In your argument, I cannot see how your view of "diversity and inclusion, foster cohesion" reflect the objective reality, when these are exactly the factors chiefly contributing to split the society. Within their very narrow-specific meaning which ARE artificially instilled, and thus used as tools for manipulation and division, you seem to miss fundamental point. Which is, you are yourself ponerized and using para-moralism to explain why Trump lost.So I took a shot at Lobaczewski’s book to figure out what "paramoralism" is supposed to mean, and the closest I got is exploiting a tragic event/situation for personal or political gains by exaggerating the severity of that event, particularly exploiting human emotions through effusions of outrage or exaltation.
It creates a divide between ‘normal people’ and those perceived as ‘ponerized’ or ‘psychopaths’.
When this is propagated at group mentality level - it becomes a serious problem: us vs them, der anderen.
And that’s how adversity and division creep in society and from there is just a descent to barbarism.
As opposed to diversity and inclusion (even artificially instilled) which foster cohesion and lead the way to the future.
MBWW:
According to your own thesis, acceptance of pathological system is going to help with pseudo-reality being imposed on you. Nevermind that you will have to accept lies or else! Well it might work for those who blindly or willfully embrace totalitarianism, as well as those who don't have to deal with conscience, but there is always price to pay. Collingwood would say, yours is counsel of despair.If you don’t at least try to understand that we are moving into a new era, and some preps for these changes that lie ahead of us are necessary, concepts of unity, acceptance and tolerance gaining more prominence and a certain neuroplasticity - you’re going to have a hard time dealing with these feelings of elites, control, programming, psyops, etc.
Now I feel enlightened.Nothing to fear but fear itself, remember that.