2024 US election: A Kennedy presidency? Trump again? Will it be rigged?

Alejo said:
I watched the interview with Rogan and I felt it was a bit underwhelming, Trump was perhaps too focused on campaigning than on talking. He did get to relax towards the end, and specially when talking about fights, that was the best part of the conversation.

His UFO conversation was tiny, but I had a feeling that it will probably be a lot more significant than that.
Click to expand...
As I listened to the last 10 minutes which featured the UFO segment, I got the strong impression that he baited Rogan with the 'people coming from space' because he wanted to switch the topic away from the JFK files. The way he talked about the JFK files was weird and disappointing. I mean, if you really want justice you don't care if those involved in the assassination are still alive, what a stupid argument! And to call Mike Pompeo a good guy...c'mon man! :-)
 
It's truly getting bizarre, Trump is a racist and a nazi.. while they're sending billions to the nazis in Ukraine.

But that's the only point against Trump that they have, today at the office the liberals that I work with kind of lost it and had no argument whatsoever other than "he's a nazi, and those are all beyond deplorable".

I do wonder what January 6th will bring should Trump be allowed to take the victory. I honestly see liberals so afraid of defeat and so ready to jump on anyone who disagrees with them.
 
Alejo said:
It's truly getting bizarre, Trump is a racist and a nazi.. while they're sending billions to the nazis in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
I guess it's Psychopaths 101: Accuse others of what you are doing yourself.

"Trump wants to destroy democracy."

"Trump wants to prosecute his political opponents."

"Trump is lying all the time."

At least they are not claiming that he will start WW3, or maybe I missed it.
 
Catherine Austin-Fitts brought up an interesting possible reason why the PTB may decide to let Trump win:

They may want to blame Trump for losing the war in Ukraine and "not supporting Ukraine enough". Ukraine losing and how to "save face" for the US/NATO/West does seem to be one of the most pressing issues for them.

She also mentions that there is a lot of talk behind the scenes from people she knows in the intelligence world that there will be a civil war in the US. However, she thinks that it would have to be almost entirely manufactured by the intelligence agencies.
 
axj said:
Catherine Austin-Fitts brought up an interesting possible reason why the PTB may decide to let Trump win:

They may want to blame Trump for losing the war in Ukraine and "not supporting Ukraine enough". Ukraine losing and how to "save face" for the US/NATO/West does seem to be one of the most pressing issues for them.
Click to expand...
that's why Trump is making his position clear on Ukraine.
axj said:
She also mentions that there is a lot of talk behind the scenes from people she knows in the intelligence world that there will be a civil war in the US. However, she thinks that it would have to be almost entirely manufactured by the intelligence agencies.
Click to expand...
Whether it is a false flag or not, that is the route it will go.

Washington Post lost 200,000 subscribers which is 8% of paid subscribers after their decision not to endorse. Bizarre. Probably not.

www.indiatoday.in

Washington Post loses 2 lakh subscribers amid Harris endorsement row: Report

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, who also owns The Washington Post, defended the newspaper's decision not to endorse a candidate for the November 5 US presidential election as “right” and “principled”.
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

The Washington Post has lost over 2 lakh subscribers in the wake of the newspaper's billionaire owner and Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, deciding not to endorse any of the two candidates for the November 5 US presidential elections, according to media reports.

On Monday, Bezos defended the Washington Post's decision, saying that it “right” and “principled”, and it was taken internally, not influenced by either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

The newspaper's editorial staff were prepared to endorse Democratic nominee Harris, but publisher Will Lewis said on October 25 that the decision to choose a candidate relied on “our readers’ ability to make up their own minds”.
Click to expand...
 
axj said:
At least they are not claiming that he will start WW3, or maybe I missed it.
Click to expand...
They made these claims the last time he was president. I haven't seen it mentioned this time around. For all I know he might be accused for not wanting to start WWIII. Now it's quite telling that the only time Trump got any positive coverage in the media was during his presidency, when he dropped some bombs over Syria.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom