I am at present working on a follow up to my last post on Poussin's painting of L'Autumne and how it may fit into the puzzle of Rennes-le-Chateau. In the meantime, I thought I would post this interesting article on the Paracas elongated skulls of Peru, which provides an update on their extraordinary DNA.
DNA Results Show The Elongated Paracas Skulls Are Not Native American
By
Ancient Code Team August 4, 2024
See:
DNA Results Show The Elongated Paracas Skulls Are Not Native American - The Ancient Code
“The Paracas were an incredibly complex ethnic mix of people… There are a number of different haplogroups that were found in the DNA tests of the Paracas elongated skulls and these haplogroups, which is your genetic ancestry, they don’t fit in with the history of Peru in any shape or form…”
According to a group of experts dealing with the Paracas skull phenomenon, recent DNA results have revealed that the elongated skulls of Paracas, Peru, are
not native to the region.
During the 1920’s, a Peruvian archaeologist by the name Julio Tello discovered a series of tombs in Paracas Peru. The contents of the tomb left experts stumped as countless elongated skulls were recovered from the tombs. Since then, more elongated skulls have been found in the region, raising numerous questions about these mysterious people.
For more than five years have experts like Brien Foerster tried solving the mystery behind the elongated skulls. While much progress has been made in understanding them, the journey has been very difficult.
The analysis of this elongated skull, which has reddish hair, shows that it has a mitochondrial haplogroup U2e, which may signify it originated somewhere in the Caucasus… far from Paracas.
After countless studies and research, we have begun finding out more about these mystery skulls. Some DNA analysis has shown that the elongation present on the Paracas skulls
was not the result of artificial cranial deformation but by genetics. Some of the Paracas Skulls have a cranial volume which is up to 25% larger and 60% percent heavier than conventional human skulls. While ‘head binding’ can alter the shape of the skull, it cannot alter its volume.
At the end of last week, a Symposium was held in Los Angeles where experts announced new results of testing performed on the elongated Skulls.
The main speakers of the event were L.A. Marzulli and Brien Foerster.
As reported by
Megalith Marvels, Foerster, author of several books on the subject and a recognized expert of the Paracas Skulls, published the following information on the aforementioned DNA results.
“
The DNA results actually were incredibly complicated… It’s going to take me some time to actually figure out what the results mean. What it does show for sure is that the Paracas elongated skull people were not 100% Native American. They were a mix or even you could say, in some ways,
a hybrid of different people.”
More question than answers…
Foerster explains that “Their blood types are very complicated as well, they should be blood type “O” if they’re 100% Native American and that’s not the case. We are likely looking at a sub-species of humanity as regards to the Paracas… Seems to be a lot of DNA evidence from extreme eastern Europe and extreme western Asia. More specifically I’m talking about the area in between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea where ancient elongated skull people lived I think about 3000 years ago.”
*************************************************
So it seems that the DNA evidence points to an origin for these large skulled hybrids in the Caucuses where the C's said the Kantekkians or Aryans/Celts were originally deposited on Earth by the Greys. We also know that a group of Aryans would migrate eastwards from there into western China where they would be rebuffed by the Chinese and make their way back eastwards, some of them ending up in Mesopotamia, where Sargon the Great and his fellow Semites or Scythian Celts would seize control and create the empire of Akkad, and other parts of the Middle East, including Egypt and Canaan. Let us also recall here that Sargon was what the C's called a "deep level punctuator" like the later Egyptian Queen Nefertiti (a fellow Hittite of Abraham/Moses):
Q: Oh, so it will be part of the picture eventually. Well, okay. We will deal with it when it comes up. Next: I notice that Sargon the Great is sort of an unknown person in historical terms. He is the first great 'Akkadian' king of Sumeria, but no one knows exactly where the term 'Akkadian' came from nor where 'Akkad' even was. Who was this Sargon?
A: Deep level punctuator.
It is interesting to note here that "Akkadian" sounds etymologically very like "Arcadian".
Perhaps one group of these Scythians became the Tuatha de Danann of Irish folklore or the Israelite Tribe of Dan of the Bible. It is also interesting to note in the above article that the Paracas skulls exhibited red hair, a calling card of the Celts but also something associated with the Tuatha de Danann as well. Lest we forget, Queen Nefertiti (herself a deep level punctuator or an underworlder) and her children, including Princess Meritaten, had large elongated skulls too, suggesting they may have been related to these large skulled Paracas people of Peru. Perhaps some of their descendants would eventually became the Merovingian nobility of France, whose own origin story suggested that they were hybrids.
Hence my theory that a group of Meritaten's Egyptian/Canaanite refugees may have settled in the Canary Islands and from there journeyed westwards to South America where they made their way up the Amazon river eventually settling in the highlands of Peru may have some merit. The Irish legends of the coming of the Tuatha de Danann speak of a group of 30 couples (60 people) arriving by boat. Curiously this matches a similar account found in the legends of the Guanche people of Tenerife, as Laura noted:
"The old Guanches themselves say that they have an immemorial
tradition that
sixty people came to this island, but they know not
whence they came. They united and formed their settlement near ICOD,
which is a place on this island, and they gave it the name, which is
a word in their language. Alzanxiquian abcanabac xerax, which means
'The place of union of the son of the great one'."
Is this just a remarkable coincidence? Could the "great one" have been Meritaten perhaps or even Abraham the father of Ishmael? This brings me back to something the C's once said with reference to Brahna (Abraham?):
Session 19 April 1997:
Q: Am I correct in my assessment that the origin of the Grail stories was the story of the Head of Bran?
A: But what was the "origin" of Brahna?
Q: Well, from the way I am interpreting what I have found, I have two possibilities: One is the Celts from Kantek, and two: a Nephilim hybrid.
A: Could be one and the same.
Does this suggest that Abraham was himself a large skulled Celtic/Nephilim hybrid like his wife Sarah/Nefertiti? This in turn makes me think of the blood oath that Moses (Abraham) made the Israelites take as referred to in the transcripts:
Q: At the making of the Covenant at Mt. Sinai, there was a bunch of sacrificed animals, and Moses took the blood, dividing it in half, he cast one half on the altar. Taking the book of the covenant, he read it to the people, and they said 'we will observe all that Yahweh has decreed. We will obey.' And then Moses took the blood and cast it on the people saying 'this is the blood of the covenant that Yahweh has made with you containing all these rules.' What is this blood of the covenant?
A: Has to do with bloodline.
Q: So this symbolized the bloodline of the Jews?
A: No.
Q: What bloodline are we talking about here?
A: Aramaic/Aryan.
Q: Are you saying that the Jews are Aramaic/Aryan?
A: No. Jews are not bloodline categorizable, per se.
However, was this bloodline in fact the Aryan/hybrid bloodline signified by the large elongated skulls? Was it a bloodline especially associated with the Levites who seem to have a unique bloodline according to recent DNA testing?
