Could be, but could you imagine the general public’s reaction given the response to Covid-19!
Chaos, hysteria, total control…. toilet paper…oh my!
Session 21 March 2020
- Thread starter Laura
- Start date
Could be, but could you imagine the general public’s reaction given the response to Covid-19!
Chaos, hysteria, total control…. toilet paper…oh my!
D
Deleted member 4320
Guest
The government and other agencies share it only to make an impression on the public that they do not hide anything before people.
The information about aliens shared by them is truncated, showed without context, and publication in little parts in a regular period.
What suggest that they are doing it because, as I wrote in the first paragraph, they want "to make an impression on the public that they do not hide anything before people." And there is NO really will to expose anything, what would make any deep impression on people and people could do something with this.
If there will be serious aliens disclosure, this will be done by themselves, and we will not doubt what has to deal with.
South Front published this today:
Leaked Video Reveals Pentagon Briefing On Development Of Vaccine To Modify Human Behavior
The video below was allegedly filmed during a presentation in the Pentagon in 2005. It has been circulating online since...
southfront.org
As I watched I remembered having seen it a long time ago. Back then I figured that if it was a hoax, it could have been made by inserting a voice-over. However, my gut feeling is that it's genuine. Anybody knows? I don't think the presenter is Bill Gates as some claim, but he does look and sound like him.
Heather
Dagobah Resident
Hi Luks (and others here weighing in on this).
Timing still seems important to consider here, though. I mean, here we are, in the middle of the Coronavirus "pandemic," when people are shut-in, and totalitarian measures are being installed, and the Pentagon decides that this is the best time to publicly declassify UFO information that could have been declassified years ago? There's got to be a concrete reason behind this decision. And, I mean, how can the Pentagon officially justify doing something that could make people even more stressed out than they already are?
The Pentagon is obviously a powerful entity, and in making this statement now it seems to be operating outside of the president's immediate (and dire) concerns with the Coronavirus and the foundering economy -- I mean, I don't see Trump taking a time out just now to declassify these old UFO documents! So, what's the deal, then, with the Pentagon?
Anyway, possibly with some further research we could come up with something concrete, and not just speculative. Or maybe something will happen that will shed some light on this.
@Kay Kim,
I think @Persej describes it well. There are perhaps several cycles within cycles occurring at least very close together.
Sometimes it helps to read more of the surrounding text so I am including a little more.
Session 23 March 1996:
The cluster may not reach earth as a single cluster. There may be comets that arrive from "all directions" and may hit at slightly different impact times I would think.
And the realm border change going from 3D to 4D changes our rules of physics/science as we know them.
So I think the Cs are saying that the comets are not the main focus but it is the realm border crossing that we should focus on and The Wave is the "realm border crossing".
Session 23 March 1996:
When Laura wondered about the comets coming before the "realm border" crossing they seem to be pointing out "Part in part out".
It may be that part of the comet cluster is in 3D and part is in 4D as the earth moves into 4D.
Session 23 March 1996:
The Cs do say that "some" will hit but not how many or what "locator" they might hit. There could also be an unexpected effect from "electric phenomena".
Session 31 October 2001:
I think the rules would then possibly change the "impact" effects. Also, 3D and 4D can exist together but the rules of 4D probably really change "the rules".
I know you wanted a "simple" explanation but in this case, I think it may require adding some other aspects to consider. If all the comets in the cluster that do impact earth are arriving at various "times" and from different directions, we may have "time" to grow our awareness of the 4th density into which we are moving. I think some may never really be aware they are even in 4th density as the comets land around them.
Session 9 September 1995:
@Windmill knight,
Until you pointed out the presenter was claimed to be Bill Gates I never gave it a thought. I had seen this video several places before and it is in the Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story? thread too. After watching it again I see he really looks and sounds like Bill Gates.
It is kind of convincing because he sounds like he really does not know what he is talking about but is still trying to sell a product just like the real Bill Gates still does. As it appeared to me (and some others) the brains (especially the skulls) look identical even though they are said to be two different people.
If it was an authentic video it would indicate how long they have been working on mind-controlling vaccines and Fort Detrick has been up to bio-lab testing for a very long time now.
I lean towards the same opinion with Windmill Knight, that it is not Bill Gates, who is speaking in that video presentation. Gates's melody of the voice is higher in pitch and more nasal sounding and his waving gesticulations with hands are way more theatrical and filled with tension.
Wandering Star
The Living Force
If anyone has seen Star Trek, they will remember the "no interference" law.
There are "pre-curvature" and "post-curvature" societies.
"Galactic" societies cannot by "Law" interfere with less evolved societies.
They are "fourth density", but when they are in "third density", they cannot interfere, so they are third density.
Consciousness and free will.
The interesting thing is that in this third density "society" (pre-curvature), there are several thousand people (at least) who "know" that there is a very different existence in "societies" that have achieved "curvature capacity".
An affectionate greeting for those who dedicate to us a wonderful smile of camaraderie, "without knowing each other."
M
Still looks like an image from the same brain.
However the info regarding the VMAT2 gene is interesting. It codes for a mechanism that regulates levels of serotonin, dopamine, and not-epinephrine (from Wikipedia).
If you look up “The God Gene” also there is interesting info to find.
I have an issue with the authenticity of the scientific study presented in this video. The brain scan image supposedly of two different participants looks identical. The hot spots on the image looked ‘cooked’ , but may have been enhanced to highlight the brain area identified in the study.South Front published this today:
Leaked Video Reveals Pentagon Briefing On Development Of Vaccine To Modify Human Behavior
The video below was allegedly filmed during a presentation in the Pentagon in 2005. It has been circulating online since...
As I watched I remembered having seen it a long time ago. Back then I figured that if it was a hoax, it could have been made by inserting a voice-over. However, my gut feeling is that it's genuine. Anybody knows? I don't think the presenter is Bill Gates as some claim, but he does look and sound like him.
Still looks like an image from the same brain.
However the info regarding the VMAT2 gene is interesting. It codes for a mechanism that regulates levels of serotonin, dopamine, and not-epinephrine (from Wikipedia).
If you look up “The God Gene” also there is interesting info to find.
You might remember this video of an ex-Russian intelligence officer. While a lot of what he says rings true, I am not sure about his idea of a depopulation agenda in relation to the COVID-19 epidemics.
Figures show that this virus exhibits low mortality rate, much lower than some "natural" viruses. How to explain then that an engineered virus, allegedly for depopulation purposes, kills less than naturally occurring viruses like some flues (not to mention Ebola or Warburg viruses)?
I would not be surprised that some elite fancy a great depopulation plan, but this epidemics doesn't seem to fit the bill. Rather, as suggested in the last session, it seems that the main goal of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not depopulation but control.
If control is the main motive, it would explain why the PTB are so invested in enforcing a vaccine for the COVID-19 which doesn't seem to be an immunizing disease, as suggested by this MIT article for example, or Pr. Raoult who recently stated:
So, according to Raoult and others, COVID-19 doesn't seem to be an immunizing disease. In other terms, if a patient is exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, he won't necessarily develop immunity against it. Consequently, it might get sick again from the same virus.
Consequently, if exposure to the whole "live" virus doesn't grant immunity, how can a vaccine containing only "desactivated" virus and/or fragments of the same virus grant any immunity?
If the objective of the much expected coronavirus vaccine isn't and can not be to trigger immunity, why is it promoted so vehemently by authorities? I guess we can only speculate at this point.
The PTB seem to have freaked out when they realized that the mutated virus could induce, in some cases, a beneficial effect (resistance to control). This unexpected beneficial effect seems to be the main problem of the PTB.
From this perspective it would be logical that the vaccine is the solution to this problem.
Unlike a virus, a vaccine is inoculated directly in the body of the patient. So the viral sequences relative to contagiousness, UV resistance, temperature resistance, which are potential causes of mutations, can be left aside. So the viral elements in the vaccine can only be the stable "control" ones.
Namely, the control part of the virus before it mutated (as initially designed in Fort Detrick) or a viral sequence that neutralizes the beneficial effects mentioned above. Ideally the vaccine would do both: increase controllability and neutralize beneficial effects (resistance to control).
I would not be surprised if the authorities already have the "vaccine" but to preserve the semblance of due diligence and proper clinical trial, don't disclose its existence yet.
Figures show that this virus exhibits low mortality rate, much lower than some "natural" viruses. How to explain then that an engineered virus, allegedly for depopulation purposes, kills less than naturally occurring viruses like some flues (not to mention Ebola or Warburg viruses)?
I would not be surprised that some elite fancy a great depopulation plan, but this epidemics doesn't seem to fit the bill. Rather, as suggested in the last session, it seems that the main goal of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was not depopulation but control.
If control is the main motive, it would explain why the PTB are so invested in enforcing a vaccine for the COVID-19 which doesn't seem to be an immunizing disease, as suggested by this MIT article for example, or Pr. Raoult who recently stated:
So, according to Raoult and others, COVID-19 doesn't seem to be an immunizing disease. In other terms, if a patient is exposed to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, he won't necessarily develop immunity against it. Consequently, it might get sick again from the same virus.
Consequently, if exposure to the whole "live" virus doesn't grant immunity, how can a vaccine containing only "desactivated" virus and/or fragments of the same virus grant any immunity?
If the objective of the much expected coronavirus vaccine isn't and can not be to trigger immunity, why is it promoted so vehemently by authorities? I guess we can only speculate at this point.
The PTB seem to have freaked out when they realized that the mutated virus could induce, in some cases, a beneficial effect (resistance to control). This unexpected beneficial effect seems to be the main problem of the PTB.
From this perspective it would be logical that the vaccine is the solution to this problem.
Unlike a virus, a vaccine is inoculated directly in the body of the patient. So the viral sequences relative to contagiousness, UV resistance, temperature resistance, which are potential causes of mutations, can be left aside. So the viral elements in the vaccine can only be the stable "control" ones.
Namely, the control part of the virus before it mutated (as initially designed in Fort Detrick) or a viral sequence that neutralizes the beneficial effects mentioned above. Ideally the vaccine would do both: increase controllability and neutralize beneficial effects (resistance to control).
I would not be surprised if the authorities already have the "vaccine" but to preserve the semblance of due diligence and proper clinical trial, don't disclose its existence yet.
Last edited:
I think we're losing sight of this. Because maybe it's not about the body, but the soul...
Hi Stern, I think almost everyone is waiting for a new session and will be really happy to read a new one
. In the meantime some books can be read, news on Sott can be followed, and last but not the least reality observed - especially in these times.Joe wrote the following some time back where a similar question came up and maybe it is also of help:
Well, there are very few questions I can think of at the moment; I'm more interested in watching how things develop and comparing events with things the Cs have already said, sometimes even years and years ago! There actually doesn't seem to be much going on that hasn't already been predicted or commented on.
Last edited:
