928 would be very similar to now. We haven't quite reached hyperinflation, all that sort of thing, but we're really getting very close to that breaking point. And then 1945 was at the end of World War II and it just struck me that that period was just so dramatic in terms of the stuff that was going on economically and globally. The war... I mean, millions of people dying and that sort of thing. So we know that now we're having this economic crisis. I don't know if it's gonna be as serious or severe as that one was, at least not for the entire world. But we are also having the rumbling of all this war business going on in the background. Now, does that mean that there's also going to be a concomitant change in the speed of light? Is something gonna happen about gravity? Are the two correlated? I don't know. No, I don't know any of those things, but it just struck me that that was an interesting phenomenon.

(Joe) Are variations in the density subjugation a natural phenomenon?

A: Yes

Q: (Gaby) They said gravity wave. So it was something cosmological?

A: Yes

Q: (Pierre) How do variations in the speed of light affect/modulate the connection between us and the information field?

A: Gravity is the key.

Session 8 April 2023

Q: Okay, next question: we have found this Novosibirtsk group. They apparently have some kind of detectors and some kinds of ideas according to this Russian guy Kozyrev, which enable them to measure instantaneous signals caused by some kind of irreversible events, such as when the comets hit Jupiter. I would like to know if the effect they have measured is a real, new effect?

A: Not "new" of course, but this is most interesting, because now we are dancing on the threshold of gravity waves, the very same thing we have been hinting at for so long, as you measure it in your linear perspective. The unusual condition that has arisen in Russia has created a bubble within the framework of the world power structure which has allowed some concussive "discoveries" to be occasionally leaked out into the open. This, of course, presents unique but potentially hazardous opportunities for you in your research.

Session 5 September 1998

Q: (A) Last time you said that gravity waves are of instantaneous imprint. That would mean that the wave propagates in space instantaneously. How does its intensity vary when you are away from the source? Does its intensity become weaker and weaker?

A: No.

Session 19 September 1998

Q: What is the symbology of the 'breaking of rocks,' as in the alchemical texts, as well as related to Perseus as 'he who breaks?'

A: Occurs at a time when rocks break, as in the electromagnetic impulses that emanate from earthbound rocks when sheared by tectonic forces, and much more importantly, the possible utilization of said forces whether naturally or otherwise induced.

Session 7 June 1997

So when a comet hits the Earth, we get an outburst of energy because of the collision, which creates a gravity wave which allows a bending of space/time, or travelling through via this "bending".

Earthquakes, solar storms and supernovas could be another source of such energy outbursts.

Gravity waves are instantaneous imprints and have an effect from a distance without losing intensity. Which means that cosmic bodies can have an effect on us from a vast distance.
 
Back
Top Bottom