2011 Crop Circles

anart said:
Approaching Infinity said:
This one looks pretty sloppy and uneven to me...

Me too - it's pitiful.

Yep, so does the third one - the two circles connected by what could be glifs. Can't actually see the first one good enough to see much.
 
Nienna Eluch said:
anart said:
Approaching Infinity said:
This one looks pretty sloppy and uneven to me...

Me too - it's pitiful.

Yep, so does the third one - the two circles connected by what could be glifs. Can't actually see the first one good enough to see much.

IMO this circle is not even finished and is incomplete, many left overs of corn so to speak.


AltonB2IMG9080.jpg
 
Gawan said:
IMO this circle is not even finished and is incomplete, many left overs of corn so to speak.
AltonB2IMG9080.jpg
That's it right there, I think Gawan! It looks like the inside circle was shaved out too much to allow for a fifth oval/beetle/blob thing to fit inside the pentagon. Man, these "circle makers" can't even get it together on their designs. It reminds me of that bible story of when people wanted to build a tower to God, but then they all started speaking different languages and just couldn't get it together.
 
Nicolas said:
Well, looks like a poor attempt at completing the previous crop circle:

AltonB2IMG9080_small.jpg


Honeystreet2_OH_800.jpg

That is the exact same crop circle. Look at the way the pre-existing roads penetrate the trilobites in the exact same place. And see the "repaired" section. Also, you can match up random spots in the field with random spots in the other. Look just to the right of the top of the ziggaurat on the bottom photo, there's hole in the field. it's there in the top as well. If you eyeball the right angle distances from that spot to the road and the circumference, it's the same. If you use it's distance to the road as a unit, it's about 3 units above the center of the radial pattern in each photo.
 
_http://www.cropcirclewisdom.co.uk/kingstone2011/coombes.html

This page describes 'circle makers' activity and has a chat record of Karen Alexander (wife of Steve Alexander the crop circle photo guy) admitting that she was photoshopping the crop circle in order to make it "look more uniform". They are desperate for real circles, since they make money off of them, so it appears Karen and Steve decided to take matters into their own hands.
 
Just to clarify, my point on posting that link is that the Alexander's are photoshopping the man made crop circles to make them look genuine. If you go to the link, you'll see it espouses that all circles are man-made, which is obviously not the case. Well, this year, perhaps... ;)
 
wmu9 said:
That is the exact same crop circle. Look at the way the pre-existing roads penetrate the trilobites in the exact same place. And see the "repaired" section. Also, you can match up random spots in the field with random spots in the other. Look just to the right of the top of the ziggaurat on the bottom photo, there's hole in the field. it's there in the top as well. If you eyeball the right angle distances from that spot to the road and the circumference, it's the same. If you use it's distance to the road as a unit, it's about 3 units above the center of the radial pattern in each photo.

I think that Nicolas meant to say that it is the same; the second being the poor completion of the first one.
 
Windmill knight said:
wmu9 said:
That is the exact same crop circle. Look at the way the pre-existing roads penetrate the trilobites in the exact same place. And see the "repaired" section. Also, you can match up random spots in the field with random spots in the other. Look just to the right of the top of the ziggaurat on the bottom photo, there's hole in the field. it's there in the top as well. If you eyeball the right angle distances from that spot to the road and the circumference, it's the same. If you use it's distance to the road as a unit, it's about 3 units above the center of the radial pattern in each photo.

I think that Nicolas meant to say that it is the same; the second being the poor completion of the first one.

That is correct. Thanks Windmill knight.
 
anart said:
Just to clarify, my point on posting that link is that the Alexander's are photoshopping the man made crop circles to make them look genuine. If you go to the link, you'll see it espouses that all circles are man-made, which is obviously not the case. Well, this year, perhaps... ;)

I wondered about theses photographers recently too, cause some of the lived of CC's if I can tell and this year almost nothing looks like a real circle. And good find anart.

Here is a quote from the page:
_http://www.cropcirclewisdom.co.uk/kingstone2011/coombes.html

If you are an individual who just enjoys crop circle art for what it is and you are not bothered by the fact that behind closed doors there ARE individuals who are manipulating the whole phenomenon in a way just to suite their needs and tell you a pack of lies then that's your choice.

If you are an individual who truly believes that crop circles are the creation of paranormal forces, then please consider what you see on this page. Please also consider that ANYONE who sells books, DVDs, calendars etc. Has a vested interest to keep you captured in a belief that is created by man NOT BY ALIENS !!. Some have created a career out of crop circles, but to create a career out of something which is unpredictable and not guaranteed, then you must be fairly confident that it will happen time and time again

We will continue to repeat our words time and time again, whether you want to listen or not, again that's your choice:

' There is a phenomenon out there which is attracted to man made formations. Why are unexplained entities taking an interest in human land art is yet to be explained?. However this phenomenon is being ignored and not researched at all by current researchers. The current aim is to grab as many images as possible so calendars and fabled DVDs can be created in order to keep the bank balance looking healthy.

Crop Circle conferences can generate up to £50.000 just for one weekend and every year the same information is being rehashed where you the unknowing public keep on paying for information which is not even remotely true.

In an era where dictators and financial scoundrels of this world are falling its time to realise that people WILL do anything to retain power and control, especially where there is money to be made.

Its your money - its your choice !
 
It looks like fake too, I don't think that the 6th light complex beings may do something so simple. Look at those three kind of triangles, they can do better. OSIT.

Because the last anart's post gave me a doubt, why if there are real ones, every of them look simple compared to the art's piece from last years?the one which may not be it's the one about the serpent, like the ones about a spider and other animals. That looks like having a deep symbology or whatever.
 
Brunauld said:
It looks like fake too, I don't think that the 6th light complex beings may do something so simple. Look at those three kind of triangles, they can do better. OSIT.

Because the last anart's post gave me a doubt, why if there are real ones, every of them look simple compared to the art's piece from last years?the one which may not be it's the one about the serpent, like the ones about a spider and other animals. That looks like having a deep symbology or whatever.

The Italian one from June looks more "real", it's smooth, it contains binary code, and has a seven-fold symmetry -- all of which require time to "fake". It's hard to imagine it being completed in a few hours over night. The five-fold one just mentioned above took a couple of days to fake.

http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/inter2011/italy/Poirino2011a.html

What do you guys think of the Italian one?
 
Kniall said:
I get a 'real deal' feeling from this one.

Interesting, because I don't. (not that that means anything, necessarily).

wmu9 said:
What do you guys think of the Italian one?

I think that one was linked to an ad agency? It's discussed earlier in the thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom