Someone pointed out that the PTB will use that fact to give us a new shot every year - or perhaps every six months? Yes, it's illogical, but humanity is way past the point that this poses any problems.
Session 21 March 2020
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Someone pointed out that the PTB will use that fact to give us a new shot every year - or perhaps every six months? Yes, it's illogical, but humanity is way past the point that this poses any problems.
This part might deserve some contextual explanations to be understood better. Here we are talking about the ex-French health minister Agnes Buzyn.
First, who is she? Here is an interesting (non-mainstream) biography translated from a newsletter titled "Faits et Documents" to which I added a few comments in brackets.
Obviously, Buzyn and her entourage ticks most boxes of the real elite: concentration camp survivor, B’nï B’rit (the master free masonry order), President of the European parliament, Zionist activism, pedophilia, euthanasia, abortion, big pharma, vaccine programs...
Now, let's have a look at what Buzyn did during the COVID-19 hysteria:
On January 13th, way before the "epidemics" reaches Europe, Buzin classified the chloroquine as a toxic substance and restricted its use. We are talking here about a substance that is used for 80 years, that is very safe as shown by a number of studies including one involving a cohort of 900,000 subjects and that has been used by about 3 billion people around the planet. In France only, 36 million of pills are consumed yearly. Chloroquine is the second most popular drug in the world after aspirine. Its safety has never been questioned for 80 years, but it was before the coronavirus craze.
On February 16th, unexpectedly Buzyn resigns from her Health minister position that, coincidentally or not, would soon become, politically, one of the crappiest position. The reason for this resignation was, allegedly, to run for Paris mayorship election and replace Macron party candidate, Benjamin Griveaux (he had to quit the campaign because he was caught sending nude videos of himself). Why quit a prominent minister position to run for a lost election? (polls gave about 15% of the vote to the late runner Buzyn)
On March 16th, only one month after starting her political campaign, Buzyn stops it. That suggests that the Paris election was just a bogus excuse to leave the Health minister position. One day later, on March 17th, Buzyn stated publicly: "I knew that the tsunami wave was before us, I warned Edouard Philippe and Emmanuel Macron in January."
From the above we can reasonably assume that very early Buzyn was informed about the coming plan. That would explain the restrictions imposed on chloroquin (the main competitor of a vaccine) as early as January, the resignation from the Health Minister position right before the epidemics and the alleged "warnings" to the government in January.
To give you an idea of the difference in level of information between Buzyn and other members of the government, Macron went to the theater on March 7th and stated publicly: "Life goes on. There is no reason, except for the most vulnerable ones, to modify our partying habits"
Poor Macron puppet. He obviously didn't get the memo. The above illustrate Douglas Reed analysis exposed in The Controversy of Zion: in the STS pyramid, the official hierarchy is not necessarily the same as the real hierarchy. Officially, Buzyn (minister) is lower than Macron (President). In reality, Buzyn is higher in the sense that she got key information way earlier than Macron. To paraphrase the Cs: "Buzyn is in on the truth, Macron is not"
Last edited:
Macron gave us a 5000 boxes of chloroquine before we started to make our own. So he is not such a bad guy, but obviously there are much darker forces controlling the France.
Evan
Jedi Council Member
That’s kinda where I figured we are: sit back and enjoy the show for awhile, then come back with impressions. “The programming is complete”, “We can retire now!” (but let’s not throw that party just yet!
), “Sit back...”. So now we’re in observation mode. Though I do check New Threads every day just in case!
Vyninho
The Force is Strong With This One
My point of view...
When the swarm of comets start their show, a part of the population (SDS and SDA) will fork in time lines according to their work on oneself / belief thus the frequency of vibratory resonance and especially free will during the epicenter of the Wave that will transport / merge us into the new reality.
Everything is really open and depends on the observer at this time of the event (there are several possibilities that will affect the recipient)
And during this transition time, we make the choice to stay to help / accompany the survivors or if the situation forces us to leave through a glass hole because the environmental rules will have changed through the Wave and our awareness / knowledge of the phenomenon.
When the swarm of comets start their show, a part of the population (SDS and SDA) will fork in time lines according to their work on oneself / belief thus the frequency of vibratory resonance and especially free will during the epicenter of the Wave that will transport / merge us into the new reality.
Everything is really open and depends on the observer at this time of the event (there are several possibilities that will affect the recipient)
And during this transition time, we make the choice to stay to help / accompany the survivors or if the situation forces us to leave through a glass hole because the environmental rules will have changed through the Wave and our awareness / knowledge of the phenomenon.
D
Deleted member 4320
Guest
This is more than that, in my opinion.That’s kinda where I figured we are: sit back and enjoy the show for awhile, then come back with impressions. “The programming is complete”, “We can retire now!” (but let’s not throw that party just yet!
C's rather have been saying it because they know that soon will be the time where the various decision can be made (as the reaction regarding the behavior of citizens and earth changes) by the governments and others (they are now doing it) what will be highly unpopular and a lot of atrocities may happen.
And what C's want to say is that I think, it would be good if you or anyone of us won't engage in any riots and be hit by the baton on the head. In other words: "They will be desperate and brutal. And pity you if you could die by the bullet in your head because changes are coming and you can do more then than lying a few meters under earth."
There is not easy to be always prepared and make always correct choices, but if it would be possible it will be good to remember to "not to be in the wrong place at the wrong time".
Our President was also not on the truth at the beginning. He was doing what he was told, but he didn't know the whole plan. Only after he came back from visiting Macron, did he tell us that Macron told him that our world will not be the same again. So at some point somebody told Macron and then he told our President when they met. But apparently, nobody explained this to our Minister of Foreign Affairs, because he is still speaking about how the reaction to a virus of this lethality is not normal. And how he distrust the possible vaccine. Like Laura said in the session, our leader are not idiots, they can see the numbers and see that something is obviously not right about this.
So I'm wondering if the exposure will not come from that direction. There are still good people in the politics but who are not on the truth. But what will happen when they do? Will some of them speak about it?
GqSoul
Jedi
Thanks to everyone for the light and comfort from this session. As we reflected, my wife and I noted that we were all bowled over by something strange during that Nov/Dec time frame. My 2 1/2 year old son had a cough/ chest cold that persisted the better part of two months. She was nearing the end of her term, preparing to birth our 2nd child, so we figured week we're all a bit more susceptibility from fatigue.It's probably impossible to know. They are simply not testing it anymore, and you may or may not have antibodies afterwards.
But I think that what matters way more than that is to pay attention to what information you let in, and how to be immune to the propaganda. Based on what the Cs said, mental hygiene may be way more important than washing our hands every 5 minutes.It may have to do with one's nature and current alignment, which "strand" you get or rather how the virus influences you. OSIT.
I don't know what strands may/may not be circulating, but it seems to me that many of us have gotten a shot in the arm or kick in the rear! The last 2 years have certainly been "intense" for us as far as lessons and growth are concerned.
WIldWolf2012
The Force is Strong With This One
I could bet you have a talent for in german so called "Hellriechen" . That means you can smell Spirits or other not-material things..
You smelled some badass spirit...
WIldWolf2012
The Force is Strong With This One
in Addition I found this :South Front published this today:
Leaked Video Reveals Pentagon Briefing On Development Of Vaccine To Modify Human Behavior
The video below was allegedly filmed during a presentation in the Pentagon in 2005. It has been circulating online since...southfront.org
As I watched I remembered having seen it a long time ago. Back then I figured that if it was a hoax, it could have been made by inserting a voice-over. However, my gut feeling is that it's genuine. Anybody knows? I don't think the presenter is Bill Gates as some claim, but he does look and sound like him.
Bastian
The Living Force
Hello @Pierre.
Here is the source, an interview with the magazine "Paris Match" :
Comments :
So there is a question : is he (and his team) working on a vaccine.
First general answer : "Vaccines are not always the good solution."
Next sentence is a special case (which may, or not, be related to Covid-19), supporting his previous claim : "Finding a vaccine for a disease which isn't immunizing... is even a silly challenge."
Next sentence is an example of the special case : "Almost 30 billion dollars were spent to find one againt HIV, see the result !"
So, from what I read, I understand that he says only that :
- vaccines may be a (public health) solution for some diseases, but not all (NB: he says so in one of his book that I had read);
- particularly vaccines are not a solution for non-immunizing diseases (example : AIDS, for which no vaccine were invented, despite huge amount of money and effort) ;
- he and his team are not working on a vaccine for Covid-19 (because it's a new infectious disease, badly known, and they already know a good cure for it, with cheap old drugs).
But (from what I understand) in this interview he doesn't clearly claim that Covid-19 (or more precisely SARS-Cov-2) is not immunizing.
(He may says that elsewhere, but I do not yet know about it.)
My two cents.
I believe you may have overinterpreted what Pr. Raoult said.
Here is the source, an interview with the magazine "Paris Match" :
My translation :Paris Match said:
Comments :
So there is a question : is he (and his team) working on a vaccine.
First general answer : "Vaccines are not always the good solution."
Next sentence is a special case (which may, or not, be related to Covid-19), supporting his previous claim : "Finding a vaccine for a disease which isn't immunizing... is even a silly challenge."
Next sentence is an example of the special case : "Almost 30 billion dollars were spent to find one againt HIV, see the result !"
So, from what I read, I understand that he says only that :
- vaccines may be a (public health) solution for some diseases, but not all (NB: he says so in one of his book that I had read);
- particularly vaccines are not a solution for non-immunizing diseases (example : AIDS, for which no vaccine were invented, despite huge amount of money and effort) ;
- he and his team are not working on a vaccine for Covid-19 (because it's a new infectious disease, badly known, and they already know a good cure for it, with cheap old drugs).
But (from what I understand) in this interview he doesn't clearly claim that Covid-19 (or more precisely SARS-Cov-2) is not immunizing.
(He may says that elsewhere, but I do not yet know about it.)
My two cents.
Gallo
Jedi
Hello,
I m new here.
How could They say that the virus can modify dna, and in the 3 june 1995 session, it is said
"A: Has virus.
Q: (SV) Don't breathe this way! (T) Ebola is here! (L) I was curious about the kamikaze virus I had the other day. It made me think about virii in general. Since virii don't have DNA, is it possible that they could be used to modify DNA?
A: No."
Sorry for my english..
I m new here.
How could They say that the virus can modify dna, and in the 3 june 1995 session, it is said
"A: Has virus.
Q: (SV) Don't breathe this way! (T) Ebola is here! (L) I was curious about the kamikaze virus I had the other day. It made me think about virii in general. Since virii don't have DNA, is it possible that they could be used to modify DNA?
A: No."
Sorry for my english..
Gallo
Jedi
So is it a vaccin or a virus ? Same thimg ?