Hey thanks for that thread. However I have had the indication that Project Camelot is a disinformation source although this wasn't really the reason for posting that article.Shane said:Hey Andrew, have you looked into Bill Ryan, who initiated Project Camelot? This thread: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=523&p=1 has some revealing information in it. There's some other related threads concerning the ATS forum that are also worth looking up.
Yes thank you Anart but something in that article struck me as significant, mostly regarding what they were "claiming" what's to happen in the near future.anart said:Yes, I previously suggested to Andrew that he search the forum for information on Camelot and those related with it. Andrew, is there reason you did not do that and chose to post more of their disinformation on this forum?
What they claim and present on their site may in fact be disinformation but whats the harm in being aware of the claims they make and correlating them with events that may/do transpire?Laura said:So, now we have a record of what they are saying, let's wait and watch and see how right they are!
Well, well, the all-wise, but unknown source again, the insider who seems to be in the "loop" providing project Camelot with "important" information based around some "end dates". So we'll see how this turns out, however, none of the issues mentioned in that piece are anything new, or did I miss something? You can SEE things happening just by closely observing regular news, as SOTT does......which makes me wonder, does SOTT has the un-known but all wise source that sends emails every so often and is giving us an update as well? And I'm not talking about the C's. I'm just wondering how mostly very questionable sites have access to an "insider" and how would one know that this source is credible to begin with?Andrew said:I came across this latest entry from the Camelot team and I thought I'd share it here in case anyone had any input:
• We have received this message (edited slightly), from an insider source who has sent us over 60 e-mails on various subjects since October 2007. ...
What stuck out to me was the "sequence of events" that is purported to happen sometime in the Near-Future:Bernhard said:Anyway, Andrew, what stuck out to you in this article? Maybe you could elaborate a bit on it, because to me, I see just some basic observations that are currently happening in the world mixed in with some fear mongering. Not to overestimate myself, but I think the "insider" is not really conveying anything new at all. Please correct me if I miss anything here.
Now I can't say that I'm fully updated on current world terrors on a day-to-day basis, so if any of that is mainstream news I apologize for posting this. But for anyone like me who isn't fully updated on potentialities or likely scenarios then this might be something to ponder over regardless of the disinformative source it comes from, especially if like you say, they seem to be basic observations of worldly-events. I do think watching out for these "key" events that are purported to happen between now and November may not be such a bad Idea especially if they begin coming to light.Project Camelot said:... Note that even though the timing is currently not exactly synchronized, the sequence is to be noted:
1) The provocation by non-compliance in Iran
2) The upcoming attack on Iran
3) Intense repercussions on the USA
4) The IMF 'overtly' intervening in US financial matters via the Federal Reserve
5) The coming collapse of the dollar
6) A Wall Street breakdown to unbelievable lows.
All this will happen very soon, most likely by November if not before.
None of it has been in the mainstream news as written above, but all of it has been in the mainstream news - and if you read SotT, which tracks these things and connects the dots, then it is 'common knowledge' - however - definite time-tables are usually (almost always) red-herrings. We'll see. We always do.Andrew said:Now I can't say that I'm fully updated on current world terrors on a day-to-day basis, so if any of that is mainstream news I apologize for posting this.
That's what I was trying to say.....connecting the dots. None of these points seem so "secret" that only an "insider" can know about them.anart said:None of it has been in the mainstream news as written above, but all of it has been in the mainstream news - and if you read SotT, which tracks these things and connects the dots, then it is 'common knowledge' - however - definite time-tables are usually (almost always) red-herrings. We'll see. We always do.
It seems to me that the Cassiopaea material calls on us to hone a rather delicate and subtle balancing act. To maintain our equalibrium and clear-sightedness, we must be hyper-aware of our multidimensional environment, sensitive to every shifting wind -- but not allow ourselves to get "swept away" by those winds. To remain calmly aware and prepared for "the big picture", without knowing the specifics that our third-density minds crave, is an ongoing act of discipline. Those who cannot tolerate the "tension" between "knowing" and "not knowing" are drawn to the gurus who claim to provide the who, what, where, when, and how, because they offer temporary relief of anxiety about the future, via a false sense of "control".Bernhard said:As the C's said: "It's not where you are are, but who you are and what you see!" Just focusing on physical survival (and panicking because of a "meltdown") might be missing the point here. I think the C's called that "being stuck in 3D way of thinking". That doesn't mean one should stay in the middle of a battleground, but any decisions based on panic or questionable fear mongering articles with certain "time limits" might not be the best way to proceed.
Distrust your neighbor. Contrast that with the Christmas Truce of 1914: _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_truceProject Camelot said:Sounds extreme, but the hungry masses will not care much about spiritual values and brotherly love and respect - sad to say.
Basically truth, but he leaves out the pathological aspect. Focuses on programming, yada yada yada, but completely fails to mention psychopathy - when in fact, this is the key, osit.Insiderman said:I want to tell you in a most sincere fashion, that, those whom the reporters refer to as "Zionist" are nothing more than the Rothschilds' henchmen. These people, an army in effect all over the world, many concentrated in the USA right now, many whom are absolutely programmed from birth, are cold-blooded, ruthless killers. They are trained in every aspect of militarization and control. Some are trained to be subtle and can draw into their confidence people from various walks of life, and then do a 180 on them without notice... very frightening folks, I can tell you.
If there's anything we've learned here is that self-reliance is overrated. It may work for some, or for a time, but for lasting progress and evolution you need a network, a group. So he's basically lying his buns off.Insiderman said:Self-reliance is the key to our future.
Alex Wallenwein is a gold salesman, talking his "book" as traders say. He publishes a newsletter called Euro vs Dollar Monitor and some of his public writings are archived on the website Safehaven. His audience are potential gold buyers. Traditionally gold is an asset of last resort in fearful times and the more fear the more business for Mr. Wallenwein. I have followed the contrarian investing strategy of these "conspiracy theorists" for decades, with some success. However, as others have pointed out, it is easier to predict the future, than when the futureCamelot said:This report from Alex Wallenwein is most important in understanding what is happening.
Since I am familiar with this style of advertising writing in the alternative investment community, I was not struck with fear as new readers might be. I did notice the emphasis on self-reliance. I have examined the political and economic collapse of the Soviet Union and Argentina. It appears from conversations with and writings of people who have experienced these events, that the quality of self-reliance that is most valuable is pschological stability. Beyond that, community or networks of people in cities adapted to and obtained the necessities of physical life more rapidly and efficiently after the collapse of political and economic systems.Camelot said:Self-reliance is the key to our future.
I was "distracted" by physical preparation for social and economic collapse for decades, before I began the real work of "observing" the reaction of fear, anger, and greed motivating my "self-reliance". The first thing I could see was my anger at being disturbed. Didn't I deserve a utopia of peace and plenty? I couldn't see the reality of the world, until I could begin to see self's mechanical reaction to the unknown. Now I know there is WORK to do.Pepperfritz said:And that, Andrew, is "the harm" in getting caught up the material put out by groups such as "Project Camelot". It can only distract us from the real Work at hand, the only area that we have genuine control over: Developing WHO WE ARE, and learning to sharpen WHAT WE SEE. The Cassiopaea material tells us that this is the ONLY really effective way to prepare ourselves for what is to come.
Yes I agree with you 100% on that point. I think in the process of keeping an objective-eye on World-Events and doing the necessary work on the Self might somehow entail the proper knowledge on how to best carry out ones ACTions when "The Ship" sinks.Bernhard said:The work is to be done here and now, keeping an objective eye on world events, regardless of when the "ship" sinks "officially".
As the C's said: "It's not where you are are, but who you are and what you see!" Just focusing on physical survival (and panicking because of a "meltdown") might be missing the point here. I think the C's called that "being stuck in 3D way of thinking".
This seems to be a pretty close paradigm to the one Camelot's material is providing to people. Throughout their material they talk about how people are writing to them with questions, on what to do, how to do it, what they should be doing etc. There is apparent fear within those who write to them and it's only obvious that it comes from the material they provide. :/PepperFritz said:Those who cannot tolerate the "tension" between "knowing" and "not knowing" are drawn to the gurus who claim to provide the who, what, where, when, and how, because they offer temporary relief of anxiety about the future, via a false sense of "control".
Can't really say that I've gotten caught up in their material, I simply gather material from multiple sources and compare and contrast the information provided; I've had my suspicions of Camelot for quite some time now so Intuition proves itself once again.PepperFritz said:And that, Andrew, is "the harm" in getting caught up the material put out by groups such as "Project Camelot". It can only distract us from the real Work at hand, the only area that we have genuine control over: Developing WHO WE ARE, and learning to sharpen WHAT WE SEE. The Cassiopaea material tells us that this is the ONLY really effective way to prepare ourselves for what is to come.
Very true. If anything he's essentially a pawn of the Higher Echelon whether he knows it or not. The powers that be are clever enough to have provided him with just the right information to carry out their own agendas through him. And if what he says has the potential to strike fear in those who read it their objective has been complete.Cyre2067 said:As for his timetable? Puh-lease. The PTB has so many tricks up their sleeves and options available I highly doubt some 'insider' (even if he is such) will know which method(s) the real rulers of humanity will pull out of their hat.
But if those "alternative perspectives" and "things unorthodox" do not reflect objective reality -- where is the "service"? There is nothing to be gained by replacing one illusion with another, simply because it is "different". A lie that contains a little bit of truth is still a lie -- one of the most effective lies there is, as all good COINTELPRO agents know....Andrew said:Camelot does a service to the people in the sense of telling them things unorthodox and giving them alternative perspectives to the world in which we live.
They are as strong as they think they are, they just can't 'see' properly (I think), or they are unaware of alternative 'realities'. Wishful thinking and not being able to 'see' play a big part in their eventual self destruction. Unfortunately it doesn't make them any less dangerous as they have the capability of 'conning' many other people into following their ways.bedower said:If the game is 'basically finished' then why hasn't the Internet been taken down; why hasn't the attack on Iran been implemented; why hasn't this happened...why hasn't that already happened and so on and so on.
Maybe I'm mistaken here, but the pieces can't all be in place, otherwise we would be in a worse case than we are, and that's bad enough. But more and more people are clicking onto sites like SOTT; thetruthseeker; Smoking Mirrors etc; more and more people are 'waking up' to what's been going on in their name. And as this happens, more and more people are spreading the word.
Seems to me that this wouldn't be allowed to happen if the PTB are as strong as they think. Or am I just being naive?