Wandering Star
The Living Force
If this is true, then it would explain several apparent contradictions in the sessions about the companion star, since on several occasions it seemed that future events were being discussed.
Very interesting.
Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Very interesting.
Yes, it would explain why it seemed like the C's were talking about our future, while Laura had the idea that this already happened in our past. And now we have the possible explanation of how both can be true. Perhaps it did happen, and it will happen again, if their orbits are similar to orbits of Sirius binary stars.
a) The paths of Sirius A and Sirius B
b) The binary pair take 50 years to complete an orbit
c) From the view point of the brighter star, Sirius B follows a highly eliptical orbit
d) The pair actually orbit round their common centre of mass
The Sirius AB pictures reminded me of DNA pictures.
I'm not sure this is the correct concept for the actual phenomenon. The voltage increases, but what happens if the capacitor is subject to any kind of load? The capacitance of a capacitor is determined by the area of the plates and the distance between the plates, but actual capacitance of a capacitor decreases as the distance between the plates increases, effectively decreasing the amount of charge the capacitor can hold when seen as a dc battery. Capacitance, in farads, is a measure of electron charge in coulombs - current.
What I see is the twin sun acts as a battery as it cuts electromagnetic lines of force in its rapid approach toward the sun.
In electrical terms, a good ground assures current flow. The twin sun approaching our sun adds to the 'solar battery', in effect creating a stronger ground to that other pole of the solar capacitor. Going by my experience in industry here, I may be wrong or misappropriating, forgive me if so.
Yes. Unfortunately, the real orbital movement looks different. Here is how they are orbiting around each other:
So there are no two close approaches, only one.
There is another thing that our solar configuration reminds me of - capacitive sensor:
So, our Sun with the heliosheath could be two plates of the solar capacitor, and the twin sun could have the role of the Target in the above picture. So when the twin sun gets inside the sensing field, the capacitance of the solar capacitor increases.
Really fascinating posts, @Persej! I'm thinking about the terms 'realm border', and 'realm border crossing'. I assumed that was some sort of mystical/energetic thing that we can't see, as the C's have said that the realm border:
Oct 18, 1994:
November 2, 1994:
Maybe one aspect of the realm border crossing is as simple as the earth moving from one interstellar cloud to another. Or maybe that is just a coincidence. But this has been really eye-opening, thank you!
Oct 18, 1994:
November 2, 1994:
Maybe one aspect of the realm border crossing is as simple as the earth moving from one interstellar cloud to another. Or maybe that is just a coincidence. But this has been really eye-opening, thank you!
The setup is a small capacitor, (solar companion) between the plates of a larger capacitor, (our sun). The smaller capacitor is moving toward the cathode of the larger capacitor, thereby cutting electromagnetic lines of force and charging up. The polarities of the capacitors are aligned. This would increase the total capacitance of the solar capacitor I think.
Whether current is blocked or allowed to flow from our sun to its twin or vice-versa is not a simple question, it seems there are a number of factors in play and it seems possible that current flow from the sun could be either increased or decreased depending on several correlated variables. Evidence shows that comets sometimes cut the magnetic lines at near perpendicular angles, creating great charge potential and causing massive current spikes between the sun and the comet, this is theoretically possible with the sun and Nemesis as well.
Pierre discusses this in his 'Earth Changes'
Pierre goes on to discuss wormholes and the possibility that any exchange of energy between the sun and Nemesis may be non-local in nature.
Maybe not crossing as in travel through the galaxy, but periodically entering our realm. I think that is how the C's described it. And yes, since every wave oscillates, it should be expected that this wave also oscillates and moves this realm back and forth through densities. Which means that after another 309,000 years this realm will again fall into the 3D. But how exactly this works we cannot know unless we see the visual presentation of it, just like we can now see those video animations on YT.
Another reason that some are looking for something big, perhaps even a companion star, larger but farther out, has to do with the fact that our sun itself is accelerating in its motion across the sky. Over the last two hundred years, a period of relatively accurate modern measurements, it has been found that the sun has increased its motion across the sky from about 50.1 arc seconds per year to 50.3 arc seconds per year. While this might not sound like much, it means that the rate at which it takes the sun to move 360 degrees (1,296,000 arc seconds - a complete orbit across the sky) has gone from 25,868 years to 25,765 years. That represents a reduction in the sun's possible binary orbit period of 100 years in just the last two centuries! This is a large effect with astronomical implications.
Few people are aware of the sun's accelerating motion because it has been obscured by an archaic precession theory, which dictates the sun cannot move. In 1543 Copernicus published De Revolutionibus, bringing back the old Greek heliocentric system (lost in 300BC) and fixing the sun as the "immovable center of the universe". In doing so, he effectively explained away all motion of the sun by saying it only "appeared" to move relative to the equinox or background stars, due to a "wobble" of the earth's axis. He, and others to follow, would claim that all motion of the sun was a vestige of a wobbling earth axis, and the sun, like the fixed stars, could not move.
A few hundred years after Copernicus, Sir Isaac Newton gave us the "lunisolar theory of precession", reasoning that it must be the huge gravity of the sun, and the nearby gravity of the moon, both pulling on an oblate earth causing the axis to change orientation by about 50 arc seconds per year. He assumed that only an axis that wobbled this much would cause the equinox to occur 50 arc seconds sooner every year (making the background stars appear to shift this much, a.k.a. precession). In his mind, a wobbling axis was the only reason we saw the sun move backwards across the sky. In other words, he thought solar motion was all an illusion, just as Copernicus had stated. This was long before anyone conceived of a galaxy, or the idea that the sun could move around the galaxy.
Newton's equations never completely worked. Specifically, they couldn't explain why the sun "appeared" to move "faster" across the sky each year. Many scientists tried to fix Newton's formula by adding in thousands of variables beyond just the moon and sun. They included forces for the other major planets, asteroids, comets, atmospheric effects, etc., but the equation still didn't predict the acceleration. Finally, around the year 1900, the great astronomer Simon Newcomb said he didn't know why the sun moved faster each year but found that by adding .000222 arc seconds per year, the precession calculation could come very close to predicting the actual rate of the sun's observed motion. This mathematical plug allowed sailors and others who needed to know the exact position of the sun to better navigate. And so it went, until radios, computers, satellites, GPS, and other forms of navigation completely negated the need to measure the sun's motion. Today, almost no one needs to know the precession rate anymore because no one navigates by the sun. Thus, it doesn't matter how much the sun moves each year - or does it?
Lost knowledge of our Sun's twin, the Great Year, and the implications for cataclysms, and consciousness - Walter Cruttenden
It's our pleasure to welcome Walter Cruttenden, author of Lost Star of Myth and Time, as our featured author this month. Walter is the Director of the Binary Research Institute in California and has a background in math and science. His book...www.sott.net
If the Sun is moving faster each year, that means that the Nemesis is coming closer to us. But if the period of the orbit of the Nemesis is 27 million years, then what causes the Sun to move 360 degrees in 25,000-years? Is there some body in the Solar system with a 25,000-years period orbit? Do we have a third sun in our Solar system?
There is a theory that Sirius is also a triple star system.
irfu.cea.fr
Sirius : triple star ?
Animation showing the interaction of a third body orbiting Sirius. The animation illustrates the possible effect of a third body with a long period (2500 yr) orbit. The tidal interaction during the close encounter at the passage of the object in the inner part of its orbit could cause a...
This documentary has nice explanations of The Great Year cycle. The only problem that I can see is that they are contradicting their own theory, because as long as the Sun is accelerating, it is moving towards the center of the Iron Age, not away from it. So we have yet to reach the worst point in this cycle.
Well, ok, but this precession of the zodiac is about 25,000 years long, give or take a few thousand years. But the Nemesis supposedly has an orbital period of 27 million years, and it orbits in tandem with the Sun. So we either live in a triple star system, or the precession of the zodiac is much longer than what they think.
I just asked ChatGPT to do calculations for me, and the long orbital period for the 3.4 percent of the mass of the sun does match. But with the 56 percent it gets way off the mark. So, either the 56 percent answer was incorrect, or that is the mass of the another star in our solar system.
I found this about Mayan calendar:
And this might be related:
So there are many cycles within cycles because this is how cosmic energy flows in the cosmos. And the Wave is also a cyclical wave of cosmic energy. So the twin sun is just one of the factors of these cycles.
And this might be related:
So there are many cycles within cycles because this is how cosmic energy flows in the cosmos. And the Wave is also a cyclical wave of cosmic energy. So the twin sun is just one of the factors of these cycles.
