abovetopscret.com EXPOSED!!!!
Submersible said:
If you need to hire a server to provide you with the opportunity to exist on the www , and they have the ability to turn your site on and off as simple as you describe, who does the 'server' apply to for access to the web?
From a backbone, people who own and resell internet connections. Mainly the phone companies or other companies that install the connections, i.e. corporations.
Submersible said:
Ultimately, is there one source of access and control that has the power to turn one or all of the servers off and shut down a portion of, or the entire www ?
Sure. The U.S. government controls the routers, nodes, etc. The alphabet soup people have complete access to all traffic.
Submersible said:
Are you aware of or do you perceive that there is an entity or 'superpower' in this world with the ability to literally "pull the plug" ? If so, who are they, or who is 'it'?
See above.
Submersible said:
If not , how can any governing body or law enforcement agency threaten to deny people of their basic freedom of expressing their 'undocumentable' thoughts?
They've been doing it for years, it's just becoming more overt of late. There's a reason for that, also. Obviously, for a long time it was done somewhat carefully and covertly utilizing paramoralisms and paralogic. Why? Well, obviously, until the ground - the psychology of the masses - is adequately prepared.
You see, if the masses were not in a "special state" to accept certain things, they would rise up and revolt. So creating that state has been part of a long, slow, programming process. You could say that it is similar to the process of hypnotic induction.
But keep in mind that even under hypnosis, a person will not do anything that goes against their "belief center." So, changing beliefs has also been part of the process.
In the process of hypnosis, there are little tests applied along the way. For example, at a certain point, the hypnotist will ask the subject to TRY to open his/her eyes. This will come after being told that the eyelids are so heavy that the subject cannot open them. So, the subject tries, and finds that he can't, and this sudden awareness that he cannot serves only to deepen his trance and the control of the hypnotist over the subject.
The Kennedy assassination was one such test... 911 is a bigger one.
The traumatic effects of 911 were part of the induction. The media constantly repeated to the shocked populace: everything has changed, everything has changed, there are evildoers in our midst, and so on.
In the middle of this, little mainstream media blurbs that the government knew and allowed 911 to happen were flashed on the screen so as to "test" and secure the trance state. This was equivalent to asking the subject, after he has been told that the eyelids are too heavy to open, to open his eyes. It served to deepen the trance even more.
Now, all the disturbing facts are coming, little by little, into the open as more "trance state" tests. These things are risks that the Controllers take, but they do it for a reason: to deepen the trance. That is mostly why they allow many of the things they allow.
There is also the reason that they want to leave the traffic open so they can know everything about everybody and "make their lists and check them twice... gonna find out who's naughty or nice..." Because, of course, there ARE people who are un-hypnotizable.
For example, consider the following:
There are large individual differences in response to hypnosis. Hypnosis has little to do with the hypnotist's technique, and very much to do with the individual's capacity, or talent, for experiencing hypnosis. Most people are at least moderately hypnotizable. However, while relatively few people absolutely cannot be hypnotized, by the same token, relatively few people fall within the highest level of responsiveness (so-called hypnotic virtuosos).
There is some controversy over whether hypnotizability can be modified. Some clinical practitioners believe that virtually everyone can be hypnotized, if only the hypnotist takes the right approach. However, there is little evidence favoring this point of view. Similarly, some researchers believe that developing positive attitudes, motivations, and expectancies concerning hypnosis can enhance hypnotizability. However, there is also evidence that such interventions may only affect behavioral compliance with suggestions, not the subjective experiences that lie at the core of hypnosis. As with any other skilled performance, hypnosis is probably a matter of both aptitude and attitude: negative attitudes, motivations, and expectancies can interfere with performance, but positive ones are not by themselves sufficient to create hypnotic virtuosity.
Hypnotizability is measured by standardized psychological tests such as the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale or the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. These instruments are work-samples that are similar to other performance tests. Hypnotizability, so measured, yields a roughly normal (i.e., bell-shaped) distribution of scores.
Source:
Institute for the Study of Healthcare Organizations & Transactions
Submersible said:
I once heard that information posted or transmitted online was not valid evidence in a court of law, I'm sure that is changing.
Yup, it's changing. Personal experience. We recently won a suit regarding material transmitted via the web.
Submersible said:
Who draws 'the line' that this forum and many others are not willing to risk crossing?
We draw our own lines here. These lines consist first of all of not doing what is illegal, period. The second set of lines is variable. We do not like to be, nor do we wish to put others, in physical peril. We've had enough experiences along this line to know who's on first in that respect.
Submersible said:
I know that's a bunch of questions, but I'm asking because it would be nice to KNOW if the threats being made towards our ability to share our personal thoughts are supported by laws that are already written and/or enforced, or if all of the concerns we share about our security exist only because we haven't identified with and questioned the source of intimidation. Because some ONE either has the ability to manipulate and restrict the flow of data and information throughout the entire world and the www, or not.
Which is it? (that's my only question)
No, most of what is being done to suppress is not legal. But unless you have a LOT of money and a lot of time to spend fighting such battles, don't even go there. They can do what they have the money to do. It's that simple. ATS types get away with the illegal stuff they pull inside the US because they have their good buddy, Wayne Jaeschke, to back them up with legal threats. The US is highly hystericized, (Canada, too), and all it takes is a psychopathic threat of a lawsuit to get most people to fold up completely. It doesn't work as well in other countries.
Identifying and questioning the ultimate source of the intimidation is a matter at a whole different level. Certainly there is a "Cryptocracy." And no doubt, some of those folks are into nasty stuff, maybe even including secret society black magick mumbo jumbo, ritual abuse, sexual perversion, and so on. You can name all kinds of groups: Skull and Bones, OTO, Enochian Magick, Kaballah, Masons, etc. It all amounts to the same thing: Pathocrats. These are psychologically deviant people attracted to ideologies that they either believe in themselves, or promote to attract adherents like themselves.
The bottom line is: it's all a load of horsehockey, not any different from the folks that believe that Jesus is gonna rapture them from catastrophe. One side believes in Jesus, the other side believes in Satan (or whoever). The Enochians identify the character as "Choronzon" honored as "that mighty devil" by John Dee's buddy, Edward Kelly.
The plain fact is that all of this nonsense are really distorted (subjective and unscientific) ways of talking about hyperdimensional energy exchanges.
Is there a hyperdimensional entity who thinks he is the Devil? Probably, but it doesn't make it so. The rules of the game are still the same, like gravity on earth: they can't take over people without their willing acceptance and to show their hand too soon would turn everyone against them thus foiling the possibility of them being able to achieve their ends.
Now this is theoretical, but seems to fit the facts. It seems that what the higher levels are after is "loosh," or consciousness in a particular state. For the entropic side, fear and horror are quite delectable. So, if a planetary cataclysm is in the works, (as seems to be the case and only the higher echelons know this), then it is desirable for them to keep everyone as ignorant as possible so that when the facts DO become obvious, they will still be in a state of hypnosis, only waking up at the last instant to be completely permeated with the requisite spice of horror at the extraordinary betrayal. That would then lock all that energy into a whole new cosmic cycle of feeding and loosh providing. In the end, from the purely mechanical point of view, it is only about energy exchanges... and can be succinctly explained via physics and mathematics.
Psychopaths and other deviants represent, in our reality, physical manifestations of the entropic, or "off" energy state. Understood in this way, you don't have to go into some kind of terror state that posits all kinds of weird hierarchies of demons and devils or secret societies that sacrifice virgins and are trying to take over the world. Sure, sick people like that exist and they do that kind of stuff somewhere at some time. But that is only evidence of their deviance, their sickness, their membership in a larger grouping of pathological elements. And the fact is, these elements only make up about 6% of humanity, though they have an extraordinary effect on the rest of us, just like a tiny, virulent bacteria has an effect on a human body and can make it sick or even kill it.
