anart said:Windmill knight said:The main conference organizer, Kerry Cassidy, revealed that a number of anonymous whistleblowers had revealed that Elenin is a piloted spacecraft, and in fact was being trailed by a fleet of spacecraft. Hoagland claims that he has been confidentially told similarly by other whistleblowers of the artificial nature of Elenin. Dr Joseph Farrell agreed and claimed that Elenin was either an artificial object (controlled spacecraft) or a natural object placed in an artificial orbit. In probably the most significant observation of the conference, Hoagland claimed that Elenin was likely an active torsion field generator.
Hopefully, this one will teach Kerry once and for all to stop believing in 'anonymous whistleblowers'.
I doubt it - the vast majority of what she's presented is nonsense and can be seen as that by anyone actually paying attention, yet she persists. It has to be by design, because I don't think she's that unintelligent.
What always strikes me is this repeating pattern of otherwise intelligent people who are completely uncritical of the information they spread.
They use their abilities to spread both good and bad information as if it was all equal.
That was how I thought of Kerry. At one moment she conducts an interview with someone credible giving good researched material, and the next moment she interviews someone easily exposed as crackpot dreamer without a shred of real evidence for their claims.
There are many more like this. That, is one clear difference between the SOTT network and the rest: being critical, and thinking!
Some of these people must be quite conscious of what they are doing, and get some sort of reward for their efforts. However, I wonder if some could be doing it unawares, believing somehow that they must NOT apply critical thinking under the misguided goal that their purpose is to spread all manner of info and disinfo and they must let the consumer of the information decide which is which?