Might have to! I live right next to Fort Sumter .... hmmm...Uh oh, will the "South rise again"?
We must not resort to violence, but if we could somehow organize a general services strike... we are already at war, someone should notify the general public.Might have to! I live right next to Fort Sumter .... hmmm...
China's hidden influence is becoming more known in the USA concerning the stolen elections and how government officials have been compromised. Here is a map of all the undersea cables existing and proposed, connecting China to other countries that allows them access to the internet. Are they helping to rig elections in other countries as well? The use of Dominion voting machines and other software systems designed to hack elections are being used world wide is my understanding. So, this is an interesting visual for understanding the complexity of it all.
I think you are seeing "reds under the bed"Submarine Cable Map
TeleGeography's comprehensive and regularly updated interactive map of the world's major submarine cable systems and landing stations.www.submarinecablemap.com
Google is building an underwater cable from the U.S. to Japan
Surprise! The Internet isn't really wireless.
www.dailydot.com
Google ( funded by CIA) will partner with China Mobile International, China Telecom Global, Global Transit, KDDI Corp, and SingTel to invest $300 million in FASTER, while NEC will be the system supplier for the cable network. The group expects FASTER to be ready by the middle of 2016.
“When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” -- the unanimous 9-0 ruling by the Supreme Court in Foster v. Love (1997)
3 U.S.C. §1 of the Constitution was specifically designed to prohibit multiday elections to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. States that failed to make a final selection of officeholder by midnight of Election Day have violated the statute, subjecting the nation at large to the very evils strict deadlines were drafted to prevent.
If, at midnight, one candidate had enough of a lead, so that there was no mathematical possibility whatsoever of their being caught, then the final selection has been made. But if the outcome was uncertain at Midnight, the State violated the deadline, and its election is void.
Why wasn't the election in Bush v. Gore void? That nightmare dragged on for 37 days. Incredibly, the answer to this very relevant question is shockingly simple: That election wasn’t void because nobody asked the court to void it.
Success in the law is based on using magic words. It really is. If you don’t use them, the court has no obligation to fix your pleadings. But if you know the spell, and you know how to cast it on paper, miracles can happen. Revolutionary arguments surface even when long standing practices appear to have firm judicial support.
3 U.S.C. § 1 states: “The electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed, in each State, on the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, in every fourth year succeeding every election of a President and Vice President.” The elections for President in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin and Nevada were void at the stroke of midnight after Election Day, because a victorious candidate wasn’t discerned by Midnight."
I don't think its suspicious at all, of course this is the way the world works now. What I'm pointing out is, with this fraudulent election, the US people are beginning to see how much China has covertly infiltrated many areas including our voting machines which operate with parts from China and where connected to the internet during the election. It wasn't China operating the system in this case. These machines (or similar) and software are being used all over the world. I ask is it possible for China (as well as others of course) to be hacking elections around the globe. This was brought up by Sidney Powell not mentioning China specifically. Considering that so much of our computerized systems are made in China has me wondering what all they have access to. There may be more Red influenced peeps under the bed then we know.I think you are seeing "reds under the bed"
Why do you think it is suspicious that China is connecting to the internet and is also funding more connections? The US, Australia, New Zealand, Europe all are involved in putting in new fibre connections across the globe. International connections are what make the internet. No international connections, no international internet. The more connections, the bigger those connections, the faster the internet runs.
All great points. Whenever things drag on and on, I have to remind myself how energy draining that can be. (2nd Stimulus package talk for how long now?) Somebody knows what they are doing. Draining everybody of energy. Those 4D STSers don't like to be anticipated.This lawsuit filed by Texas appears to be the first action taken that could potentially be a 'game changer'. What I'm wondering is, why did it take so long for them to do this – why not file it earlier?
As I said earlier, the efforts of the Giuliani team has given me the appearance of a somewhat amateurish effort. I could be wrong, but that's how it has appeared to me as I've watched the hearings. Or, at the very least, Giuliani's group hasn't got any 'big players' on their side – they've been quite alone in what they have been doing.
On the other hand, if there ever was any methodical plan to this, maybe the evidence Giuliani's team has dug up so far was intended to have the effect of swaying the opinion of those legislators and other officials who have been 'on the fence' about the thing and who are not on the side of the 'bad guys'. So, maybe Texas waited for there to be enough visible evidence to gain more momentum?
Then there's the 'Kraken' couple of Sideny Powell and Linn Wood. I'm not sure about Powell but Wood has acted pretty unhinged and unprofessionally with his weird preaching and wild claims. I see him as either controlled opposition or a guy who's mentally challenged. Powell's comments about 'releasing the kraken' etc. have the same flavor. I'm not sure what's 'wrong' with her for acting like she does, maybe Wood has influenced her with his preaching, or something.
Politico reports that federal antitrust authorities and dozens of states are set to launch a double-barreled legal assault against Facebook over allegations of antitrust violations. Both lawsuits aim to force Facebook to break up its empire which includes messaging service WhatsApp and photo-sharing app Instagram.
Attorneys general from 48 U.S. states and territories, including New York, are behind one of the suits that was first hinted at last week. The second suit filed by the FTC is set to be filed later this afternoon.
The cases accuse Facebook of illegally using its power for more than a decade to push out rivals and buy out rising competitors, noting WhatsApp and Instagram as specific examples of this. Facebook has continued to purchase multiple companies despite recent scrutiny, Breitbart News recently reported on Facebook’s purchase of the customer service startup Kustomer in a deal valued at more than $1 billion.
The suit is part of the latest escalation in the power struggle between world governments and U.S. tech firms. In October, the Justice Department and a smaller group of U.S. states filed a similar antitrust lawsuit against Google.
Facebook has denied being a monopoly, noting that it ranks behind Google in how much revenue it takes from the $160 billion global market for online advertising. Google and Facebook maintain a duopoly over the online advertising market. Facebook currently has 2.74 billion users worldwide and disclosed in July 2019 that the FTC was investigating it for alleged antitrust violations. New York States attorney general, Tish James, announced two months later that she was leading a multistate coalition probing antitrust concerns of Facebook.
Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan or contact via secure email at the address lucasnolan@protonmail.com
Seemed notable that the terms dumb, crazy and insane were also utilised, probably a dozen times, in the article.
This lawsuit filed by Texas appears to be the first action taken that could potentially be a 'game changer'. What I'm wondering is, why did it take so long for them to do this – why not file it earlier?
As I said earlier, the efforts of the Giuliani team has given me the appearance of a somewhat amateurish effort. I could be wrong, but that's how it has appeared to me as I've watched the hearings. Or, at the very least, Giuliani's group hasn't got any 'big players' on their side – they've been quite alone in what they have been doing.
On the other hand, if there ever was any methodical plan to this, maybe the evidence Giuliani's team has dug up so far was intended to have the effect of swaying the opinion of those legislators and other officials who have been 'on the fence' about the thing and who are not on the side of the 'bad guys'. So, maybe Texas waited for there to be enough visible evidence to gain more momentum?