WATCH: Italian Police Stand Down In Solidarity With Anti-Vaccine Mandate Protestors

A video posted on Twitter on September 26th reportedly shows Italian police officers taking off their riot gear and standing down in a show of solidarity after being confronted by a large group of anti-vaccine mandate protestors.

Members of the crowd erupted into applause and cheers as the police officers removed their helmets and took off their chest coverings.
:clap:
 
Further affirmation that the vax is the problem:

BREAKING: AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” SHATTERS official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week

(Natural News) An AI-powered Dept. of Defense program named “Project Salus,” run in cooperation with the JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center), has analyzed data on 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older. Data were aggregated from Humetrix, a real-time data and analytics platform that tracks health care outcomes. Legal analysis from Thomas Renz of Renz-Law.com is included in a breaking video interview, below.

The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths.

These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated.

Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection.
[...]

Vaccine failure dramatically worsens within 5-6 months after being vaccinated​

One slide from the analysis reveals that so-called “breakthrough” infections — vaccine failures — increase with time, showing a near doubling of breakthrough infections among those vaccinated 5-6 months ago vs. those vaccinated only 3-4 months ago.

These data end at August 21st, 2021 but the trend does not appear to be flattening. As more data are added to this analysis each week, it seems almost certain that breakthrough infections rates will continue to rise over time in vaccinated individuals. We do not yet know what will happen in 9 months after vaccination, but these data show cause for serious concern.

Once the Delta variant took hold, 71% of COVID-19 “breakthrough” cases occurred among the fully vaccinated​

As the following chart shows, 71% of COVID-19 “cases” were breakthrough cases (vaccine failures) once the Delta variant reached 90% spread across those infected.

Understand that the authors of this document state that those who are jabbed are not considered “vaccinated” until two weeks after they received the injections, which means that infections, hospitalizations and deaths which occurred from 0 – 14 days are ignored in this data set.

In reality, that means the percentage of “fully vaccinated” people responsible for breakthrough infections, hospitalizations and deaths is substantially higher than what is shown in these data. If they are claiming a 71% rate, it may in reality be more like 80% or even 90%, but we don’t know for sure because they are hiding all negative health outcomes for the first two weeks after the vaccines are administered (by claiming those people are “unvaccinated,” which is a deliberate deception being used to try to hide the harmful effects of vaccines).
[...]

Ethnic groups hit hardest: Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks​

Finally, a horrifying slide in the data set reveals that one of the highest risk factors for being hospitalized after being vaccinated is simply being of Native American descent. According to the data in this slide, Native Americans face around 50% higher odds of being hospitalized after being vaccinated, compared to other ethnic groups such as Whites.

Hispanics face a slightly lower risk which appears to be around 40% higher odds. Blacks face around 25% higher odds.

Why is this the case? The gain-of-function properties which were engineered into the SARS-CoV-2 biological weapon — via Fauci, Daszak and the NIH — target ACE2 receptors which exist in higher densities in targeted organ systems of many minority groups such as Native Americans, Hispanics and Blacks. This has led many observers to conclude that the covid spike protein — which is generated in the bodies of those who take mRNA vaccines — is a race-specific bioweapon designed to achieve depopulation of minority groups. Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, has engaged in many efforts to bring this to the attention of his followers, for example. These data provided by the DoD / JAIC / Project Salus document shown here appear to support the plausibility of such theories.
FULL ARTICLE
The full interview with Thomas Renz is available here:
Brighteon.com/c3c52dd7-7db9-4e1c-b386-58b9a6c97f5b

NOTE: The last point in the article seemingly contradicts previous data that shows getting vaxxed after recovering from Covid results in worst adverse effects:
Finally, the data presented in this document shows that natural immunity — listed as “prior covid-19” substantially decreases the risk of hospitalization after receiving covid-19 vaccines. (See slide above.)

What this means is that the best way to ensure the safest outcome of a covid vaccine is to experience a covid infection before getting vaccinated. This dramatically reduces your risk of negative health outcomes.
Here's the referenced slide:
Salus-Humetrix-VE-Study-17-600.jpg


Apparently, I wasn't the only one to catch that inconsistency - the very first comment:
Chemist3 hours ago
Information in this story regarding prior covid infection followed by vaccination runs counter to information that we've been hearing for the past 6 months stating that vaccination after covid infection ruins your immunity.
If that statistic is wrong, then it throws doubt on the rest. Or is it a case of "figures don't lie, but liars can figure"? Purposeful insertion to assert the benefit to the already immune protected to take the shot? 🤨
 
I am sorry, but I have a knot in my brain, but please someone explain to me what a negative percentage means? does it mean they correct their said "95%" by 66%? Or does it mean something else? I do not understand, sry. Don*t want to create noise, though.
 
I am sorry, but I have a knot in my brain, but please someone explain to me what a negative percentage means? does it mean they correct their said "95%" by 66%? Or does it mean something else? I do not understand, sry. Don*t want to create noise, though.
According to the article:
The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation being used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.
One data point:
Between week 35 and week 38 of 2021 there were 21,667 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 40’s, 7,106 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 40’s, and a frightening 202,343 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 40’s.
Apparently, by using this real data and applying the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency (a calculation that previously showed 95% effectiveness), the results come out in negative numbers! So, not only are the vaxxes not effective, they're ridiculously ineffective! Or at least that's my understanding. The 95% effectiveness previously calculated was also ridiculous! Dr. Richard Fleming exposed that statistical manipulation in his Dallas expose and it should still appear on his website.
 
According to the article:

One data point:

Apparently, by using this real data and applying the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency (a calculation that previously showed 95% effectiveness), the results come out in negative numbers! So, not only are the vaxxes not effective, they're ridiculously ineffective! Or at least that's my understanding. The 95% effectiveness previously calculated was also ridiculous! Dr. Richard Fleming exposed that statistical manipulation in his Dallas expose and it should still appear on his website.
Thank you, yes THAT was what I understood. They are ineffective AND are making peeps even more vulnerable, in my eyes. AND they used unproper methods to come to these 95%, that is also clear to me. But my question was about the negative percentage, how to understand this, what is the referance, minus 66% of what? or do they mean that the shots INCREASE the risk by 66%? THAT is my question.
 
Thank you, yes THAT was what I understood. They are ineffective AND are making peeps even more vulnerable, in my eyes. AND they used unproper methods to come to these 95%, that is also clear to me. But my question was about the negative percentage, how to understand this, what is the referance, minus 66% of what? or do they mean that the shots INCREASE the risk by 66%? THAT is my question.
I think it means that you are 66% more likely to get covid than if you are un-injected?

That the vax increases the risk of infection by 66% vs being unvaxxed would seem to be a reasonable conclusion as @BHelmet thinks. That the calculation with real world data is producing negative numbers says to me that the vaxxes are worthless! If it means not only worthless in protecting but also increasing likelihood of infection - then that's really a bombshell finding! Does anyone else have a take on these negative percentages?
 
That the vax increases the risk of infection by 66% vs being unvaxxed would seem to be a reasonable conclusion as @BHelmet thinks. That the calculation with real world data is producing negative numbers says to me that the vaxxes are worthless! If it means not only worthless in protecting but also increasing likelihood of infection - then that's really a bombshell finding! Does anyone else have a take on these negative percentages?
yes, thank you, that was my thought too, what it really means. It is not only worthless, it is damaging. That is what I think it means. You have to admit that it is not easily understandable, how they put it. I am still not sure what the really mean by that, but at least I am not the only one to have the impression.
 
Newscaster: Good morning, you are watching CVD News. My name is Rick and joining me today is Jim. Jim, how is the Covid situation where you are?
Reporter: Oh, Rick, the situation is getting worse. The number of Covid cases has risen to 4. It's a 100% increase from yesterday.
Newscaster: Was there a "super-spreader" event in the area?
Reporter: That's right, Rick. A family gathered outside to make a barbecue and, lo and behold, the barbecue smoke contaminated the whole city.
Newscaster: How depressing! Do we have any information on this family?
Reporter: Due to the ongoing criminal investigation, we don't have many details... except for the fact that there is a sign on their front yard saying "No vaxx? No problem!"
Newscaster: Hmm... seems like a bunch of anti-vaxxers! What do you think, Jim?
Reporter: Absolutely, Rick. It's always about their little "rights". They never grow up!
Newscaster: What should we do with these people?
Reporter: Well, Rick, the government is planning on reducing the oxygen intake of anti-vaxxers.
Newscaster: Sweet. We can't have second-class citizens polluting our air. Enough is enough!
Reporter: I couldn't agree with you more, Rick.

Newscaster: Good evening, you are watching CVD News. My name is Rick and, as always, Jim is with us. Jim, any new developments?
Reporter: Rick, you wouldn't believe your eyes! The city has been devastated by a super-tornado. Experts are saying this
happens every 309 000 years!
Newscaster: Unbelievable! Jim, are you safe?
Reporter: Yes, Rick, I am alright. My cameraman was hurt, but he's alright now.
Newscaster: Is there anything left standing? Has everything been destroyed?
Reporter: I know it's not the news you wanted to hear, Rick, but the anti-vaxxers' house has been left unscathed.
Newscaster: How is this possible? Who protects these people???
Reporter: I don't know, Rick. All I can say is that there is a new sign on their house saying "Help is on the way!"
Newscaster: Can you approach the house? Do you see anything else?
Reporter: Yes, apparently they are dancing in a circular motion in the living room.
Newscaster: What a bunch of selfish lunatics!
Reporter:
Oh, Rick, we live in a mad, mad world!

Newscaster: Good night, you are watching CVD News. My name is Rick and... let's see if Jim is on the line. Jim?
Reporter: Yes, Rick, I'm here. Whoa, what a turn of events!
Newscaster: Jim, what happened?
Reporter: Something very special.
Newscaster: Please give us more details.
Reporter: The whole city has been rebuilt in a matter of hours. People are helping each other. People are united. There is a big wave of solidarity. It is truly beautiful to witness.
Newscaster: What kind of fairy tale are you talking about?
Reporter: I have never seen anything like this before. It's like a new reality is being born.
Newscaster: Jim, stop dreaming. Come back to earth. What do you really see?
Reporter: These people... they are lending me their hands.. they are asking me to join them...
Newscaster: For God's sake, stay with us, Jim!
Reporter: No, Rick. I have to make a choice. I think I have made my choice.
Newscaster: Stay away from them, Jim! They want to enslave you!
Reporter: No, I am sorry, Rick. It feels natural. I feel like I am being carried away from all the horror on this planet. I see things differently now. Covid, it was all lies. Masks, all lies. Lockdowns, all lies. CVD News, all lies. It is all over, Rick.
Newscaster: Dear CVD News viewers, we are experiencing connection problems. We shall be back with you shortly. In the meantime, don't forget to keep a solid, 100-meter distance between each other. Stay safe!

Two minutes later, a comet hits CVD News station. The rest is history.
Thanks for this, Natus Videre. At the beginning of the "Delta wave" one local news outlet was running scare headlines "Hospitalizations up over 400 percent!!!" Turns out the real numbers were 4 people hospitalized the previous week, 13 hospitalized in the current week. While technically true, they neglect to mention, this is in a population of over a million people. Scare, scare, scare fear porn on steroids!
 
Apparently, I wasn't the only one to catch that inconsistency - the very first comment:

Chemist3 hours ago
Information in this story regarding prior covid infection followed by vaccination runs counter to information that we've been hearing for the past 6 months stating that vaccination after covid infection ruins your immunity.
Ok - processing this some more. Here's a screenshot from the Thomas Renz/Mike Adams vid:

1633201358495-png.49999


The fourth data point down says, "Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization."

Now, according to Mike and Tom, "breakthrough" equates to "vaccine failure". IOW, one has to be vaccinated in order to experience a vaccine failure/breakthrough. So, recovered COVID persons get vaxxed and their "vaccine failure" that results in hospitalization appears to be less than the other statistical categories noting that the entire group consists of vaxxed 65 & over people. Perhaps the former asserted data that getting vaxxed after already having had COVID results in worst adverse effects applies more to the under 65 people? It all gets even more schizoid when it's been opined that there really isn't any Delta, but that 'Delta' is really ADE.

Looking at that last data point in the graphic above, is the reason the hospitalization/death rate of breakthroughs is lower than the rates in the pre-vaccinated phase the result of the vaxxed receiving Ivermectin as is being speculated - whereas the unvaxxed are getting Remdisivir/ventilators? That could also apply to the other data point in the previous paragraph.

Oh what a wicked web we weave, when we first practice to deceive.
 
Wonder how many viewers were completely unaware of the situation in Australia - I was surprised of the lack of restrictions in Perth:

Tucker shreds Australia's tough COVID restrictions


Click to expand...
In my circle of friends/family, no one has any idea of what is happening in the Land of OZ.
NO ONE !!!!
Pretty much the same here - zero, zip, zilch, nada.

In Tucker's talk, he mentions Alberta's Health minister Deena Hinshaw, regarding any case of respiratory illness to be counted as covid, at least for children, to help their graphs. Plus any tested positive for covid who are then in their home environment, she is recommending, at for now and not ordering, that all in the house self-isolate for 14 days. One can listen to her here if you don't mind pathocrat's, or read this DailyMail article that relates to children.

The well funded insane asylum is starting to get crowded, with new self-appointed recruits everyday.
 
one local news outlet was running scare headlines "Hospitalizations up over 400 percent!!!" Turns out the real numbers were 4 people hospitalized the previous week, 13 hospitalized in the current week. While technically true, they neglect to mention, this is in a population of over a million people. Scare, scare, scare fear porn on steroids!

That's probably after witnessing similar statistics manipulation that Mark Twain came with the following words:

Mark-Twain-lies-damned-lies-statistics.png
 
Subramanian, S.V., Kumar, A. (2021) "Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States". Eur J Epidemiol . Link

"In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people."

1.jpg
 
Ok - processing this some more. Here's a screenshot from the Thomas Renz/Mike Adams vid:

1633201358495-png.49999


The fourth data point down says, "Prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization."

Now, according to Mike and Tom, "breakthrough" equates to "vaccine failure". IOW, one has to be vaccinated in order to experience a vaccine failure/breakthrough. So, recovered COVID persons get vaxxed and their "vaccine failure" that results in hospitalization appears to be less than the other statistical categories noting that the entire group consists of vaxxed 65 & over people. Perhaps the former asserted data that getting vaxxed after already having had COVID results in worst adverse effects applies more to the under 65 people? It all gets even more schizoid when it's been opined that there really isn't any Delta, but that 'Delta' is really ADE.

Looking at that last data point in the graphic above, is the reason the hospitalization/death rate of breakthroughs is lower than the rates in the pre-vaccinated phase the result of the vaxxed receiving Ivermectin as is being speculated - whereas the unvaxxed are getting Remdisivir/ventilators? That could also apply to the other data point in the previous paragraph.

Oh what a wicked web we weave, when we first practice to deceive.
I'm skipping through because its too late now, and buzzy day tomorrow, but the main problem in the tables 2-4 of the HSA study is the mix up of positive tests with cases. It seems the vaxx leads to many false positives.
So then the outcome for the vaxx seems positive in terms of less severe illness per 100k 'cases' compared to unvaxxed.
Think they know this and use less cycles in the PCR test with vaxxed than with unvaxxed, not sure also in UK.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom