2011 Crop Circles

anart said:
I think that one was linked to an ad agency? It's discussed earlier in the thread.

Wasn't really discussed or sourced...

rrraven said:
:D ;D :D
that Italian one ,which is pretty I admit, you all seem to think is real....hmmm...look at my avatar pic...its from the same area of Italy ,last year
its irregular bits translate to E=mc2,apparently
as far as I remember it turned out to be done by some Italian advertizing agency
I was tempted to change my pic back then when I found out , but left it cause it is pretty
this years coded message apparently is Ea Enki space

No such google searches provide any links to an ad agency, or mention it is fake... I'd love to see them.
http://www.google.com/search?num=100q=Poirino+2011+formation

No other 'experts' claim the June Poirino formation is a fake that I can find on the internet.

http://www.margheritacampaniolo.it/crop_circles_2011/poirino_2011_aggiornamento.htm

I'd love to read about an ad agency creating it. It possesses so many of the "unhoaxable" attributes, if proven fake it will put a whole lot more crop circles on the possible fake list.
 
wmu9 said:
anart said:
I think that one was linked to an ad agency? It's discussed earlier in the thread.

Wasn't really discussed or sourced...

rrraven said:
:D ;D :D
that Italian one ,which is pretty I admit, you all seem to think is real....hmmm...look at my avatar pic...its from the same area of Italy ,last year
its irregular bits translate to E=mc2,apparently
as far as I remember it turned out to be done by some Italian advertizing agency
I was tempted to change my pic back then when I found out , but left it cause it is pretty
this years coded message apparently is Ea Enki space


Perhaps rrraven can chime in on her information to get to the bottom of it.

My impression of it (subjective) is that there are a lot of irregularities in the smallest circles and there is no 'oomph' to it - that organic flow impression is missing, but that's just my subjective impression. So, I don't think its source is 6D STO.
 
anart said:
My impression of it (subjective) is that there are a lot of irregularities in the smallest circles and there is no 'oomph' to it - that organic flow impression is missing, but that's just my subjective impression. So, I don't think its source is 6D STO.

Same here. I don't get a good vibe when messages comes down in "bits". Why coding a crop with a binary message? Ea&Enki?? Sounds so Sitchinian to me, and reminds of the big grey-faced alien with the bit disc, the 15th August 2002's UK crop circle. We'll see.
 
It's really disappointing that none of the really marvelous type of crop circle from previous years are appearing this year. They were really awe inspiring to look at, even though it was REALLY hard to decipher the messages. Just the spectacular quality of the designs and execution kept me returning to look at them again to try to see some more symbolism or what hidden messages there could be.

The fake one are really pitiful in comparison to the authentic ones.
 
I think that this is showing just how much the hoaxers can really do. Nothing really intricate and beautiful, let alone symmetrical.

There have been no "Wowser!" ones at all.
 
hi wmu9,
the one that was suspected to be commissioned by an advertizing agency was the poirino 2010 not this years but the resemblance is there I had a quick look and found this
20 July 2010 at 14:33 · Like · · Share

Report A Crop Circle Formation
‎@Kayla. I listed the Poirino cc. An associated examined the crop and found it broken with no physics to suggest it is authentic. Also, the man who examined it said the farmer would not talk about the crop circle and said it had been commissioned by an advertising agency. The Dutch butterfly was supposed to have been commissioned by an advertising company that could not be found. So, why are reports of advertising companies made but they cannot be found? Maybe they are just shell companies set up to do business for a specific crop circle then disappear when no longer needed. That's a guess. Krsanna
22 July 2010 at 12:45 · Like
Kayla Vandal ‎@Krsanna: Thank you for the information!
22 July 2010 at 22:40 · Like

so I guess I read it on CCC possibly or even FB
I only remember because I chose the 2010 one as my avatar...so when I read that my predator was giving me heaps for being a ''fake'' as well,I almost changed it
but then didn't , cause I chose it for prettiness and it bugs me when people change their avatars and you can't recognize them anymore :rolleyes:

again I would not dismiss all of this seasons cc as fakes so quickly...maybe there are new recruits with the 6D cc editors that are still ''grooving'' or they are just footnotes on the last page
 
rrraven said:
again I would not dismiss all of this seasons cc as fakes so quickly...maybe there are new recruits with the 6D cc editors that are still ''grooving'' or they are just footnotes on the last page

Thanks for the clarification. I'd like to point out (again) that no one is 'dismissing all of this season's crop circles as fakes quickly' - each one is being examined and the impressions are noted here. It just so happens that none (or certainly very few) have even come close to appearing to be authentic.
 
anart said:
rrraven said:
again I would not dismiss all of this seasons cc as fakes so quickly...maybe there are new recruits with the 6D cc editors that are still ''grooving'' or they are just footnotes on the last page

Thanks for the clarification. I'd like to point out (again) that no one is 'dismissing all of this season's crop circles as fakes quickly' - each one is being examined and the impressions are noted here. It just so happens that none (or certainly very few) have even come close to appearing to be authentic.

Plus there is no good field analysis such as showing the condition of the plants (if the stalks are bent or broken) this year. I wonder why that is? It usually gave good clues.
 
New cc reported on 11th July. - Source.

StantonStBernard2011a.jpg
 
Vulcan59 said:
New cc reported on 11th July. - Source.

StantonStBernard2011a.jpg

A comment was posted that is interesting about this crop circle:

[quote author=Richard van Straaten The Netherlands]The Crop Circle found in Wiltshire on July 11th is the logo of a metal band called "Cavalera Conspiracy". This is probably a fake formation, unless the Arcturians love Heavy Metal of course... :)[/quote]

CavaleraConspiracy.jpg
 
Nicolas said:
A comment was posted that is interesting about this crop circle:

[quote author=Richard van Straaten The Netherlands]The Crop Circle found in Wiltshire on July 11th is the logo of a metal band called "Cavalera Conspiracy". This is probably a fake formation, unless the Arcturians love Heavy Metal of course... :)
[/quote]

:headbanger:

Sorry - couldn't resist...
 
That last picture looks very dubious, the fake ones always look smudgy with no true creative flow or energy.

I am going on a day long walking tour of crop circles on the 28th of this month with Lucy Pringle. So if any one has any questions fire away and I find out her thoughts on what's not been happening this year.
 
Liberty said:
That last picture looks very dubious, the fake ones always look smudgy with no true creative flow or energy.

I am going on a day long walking tour of crop circles on the 28th of this month with Lucy Pringle. So if any one has any questions fire away and I find out her thoughts on what's not been happening this year.

It will be interesting to see if she admits that not a lot is happening this year.
 
what I find strange , when those obviously not completed crop cicles (like the last one) are frome fakers, why is it that this is so extrem and obvious ? what is the reason behind that, if those are frome fakers ? maybe some of them are real and something isn't the same as in the last years, maybe something disturbs the message (it doesn't come down as intended)?
 
Back
Top Bottom