Blockchain technology

Putin about blockchain:

Putin Comes out Strongly against Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies – Oct 11, 2017 (reading notes)
https://youtu.be/VujyQcc40Rc

BREAKING: Putin Fully Endorses Blockchain Techhonology: Russia Has Oil and Gas But We Need Cryptos – Feb 24, 2018 (really talking) :D
https://youtu.be/-Toso2Cd_30

I think this is strong related with the last speech and Putin's demonstration of strength. His speech was very focused on innovation and technology. In the video above he said that countries that do not join this race (or "wave"?) would practically be in full dependence.

I get the feeling that the demonstration of strength was aimed at the psychopaths, (and to encourage those who are afraid of innovation) inside and outside of Russia

"When you believe the lie of the psychopath, you have given it control of your free will - the essence of creativity"

It seems very relevant to what was said in the last session with the C's in my opinion. It seems to me that no media, not even the "pro-Kremlin" did justice explaining what this epic chapter in the history of humanity could meant, or maybe I'm just very excited about the possibilities :D
 
Telegram is a fairly popular mobile chat service that is launching their own cryptocurrency with (it seems) the aim of making it part of their mobile app. If they can make it as widespread as their app, then it may amount to something.

Mod's note: Link removed since it is a scam as suggested by the author of the post.
 
Another new cryptocurrency initiative seems to have been launched recently.

Source: https://qz.com/1235277/saga-token-nobel-winner-myron-scholes-on-team-launching-low-volatility-cryptocurrency/ (one illustration omitted)

A Nobel-winning economist is part of a team launching a low-volatility cryptocurrency

Written by Eshe Nelson Joon Ian Wong

March 22, 2018

Last year, when the price of bitcoin rose 1,000%, you might have regretted not buying in. Now that it has fallen almost 40% so this year, perhaps you don’t have as many regrets. The murky trading and wrenching volatility of cryptocurrencies threaten their place as a fundamental plank of the future financial system, as proponents are pushing. Now, a group of famed economists and financial innovators have a plan to address those challenges by creating “the first non-anonymous blockchain-based digital currency,” called Saga (SGA).

Think of it as a cryptocurrency without all the things that make regulators, central bankers, and, frankly, most people nervous—the extreme volatility, the ambiguous notion of value, the anonymity.

Saga is being developed by The Saga Foundation, a Swiss non-profit created last year that is dedicated to developing new technologies in open and decentralized software. The advisory board includes Jacob Frenkel, the former Governor of the Bank of Israel and chairman of JPMorgan Chase International; economics Nobel laureate Myron Scholes, known for creating the Black-Scholes formula, the most well-known model for pricing options and derivatives; Dan Galai, a co-developer of VIX, the leading measure of financial market volatility; and Leo Melamed, the chairman emeritus of CME Group and pioneer in financial futures. Needless to say, the board knows a thing or two about how markets work.

The Saga token’s purported stability is intended to make it useful as a unit of account and a means of exchange, rather than a tool of pure speculation. The wild price swings in many—most, really—cryptocurrencies make them unappealing as a means of payment, to say nothing of the strains the volatility has put on the exchanges where they trade.

atlas_B1Jf0lZ9f.png


To ensure low volatility, Saga will employ methods from traditional finance. Saga will use a fractional reserve method (similar to what banks use) and deposit reserves in regulated banks. Saga will be essentially pegged to the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR), an international reserve asset that’s comprised of a basket dominated by the US dollar and euro. Central banks also often keep the SDR in their official reserves.

atlas_r1Qu1Zbqz.png


Saga’s money supply will be adjusted algorithmically according to the size of its economy: for example, when the economy expands, a smart contract increases the token supply, which will limit price rises. There will also be a price band to act as another check on volatility.

Holders of Saga must complete “know your customer” and anti-money laundering requirements under Swiss law. This removes the anonymity aspect, considered a crucial element of cryptocurrencies based on the idea of a decentralized system that exists outside the control of governments and central banks. It’s worth noting that such identification measures are already widely used by existing crypto exchanges, and in many token sales.

There is also some irony in a cryptocurrency backed by fractional reserves. This was anathema to the founding principles of bitcoin, the granddaddy of cryptocurrencies. Its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, encoded a message in the first bitcoin block ever mined, which says: “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.” That was not exactly a ringing endorsement of the traditional financial processes being touted by Saga’s distinguished crew.

But a coin whose price doesn’t swing wildly—a so-called “stablecoin”—is something that has been pursued by the cryptorati for some time. The most high-profile example is Tether, a token whose makers claim is fully backed by dollar reserves, with each tether backed by one US dollar. There is about $2.3 billion worth of Tether circulating on global crypto-markets today, but no one is sure whether those cash reserves truly exist. Tether’s creators have fired an auditor it hired to verify its claims, raising further suspicions from the market.

Saga joins a rush to create a legitimate stablecoin, including some backed by big-name Silicon Valley investors. They include Basecoin, which promises a price regulated by an “algorithmic central bank” and Dai token, whose value against the US dollar is set by a “decentralized autonomous organization”—a sort of mashup between algorithms and continuous shareholder voting. Both are backed by the blue-chip venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz.

Saga tokens can be bought starting in the fourth quarter of this year, the foundation’s website says, and can be purchased using ether or a bank transfer to one the banks holding Saga’s reserves. Here’s how it works with ether:

colorcorrected-35.jpeg


Rather than doing an ICO, the usual method for issuing new coins in the crypto space, Saga has raised $30 million from investors at venture capital and hedge funds, including Mangrove Capital Partners and Lightspeed Venture Partners. Saga Genesis is being offered as a voucher token to early supporters and investors.

More broadly, the Saga Foundation wants to use blockchain to “re-examine governance paradigms” and come up with a new approach to how society exchanges value. If this sounds confusing, maybe this artsy video the foundation created can clear it up:


https://youtu.be/lqsRZiewk7M

Or maybe not.

NOTE: although Swiss based, the foundation is predominantly manned and staffed with Israelis and other Jews.
 
Interesting Palinurus, thanks for posting. Looks like it could be a play by whoever is behind it to have a TPTB crypto that they could try to force people to us at some point.
 
Source: How blockchain could solve the internet privacy problem

How blockchain could solve the internet privacy problem

Blockchain, with its encrypted and immutable record, will eventually be used to
create universal digital identities, filled with information that only we will control
and that will link back to the issuing banks, governments or even employers.


News Analysis By Lucas Mearian Senior Reporter, Computerworld Apr 9, 2018 3:00 AM PT

global_connections_fintech_network_blockchain_transactions_binary_world_thinkstock_906407688-100749947-large.jpg


Fintech firms, software makers, telecom providers and other businesses have joined forces develop a blockchain-based network that will enable anyone to exchange digital credentials online and without the risk of unintentionally exposing any private data.

The companies are part of the Sovrin Foundation, a new nonprofit organization now developing the Sovrin Network, which could enable anyone to globally exchange pre-verified data with any entity also on the network.

The online credentials would be akin to identify information you or I might have in our physical wallets: a driver's license, a bank debit card or a company ID.

Instead of a physical card, however, the IDs in our digital wallets would be encrypted and link back to the institutions that created them, such as a bank, a government or even an employer, which, through the blockchain, would automatically verify that information to a requester.

fintech_network_blockchain_transactions_connections_thinkstock_680295130-100749821-large.jpg


Maintaining control
The owner of the digital wallet can determine what information a requesting business receives, and no more.

"They control who has access to their wallet and also can revoke that access at any time," said Adam Gunther, IBM's director of trusted identity.

This week, IBM announced it had joined the Sovrin Network to assist businesses, nonprofits and governments in building out the infrastructure and applications that will enable consumers to transact with them.

Along with other members of the Sovrin Foundation, IBM has been working with an industry standards body, the Decentralized Identity Foundation, to ensure a homogeneous interface. IBM will also dedicate hardware, security and network capacity to assist in the operation of the self-sovereign identity network.

In addition to IBM, Sovrin Founders include 22 businesses from a wide range of industries, such as ATB Financial, SICPA, a maker of security inks used in paper money, and T-Labs, the research and innovation unit of Deutsche Telekom. Evernym, another founding member, is a software company that develops an open-source sovereign identity blockchain.

In a digital economy, where consumers and businesses buy merchandise, apply for mortgages and loans, and send identify verification information for a myriad of purposes, ensuring data privacy has become paramount, particularly after many high-profile data breaches.

Solving an online insecurity problem
Last year, more than 2.9 billion records were compromised from various security incidents across industries, including 143 million American consumers whose sensitive personal information was exposed in a data breach at credit reporting agency Equifax.

To address what it sees as an internet infrastructure flaw, the Sovrin Network will add a missing identity layer to it based on an immutable blockchain record, making secure and private self-sovereign digital identity possible for the first time, according to Phil Windley, chair of the Sovrin Foundation.

Video 3:53 min.

The network is currently in beta, with pilots taking place among various Sovrin Foundation members, Windley said. It should be generally available to businesses sometime this summer.

"I don't believe there's a ton of people who are suddenly going to wake up this summer and say, 'I need to download a self-sovereign identity wallet for my phone,' " Windley said. "What's more likely to happen is they're going to go into their bank or credit union and they're going to say, 'We have this new way of logging into your account.' You'll download an app."

Behind the scenes, the bank and customer will exchange non-correlatable identifiers; they'll simply scan a QR code and will be signed up for the new identity service.

"Later on, they'll see that as an [icon] on their phone," Windley said.

One pilot the Sovrin Foundation is currently testing with IBM is verifying employee identification. IBM workers scan a QR code provided by their company, and they're automatically given an icon that a bank on the network can use to verify employment.

Sovrin is not alone
While Sovrin may have a groundswell of support among its members, it is by no means the first to use blockchain to link identifiable data to a user through a blockchain distributed ledger.

Microsoft plans to pilot its own blockchain-based digital ID platform that would allow users to control access to sensitive online information via an encrypted data hub.

"This new world needs a new model for digital identity, one that enhances individual privacy and security across the physical and digital world," Ankur Patel, a principal product manager with Microsoft's Identity Division, wrote in a blog post. "Rather than grant broad consent to countless apps and services, and have their identity data spread across numerous providers, individuals need a secure encrypted digital hub where they can store their identity data and easily control access to it."

fintech_blockchain_world_global_connections_thinkstock_877473868-100749818-large.jpg


In January, Microsoft joined the ID2020 alliance, a global partnership working to create an open-source, blockchain-based digital identity system for people in the U.S. or other nations who lack legal documentation because of their economic or social status. The ID2020 alliance is targeting people who lack fundamental rights and services such as voting, healthcare, housing and education that are tethered to legal proof of identification.

Tech-savvy institutions like MIT have started issuing graduates diplomas via blockchain so that future employers no longer have to verify degrees and transcripts with the university.

Michael Fauscette, chief research officer at G2 Crowd, a business-to-business software review site, expects that in the next five years, decentralized verification will no longer be a novelty; it will be the norm.

"Imagine hiring without reference checks or transcript verifications, where all that an applicant needs is a blockchain hash,” Fauscette said.

The digital wallet
The concept behind digital wallets has been used for years by cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin to verify whether someone has the actual funds to purchase the digital currency, while keeping their identify anonymous. A financial services institution that is part of the bitcoin network, for example, simply verifies that there are sufficient funds for a bitcoin purchase without the need to disclose the identity or actual account balance of the banking customer.

bitcoin_blockchain_fintech_finance_cryptocurrency_virtual_money_thinkstock_898877382-100749775-large.jpg


In cryptography, the concept is known as zero knowledge proofs, a method by which someone of which information is being requested can link back to a verifying person or institution, without conveying any additional information except that which they are being asked.

So, for example, a bank may request to know you earn above $75,000 a year for the purposes of a loan; as a member of the blockchain network, your employer could verify only that you make more than $75K without disclosing your actual annual salary. Or a government could verify that a consumer is older than 18 for voting purposes or older than 21 in order to purchase alcohol. The information would be verified by the consumer by simply bringing up an application on their phone and presenting an icon.

The Sovrin Network will ensure three things: The individual is their own identity provider; the individual controls who has access to their information, a privilege they can revoke at any time; and the Sovrin Foundation becomes the central governing authority, determining who can join that permissioned blockchain network so that people can do business across it.

Businesses or government organizations that verify consumer identities and their private data would be known as "trust anchors" on the network. Those trust anchors could also delete and reissue user authority.

"So if my phone was stolen, I could have my keys revoked and reissued, so now that wallet is unusable," Gunther said. "Just like today, if your credit card is stolen, a bank can invalidate that card and reissue one.

"We need that model across everything for identity. Imagine if you could do that with your social security number — how much better life would be," he said.

Underpinning a new trust economy
A blockchain-based self-sovereign identity network also has the potential to satisfy new, more stringent requirements for businesses to know with whom they're doing business.

So called "Know Your Customer" regulations were enacted over the past four to five years to address an increase in money laundering and terrorist activity funding. Through a blockchain identifier network, banks would have pre-verified who their customers are, and whether or not they're tied to any nefarious activities, Gunther said.

There are many blockchain specifications, and many of them are based on open-source software. The Sovrin Network is based on the Linux Foundation's Hyperledger Indy specification, which was built from the ground up for verifying a user's identity.

Blockchain networks, or distributed electronic ledgers, can protect the identity of users behind a randomly generated hash table, a type of cryptographically signed credential, to prove the digital identity information in the identity owner's possession. Once a business or organization has verified information about a person, a simple icon can be used approve a transaction.

Besides being used for bitcoin and other cryptocurrency transactions, blockchain has most recently been adopted for business transactions, such as automating supply-chain management and cross-border money exchanges.

In short, many businesses and governments believe blockchain could underpin a new trust economy, one constructed of person-to-person (P2P) transactions and not dependent on more traditional methods such as credit ratings or guaranteed cashier's checks.

"Rather, it relies on each transacting party's reputation and digital identity — the elements of which may soon be stored and managed in a blockchain," Deloitte analysts said in a recent report.

Permissioned blockchains — which, like a relational database, are centrally managed — can combat cybersecurity risks and protect "consumers' financial information and the integrity of the global financial system," the researchers said in a white paper highlighted in a Microsoft blog.

The distributed ledger technology, the paper argues, offers significant cybersecurity capabilities, as well as some of the same cyber risks that affect other IT systems, "all of which merit further evaluation by regulators and industry."
 
Blockchain: the future of flight data management?
27 March 2018 Airport Industry Review
https://www.airport-technology.com/features/blockchain-future-flight-data-management/

IT technology firm SITA has built a private-permissioned blockchain system called FlightChain, which stores flight information and uses smart contracts to judge potentially conflicting information. SITA Lab lead engineer Kevin O’Sullivan outlines the key outcomes of the project and explains how blockchain could create a single ‘source of truth’ for flight data.

Leading digital currency Bitcoin is enduring a rocky start to 2018, with a sizeable drop in its exchange rate casting doubt on its sustainability. Nevertheless, the buzz behind blockchain platforms, which power crypto-currencies, remains persistent across the aviation sector.

For the uninitiated, a blockchain is essentially a digital database that records data shared between parties, with each set of data forming a ‘block’ along the chain. Every block is encrypted and can be accessed and verified by users across a network of computers.

Changes to the blockchain cannot be made without the agreement of the majority of users, making it a significantly more secure way of storing information. The entire chain is visible to all users across the network, preventing data from being lost or manipulated by cybercriminals, and removing the need for a third party – such as a bank – to verify transactions.

Blockchain’s role as a shared, decentralised digital ledger could enable more accurate exchange of flight information between airlines and airports. Last year, IT firm SITA announced the results of its FlightChain project, which investigated the potential use of blockchain for flight information storage and management.

The company created a private-permissioned blockchain for participants in the project, which included British Airways and three major airports. Each party provided flight data, which was validated and written onto the blockchain by a smart contract – a software program that automatically verified the data against a set of predefined business rules.

The goal of FlightChain was to find out how blockchain could create a single ‘source of truth’ for various data used by different stakeholders in the aviation industry. Here, SITA Lab lead engineer Kevin O’Sullivan explains the problems that this could solve, as well as the potential pitfalls revealed by the FlightChain project.

Joe Baker (JB): FlightChain focused on the suitability of sharing flight data. Can you provide examples of the kind of information being shared in the blockchain?

Kevin O’Sullivan (KO): During the trial, British Airways, Geneva Airport, Heathrow and Miami International Airport provided flight data that was merged and stored on the blockchain. During this project, more than two million flight changes were processed by the smart contract and stored on FlightChain.

JB: What is the ‘flight data problem’?

KO: The issue is that there is no single source of the truth about flight data, and the data that does exist is not easily accessed by all parties. While there are many cases of airlines and airports collaborating to share flight data, this data still resides in separate silos. When there are flight delays, this results in differences between passenger apps, airport flight information display systems, and airline and airport agents. It can be hard for passengers and other stakeholders to know what the correct information is.

JB: Why might blockchain be more effective than other established technologies for solving this problem?

KO: There are four key reasons why blockchain could be the right technology.

Blockchain implementations provide a cryptographically immutable transaction ledger that is distributed to all participants in the network. Thus all participants will have a complete copy of all transactions on the ledger and have confidence that the record of transactions is true and consistent for all participants.

[The system] provides a mechanism for multiple writers to update a common data set, where the data set is visible to all participants in the blockchain.

Blockchain has advantages over centralised/distributed databases in the case where there is an absence of trust between writers of the database. This is because all transitions are immutably recorded and shared on the ledger such that readers and other writers can decide whether to accept or ignore the transactions of any participant based on the rules specified in the smart contract.

The use of a smart contract allows different organisations to share control of the data through an approved and shared set of business rules codified by the smart contract. This disintermediation approach enables shared control of the data and presents a key differentiator in contrast to the trusted intermediary model exhibited by a centralised or decentralised database.

JB: The SITA report mentioned ‘key lessons’ from the FlightChain project – which would you say was the most important?

KO: We have learnt six key lessons from the research. In order of importance, they are:
  • Any private-permissioned blockchain needs governance and it is important to select the right model
  • It is still too early in the lifecycle of the blockchain technology to make a definitive recommendation about its use
  • Smart contracts are likely to have an important role to play, however they do not have legal status so will need industry standards to make them truly usable
  • Any system is only as strong as its weakest link, so security remains paramount
  • For business to business use, a private blockchain is likely to be more appropriate than a public one
  • A private blockchain has the performance, scalability and resilience to be a useful tool for the air transport industry
JB: The report notes that a private-permissioned blockchain requires governance. Does this compromise it in any way?

KO: The nature of blockchain means that some actions require the consensus of other participants so the governance body would in fact have more of a caretaker role. Our recommendation is that the governance should be carried out by an industry body, such as the International Air Transport Association or Airport Council International. The blockchain would therefore be set up and managed by a trusted organisation.

JB: Is there any way that having a whole network of users might make data sharing less secure?

KO: Blockchains are, like any database or network, potentially subject to security breaches. However, in a private blockchain it is important to put the right defences and monitoring in place to ensure it remains secure

JB: Has SITA explored other potential uses of blockchain in the aviation industry?

KO: SITA is also looking into the use of blockchain for self-sovereign identity in air travel. Self-sovereign identity will allow passengers to have improved control over their own data, and who it is shared with. At the same time it can enable governments to have improved confidence in the quality of data they receive about passengers at the point of arrival in a country.
At this stage, we have limited our research to flight status data because we needed to focus on one particular area. As I mentioned, flight status data provided a good opportunity. Our research has prompted interesting discussions across the industry and we are constantly examining other areas in which the industry could use blockchain technology. However, it is too soon to go into any more details because we are at the very early stages of blockchain deployment.

JB: Why might more airlines and airports be convinced to turn towards blockchain in the future?

KO: It isn’t really a question of convincing the air transport industry about the benefits of blockchain. It certainly could be a transformational technology for many industries and SITA’s research showed it can be of benefit in certain circumstances. However, it is very early days for the technology and a lot more work needs to be done before we reach the point of having fully operational commercial blockchain solutions.


 
I have followed this now for over a year and learned a whole lot. I could never resist betting on something that the mainstream media were adamant that people stay away from, and that strategy was successful in a few areas. So here is a little update on some of what I’ve learned and some of what is happening to bitcoin and potentially happening in future. Primarily with the view of making money where there is potential to do so.

The cryptocurrency markets took a beating this year with bitcoin way down from the euphoria peak and other ‘assets’ giving back more than 90% of the gains they made in the bubble.
Despite this we are getting word of numerous developments in the institutional space in bitcoin, even after them trashing it for years. This is not being covered much at all even within crypto circles (the prevailing sentiment being “bearish”).

Northern Trust, one of the most reputable firms on the planet, is helping hedge funds add cryptocurrency investments to their portfolios.
Source:
https://www.forbes.com/consent/?toURL=https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2018/07/31/northern-trust-opens-doors-to-cryptocurrency-hedge-funds-as-part-of-pervasive-blockchain-expansion/#58acb2f748bc

ICE, parent company of the NYSE exchange (23 regulated exchanges in total), announced plans to offer a one-day "physical" bitcoin futures contract. Unlike the CBOE/CME futures contracts that fueled the december run up and released at the top, this is not just a “paper” derivatives market and would actually require buying physical bitcoin (creating actual demand for ownership of bitcoin).

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180803005236/en/Intercontinental-Exchange-Announces-Bakkt-Global-Platform-Ecosystem

National Bureau of Economic Research published an very in-depth paper analysing the sharpe-ratio of top cryptos and basically recommending a small amount of crypto investment “1 or 4 or 6 percent in bitcoin”

http://papers.nber.org/tmp/37004-w24877.pdf

Bitcoin hashrate (the amount of computing power being used to mine bitcoins and secure the network) continues to rise. This means either that more people are now mining bitcoin than ever before, or big big players have stepped into the game with more advanced hardware. It is likely both, and both of them represent a massive investment, and lots of money. Big money doesn’t tend to be dumb in its investments.
aQl67E3dw3JNXMPG9g7YAtZTuVM-7uF8G9d3nBk_mk_4EwTDLOBaaaxwWDWxpcpO7Ez4iR5-LzEOW7ceB7C5hisootar2fICRaOstuw2hc9-Z8fJ5pR_G2ViMKYVzaITfpVKd7T3

All in all lots of stuff going on behind the scenes.


Much in the way the C’s described, the financial system is a tool used by the “illuminati” to expand their wealth by leveraging their biggest resource: us. Trapping people in 9-5 jobs and having the slaves do all the production while they create magic money and expand capital endlessly (now going into asteroid mining and off-world adventures to continue the exponential house of cards).

But also those who do try to participate in markets will not have an easy time. Whether by conspiracy or by simple universal laws, they are built in a way that transfers wealth from the 99% to the 1%. The prices plunge and the masses feel fear, they sell. The markets go back up, break all time highs, and the masses feel the greed and buy back in, only to give back all their gains in the next market crash. Human emotion is the tool used to manipulate.

tMT5JQ1eekdhjs5nKDLj5PjfRNvnKDzhpaJCpAk1CtKaRXTWkIPaXTxHZVGm1qxTuwA5c_h6WMYrEfuZNBhrB7_G0-D0ZVtJzP7u2wr0mqpmni9bIysU3mU2LMZAtYFUYKCZIds6


For this reason it’s generally good to go against the crowd. In other words, when everyone is fearful/selling it’s often a good time to buy, and vice versa.

The crypto greed/fear index (calculated through various forms of scanning sentiment online) is signalling that most people have a dismal outlook on it. I can confirm this with numerous groups. And people in real life who bought in to the euphoria late 2017/early 2018 and have now sold at a massive loss or are depressed over the losses.

Some potential indicators included here as well:
zldPkBfYONpwMi7Tj116eHAF-imi2rCUbcrhMAykt6i-bLMadcr2YoX0MzxBzIKqgMkbnqcwnQx5x9qu5J7LKWnl6-pJ0gHz_uIV29RYgGQnYu5TNxsslw4Ymjj8P3fRQ-y6_Ny8


CNBC (Notoriously wrong news service) poll:
v6L-qSUY9fJHVAhQWzXjhVYp4aPMf_HLFtRgYOL4w61sfaLbJ3mUfknBSF9NSKPXq6CAxBUctDuUMfq9k6Pbh0fV0BmXI7MGFxWZuhAI7pFxhVibP4A41KvxOXP1BjEm18tVov-R

CNBC again. Fearful imagery, thoughts of hell, pain, suffering:
EHPjJxDCZ8uxZqKGO2KUwmMNlmelNP4lSDxWqwlZX7hInVL4fR65JlYhPTlLa05DoNeczTX1yBt2A8ilYELEkGkhcWC1mgP3F16sxQ1UrYxZ8HsjOVoH1laJU9L7UE8UNLPA4pO7


Emotional sentiment in general, throughout the long term trend is attached as BITCOIN_Media.jpg.

BITCOIN_Media.jpg


Here’s the chart currently
_DUk0Uk-2cbuFDBfpAWZ1h3HgWUkZMar1436xNSgTaUVCpScOPpSgPNYESEIzz954byCs9C26IHTMorDLUWk13kGrfLZp7mwTp7sxhvopsUf860rbY-fBKggDTZx3x2gNBTOacMr


$5800 area clearly represents a level where buyers are willing to step in again and again. Whether for mining costs or for other fundamental reasons, it doesn’t really matter - it is all shown in the chart. If it does break below this level for whatever reason then it’s probably gonna get a lot more ugly.

Since we are so close to this level now, this area offers the best risk-to-reward ratio on entering Bitcoin since 2017 if you ever wanted to, the risk being a 10% loss on capital and the reward being a potential 10x from here.

This is not advice or anything, just worth noting.

Bitcoin’s market capitalization is sitting at around $100 billion (including many lost wallets that can not be recovered, and the mysterious “satoshi addresses”). This is still very small. With the significant institutional developments, some of which linked above, it is quite likely that this market expands to the next stage. For reference the ‘market cap’ of Gold is estimated to be around $8 trillion or 80x larger. Apple recently reached $1 trillion market cap.

All in all I wouldn't be surprised to see the tide turning. Bitcoin is moving from its stage as an evil money laundering ponzi to actually being adopted by some of the largest and most reputable firms, and no doubt the PTB want to and are in the process of taking it over right now. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the media change their tune completely in the coming years.

Also I’m not recommending anything here. There’s massive risk. Hacks happen, and bitcoin was probably created by the NSA or other such organisation. They probably have a backdoor in sha-256. Digital ledger will be useless in a world wide catastrophe situation, etc. Just one more thing to be aware of.
 
They probably have a backdoor in sha-256. Digital ledger will be useless in a world wide catastrophe situation, etc. Just one more thing to be aware of.

There is no "door" so it doesn't make sense to say backdoor, like a backdoor would be reinforcement the idea there is a door which you wouldn't need even if you believed.

And The digital legder will bring about catastrophe both ways. see if there was a backdoor there must be a frontdoor and the digital ledger not only won't be useless ( well yes it would almost be both ways ) but you have it reversed. because it would be useless by being smaller (sto) and being weaker(sts). And you must not believe this technology, that's why we think you have the reversed concept and we have the right one.

sorry for this outburst...
 
I haven't thought about this thread in a long time but I noticed a kind of utopian article that kind of demonstrates the best case scenario of life in a more STO world. Many of us see the controlling agendas and negative aspects of cryptocurrencies and it makes one just want to forget the whole idea of blockchain and cryptocurrency in general.

Let's just imagine if things would change to a more positive timeline where a decentralized system of currency based on values established by the market and not some fake fiat currency were actually developed by independent creative humans.

Blockchain Technology Is Going Green

The above article does give some examples of how this value system would work.

90

INNOVATION
Blockchain Technology Is Going Green

By Andrew Eatwell
Tuesday, November 6, 2018
0

Share
Blockchain technology, widely assumed to be most applicable to finance and cryptocurrencies, is showing to the potential for making the world a greener place.
The blockchain design, which allows users to transmit information securely without a centralized authority, has received significant attention for its ability to validate and track financial transactions. Yet the power of the technology to manage data in an independent and secure manner makes it ideal for identifying and tracking the value of environmental transactions.
And that would allow environmentally-related behavior to be assigned a value, thus providing a much-needed system of incentives for desired behavior.

Monetizing Morals
“Blockchain provides a strong potential to unlock and monetize value that is currently embedded (but unrealized) in environmental systems, and there is a clear gap within the market” wrote the World Economic Form in a recent report.

Energy trading among peers illustrates how blockchain technology could be applied. Currently, most electricity consumption is managed through a centralized grid, creating one of the major challenges: balancing demand against shortages or unused surpluses.
Under a blockchain-based platform, electricity would be traded and moved locally by individuals and companies interested in investing in renewable energy installations, reducing the need for the traditional large fossil fuel power plants or battery storage. While futuristic in concept, companies such as EcoChain, ElectricChain, Transactive Grid and SunContract are already working on the underpinning blockchain platform required to make it possible.

Environmental Validator
Blockchain technology is also ideal for providing transparency in supply chains, which will in turn provide consumers with precise information about whether a product is truly as environmentally friendly as it claims.

“Every single product worldwide can be assigned a cryptographic unique identifier at the start of the chain, wherever it is sourced or created” explained Pieter Vandevelde, the chief revenue officer of TBSx3. “This unique code is tied to a utility token that is time-stamped as it moves through the supply chain, with the entire life cycle of that item stored on the blockchain archive.”
The information, which consumers would be able to confirm on their smartphones, could be the key to pressing for ethical business practices that protect local environments. According to Candice Visser at the University of Wollongong, platforms developed by ConsenSys and TraSeableit have already been used to reduce illegal fishing in the Pacific Islands tuna industry.
It could also help reduce carbon emissions from materials sourced far from their end consumption point, and increase pressure on environmentally harmful products, including crops that account for large amounts of tropical deforestation. According to Future Thinkers, Foodtrax and Provenace are currently working on developing blockchain-powered supply chains.

A method for earning SolarCoins is shown here:

ElectriCChain

Admittedly this is a highly unlikely scenario since our present chaotic Dionysian timeline seems to be taking front and center stage.:cry:
 
With all the talks of Universal Basic Income these days, I've also pondered the STO or good way of using
the blockchain technology to improve our standard of living. Also it's very interesting how all the financial institutions have been
warning the public to stay away from Blockchain for awhile, yet IMF and WorldBank are now seriously
considering the supranational currencies running on blockchain network.

I'm very curious to know what everyone else's take on this is, the STO and STS implications of all this
 
With all the talks of Universal Basic Income these days, I've also pondered the STO or good way of using
the blockchain technology to improve our standard of living. Also it's very interesting how all the financial institutions have been
warning the public to stay away from Blockchain for awhile, yet IMF and WorldBank are now seriously
considering the supranational currencies running on blockchain network.

I'm very curious to know what everyone else's take on this is, the STO and STS implications of all this

I think the STO and STS implications are something we should be thinking about as we watch the technology being developed and used in the world of finance.

As you mentioned the IMF has no problem using blockchain. As long as they can control it, it really is one more step in being able to "control" everything.

As long as we live in a STS world this scenario will probably be played out over and over.

In a STO world this great need for security may not be as important but as for security in a 3D STS world it doesn't look so good.

BRICS may be a balancing factor to watch although Brazil is seems to be one of the weaker links in that alliance attempt.

I think the blockchain technology could be used in a less controlling way but I can't see that happening unless there would be a more balanced "multi-polar" approach.
 
With all the talks of Universal Basic Income these days, I've also pondered the STO or good way of using
the blockchain technology to improve our standard of living. Also it's very interesting how all the financial institutions have been
warning the public to stay away from Blockchain for awhile, yet IMF and WorldBank are now seriously
considering the supranational currencies running on blockchain network.

I'm very curious to know what everyone else's take on this is, the STO and STS implications of all this

The technology and idea of blockchain was taken and used (as expected) by the likes of IBM, JP Morgan etc. to simply make their own centrally-controlled versions. This was the only way it was ever gonna go and I'm skeptical of the possibility and efficiency of any totally decentralised system.

It might be pessimistic but you can hardly trust most people to make important decisions on things. Centralisation = efficiency is kind of a law of the universe at least in this world. Therefore most of the blockchain projects out there with their own token currently have little to no value.

There are some use-cases being developed that might prove interesting such as energy sharing, or more niche stuff like virtual assets, esports gambling, streaming services etc. Then you have censorship-resistant platforms, private currencies and illicit markets. However at some point all of this needs to touch the fiat system for the tokens to have any monetary value as a tradeable asset, making it quite easy to lock down. Even BTC is basically centralised into mining pools, and since the futures market came in the price is more tightly controlled too.

Despite there being very little of substance or value in the much hyped "blockchain revolution" and thousands of cryptocurrencies it spawned, the natural seasonality of markets still applies and they may well all increase in price dramatically again and perhaps see another wave of hype. And maybe something of use will actually come out of it.

One of the projects that still interests me Radix (Radix DLT - Decentralized Ledger Technology). Having studied their tech and economics somewhat and met their team and followed them for a while, I'd say they seem the closest to creating an actually decentralised (closer to "STO") system that runs entirely on algos efficiently and securely. Its a platform to run DApps, transact value, create/exchange tokens all in a decentralised manner. To avoid the wild ridiculous crypto swings in price the native token value is controlled by what pretty much amounts to an automated central bank, which restricts or expands the currency supply depending on demand. However even this is still subject to some oversight at the gateways to traditional currency and "approved minters" system, and its value will ultimately be backed by actual US dollars and other currency baskets.
 
As others have said Bitcoin and possibly the name Satoshi seem to be engineered by the NSA. The original creator of Bitcoin may have been a regular person who's project was seized, as it's potential to be a decentralised alternative to the banking system etc would be threatening to the PTB osit.

This is an image that got circulated on a few cryptocurrency related forums a while back. Maybe a coincidence really.
satoshi.jpg

It may then have been released with the intention of creating a bubble for the original engineers and their friends to make big money off working class folk wanting a free lunch. Also one fine way to put people off crypto's potential, if it even has any.

One extreme example is Bitconnect, a spin off of Bitcoin. People have reported losing life savings and even comitting suicide over their losses.

Mostly speculation but you can clearly correlate the intentional MSM media hype timing to the top of the markets price, following a huge crash as big investors sold off their cheaply bought stocks to newbies who paid peak prices per BTC and other alt-coins.

AFAIK not one person could really give a straight or credible answer to 'how does this have any real world application in it's current state?'. In a dream world potentially yes a decentralised voting system or the likes could be created.
 
Back
Top Bottom