Menna
The Living Force
YeaIt was the vaccine announcement?
YeaIt was the vaccine announcement?
I think he feels that he doesn’t HAVE to engage with the media if he doesn’t want to. He is also launching his own media so maybe saving fuel for his own fire. Maybe he’s smart enough to not give energy to something that is solely giving him negative energy.Well, I noticed for the first time that Trump seems to have completely gray hair now:
In his last public appearance that I know of (just 10 days ago) he seemed to still have quite some light blond hair left:
Could be just a matter of lighting that Trumps hair appear very gray now, but that doesn't seem to be the case to me. From the looks of it, it could also be that he had gray hair already for a while but dyed it before and doesn't do it anymore. One things seems to be sure though, the pressure on the guy was and is almost too much for any person to endure. The pressure and probably all sorts of negative things directed at him (including beaming) - without even mentioning all the defamations - must be tremendous, to put it very mildly. Especially now.
We will see how the vaccine nonsense plays out though. It is one of his promises that he made that he will deliver it "quickly" and "effectively" in order to stop "the Virus", or rather, the Lockdown nonsense and the downward spiral of America. Ironically enough though, by doing this in this way, he could play in the hands of the main agenda here (getting as much people vaccinated as possible). It could also be though, that by rushing the vaccine in this way, the companies that produce it may not be able to finalize the product so that the right amount of evil stuff and correctly working "chips" is in there, as would be the case if they would have more time to test it out.
I also noticed that ever since his first public appearance after the election he doesn't seem to have had the same energy and determination of countering the media nonsense by non improvised counter speech. He read a lot from papers instead of his usual style of speaking more freely. He also avoided any media questions since the election.
I think there is a good likelihood that he will win, although from then on the pressure on him will magnify (as if it wasn't enough already!).
While China caved in and congratulated, russia made it clear once more (now coming from Lavrov), that they won't congratulate until the win is officially recognized. Here are three english articles that I could find:Even China congratulated Biden.
The head of Russian diplomacy called the US electoral system one of the most “archaic” in the world on Thursday, after media announced the victory of Joe Biden, which was rejected by Donald Trump.
“They have probably the most archaic electoral system in existence, when compared to other important countries of the world,” Sergey Lavrov declared during a press conference. The Russian Foreign Minister criticized above all the indirect nature of the election of the president, who is chosen by electoral college delegates appointed by universal suffrage, something that is referred to as second-level elections.
According to this system, the winner is not the one who gets the most votes at the national level, but the one who wins the electoral college, made up of 270 delegates from all the states in the US. “If Americans are willing to live by this tradition that considerably deforms the will of the people… let them do so,” said Lavrov.
Like Russian President Vladimir Putin, the Foreign Minister indicated that Moscow would only congratulate the winner of the election after the publication of the official results. “Congratulations are sent before the publication of the results only when there is no litigation,” said the Russian minister.
----------------------------
"Congratulations are sent even before the official results are announced when there is no dispute when the other side recognizes their opponents' victory. Just as it was in 2016 when Obama recognized Trump's victory. Then no one had any questions. Now such questions remain, so we need to wait for the official announcement", TASS quotes the minister as saying.
----------------------
[...] Lavrov said:
"As for congratulations, I do wonder why so much attention is paid to it. Congratulations will be offered after the election results have been officially published. This did not happen in the USA [yet]. All congratulations received so far are based on the projections of CNN, ABC, Social Media, but especially [based] on reports from the leading US media. If it is traditional for someone to send state congratulations for such reasons, there is nothing we can do about it, but we have a different approach. We should wait for an official statement."
The minister also drew attention to different positions within the USA. He pointed out that even the US State Department has not yet recognized the election results. He said:
"If you heard the statement of [US Secretary of State Mike] Pompeo, you know that the State Department has not yet recognized the US elections as legitimate. Pompeo called for a wait until the vote count is complete."
The Russian minister called the US electoral system "one of the most archaic" in the larger countries.
According to Lavrov, under Biden's presidency, interstate relations between Russia and the United States would not change much. US foreign policy would be similar to that of former President Barack Obama. The diplomat also stressed that "the United States is deeply divided", as the results of the vote show.
[...]
Without the vote fraud, Trump wins with 307 electoral votes
The website EveryLegalVote.com shows the real election results once you remove all the vote theft. Without vote theft: Trump wins with 307 electoral votes. With vote theft: Biden wins with 304 electoral votes. Fraud has been detected and documented in nearly all the swing states, including PA, MI, WI, GA and VA:
[...]
“Patriots are coming forward all day every day” with “statistical evidence that shows just hundreds of thousands of votes being put in and replicated” to swing the vote to Biden, Powell said, suggesting Big Tech and the media establishment had finished the job by covering up for Dominion and its political cronies.President Trump won this election in a landslide. It’s going to be irrefutable.
Powell seemed unconcerned about the December deadline looming for states to certify their election results, arguing that “for fraud this serious, I think… even if the states are stupid enough to go ahead and certify the votes where we know the machines were operating and producing altered election results… they will be set aside by the fraud also.”I’m going to release the Kraken.
Sidney Powell is about to release the Kraken.
‘I’m going to RELEASE THE KRAKEN’: Michael Flynn’s attorney vows to expose Dem collusion behind prominent voting machine firm
Republican attorney Sidney Powell has vowed to “expose every one of” the officials who helped allegedly steal the 2020 election for Democrat Joe Biden, claiming voting machine maker Dominion Voting Systems facilitated the theft.www.rt.com
‘I’m going to RELEASE THE KRAKEN’: Michael Flynn’s attorney vows to expose Dem collusion behind prominent voting machine firm
14 Nov, 2020 07:44
Get short URL
A poll worker checks the registration of a voter in Chicago, Illinois. © AFP / Jonathan Daniel / Getty Images via AFP
Follow RT on
- 175
- 1
Republican attorney Sidney Powell has vowed to “expose every one of” the officials who helped allegedly steal the 2020 election for Democrat Joe Biden, claiming voting machine maker Dominion Voting Systems facilitated the theft.
Powell, who is representing former Trump National Security Advisor Michael Flynn in his Russiagate-spawned legal battle, leveled her own allegations of foreign collusion and election meddling on Fox News’ Lou Dobbs Tonight show on Friday. Threatening those responsible with a “new American revolution,” she called for a sweeping probe into what she described as a longstanding pattern of election interference.
Claiming Dominion Voting Systems, one of the largest makers of voting machines for the US, “was created to produce altered voting results in Venezuela for [socialist leader] Hugo Chavez,” Powell argued that the system – which she said was funded by Cuba and China as well as Caracas – is little more than an election-fixing operation.
Dominion has “been used all over the world to defy the will of people who wanted freedom,” she declared.
“Patriots are coming forward all day every day” with “statistical evidence that shows just hundreds of thousands of votes being put in and replicated” to swing the vote to Biden, Powell said, suggesting Big Tech and the media establishment had finished the job by covering up for Dominion and its political cronies.
“There needs to be a massive criminal investigation and it’s going to affect just millions of voters and elections,” she told the Fox News host, urging viewers to “come forward now and get on the right side of this issue and report the fraud they know existed in Dominion Voting Systems” while she prepares to pull up the curtain on the entire operation.
Powell seemed unconcerned about the December deadline looming for states to certify their election results, arguing that “for fraud this serious, I think… even if the states are stupid enough to go ahead and certify the votes where we know the machines were operating and producing altered election results… they will be set aside by the fraud also.”
Nor were members of law enforcement safe, she intimated – not only does the Department of Homeland Security’s election security team need to be fired “yesterday,” but FBI director Chris Wray is long overdue for firing, she said, slamming the intel chief for wasting taxpayer resources intimidating a postal service whistleblower into recanting his story.
ALSO ON RT.COM‘This is disputed’: Twitter’s obsessive tagging of Trump election posts spawns meme response
American voters in 28 states cast their ballots using Dominion technology, including the areas where vote counting has come under scrutiny in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, and Nevada. The company has “categorically denied” any issues with its voting machines affected last week’s election.
Why doesn't he just do it instead of saying he's going to do it? Is it to emotionally manipulate people by keeping their emotions elevated and in a constant state of tension / stress?
I'm noticing this as a tactic now to keep Trump supporters in this constant state of tension where a lot of grand big reveals are being promised but I'm not seeing the bombshells coming through.
A: Just stay calm and patient. Goodbye.
This question is by no means rhetorical. For example, the mass disinformation media has chosen Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. Many people liked this news, but I must disappoint them – the television broadcasters have, according to the U.S. Constitution, nothing to do with who will live in the White House for the next four years.
Maybe the Supreme Court chooses the President? No, the Constitution does not provide for this. Could it be that the citizens of America choose their President? Following the U.S. Constitution, no. So, who then chooses the President?
Before answering this question, let us note that, contrary to popular misconception, the President of the United States is not a representative of the American people. State legislators and governors are representatives of the people, and at the federal level so are the members of the House of Representatives of the United States Congress. (Currently, senators are also representatives of the people, but before the ratification of the 17th Amendment to the Constitution in 1913, they were appointed by state legislators). So, who does the President of America represent?
The President of the United States of America, according to the Constitution, represents state legislators' interests and no one else.
In general, the federal government's structure in America reflects the numerous attempts of the Founding Fathers of the United States to introduce a system of effective state control over the federal government. The fact is that the main difference between our country and all other countries, without exception, is that it was organized "from the bottom up," that is, individual colonies voluntarily united against a common enemy – the British Empire. All other "republics" on the planet were created "from the top down," when the already existing provinces were graciously granted some independence by the already existing central government.
In building the American state, the fundamental principle was state control over the newly created federal power structure. Therefore, from the Founding Fathers' point of view, the federal government in Washington should consist of both representatives of the people (congressmen) and representatives of the state leadership – the federal President and senators. This is how the institution of the Electoral College was invented and implemented. The electors are appointed by the state legislatures, and they are the ones who elect the President of the country.
So why do American citizens need to participate in the presidential elections? Well, strictly speaking, it is not necessary. It is just that there is a long tradition in America – state legislators appoint electors in such a way that these appointments correspond to the mood of the people (in some states, this is even enshrined by law). This is a tradition, but according to the U.S. Constitution, the participation of the people in presidential elections, generally speaking, is not required. According to the Constitution, the people participate in the direct elections of their legislators, which is quite enough.
There is nothing reprehensible in this – after all, the President of America is not the representative of the American people. He is the representative of state legislators. From the point of view of the states, the President (and pre-1913, two senators from each state) are the "overseers" of the federal government. In other words, the President, from the point of view of state legislators, is "our man in Havana" (that is, in Washington), who is responsible for the observance of state rights by the federal government.
Thus, under the Constitution, state legislators have the right to generally ignore the results of the voting of citizens of their state and appoint those who they deem necessary to the Electoral College. Why did the Founding Fathers of the United States give state legislators such unprecedented power? Because most of the Founding Fathers were geniuses with impressive foresight. They did not know precisely when this would happen, but they knew it would eventually happen: the election's published results would have nothing to do with how the citizens voted.
Of course, there have been falsifications in the counting of votes in America before. However, in 2020, the Democrats went all-in with a scam, and for the first time in American history, they were close to success. Actually, they simply had no other choice. They knew very well that another Trump term would be enough to crush the American left to its core. (However, even if Trump does not manage to stay in the White House, his departure from politics will be such that the left will not be envied.)
Now, more than a week after the elections, it is already clear what the Trump team is doing. They are working in two directions.
First, they sue in states where there was a clear violation of the electoral law. Violations include the counting of votes that came after polling stations closed, turnout of more than 100%, the use of computer systems that were systematically "wrong," always in favor of Biden, the thousands of Pennsylvania voters born on January 1, 1900 (or even on January 1, 1800), and much more.
For example, election results in some Democrat-controlled states violate fundamental laws of both mathematics and physics. The votes cast for Biden do not comply with the statistical law of distribution of digits (Benford's Law), while the ballots cast for Trump do adhere to this law. Thousands of mailed ballots were received even before they were officially sent. Thus, the 2020 election showed compelling evidence of the possibility of time travel.
Secondly, the Trump team calls on state legislators to use their constitutional powers to rectify the local executive authority's criminal actions to the point of completely ignoring the falsified voting results.
These are the expected steps. Any presidential candidate would and should take such measures. Al Gore did the same in 2000, but then the case concerned only the state of Florida. In 2000, the country did not know the name of the winner for 35 days, and in 2020 we should not expect a faster resolution of the issue because now we are talking about at least six "problem" states.
Only now is the reason for the frenzy with which the Democrats attacked the three Trump-nominated Supreme Court justices is becoming clear. The fact is that the Trump-nominated current U.S. Supreme Court justices – Gorsuch, Kavanagh, and Barrett – were on Bush's legal team that secured the Supreme Court case in favor of Bush in 2000.
But the main difference between the 2020 elections and the 2000 elections is the involvement of the federal government's apparatus in investigating violations. The investigation is carried out by both prosecutors of the Department of Justice and FBI agents.
According to the Constitution, all courts and all other voting problems must be resolved by the first Monday after the second Wednesday of December, which falls on December 14 this year. If on December 14, the Electoral College fails to elect a president, then the Constitution also provides for this scenario. Per the 12th Amendment to the Constitution, in this case, the President and Vice President will be elected by the House of Representatives (however, if for some reason the Vice President cannot be elected by the House of Representatives, then the right of his choice is transferred to the Senate.)
In the House of Representatives, state delegations will be voting, not the individual congressmen themselves. Now in the House of Representatives, the majority of delegations – 26 – belong to Republicans. In the Senate, the Republicans also have an advantage. So, the only reason Trump can lose the election now, a week after the election, is his own admission of defeat. But such a strange decision by Trump is unlikely – this guy is from Queens, and if he gets involved in a fight, he will see it through to the end.
It is also unlikely that Trump does not understand that if the chronic vote-rigging by Democrats is not stopped now, America will end. The Trump team is well aware that such an opportunity to end the creeping socialist revolution may no longer be presented.
As a result, Democrats will likely not recover from this fraud. The disinformation media (which Fox News joined on the election night) will not recover from deliberately covering up this fraud, this attempted coup. If the Democrats went for broke, then Trump could, most likely, also go for broke.
Trump may have already destroyed the Democratic National Committee, but they just do not know it yet.
In military terms, Trump's team conducted careful reconnaissance and intelligence on the enemy for a week. They collected numerous affidavits about the electoral fraud of Democrats, witnesses who confirm their testimony under oath. But on the evening of November 10, the reconnaissance was completed, and massive artillery bombardment began in the form of lawsuits in several key states and the initiation of criminal investigations into violations by the Department of Justice. If this does not help, Trump will bring into the battle the strategic reserves available only to the President of the American state apparatus – for example, in the form of a complete declassification of Obamagate. In any case, our country is by no means at the end; we are at the very beginning of this process.
From a legal perspective, Biden is an impostor, a false president, at least until December 14 of this year. If Biden can declare himself President-elect without any legal basis, then any other American citizen can also declare himself President-elect.
Therefore, I am forced to repeat my advice once again – to survive in this leftist madhouse, turn off the TV and start thinking for yourself. If you have read the article so far, you will definitely succeed. And remember – if the laws in our country are still observed, then the chances of the Harris-Biden administration (in this order) are practically zero. If the laws in America are not followed, then the great American political experiment will unfortunately end.
While China caved in and congratulated, russia made it clear once more (now coming from Lavrov), that they won't congratulate until the win is officially recognized. Here are three english articles that I could find:
Democrat and attorney for the Clintons says Trump is going to win at the Supreme Court.
"What has been done in PA is simply against the law, so the opportunities lie with Trump"
This lawyer btw hates Trump.
Former Hillary Clinton Donor Alan Dershowitz: 'Trump Will Win the Pennsylvania Lawsuit'
The wheels turn slow, but they're turning still...redstate.com
@SOTTREADER
Best to keep your head in the game. If Trump loses we lost the battle, but that doesn't mean that we lost the war.