2020 US Election - Let The Games Begin!

Is it all a show? Ashli Babbitt.

View attachment 41544


Strange indeed. While Antifa actors and some patriots were 'breaching' the Capitol (or were led in by Police) a couple of intelligence agents have been collecting Nancy Pelosi's laptop (and a couple of others).

Now I'm really beginning to enjoy the show! :-D

What's more, Ashli Babbitt is still alive... 🦸‍♀️

May I be so bold as to suggest that the whole bunch of patriots were only called to D.C. as a distraction while the intelligence service were pushing their 'Antifa' actors into the building. Meanwhile the Capitol Police was leading panicking Nancy into the basement and the feds went off with her computer... 👨‍💻
 
Completely agree SummerLite.
He is a genuine person with a lot of experience and good contacts.

He says the president signed the insurrection act. I'll be back to this post.

If 2 weeks come and go with us not seeing this insurrection act coming into force, I'll be keen to see what other lies things will be spurn to explain it and string us along even further. Perhaps we'll be told Trump is starting an underground breakaway civilisation or whatever other thing these people come up with to keep people on a string.
 
Well I tried to copy and paste but he removed a lot of posts it looks like. I've been reading it over the weekend and he claimed there was a nuke in DC, then that POTUS was in Texas. Nope he was in My Nebraska. Oh wrong again now Colorado. He also claimed fighter jets were chasing a B52 with Epstein on it. I quit reading after all that.

some of his sources include Q drops and Lin Wood, so......
Ok. I haven't heard those instances from him but he did say once that a high profile person may have been on a medical flight from DC to Gitmo which may be an example of what you say. However, he did qualify that saying it was speculation so I imagine he'd say the same about your examples. He did trust Lin Woods and relaid the info from him about POTUS being in Texas and there was some unusual flight activity at the time. He came back the next day and said that was disinformation and Trump isn't in Texas, so he doesn't trust Lin Woods now like he did. It seems like in listening to almost anyone, a filter needs to be applied to some extent because people color their observations with their own beliefs. It's a human quality.

He has his limits in what he can see and know so thats to be kept in mind. It seems like a lot of people think Q is legit and that has become an automatic disqualifier to anything else they say. Maybe not in your case but I think thats a very limiting view. I've followed a few Q believers not because I believe in Q but because they are intelligent people that have good, truthful information to share. Jeffery Prather is an example of that. He's a wealth of information and experience. He spoke of Q in maybe 4 sentences, and what a waste to dismiss him for that.

Monkey will come back and say if its bogus.
 
So, we've seen here two sources -- Monkey Werx and Simon Parks -- questionable to be sure, indicating Trump signed the Insurrection Act; and here someone is asking about troops on the ground in D.C., which could indicate the same.

I haven't read Monkey Werx's blog (which, according to @RevChristoph sounds problematic), but the software he's using is such that one can pretty much draw one's own conclusions. It's obvious something is going on over D.C. today. That's not editorializing, that's what the software is showing. Also, there are about ten times the number of military planes up in the air across the country today than one would normally see on a Sunday.
 
SummerLite- I may have missed a previous discussion that would clarify this but what sources do you know about that verify the idea that this source may have actual knowledge regarding any military activity? There is so much disinfo out there it is very hard to know what sources are trustworthy....

'Monkey' is not normally giving any predictions. If you were following his vids regularly you'd know that he is a former Air Force guy and naturally has connections to the military.

He has a knack for interpreting the flight activity on the screen and is obviously doing so for a long time.
Of course there is disinfo out there but over time you find out whether you can trust a guy or not.
 
The update fixes the issue with MMS, it doesn’t make your phone not receive MMS.
This is the sort of thing I’ve been talking about. The source is appallingly misinformed, and the forum member posting here is not doing their due diligence.
This has been the standard here for awhile.
Let me ask you guys, what’s the percentage of extraordinary claims posted on this thread that turned out to be true so far? I’d say less than 1% and there has been hundreds. I think that’s abysmal. Just today we had the Pope arrested, Trump signing the insurrection act, blackouts all over the place. What’s next? Pence murdered by buffalo horn guy? C’mon

In a professional environment, this whole thing will be conducted in a more organised fashion.

There would be an audit trail of each contributors predictions and sources they rely on, or post here. As events come and go, there would be an accounting as to what was right, partially right, totally false etc. This in turn would enable the signal to be filtered from the noise and also enable people to refine their approach so as to improve their signal to noise ratio.

Sadly, we're not in a professional environment here. We're in the wild wild west. I personally know what I usually take with a pinch of salt... no offense but a lot of Ocean's info / links I usually have 99% distrust level on. I've just never seen the stuff he usually brings forth pan out - no offense, maybe I haven't been paying attention.

In any case, I guess this is how things have to be.

Btw, on the whole "professional" angle thing of reading events and predicting outcomes, it's a whole professional field from what I understand and of course the approach is very scientific and orderly.

 
Ok. I haven't heard those instances from him but he did say once that a high profile person may have been on a medical flight from DC to Gitmo which may be an example of what you say. However, he did qualify that saying it was speculation so I imagine he'd say the same about your examples. He did trust Lin Woods and relaid the info from him about POTUS being in Texas and there was some unusual flight activity at the time. He came back the next day and said that was disinformation and Trump isn't in Texas, so he doesn't trust Lin Woods now like he did. It seems like in listening to almost anyone, a filter needs to be applied to some extent because people color their observations with their own beliefs. It's a human quality.

He has his limits in what he can see and know so thats to be kept in mind. It seems like a lot of people think Q is legit and that has become an automatic disqualifier to anything else they say. Maybe not in your case but I think thats a very limiting view. I've followed a few Q believers not because I believe in Q but because they are intelligent people that have good, truthful information to share. Jeffery Prather is an example of that. He's a wealth of information and experience. He spoke of Q in maybe 4 sentences, and what a waste to dismiss him for that.

Monkey will come back and say if its bogus.
I'm sure he's a good guy, but I have issues with Q, Woods, Alex jones, etc as sources though. If even half of what all these guys say is true, do you think they would be allowed to operate in the capacity of which they have/are?
 
I'm sure he's a good guy, but I have issues with Q, Woods, Alex jones, etc as sources though. If even half of what all these guys say is true, do you think they would be allowed to operate in the capacity of which they have/are?
Alex Jones for example has been talking about martial law since mid-2000's, that's about 15 years.

FEMA camps are another favourite topic.

We're approaching 20 years and people who have consistently told nothing but lies in the alternate space are still around and in fact have BIGGER audiences. There whole shtick is fear and playing on people's hopes continuously whilst nothing actually changes materially in the world.

It's really hard to find good sources in the alt space. They are there e.g. James Corbett, JP Sears amongst others but my God, for every decent one, there's 50 false ones that you have to weed through.
 
Even if Pelosi's laptop hold incriminating evidence. It will get the same traction as Hunters Laptop. The US is to far corrupt and the Deep State is buried too deep.

You think it doesn't hold incriminating evidence? Then the whole 'Antifa' operation would have been in vain.
I think Hunter's laptop was stored at AG Barr's DOD, an operative of the deep state that's why its content was never processed.
 
You think it doesn't hold incriminating evidence? Then the whole 'Antifa' operation would have been in vain.
I think Hunter's laptop was stored at AG Barr's DOD, an operative of the deep state that's why its content was never processed.

Maybe it does. Could be. But who is going to prosecute it? If this election tough us anything is that all the courts are bought and paid for.
 
Back
Top Bottom