Boston Marathon Bombs

Quote from: mimimari on April 19, 2013, 08:58:27 PM
This is an article from ABCnews: 'Boston Bomb Suspect's Dad Tells Him to Surrender, Warns ' Hell Will Break Loose' if Son Dies.'

The above doesn't make sense, if the father indeed said it, because they already killed one of his sons! Are they trying to blame more things yet to come on this family?

I think the Family is being spotlighted because of their Russian background and Muslim Faith. Their Son's were set up and used to advance someone's agenda. With the Father living in Russia and what his Family has now suffered in the United States, makes this an International problem between two Super Power's.

Some report's suggest the oldest Son was taken alive and in handcuff's? Another report goes into alot of word salad and a 7-11 robbery, stating the oldest was handcuffed and on the ground while the youngest one drove over him - (blaming the victim of killing his own Brother) - as he was speeding away, only to later be found in a boat in some guy's yard, just outside of the 20 block radius.

In the past, Obama and Putin have both exchanged word's on Human Right's violations. One blaming the other. For what has transpired in the last few days, Putin has "just cause" to attack the US. And maybe, that's part of the secret agenda.

I'm reminded of an incident that happen late last Summer, when local Army Troops and Russian UN/NATO Troops gathered for a Homeland Security Practice Drill on an abandoned building in our area. For what I have read in other report's, these Russian Troops have been part of other City and State Drills and still stationed in the US. This Boston situation puts the American People in danger, in more ways than one.

Another thought, Mitt Romney was Massachusetts 70th Governor from 2003-2007 and his Home State.
If memory serves me, Flight 11 took off from Boston's Logan Airport, the day of 911. Plus, former Prez Bush's Home State is Texas, the scene of the latest factory explosion. "Different factions of the govt working against each other?"

With profound sadness, considering the History of Massachusetts that lead to their celebrations of Patriot's Day, and the bloody Revolution that led us to "our Independence" has all been forgotten, for what it represents and in the responsibility to honor what it has afforded us, as individuals and as a Nation. In the last few days, Patriot's Day was trashed. Those, with a true understanding of what it represented, choose to remain silent. We just defeated - ourselves!
 
Re: Report of 2 Explosions At The Boston Marathon Finishline

Bim said:
JGeropoulas: interesting. Maybe soon we'll see another attempt at controlling the internet. Since "the internet is teaching people evil things, it needs to be regulated!"

Speaking of regulating the internet, I just saw these articles that don't bode well for internet freedom:

Police Scanner Live-Tweeting Complicates Manhunt For Second Suspected Marathon Bomber
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/boston-police-scanner-live-tweeting-manhunt_n_3118253.html?ref=topbar

CISPA legislation passed in the house the day after the Marathon bombings
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/18/cispa-vote-house-approves_n_3109504.html?utm_hp_ref=technology&ir=Technology&utm_hp_ref=technology

Anonymous Calls For Internet Blackout On April 22 To Protest CISPA
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/anonymous-blackout-cispa_n_3116509.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
 
Some related news stories I just saw while closing out some windows on my PC:

Police Release Photos Showing How Thermal Imaging [scanned from police helicopters] Uncovered Bombing Suspect
_http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/police-release-photos-showing-bombing-suspect-in-boat

Miranda Rights Won't Be Read For Boston Bombing Suspect: Justice Official
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/miranda-rights-boston-bombing suspect_n_3120333.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

Boston Bombing Suspect Under FBI Surveillance For At Least 3 Years, Mother Says
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/20/boston-bombing-suspect-fbi-surveillance_n_3122330.html?1366480990

Zubeidat Tsarnaeva told the English-language Russia Today state television station in a phone interview, a recording of which was obtained by Reuters, that she believed her sons were innocent and had been framed. "He (Tamerlan) was 'controlled' by the FBI, like, for three to five years," she said, speaking in English and using the direct English translation of a word in Russian that means monitored....the boys' father, Anzor said on Friday that he believed they had been framed. Both suggested in separate interviews that the FBI had made no secret of the fact that at least one of the brothers was being watched."I do not believe that my sons could have planned and organised the terrorist act, because they knew U.S. national security services were keeping an eye on them," Anzor Tsarnaev told Russia's Channel One television.

And predictably and right on cue...
Ann Coulter argues for public surveillance cameras post-Boston bombing
_http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/17/ann-coulter-argues-for-public-surveillance-cameras-post-boston-bombing-video/#ixzz2R4ci8a6H

New York state senator on Boston suspect: “Who wouldn’t use torture on this punk?”
_http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/new_york_state_senator_on_boston_suspect_who_wouldnt_use_torture_on_this_punk/

Boston Manhunt: Senator Graham Issues Veiled Call For Torture Of Boston Suspect
_http://www.policymic.com/articles/36689/boston-manhunt-senator-graham-issues-veiled-call-for-torture-of-boston-suspect
 
It's possible that the others (I heard reports of three) that were arrested during this time (some footage here)
_http://edition.cnn.com/video/standard.html (Boston suspect arrested)
are residents that refused to comply with police demands or refused police entry onto their property.

I find it interesting that his face isn't covered to protect his identity (or am I just naive to think they still do that)?

No Miranda rights read and nobody questions that? Now that's just scary! :scared:
 
Just saw this on FB, a picture analysis of the events on the ground that day:

_http://thefreedomcycle.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/are-you-just-believer-or-do-you-this.html
 
I read this article this morning, in which Senator Lindsey Graham begins to claim the bombing in boston 'proves' the 'homeland' is the battlefield. Not too sure about the source of the article, but Senator Graham's statements are interesting in connection with the military lockdon and policing.

Link: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Sen._Lindsey_Graham%3A_Boston_Bombing_Proves_Homeland_is_the_Battlefield/25459/0/38/38/Y/M.html

From the article:
Source: Daniel Taylor, Old Thinker News

In an interview with the Washington Post, Senator Lindsey Graham held up the Boston bombings as an example of “…why the homeland is the battlefield.” He further stated, “It sure would be nice to have a drone up there [to track the suspect.]”



In 2011, Lindsey Graham, commenting on the National Defense Authorization Act – now signed into law by President Obama – threatened American citizens who would “help Al Qaeda” with death, detention and prosecution. If suspects ask for a lawyer, Graham says they should “shut up.”



Documents leaked last year showed that the military has been preparing for domestic internment camps. The U.S. Army document, titled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, outlines a plan to arrest “political activists” who are then pacified by PSYOP officers. Eventually the activists develop an “appreciation for US policies.”


The massive demonstration of martial law in Boston has shown the country just how militarized our society has become in the aftermath of 9/11. The scene that unfolded is eerily reminiscent of the 1998 movie The Siege in which martial law is declared in New York after a terrorist attack. At the time of its release, the film’s scenario seemed unbelievable and disturbing. How far will we slide down the slope into total tyranny?

It is interesting to see how drones are now being tied in as 'necessary'.

This is a video of Graham speaking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ni-nPc6gT4&feature=player_embedded

FWIW
 
SovereignDove said:
I read this article this morning, in which Senator Lindsey Graham begins to claim the bombing in boston 'proves' the 'homeland' is the battlefield. Not too sure about the source of the article, but Senator Graham's statements are interesting in connection with the military lockdon and policing.

Link: http://www.blacklistednews.com/Sen._Lindsey_Graham%3A_Boston_Bombing_Proves_Homeland_is_the_Battlefield/25459/0/38/38/Y/M.html

<snip>

It is interesting to see how drones are now being tied in as 'necessary'.

This is a video of Graham speaking: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ni-nPc6gT4&feature=player_embedded

FWIW

As Lobaczewski wrote:

Any war waged by a pathocratic nation has two fronts, the internal and the external. The internal front is more important for the leaders and the governing elite... After all, pathocrats give short shrift to blood and suffering of people they consider to be not quite conspecific. ...

Pathocracy has other internal reasons for pursuing expansionism through the use of all means possible. As long as that “other” world governed by the systems of normal man exists, it inducts into the non-pathological majority a certain sense of direction. The non-pathological majority of the country’s population will never stop dreaming of the reinstatement of the normal man’s system in any possible form. This majority will never stop watching other countries, waiting for the opportune moment; its attention and power must therefore be distracted from this purpose, and the masses must be “educated” and channeled in the direction of imperialist strivings. This goal must be pursued doggedly so that everyone knows what is being fought for and in whose name harsh discipline and poverty must be endured. The latter factor – creating conditions of poverty and hardship - effectively limits the possibility of “subversive” activities on the part of the society of normal people.

The ideology must, of course, furnish a corresponding justification for this alleged right to conquer the world and must therefore be properly elaborated. Expansionism is derived from the very nature of pathocracy, not from ideology, but this fact must be masked by ideology. Whenever this phenomenon has been witnessed in history, imperialism was always its most demonstrative quality. ...

Such countries thus undertake various means of action for this purpose, their quality depending on the possibility of understanding that other reality. Such efforts resonate within the country, and the military power of normal man’s countries limits the pathocracy’s possibilities of armed maneuvers. Weakening those countries that could possibly stand against the pathocracy, especially by utilizing the response pathocracy awakens in some of their deviant citizens, again becomes a matter of the pathocracy’s survival. ...

Economic factors constitute a non-negligible part of the motivation for this expansionist tendency. Since the managerial functions have been taken over by individuals with mediocre intelligence and pathological character traits, the pathocracy becomes incapable of properly administering anything at all. The area suffering most severely must always be whichever one requires a person to act independently, not wasting time searching for the proper way to behave. Agriculture is dependent upon changing climate conditions and the appearance of pests and plant diseases. A farmer’s personal qualities have thus been an essential factor of success in this area, as it was for many centuries. Pathocracy therefore invariably brings about food shortages. ...

However, many countries with normal man’s systems abound in sufficiency of industrial products and experience problems with their food surpluses and temporary economic recessions even though the citizens are by no means overworked. The temptation to dominate such a country and its prosperity, that perennial imperialist motive, thus becomes even more strong in the pathocracy. The collected prosperity of the conquered nation can be exploited for a time, the citizens forced to work harder for paltry remuneration. For the moment, no thought is given to the fact that introducing a pathocratic system within such a country will eventually cause similar unproductive conditions; after all psychological deviance, by definition, indicates a lack of self-knowledge in this area. Unfortunately, the idea of conquering rich countries also motivates the minds of many poor non-pathological fellows suffering under the pathocracy, but not understanding why, and who would like to use this opportunity to grab something for themselves and eat their fill of good food.

As has been the case for centuries, military power is of course the primary means for achieving these ends. Throughout the centuries, though, whenever history has registered the appearance of the phenomenon of pathocracy, (regardless of the ideological cloak covering it), specific measures of influence have also become apparent: something in the order of specific intelligence in the service of international intrigue facilitating conquest. This quality is derived from the above-discussed personality characteristics inspiring the overall phenomenon; it should constitute data for historians to identify this type of phenomenon throughout history....

People exist everywhere in the world with specifically susceptible deviant personalities; even a faraway pathocracy evokes a resonating response in them, working on their underlying feeling that “there is a place for people like us there”. Uncritical, frustrated, and abused people also exist everywhere, and they can be reached by appropriately elaborated propaganda. The future of a nation is greatly dependent on how many such people it contains. Thanks to its specific psychological knowledge and its conviction that normal people are naive, a pathocracy is able to improve its “anti-psychotherapeutic” techniques, and pathologically egotistical as usual, to insinuate its deviant world of concepts to others in other countries, thus making them susceptible to conquest and domination.
The most frequently used methods include paralogistic and conversion methods such as the projection of one’s own qualities and intention onto other persons, social groups, or nations, paramoral indignation, and reverse blocking. This last method is a pathocratic favorite used on the mass scale, driving the minds of average people into a dead end because, as a result, it causes them to search for the truth in the “golden mean” between the reality and its opposite. ...

However, this macrosocial phenomenon’s internal actions and external expansion are based upon psychological data. As such, regardless of how these data are deformed within the pathocrats’ personalities, its cunning is vastly superior to normal people’s legal systems. This makes pathocracy the social system of the future, albeit in the shape of a caricature. ...

Whenever a nation experiences a “system crisis” or a hyperactivity of ponerogenic processes within, it becomes the object of a pathocratic penetration whose purpose is to serve up the country as booty. It will then become easy to take advantage of its internal weaknesses and revolutionary movements in order to impose rule on the basis of a limited use of force. ...

In ponerogenic processes, moral deficiencies, intellectual failings, and pathological factors intersect in a time-space causative network giving rise to individual and national suffering.

Any war waged with psychological weapons costs only a fraction as much as classical warfare, but it does have a cost, especially when it is being waged simultaneously in many countries throughout the world. ...

Whenever a society contains serious social problems, there will also be some group of sensible people striving to improve the social situation by means of energetic reforms, so as to eliminate the cause of social tension. Others consider it their duty to bring about a moral rejuvenation of society. Elimination of social injustice and reconstruction of the country’s morals and civilization could deprive a pathocracy of any chance to take over. Such reformers and moralists must therefore be consistently neutralized by means of liberal or conservative positions and appropriately suggestive catchwords and paramoralisms; if necessary, the best among them has to be murdered.

Psychological warfare strategists must decide rather early on which ideology would be most efficient in a particular country because of its adaptability to said nation’s traditions. After all, the appropriately adapted ideology must perform the function of a Trojan horse, transporting pathocracy into the country. These various ideologies are then gradually conformed to one’s own original master plan. Finally, off comes the mask. ...

At the right time, local partisans are organized and armed, with recruits picked from dissatisfied localities; leadership is provided by trained officers familiar with the secret idea as well as the operative idea concocted for propagation in the country in question. Assistance must then be given so groups of conspirators adhering to the concocted ideology can stage a coup d’état, whereupon an iron-fisted government is installed. Once this has been brought about, the diversionary partisans’ activities are stymied – they are made out to be patsies - so that the new authorities can take credit for bringing about internal peace. Any hoodlum who cannot or will not submit to the new decrees is “gently” invited before his former leader and shot in the back of the head. This is the new reality.
 
Video shows Police in Watertown rip family from their home and treat them like terrorist

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=43669

In this astonishing video out of Watertown, MA, you see heavily armed militarized police rip a family from their home and treat them like potential terrorists. The cops bang on their door, then detain them, search their home, and shout orders at them all while pointing assault rifles at them as though they're dangerous terrorists.

It should be noted this entire police state trampling of the constitution was shown to be completely worthless and a mere exercise in power dominance as the suspects were caught thanks to tips from the general public. Despite calling on the general public to send them all their footage to assist in their investigation, the Associated Press reported a police officer was caught threatening to kill a reporter for filming with his cellphone.

If you violate people's rights to catch someone who violated people's rights, you become a criminal and serve to impose what you're fighting against.

Here's the description from the poster on YouTube:


WATERTOWN, MA -- On Friday, April 19, 2013, during a manhunt for a bombing suspect, police and federal agents spent the day storming people's homes and performing illegal searches. While it was unclear initially if the home searches were voluntary, it is now crystal clear that they were absolutely NOT voluntary. Police were filmed ripping people from their homes at gunpoint, marching the residents out with their hands raised in submission, and then storming the homes to perform their illegal searches.

This was part of a larger operation that involved total lockdown of the suburban neighbor to Boston. Roads were barricaded and vehicle traffic was prohibited. A No-Fly Zone was declared over the town. People were "ordered" to stay indoors. Businesses were told not to open. National Guard soldiers helped with the lockdown, and were photographed checking IDs of pedestrians on the streets. All the while, police were performing these disgusting house-to-house searches.
It should also be noted the police knew the suspects they were looking for, yet they barked orders at these innocent people who did not match the description and were nothing but entirely submissive.

The actions of these police are not to be celebrated, they're to be condemned for violating their oath to uphold the constitution and turning the city into a lawless police state.


U.S. cites Human Right's problems in Russia, China & Egypt
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/19/us-usa-rights-idUSBRE93I1BJ20130419

The U.S. government on Friday expressed concern about increasing crackdowns on civil liberties around the world, from Russia to Egypt and China, saying these and other countries were shrinking the space in which independent political and other activists can operate.

mod edit: updated first link
 
angelburst29 said:
Video shows Police in Watertown rip family from their home and treat them like terrorist...

Yes, I was just watching that. So that is one way to resist -- record video and audio of anything you can (hopefully without being detected, since such actions on your part might be construed as acts of terrorism these days; clever, these psychopaths), although I would think that follow-up legal action would also be needed. It would be great if there were numerous videos like this, containing details that are hard to fake.

The only time I have been in any sort of situation like this, perhaps a year ago, a bunch of police stormed the light rail car that I was riding as it stopped, with guns drawn, to arrest some stupid kid (perhaps 18 - 22, probably unarmed) with absolutely no regard for the passengers, although they didn't physically abuse anyone. I just had to step out of their way, since the car was full and many of us were standing.

As usual, nobody seemed to get that there might be something wrong with this picture, although most all appeared to be duly traumatized. I did think about taking photos or video but, having authoritarian wackos (police) all around with guns drawn made me think the better of it. I was standing perhaps 8 feet from where the "suspect" was, so it was up close and personal. I felt disgusted, but not traumatized. The train stop was in a high-poverty area, and it appeared to me to be part of the ongoing class war.

Some sort of concealed recorder could come in handy in such situations. I think it can't be all that rare or I probably never would have seen it.
 
The backpack in the FBI photo that is circled does not appear to be the same as the one he was carrying. I downloaded both to look at side-by-side and they don't match. The bomb bag is mostly white on top but black on front, and the suspects bag is mostly white all over.
https://www.dropbox.com/sc/d7345j50ppaxyli/-GydbXetmN.
https://www.dropbox.com/sc/kol6chuvos2d2x2/28dH0WyYiZ
 
Re: Report of 2 Explosions At The Boston Marathon Finishline

anart said:
jasminum said:
I do choose otherwise, although it looks like I do not know what it means in practice. As to waking people up my idea was that I need to Work on myself in order to wake up myself first, at least to extent to be able to pass the knowledge to those who ask.

Of course - my main point here is that a person should strive to be response-able - to be capable of reacting to circumstances in a way that does not compromise the truth or their soul, and to be willing to do so because there IS a truth here. That's really the whole point, that we should strive to not be frightened, mindless sheep so easily herded.

j said:
Also my idea was that it is a main purpose of our waking up - that if critical mass of awakened people would be achieved, things are going to change in material 3D plane, though I do not know in what way it will manifest, perhaps acting in such circumstances.

Perhaps, I don't know for certain either. All I do know is that if we don't base our thoughts and actions on truth and what is the right thing to do (to the extent we can do it and that is variable) in any specific circumstance, we're already lost.

j said:
But what it means in terms of acting in this particular situation I still do not understand and I think that your post does not really answer it. It sounds to me (maybe I am wrong) like you are being impatient with me, like since I am here I should already know.

Not at all, what I'm doing is simply pointing out that you are regurgitating all of the programming that has been installed over the past dozen years as if it is the truth. It only becomes the truth if you follow it - and you don't have to. You're the one who brought up Nazi Germany and how a handful of soldiers controlled masses of people through fear - that's exactly how it works when people buy into the programming that has been installed over the last dozen years.

j said:
I just imagine myself being there and I wonder what I could do? Practically. Realistically. I do not think I am buying into what they want us to believe, but aren’t we often powerless in many practical situations in life and we have to go with them?

If you think you are powerless, you are buying into what they want you to believe. The battle is through us, jasminum and it is a battle of the mind/heart/soul.

Sorry I answer only now, I was away for weekend and did not have an access to internet.
I am trying to be really sincere with myself now, which is what I am always trying to do to the best of my ability. I remember reading some threads here on this forum, when some members, including you, Anart, were trying to point out something to somebody and I was amazed to see how these people took it as offence, kept arguing and were not able to get the point about themselves.
So now I wonder if this is exactly what I am doing now, that I cannot see clearly, just because it concerns me. If that is the case, please be patient with me. Or I simply do not have an ability to express myself clearly, the way to be understood. :)

I think there is a kind of misunderstanding in this interaction. I was talking about one particular situation, and most answers were as if I was talking in general.

I never sad I believe we should not do anything generally, or that we are generally powerless.
Now I have read my first post. It was not clear, I admit, my points (basically two) were mixed up. One point was that programmed people cannot resist, because in order to resist people would have to unite and work together, which is what they unable do. Also being traumatized does not help.
Second point was that, if somebody aware happened to be amongst them, there was nothing in practical terms he could possibly do to influence the situation, that is what I felt at that moment and that was my point.
I said: “Otherwise even if you are not that sound asleep but you are alone with your understanding, what can you possibly do? Get out of you house and get stripped naked… “
It is still the same meaning, notice the 3 dots, it was an example - get stripped, get arrested, get abused… I did not mean that somebody should be literally afraid of being stripped, the sentence was supposed to stress, that this kind of action would be meaningless (it would not change anything, perhaps only giving THEM the opportunity to remove you from the scene permanently).

Whether I was right or wrong is another question, but that was what I said and what I meant. I was talking about the situation in Boston, not in general and I was trying to point it out in my next posts.
I did not talk about being powerless in general or not doing anything in general, I was talking about Boston. The thread was about Boston and at that moment I thought nothing could be done there.
I said we are being powerless in many practical situations in this world. That means there are situations in life you can do nothing about. And isn’t it true?

Please read my posts again bearing in mind of what I just said. I do value your opinion and I will appreciate your answer. If you can see the second bottom in what I said, please point it out to me.

And by the way, I do try to see all situations in my life as objectively as I can and always do what I believe is right in given circumstances and not to compromise the truth. That is what I consider The Work to be. :)
 
Laura said:
As Lobaczewski wrote:

Very poignant quote examples. A couple that really stand out (well they all do), especially in light of the current events, are these paragraphs:

The most frequently used methods include paralogistic and conversion methods such as the projection of one’s own qualities and intention onto other persons, social groups, or nations, paramoral indignation, and reverse blocking. This last method is a pathocratic favorite used on the mass scale, driving the minds of average people into a dead end because, as a result, it causes them to search for the truth in the “golden mean” between the reality and its opposite. ...

Whenever a nation experiences a “system crisis” or a hyperactivity of ponerogenic processes within, it becomes the object of a pathocratic penetration whose purpose is to serve up the country as booty. It will then become easy to take advantage of its internal weaknesses and revolutionary movements in order to impose rule on the basis of a limited use of force. ...

Psychological warfare strategists must decide rather early on which ideology would be most efficient in a particular country because of its adaptability to said nation’s traditions. After all, the appropriately adapted ideology must perform the function of a Trojan horse, transporting pathocracy into the country. These various ideologies are then gradually conformed to one’s own original master plan. Finally, off comes the mask. ...

At the right time, local partisans are organized and armed, with recruits picked from dissatisfied localities; leadership is provided by trained officers familiar with the secret idea as well as the operative idea concocted for propagation in the country in question. Assistance must then be given so groups of conspirators adhering to the concocted ideology can stage a coup d’état, whereupon an iron-fisted government is installed. Once this has been brought about, the diversionary partisans’ activities are stymied – they are made out to be patsies - so that the new authorities can take credit for bringing about internal peace. Any hoodlum who cannot or will not submit to the new decrees is “gently” invited before his former leader and shot in the back of the head. This is the new reality.
[/quote]
 
beetlemaniac said:
Just saw this on FB, a picture analysis of the events on the ground that day:

_http://thefreedomcycle.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/are-you-just-believer-or-do-you-this.html

Sorry for posting this, it's actually disinfo from ATS of all places. I should be more careful.
 
Re: Report of 2 Explosions At The Boston Marathon Finishline

JGeropoulas said:
Bim said:
JGeropoulas: interesting. Maybe soon we'll see another attempt at controlling the internet. Since "the internet is teaching people evil things, it needs to be regulated!"

Speaking of regulating the internet, I just saw these articles that don't bode well for internet freedom:

Police Scanner Live-Tweeting Complicates Manhunt For Second Suspected Marathon Bomber
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/boston-police-scanner-live-tweeting-manhunt_n_3118253.html?ref=topbar

CISPA legislation passed in the house the day after the Marathon bombings
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/18/cispa-vote-house-approves_n_3109504.html?utm_hp_ref=technology&ir=Technology&utm_hp_ref=technology

Anonymous Calls For Internet Blackout On April 22 To Protest CISPA
_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/19/anonymous-blackout-cispa_n_3116509.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
Ha!. Why am i not surprised? :rolleyes:
 
beetlemaniac said:
beetlemaniac said:
Just saw this on FB, a picture analysis of the events on the ground that day:

_http://thefreedomcycle.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/are-you-just-believer-or-do-you-this.html

Sorry for posting this, it's actually disinfo from ATS of all places. I should be more careful.

Yes, it got viral in the last days. It is not ATS per se but is originating from different forums (David Icke, ATS as I could see) and someone did make an article out of that forum post. And it is a similar strategy since Sandy Hook to claim everything was acted or staged. Eventually listening to the most recent sott talk radio show gives some more background:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/sottnet/2013/04/21/baghdad-to-boston--terrorism-strikes-the-american-homeland

It starts about minute: 93
 
Back
Top Bottom