WHO Chief Scientist Warns "No Evidence COVID Vaccine Prevents Viral Transmission"​

Once again, the WHO has stepped in to offer some confusing comments about the coronavirus vaccine, warning that there is "no evidence to be confident shots prevent transmission" and that people who receive the vaccine should continue wearing masks and following all social distancing and travel guidelines.

The comments were made by WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan during what appears to have been a virtual press conference held Monday.

I saw this yesterday, but was waiting on some sort of confirmation that it was authentic:

 

An Oregon salon owner who opened her business in defiance of the state's lockdown orders accused Gov. Kate Brown of "retaliating" against her family in a $100,000 lawsuit​

Glamour Salon owner Lindsey Graham reopened her salon in May and received a fine of $14,000 from the state. Graham claimed that Brown began to personally "terrorize" her family, and threatened to place her children under the care of Child Protective Services to "intimidate" her into closing her salon doors.
"She terrorized myself, she terrorized my stylists, and she terrorized my family. She took every government agency she could, and she put her full weight into intimidating me into closing, including sending Child Protective Services to my home and threatening the removal of my children." Three days after publically opening her salon, Child Protective Services showed up at Graham's home and "interviewed my children without my presence," she explained.
Graham claims that Brown does not have the authority to close private businesses that can demonstrate they can operate safely and adhere to the requirements the government laid out. Graham also claimed that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration closed her case, deeming her business a "hazardous facility" for her employees.
This seems like a potentially effective way to challenge lock-downs, although it's not practical for many.

 
Most of the protocol is vitamins and minerals and one off-label drug that won Nobel Prize in 1975 for its discovery - Ivermectin. Ivermectin is cultured from soil specific to a part of Japan. The door is 'officially' locked to successful prevention and treatment. So a lot of us keep trying. Posting link to that protocol here, one of many effective approaches. 'I-MASK+ Protocol Downloads & Translations | FLCCC | Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance'

Interesting that Canada has subsituted bureaucrats for medically-trained people in all the top positions in health. One of these such authorities was caught on camera prior to the official announcement of the day saying she just read what 'they' gave her and her sidekick interviewer for the program said he did the same thing. I could post the link and will do so if anybody wants to see them.
Ivermectin just got banned in South Africa, so insane! SA drugs regulator bans 'miracle' Covid-19 treatment as unsafe "“Sahpra is focused on quality, safety and efficacy and its ultimate goal is to protect the health and well-being of all those who live in South Africa. The use of such a drug could potentially lead to harmful effects or even death,” said Semete-Makokotlela."

Here is the clip you are talking about in Canada, from Rebel News (love them!):
 
COVID-19 and Your Health: "FACT: People who have gotten sick with COVID-19 may still benefit from getting vaccinated" ~ Well talk about ensuring global rollout, gee whiz....
How Life Will (and Won’t) Change After Getting COVID-19 Vaccine: "No noticeable change for the near future" ~ Well then, what's the damn point? Oh right, saving lives.....
Here’s what you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccines: "it’s not known yet to what extent they prevent infection, it’s possible that a vaccinated person might get the virus and be able to pass it on to others. " ~ Again, then what's the damn point? Oh right, "It is important to remember that you can’t get COVID-19 directly from the vaccines being evaluated now as none of them contain the complete virus." Gee whiz, thanks so much. How are people falling for this nonsense?!?
https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/...ction/65-f65cb7ee-24dc-48d0-bc08-8cfb3423a3b6: "This isn’t rare for vaccines." Dr. Moss said most vaccines don’t actually stop a virus from entering your body. That requires a really strong kind of immune response to prevent infection.” ~ An immune system prevents infection? And the vaccine does what? Nothing, apparently, so what's in the damn thing, then!!!
Coronavirus vaccines are proven to prevent disease, but what about transmission?: “If the vaccine helps prevent transmission, to one extent or another, it suggests we could have a herd immunity effect,” Reingold said. “If it doesn’t prevent that, fundamentally, herd immunity is not going to pertain, and the real question will be vaccinating as many people as possible to protect them through direct vaccination.” ~ Well, it's definitely not gonna happen that you will be vaccinating periodically and regularly as much as possible in order to .... oh wait, you will! What the f**k!!!
Vaccine Q&A: Safety, Skepticism and How Long Protection Will Last: "Given how quickly the vaccines were developed and tested, are you concerned about safety? Matt Koci: I’m not concerned with anything I’ve seen so far." ~ OMG!!!!! And THIS is the level of "top scientists" or whatever, jeeeeezuz, humanity is screwed....

With this small sample of what is going on regarding the vaccine, and it doesn't even touch on the many documented deleterious side effects, which all these "officious" people are completely ignoring and outright denying exists... humanity is in for a world of hurt. Get your vitamins regimes and homeopaths on standby, everyone! This is gonna be a shit-show!
 

CDC reports record-low positive flu tests​

As coronavirus cases surge nationwide, the flu has seen a remarkable dip. Reported cases of influenza reached record lows last week, with fewer than 40 diagnoses recorded during Dec. 13-19.

In week 51 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's "FluView" data monitoring system, 36 positive flu tests were documented. This marks a steep decrease from last year's total of 7,703 cases during the same time frame. The positivity rate has sharply declined this calendar year as only 0.10% of tests taken this year came back positive. The five-year average is 15.80% positive.
Hmmm. It couldn't possibly be because flu cases are being identified as the 'rona. Never mind that even Coca-Cola tests positive.

 

They Want You Muzzled Permanently: Wear Your Mask Even If You Get The Vaccine​

The authorities and rulers are telling the public that they must continue to wear their face masks even after they get the “effective” COVID-19 vaccine. Mainstream media and the authoritarian ruling class is trying to convince the public to muzzle themselves permanently.

The country’s first coronavirus vaccinations are now being distributed to the sheep willing to take this thing. The FDA granted the Pfizer vaccine emergency authorization for use, and it’s expected that soon, possibly by this week, it will do the same for the Moderna vaccine. In trials, the Pfizer vaccine was 95% effective in preventing COVID-19, and the Moderna vaccine stands at 94%, both significantly more effective than many scientists anticipated.

If the vaccines are actually as effective as they say they are, why do we need masks? If masks worked, why do we need this rushed, unproven, and unwanted vaccine? No one is asking these questions in the mainstream media, so it’s time we start thinking for ourselves and undoing the years of brainwashing from listening to psychopathic politicians and their lapdog public relations department, the mainstream media.
So basically, you can still get the coronavirus if you get two shots of the “effective” COVID-19 vaccine. And then you’ll be “asymptomatic” and won’t know you’re sick, and could still infect others. So instead of the side effects of getting a cold, those who choose to take the vaccine face severe side effects, including death, that the Big Pharma companies won’t be liable for.

Does anyone still believe this vaccine is for our own good? It’s getting ridiculous that people are still so blind to what’s going on here.
baaad.jpg
 
As of yet, I've not seen many opinions on what happens to those that don't want it, but I give it a few months and then I see them making my life, and the lives of others like me, very difficult indeed. And in a strange way, I feel that everyone knows that the next step will be how to deal with the naysayers.
The pre-emptive programming has already started - in today's paper:

1609273085649.png

USA TODAY

Fact check: Yes, employers can require that workers receive the COVID-19 vaccine

Camille Caldera, USA TODAY 6 days ago

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission released its first guidance on workplace coronavirus vaccination requirements Dec. 16.

Hood Report TV took to Instagram to share the news. "Employers Can Reportedly Require Workers to Get COVID-19 Vaccine," its post read.

Western Journal also wrote about the guidelines on its website. "Employers Can Now Legally Fire You for Refusing COVID Vaccine," the headline reads.

Hood Report TV and Western Journal have not responded to requests from USA TODAY for comment.

There are some exceptions​

Employers have the legal right to mandate that their employees receive a COVID-19 vaccination, according to the guidance.

The law allows employers to set "a requirement that an individual shall not pose a direct threat to the health or safety of individuals in the workplace."

There are exceptions for employees with disabilities or "sincerely held" religious beliefs – protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII, respectively.

In those instances, employers are required to show that an unvaccinated employee poses a “significant risk of substantial harm to the health or safety of the individual or others" in the workplace.

Employers that conclude an unvaccinated employee poses such a threat must try to provide a "reasonable accommodation" to the employee.

If there is no reasonable accommodation, or the accommodation places an "undue hardship" on the employer, it is lawful for the employer to "exclude the employee from the workplace," according to the guidance.

That does not mean the employer may automatically terminate the worker. Before termination, the employer most determine whether "any other rights apply" under federal anti-discrimination laws or federal, state and local laws and regulations.

Employees who don't receive vaccine can be fired​

Helen Rella, a workplace attorney at the law firm Wilk Auslander, explained the practical implications of the guidance to CBS News.

"The logical conclusion is that if no possible accommodation can be made and the employee's job requires that they be in the physical workplace – and they pose a direct threat to the safety of the workplace or others – that yes, they could be terminated," Rella said.

Our rating: True​

Based on our research, the claim that employers can require their employees to receive a coronavirus vaccine and fire them if they don't is TRUE. The latest guidance from the U.S. Equal Opportunity Employment Commission clarifies that employers may require their employees to get vaccinated, with some exceptions – including disability and religious beliefs. Though they must seek to accommodate those employees, they may not be able to do so, in which case they may bar employees from the workplace or terminate them.

Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook.
Article conclusion: Our rating: True

IOW - RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!

The above article (Our fact check work is supported in part by a grant from Facebook) has these inserts:
Fact check: Nurse who fainted after COVID-19 vaccine has an underlying health condition
Fact check: Posts falsely claim cap was on Nancy Pelosi's COVID-19 vaccine
Fact check: Syringes with RFID technology track vaccines, not recipients

The public is being subjected to a full-court press of lies and disinformation. As it's already been officially determined that one can lose their job if they refuse vaccination, then don't even think about not submitting! OBEY or Else!!!

Frankly, I'm beginning to believe resistance is futile! No matter how many legitimate doctors, heath professionals, and scientific studies expose the falsehoods associated with the virus, the "preventative" spread measures, the vaccines, etc., the rollout continues unabated with no end in sight of masking, social distancing, lockdowns, restrictions on travel and gatherings, etc. The propaganda/programming is all ahead tilt and any contradictory information is either countered with totally untrue "facts" or completely ignored into oblivion.

Saddest of all is that it seems the younger generations (my offspring's age group -GenX/Millenials- and younger) are swallowing all of this hook-line-and sinker! My good friend hasn't had actual physical contact with her one son/daughter-in-law/only grandchild since March! Poor child looked totally forlorn when his Christmas gift was handed off from the driveway. The children are getting the worst of it by being cut off from grandparents, relatives, and friends along with having their faces swaddled with the virus diaper whenever they venture outside. Plus, their most trusted adults are complicit in indoctrinating them in the most egregious of lies!
Laura said:
A: Today was not the end of the world in case you didn't notice, however an "end" of sorts will certainly come as we have been suggesting for many years. Time is never definite. Things also happen in steps and stages. The major steps include things like assassinations that are accepted by the masses. When such is not objected to, then the next stage is prepared.
Pretty sure I referenced the above earlier in thread. Humanity appears completely unable to discern the psyops being perpetrated on them ensuring that the agenda will proceed uninhibited - at least by the populace. Guess earth changes are all we can count on since actual truth is being eviscerated from all directions. Happy New Year . . .
 
New Year's Eve "protest" in Las Vegas. The $25 supposedly is not a ticket price for the party but a fee to help pay for security for the "protest". Las Vegas police will not be enforcing masks or social distancing on New Year's Eve.

Maybe other businesses should follow this example, eg the $25 is not the price of the food for dining in at a restaurant, but a fee for security of the protest inside the restaurant.

Officials worry large New Year’s Eve party in Las Vegas will be COVID-19 superspreader event
by: Associated Press
Posted: Dec 29, 2020 / 04:58 PM PST

A New Year’s Eve event at a canopied casino-mall in Las Vegas expected to be attended by at least 14,000 people could be a superspreader event that overruns hospitals, members of Nevada’s coronavirus task force said Tuesday.

Nevada COVID-19 response director Caleb Cage said plans for the Fremont Street Experience’s annual event could hamper the state’s ability to contain the virus amid the ongoing surge in hospitalizations.

“It seems an awful lot like the city worked very hard in order to skirt the spirit and the letter of the directives as they are written in order to protect us,” he said.

Since November, Nevada has limited capacity at events to 25% or 50 people to contain the virus. Cage said the Fremont Street event not only violated the current restrictions, but wouldn’t be allowed under any of the past 10 months’ looser restrictions.

Nevada Occupational Safety and Health Administration denied Fremont Street Experience a permit to host its annual celebration, but the city of Las Vegas issued the venue a special-use permit so it could charge for access and enforce crowd control.

City spokesman David Riggleman said, by issuing a special-use permit, Las Vegas wasn’t sanctioning any event but recognizing that many planned to gather in a public place and attempting to make it as safe as possible.

“People are coming to the Fremont Street Experience and the question for the city was: What was it going to do to prepare for the fact that people were coming?” said Wesley Harper, the executive director of the Nevada League of Cities, who spoke on behalf of Las Vegas. “If they’re going to come, let’s do some things to try and make this as responsible as possible.”

Harper implored officials to view the event as a “protest” that couldn’t be stopped without violating the First Amendment. He said the $25 cost wasn’t for tickets, but for a “service fee” to subsidize the cost of necessary law enforcement.

Fremont Street Experience’s public relations representative Terri Maruca declined to comment.

According to the outdoor mall’s website, everyone will need to wear a mask at all times and stay 6 feet away from each other. Unlike past years, Thursday’s event will not include street performers or live music. But guests will be able to watch a light show, see the Slotzilla Zoomline and walk the corridor’s six blocks. Guests of Fremont Street hotels will also be allowed on the premises for festivities.

Clark County Commission Chairwoman Marilyn Kirkpatrick told the state task force she was concerned the event could push Las Vegas-area hospitals beyond their capacity. In Clark County, 87% of licensed hospital beds — including 78% of ICU beds — were occupied as of Monday, the most recently available data.

Kirkpatrick said she worried it would be hospitals and their staff, rather than New Year’s Eve street party-goers, who will pay the price for the event. While it does not fall under county jurisdiction, she said she planned to ask organizers to cut the size of the event to 7,000 and cancel the light show.

Las Vegas Metropolitan police Deputy Chief Kelly McMahill said at a Tuesday news conference that officers will not be enforcing Nevada’s mask mandate and or social distancing requirement on New Year’s Eve, but they plan to ask pedestrians to comply.

“We welcome you to have a good time but we also don’t want to send ourselves back months in this pandemic where we have more and more people going to the hospital and we’re closing down the city,” McMahill said.
 

Not sure how this got approved when they were caught fudging doses.

Think this is also the one known for transverse myelitis.
 
UK changing vax strategy. They are now following Tony Blair's orders and giving as many people as possible the first dose and then the second dose months later! LOL


For some reason they are rushing to get jabs in people as quick as possible despite them previously saying one isn't protected until after 2 weeks following the 2nd injection.
 

Not sure how this got approved when they were caught fudging doses.

Think this is also the one known for transverse myelitis.

Another thing, this article on Sott suggests the Russian scientist who stabbed himself and jumped off a building may have been involved with the vaccine. I wonder if he knew something and was considered a security risk.

You'll also notice that recently Oxford / Astrazeneca and Russia Sputnik vax makers are collaborating. So new developments here. What's going on? UK and Russia working together? Looks very normal!

Also worth noting that the new strains of covid making all the news are emerging from countries where Oxford were doing their trials: UK, South Africa and Brazil.






Don't forget the Oxford vaccine is meant to be the main one being distributed to poor countries too.


Some broad brushes but this Oxford vaccine looks highly suspect. They also had the transverse myelitis cases plus the whole hoopla with dosing. These guys as well cheated in their trials and I believe we're pumping people full of drugs to control fever plus I recall their being some absolutely dodgy stuff going on when they trialled the vaccine on the monkeys early on.

HIGHLY SUSPECT!
 
This might warrant some further research...

View attachment 41189
From Wikipedia:


Excerpt:

On December 18, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Letlow announced that he had tested positive for the virus. He was hospitalized in Monroe.[13] After his condition deteriorated, he was transferred to the intensive care unit of Ochsner LSU Health Shreveport on December 23.[14] On December 29, Letlow died of complications of COVID-19 at the age of 41, five days before he was scheduled to be sworn into office.[2][13] The hospital reported that he had no underlying conditions when admitted but died in the ICU of a heart attack after a procedure.[8]

So, he was only 41 years old and had no underlying health conditions but "died in the ICU of a heart attack after a procedure."

At the very least, he may have received poor medical care.

He was to represent the largest district in Louisiana.
 
Back
Top Bottom