2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

I wrote this before seeing Woodsman's post, so I'm somewhat on the same track.

I keep thinking of something Catherine Fitts said re: the strategic importance of the South China Sea; she termed it THE central strategic issue to be aware of just now; it's an exceedingly serious game changer for whoever dominates the region. This has me thinking of what initially came out in the Hunter Biden laptop story; what seemed most concerning about that story was not so much the personal gain involved, but the fact that Joe Biden was looking the other way as China expanded its military presence in... you guessed it, the South China Sea.

Aside from this week's Slalwell scandal involving a Chinese agent/Slalwell's lover, Christine Fang (affectionately known as "Fang Fang"), and Democratic Representative Eric Slalwell, who conveniently enough (for China's interests) sits on the House Intelligence Committee, there's now the tape of the Chinese Economics professor -- the tape vetted by the producers of the Tucker Carlson Show -- speaking openly of how China has "people at the top of America's core inner circle of power and influence." Yes, for decades China has had influence over U.S. government policy via China's significant ties with Wall Street, all this before Trump came along, started a trade war, and ruined everything. It's interesting to watch:


The professor explains that since the 1970's, Wall Street had a great influence on America's domestic and foreign policy, but that after 2008 (after the Wall Street collapse, in other words), it had lost a good deal of its prestige. He then stated that an even greater problem happened in 2016 since "we can't fix Trump," he said. He explained that Trump had a previous "soft default issue" with Wall Street (something he said he had no time to elaborate on), and so the two were in conflict. He said that in the midst of Trump's trade war, China's Wall Street connections couldn't do much to counter it.

Tucker Carlson then mentions in this same segment what we've all been hearing about for decades: China's stealing billions of dollars worth of intellectual property from American companies. As came out during the initial Hunter laptop scandal (the one very effectively suppressed by Big Tech, which cost Trump more than the margin he needed to win, according to later analysis), Joe Biden was also looking the other way regarding China's intellectual property theft as well.

Carlson also mentions China's major role in the American opioid crisis. This is especially interesting since historically speaking the British used opium to finally penetrate China when, prior to that time, for several perhaps unprecedented centuries, China's emperors perfected a method of "incorruptibility" within China's borders in part through switching the locations of its various officials on a regular basis. In this way, China remained isolationist, and very successfully so, keeping the secret of the remarkably advanced techniques behind its beautiful porcelain, for example -- secrets the West was very keen on having -- even keeping to themselves their invention of gunpowder, which they themselves had no military use for. In fact, this era of maybe just two centuries (which I assume to be just before Western industrialization) was a time in which China's agrarian peasants truly saw, without irony, that their emperor/s represented their very best interests, an example of which was the improvement to their daily lives given the development of new methods of irrigation. (Somewhere I have a transcript of the fascinating documentary I've been referring to titled "The Genius that was China," which I need to see if I can dig up. It was that documentary that described how the only way the British had of breaking down this incredibly inventive and self-sustaining civilization involved Britain's ability to stealthily create opium addicts within China's border, which itself took many years to pull off. I've seen this aspect of China's history mischaracterized in more recent docs as China's own undoing having nothing to do with Britain's persistent unscrupulousness.)

Somewhat related to this, I just heard an anecdote about Putin from Dr. Klinghardt, a doctor specializing in the immune system and detoxification whom I've mentioned on the thread dealing with high dose melatonin. Klinghardt in one of his videos mentioned a friend of his who I believe is Russian who described how Putin acknowledged that Russia really has no need to worry about the United States since its government is not protecting its population from EMF exposure. This is to say that the American population will surely start to die off because of that fact. As discussed by Klinghardt, Russia knows, as does China -- and Iran, interesting enough -- that EMF exposure is especially dangerous for fetuses. In Beijin, for example, pregnant women need to wear protective clothing over their stomachs. I don't know what other protective measures China has in place, since its been claimed that Wuhan province may have been particularly hard hit with its initial Covid-19 outbreak given it was entirely wired for 5G. In fact, China has more 5G installed in that one province than that found in the entire United States (or, at least at the time of the initial Covid-19 outbreak). However, Klinghart's point seemed to be that these countries have at least acknowledged the danger of EMF as an issue in need of addressing, unlike here in the United States where very few even understand this as a serious problem, one increasingly causing serious chronic illness, including autism, as well as infertility.

As Klinghardt consistently acknowledges in his talks, between EMF exposure, fluoridated water, toxic vaccines and geo-engineered spraying, Americans are not just succumbing in huge numbers to chronic illnesses having to do with their compromised immune systems, but are also losing their competitive/inventive/creative edge since this is having a deleterious effect on America's brain power. And these changes to the brain are permanent, it seems. For, while we can improve our brain function through careful and knowledgeable detoxification and supplementation, we can never regain the brain power that each of us once possessed. For that, according to Klinghardt, has been permanently altered.

Well, I started this as a post about China, but have wound up on the ways in which the United States is perfectly capable of self-destruction without foreign influence. That doesn't mean, however, that China is not any kind of a threat; nor does it mean that Trump's aggressive policy toward China is entirely without merit. Actually,Tucker Carlson has rendered a pretty good argument these past months for the left's using "Russia collusion" regarding Trump as a foil for "China collusion" concerning themselves. That is, after all, how psychopaths tend to operate: accuse the opposite side of the very thing you yourself are guilty of.
*Correction: Swalwell.

(I feel like I'm slurring my speech just trying to pronounce that name.)
 

Dominion Advisor Met With John Podesta Offering ‘Anything’ That Would Help Defeat Trump, According to Email Released by WikiLeaks​




An email previously released by WikiLeaks reveals that a Dominion Voting advisor met with John Podesta during Hillary Clinton’s campaign to discuss ways that they could help to defeat Donald Trump.

In 2018, Dominion Voting announced that it had been acquired by its management team and Staple Street Capital, a New York-based private equity firm, who was being advised by Kirkland & Ellis LLP

During Clinton’s campaign, according to an email chain released by WikiLeaks, Kirkland & Ellis LLP partner Kamran S. Bajwa met with John Podesta while offering “anything” to help defeat Donald Trump.

Podesta, at the time, was chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 U.S. presidential campaign.
On Saturday, December 19, 2015, Bajwa wrote to Podesta that “it was a pleasure to meet this past Th in NY. As discussed, I want to do whatever I can by way of sharing ideas, raising funds, recruiting campaign volunteers, and anything else that can help with your campaign. I hope my small efforts to introduce you to a growing group of professionals like myself will be able to boost your important work for Secretary Clinton’s campaign.”

1-773-600x344.jpg




“I come to NY frequently and would welcome the opportunity to sit with you and discuss the best way to coordinate our efforts. If you will be in NY Jan 5, I will be free that day to meet you at any time and place convenient for you.”

Podesta responded by saying “can’t remember whether we discussed Trump’s effect on ISIS/radical recruitment. You following that?”

“John, just a quick note to say I was catching up with my senior partner Bill Singer back in the office and letting him know of my intentions to help your campaign as much as I can. He was very effusive in his praise of you and asked me to send along his regards. I will look forward to being touch after the break,” Bajwa wrote on December 21.

On January 2, 2016, Bajwa again followed up asking to meet with Podesta once again. He said that “I wanted to follow up on our brief conversation a few weeks back and see if you would be available to meet this coming Tuesday in NY? I will be in town for work and my schedule is flexible on Tuesday so if you can meet, I can come to you at a convenient time and place anytime prior to 5pm.”

Podesta then forwarded the email to Clinton campaign staffer Milia Fisher and asked her to find the time for the meeting.



Dominion has become the center of the election fraud scandal as anomalies and evidence of fraud just-so-happen to have been heaviest in states using their machines.


.
 
Did they? Maybe they try to expand their influence through soft power. But consider this.

If China is so Imperialistic, then why don’t they expand and use their influence building military bases around the globe.

Russia, China other nations are investing trillions in long-term, multi-lateral economic projects, while establishing parallel financial governance structures such as the AIIB and BRICS New Development Bank. So far, some invested $1 trillion has been earmarked for investment in both Asia and Africa.

In exchange they only seek a win-win mutual cooperation between nations.

China in return could make deals to build military bases in Asia and Africa. They don’t. Simply because their foreign policy is based on self-defence. In clear contrast with the US who want to dominate.

US patriots should point their guns at the Deep State. Not outside threats. Which are mostly total fabrications.
In the recent 2020 Governor's Association, Mike Pompeo delivered a speech to governors and other attendees of possible Chinese influence in the United States—much of it done under subterfuge and camouflage (i.e. representing yourself as an entity with no possible connection to the CCP but are indirectly funded by them. After Trump won the 2016 election, it is arguably considered that the USA has the strongest military force currently, so there would be a reason for China to employ tactics that would run under people's noses. This could be largely exaggerated in scope, but I wouldn't doubt something like this is happening on some scale since public perception is such a valuable thing to control (the entire illusory economy is predicated on it). I also find it strange that the Trump blames China for the virus when it actually originated in a military lab in the USA (could be given incomplete information). The same could be happening here when the nation points its finger at China.

As a warning to the governors in attendance, Pompeo strong-armed the them and issued a warning shot to governors when he said to them that China has a list that categorizes each of the 50 governors as being either friendly, hard-lined, or ambiguous. Whether its factual to the extent that he says, it seems like a way to tighten the leash on them via fear-dominance.

As it relates to the election, the soft war against China appears to be a way to foment further nationalism in the US. What better way to prop up China as the "enemy" as a way to direct this growing nationalism. Now, for what means and to what ends does this play in the global state of things, that I don't know.
 
Last edited:
A few musings before it finally plays out:

If your game is "order out of chaos" then you want the maximum chaos and a Trump win, at this point, would create a lot of chaos and trauma, no doubt.

But it is also worth noting that the ultimate game is complete control (out of the chaos).

So, would a Biden "win" cause even more chaos, psychological trauma and backlash coupled with quicker control?

What if there is a time constraint or event horizon we are unaware of?

(Things ARE being pushed VERY fast.)

One such that the Controllers may just install the cheating puppet and assert control now and be saying, in essence, "We are through screwing around, we are taking over now/here comes the UN Agenda/Beast system Green Deal ready or not and we don't care who knows it. We have an agenda and a narrative to push through, and we can't waste time screwing around with Trump throwing spanners in the works any longer. We are ramming this deal down your throats and you won't do anything - you (right wing 2nd amendment patriot crowd) will accept it because you love law and order AND we will have you so psychologically and emotionally traumatized you will just curl up and die. We will bury you in COVID restrictions on top of that."

That could represent the kind of hubris and wishful thinking by 4D STS that got Trump elected in the first place.

Then if the rank and file Trump loyalists cause the chaos, the PTB can have their cake and eat it too: having taken control and then having the 2nd amendment crew cause enough real trouble to lock down even harder AND have an excuse to exterminate the Trump supporters who are enemies of the control system anyway.

While the ham-fisted steal of the election could be to intentionally get caught (as part of some strategy); it could just as easily be a precursor to a ham-fisted takeover.

The ultimate goal seems to be to stampede the herd into accepting and begging for an authoritarian nightmare; a mass surrender of free will.

It is important to realize that the US chess match is a subset of a larger chess match of total global control, and the US outcome is probably being gamed into that scenario as well and not just in and of itself.

If the main driving chaos is to be global economic collapse/fiat currency collapse/societal breakdown/starvation... then Biden is a more likely choice to quickly capitulate to a world order.

But then we have Trump as the poster boy for the failure of populism - the perfect scapegoat. (it bugs me that populism has become a dirty word. Yeah, doing what is the most benefit to the masses of citizens...what a crazy idea! Can't have that!) So a Trump epic fail would serve that agenda VERY well.

I guess I am back full circle to a Trump victory on a hail Mary. Then he gets blamed as the SHTF. In ride the conquering heroes of the WEF/UN/World Banksters etc.

That is probably an oversimplification.

Like so many of these revolutionary scenarios, who controls the military is going to be HUGE.
 
How bout this one?


From the story:
“And America bought what they were selling: after the highest turnout in a century, they racked up 81 million votes and counting, the most in presidential history, topping Trump by some 7 million votes and flipping five battleground states.”

Boy, that is some strong kool-aid they are drinking. (And passing around).:lol:

Thank you time magazine... thank you so bloody much!!!
 
In the recent 2020 Governor's Association, Mike Pompeo delivered a speech to governors and other attendees of possible Chinese influence in the United States—much of it done under subterfuge and camouflage (i.e. representing yourself as an entity with no possible connection to the CCP but are indirectly funded by them. After Trump won the 2016 election, it is arguably considered that the USA has the strongest military force currently, so there would be a reason for China to employ tactics that would run under people's noses. This could be largely exaggerated in scope, but I wouldn't doubt something like this is happening on some scale since public perception is such a valuable thing to control (the entire illusory economy is predicated on it). I also find it strange that the Trump blames China for the virus when it actually originated in a military lab in the USA (could be given incomplete information). The same could be happening here when the nation points its finger at China.

As a warning to the governors in attendance, Pompeo strong-armed the them and issued a warning shot to governors when he said to them that China has a list that categorizes each of the 50 governors as being either friendly, hard-lined, or ambiguous. Whether its factual to the extent that he says, it seems like a way to tighten the leash on them via fear-dominance.

As it relates to the election, the soft war against China appears to be a way to foment further nationalism in the US. What better way to prop up China as the "enemy" as a way to direct this growing nationalism. Now, for what means and to what ends does this play in the global state of things, that I don't know.
If Pompeo is bashing the "nasty Chinese spying and inflitrating us" drum, there all by itself is a really good reason to doubt the veracity of the data. The man is s proven liar pushing an agenda
 
If Pompeo is bashing the "nasty Chinese spying and inflitrating us" drum, there all by itself is a really good reason to doubt the veracity of the data. The man is s proven liar pushing an agenda


Yes, and the Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, is also bashing the very same drum. China is most certainly on the docket right now. The question is why now? Of course, such answers usually lie in the not said. I mean, we may even agree with a lot of what Ratcliffe is saying here. But, again, why now? And why such a broad smile? He's chomping at the bit, it looks like; he's ready to go.

As per a CBS News article I linked to earlier on this thread... let me see if I can link to that post (I'm not sure I'm doing this correctly)...


... Trump is not only cutting the CIA out of special operations, he's largely pulling out of the Middle East in order to put the focus on "Russia and China," although one would think China would be up front and center (except for the fact that the MSM continues to link Trump to Russia, as CBS is doing here).
 

Facebook “Fact-Checker” Lead Stories Funded By Controversial Chinese Company That Owns TikTok​



Same “fact-checkers” claimed Georgia smoking-gun election footage showed “no fraud.”
Facebook’s “fact-checking” partner Lead Stories is funded in part by a Chinese company called ByteDance LLC, which owns TikTok and has been accused of censorship on behalf of the country’s communist government.

Lead Stories was brought in to work with Facebook in February of 2019, “using its own technology, called ‘Trendolizer,’ to detect trending hoaxes from hundreds of known fake news sites, satirical websites and prank generators. Lead Stories specializes in hoax debunking as well as fact-checking,” according to Axios.
One such “debunked” story, was a recent video showing suspicious activity in Georgia during the 2020 election.

Lead Stories wrote, “Fact Check: Video From Georgia Does NOT Show Suitcases Filled With Ballots Suspiciously Pulled From Under A Table; Poll Watchers Were NOT Told To Leave.”
However, their “fact check” has already been thoroughly destroyed by real journalists.
Facebook is even censoring users from criticizing Lead Stories‘ fact checks, so good luck sharing this on Zuck’s anti-free speech platform.
A screenshot from the Lead Stories website shows ByteDance was one of their “main funding sources” for the year 2020.

Screen-Shot-2020-12-10-at-12.52.45-PM Facebook “Fact-Checker” Lead Stories Funded By Controversial Chinese Company That Owns TikTok Business Top Stories [your]NEWS

ByteDance currently owns TikTok, but a court case could soon force them to sell the video-sharing platform to a U.S. company.

President Trump warned ByteDance on Aug. 14 that they must find a suitable buyer for TikTok’s U.S. business because the platform presented a national security risk.
So, the same company Trump sees as a potential national security threat is funding Facebook’s main “fact-checker?”

The Chinese company has also been accused of working with the nation’s communist government to censor information.
A 2019 report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s International Cyber Policy Centre detailed how ByteDance is “engaged in deeply unethical behavior in Xinjiang, where their work directly supports and enables mass human rights abuses.”

The investigation determined, “ByteDance is uniquely susceptible to other problems that come with its closeness to the censorship and surveillance apparatus of the CCP-led state… The meteoric growth of TikTok now puts the CCP in a position where it can attempt to do the same on a largely non-Chinese speaking platform—with the help of an advanced AI-powered algorithm.”

In September 2019, The Guardian obtained leaked documents explaining, ByteDance “is advancing Chinese foreign policy aims abroad through the app.”

For example, the documents showed TikTok moderators were instructed to “censor videos that mention Tiananmen Square, Tibetan independence, or the banned religious group Falun Gong.”
Even the Washington Post admitted, “Chinese tech giants including ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, and Huawei Technologies are working closely with the Communist Party to censor and surveil Uighur Muslims in China’s western region of Xinjiang.”

A Reuters article from August 2020 accused ByteDance of censoring “content it perceived as critical of the Chinese government on its news aggregator app in Indonesia from 2018 to mid-2020.”
“The sources said that local moderators were instructed by a team from ByteDance’s Beijing headquarters to delete articles seen as ‘negative’ about Chinese authorities on the Baca Berita (BaBe) app.”
In May of 2020, former top Disney executive Kevin Mayer was made ByteDance’s Chief Operating Officer (COO).

Mayer most recently “oversaw the development and successful rollout of Disney+, the company’s flagship streaming service,” according to a press release announcing his hiring.
Disney’s cozy relationship with China’s communist government has been the subject of debate for years now, even reaching the level of becoming a South Park joke.

Is America satisfied with a Chinese company that has a history of censorship funding one of our nation’s top “fact-checkers?”
 
Fact Checkers and the CCP


Facebook portrays its fact-checkers as independent. But specifically, of course, they are not. One contractor is ‘LeadStories’ owned by ‘TikTok’, in turn, owned by The CCP.

The alleged overseeing organization of “LeadStories’ is ‘Polymer’, also owned by ‘TikTok’. The ‘LeadStories’ propaganda machine is a further subcontractor of ‘ByteDance’, also owned by The CCP.

‘LeadStories’, was founded in 2015 by; Maarten Schenk, CNN Alan Duke, a hiding lawyer in Colorado, and another in Florida.

In fiscal 2017 it declared operating expenses of less than $50,000. In 2019 it declared $350,000, with Facebook having paid it $460,000 in 2018-2019. The then 12 new staff, included 6 from CNN.

‘LeadStories’, has become the hidden prime censorship and propaganda machine of; contractor ‘ByteSource’, Facebook, Google, and also affecting advertising content. Yet advising only $25,000 for fiscal 2019.

The tracking tool is ‘Trendolizer’, in turn claiming the myth of ‘Privacy’ for CCP data harvesting, and insertion of Propaganda through Censorship.

The 3 main allied linked are; “LeadStories’, ‘Trendolizer’, and ‘StoryTide’. ‘LeadStories’ is now running the deletion of any material concerning the current election fraud.

TikTok’ is owned by Beijing hidden CCP front “ByteDance’; started by party hack, Yiming Zhang. Who in turn was persecuted and closed an unacceptable app ‘Neihan Duanzi’.

Propaganda and Censorship are regarded as Education, concerning The Four Consciousnesses’ of CCP Directives of; Socialist Core Values, Correct Guidance of Public Opinion, Laws and Regulations, and Acting with Social Responsibility. ‘Authoritative Media Content’ to be in ‘Elevating Distribution’ ensuring ‘Media Voices are Broadcast in Strength’.

In 2019: ‘TikTok’, introduced an agenda for its ‘Moderators’ to block material and as instructed by The CCP. Including that concerning Falun Gong, being persecuted from 1999. In May 2019: ‘TikTok’, denied its still ongoing agenda (Guidelines).

In December 2019: Facebook accounts were suspended, after comments concerning the persecution and Genocide of Uyghur Muslims, and further exposure of the concentration camps in Xinjiang.

In June 2019: Facebook accounts were closed after comments concerning The Chinese National Anthem.

In 2017: ‘ByteDance’, bought Musical.ly’, as a video sharing platform targeting American teenagers, who were then moved to ‘TikTok’; a CCP controlled enterprise further linked back to The Singaporean Government, which is now under CCP control.

The US Commerce Dept. banning of ‘TikTok’ on issues of National Security effective from 12 November 2020; is blocked in US courts, of course, and pending the success of The Biden Election Fraud.

And in the meantime: “ByteDance’ is infiltrating WalMart and Oracle.

Captured Facebook is using the fraud of fact-checkers needing certification by the further owned fraud of IFCN (The International Fact-Checking Network). Founded in 2015 and operated by The CCP owned front of The School of Journalism of the unaccountable, alleged non-profit Poynter Institute. Even though Poynter is owned by ‘TikTok’ and partner ‘MediaWise’. All frontend by the further owned Tina Dyakom in turn funded by ‘ByteDance’.

‘Fact-Checking’ now further mutating to the even more ridiculous ‘Media Literacy’. Further hidden by the absurdities of; Editorial Independence, and Ethics Policies.

A further funding link to The IFCN, from 2019, is eBay founder and major Dem. Party funder, Pierre Omidyar. In turn, further linked back to funds from; Soros, Google, and Facebook.

IFCN certification is by a panel of 7, including Glenn Kessler chief fact-checker of The Washington Post, and author of the propaganda fraud of; ‘Donald Trump and His Assault on Truth’. Another is Angie Drobnic Holan, editor-in-chief of PolitiFact, further owned by The Poynter Institute.

A further IFCN luminary is Baybars Orsek, its liar-in-chief, posturing that the 7 board members, recuse themselves concerning ‘voting and deliberations on certifications for organizations in which they hold major positions’.

Are you getting the general idea?
 
These hearings have been a dog and pony show. Does this mean that it is over? Sounds like the Supreme court is sanctioning civil war. Or are Republicans going to object on January 6th?

 
Last edited:

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom