You know, I give my mind little to no attention to these ppl who shoot to fame, somehow. As, an older individual, I've seen this same type person thrown out to the masses as some anti-establishment hero...although as time grinds on, they become more coarse. I've seen it in rock and media stars, politicians, authors....Authors, there's a good one from the past. Look at what A. Huxley did, opening the doors of perception and helping to bring on the explostion of drug use for mind expansion...we also passed his book, "A Brave New World," holding him up as a prophetic hero, while all along he was a member of the 'club,' coming from a family promoting eugenics. I often wondered if our very own power of thought wasn't added to the drive to actually help bring about, 'the brave new world' we currently live in.
All of these ppl, who rise to meteoric fame, are created from the same playbook. When are ppl ever going to be able to spot them? Idk, I guess each generation has to learn for themselves.
Anyway, here's a good article on Tate (and others like him are mentioned)....I'll let the article speak for itself...
Andrew "Cobra" Tate: Another Snake in the Matrix
SNIP:
But know your enemy. The mainstream and the establishment are your enemy, and therefore, anyone they promote to meteoric notoriety is as well - even (and perhaps especially) when they say some things you agree with.
I have opined on Andrew Tate previously, and explained he is a
key change agent in the manufactured ultra-conservative revolution that is currently underway. Other establishment-managed assets in this looming cultural shift include Matt Walsh, Candace Owens, Ben Shapiro, and
Louise Perry.
I know how satisfying and refreshing it feels to seemingly have our voices represented prominently in the media, after so many years of the domination of the increasingly lunatic "left", but this is precisely why we must remain ultra-vigilant - because our enemies know what gratitude and relief we feel about finally seeming to "be heard", and they use that.
That's not to say these people don't produce valuable and valid offerings - I loved Matt Walsh's "What Is A Woman?" - but can't you see that these people have to appeal to us and have to seem credible to have any sway? They would be useless assets if they were unpersuasive. But if you look into the back stories of these individuals, you all too often find their
clear deep state connections. They are saying the right things to gain our trust so ultimately they can flip the narrative - bait and switch. Remember how Serena Joy recruited for Gilead in the Handmaid's Tale - how she promoted "the revolution" in her book and speaking tour - and then how it actually was?
On the subject of Andrew Tate's backstory, it seems quite clear that
his father was a military/intelligence asset. Tate's father, Emory Andrew Tate Jr., is described as a high-ranking member of the US Air Force who "excelled as a linguist", becoming fluent in several languages including Russian. That's pretty thinly veneered military code for "intelligence asset" (such people often get put through intensive language courses to better infiltrate different environments) and these military guys seem to just love offering up their offspring for "
special projects". Please see the
fascinating story behind Admiral James Morrison and his supposed "anti-establishment rebel" son, The Doors' Jim, who was, in reality, a military-managed change agent - like so many of these prominent "heroes" and "rebels" are.
It really is imperative in not falling for these same establishment psy-ops again and again (and they have been going on for very many decades) that we can clearly see what is being done to manipulate us - and, equally, that everyone can clearly see the difference between being aware and discerning, and being paranoid. There's an enormous chasm of difference between being media savvy - understanding that the establishment media never, ever repeatedly draws attention to someone and their views unless it is in in the establishment's interests for them to do so - and, as someone put it on my FB earlier, "not trusting your own shadow".
The people promoted by the mainstream media equate to about 0.0001% of the global population. While I don't trust that 0.0001% at all - ever - that does still leave the best part of 7 billion other people for me to choose from. I trust plenty of people - I have family and friends - and I read and learn from a wide range of learned sources every day. But you're never going to see these people's names plastered across the front pages of the Daily Mail, or have the Guardian breathlessly reporting on their Twitter spats.
Please stop being played by the very machine you are fighting against. Andrew Tate is a plant and he tells you so clearly himself (as
he himself has said, those in the club always have to tell you who they really are and what they are really doing). Such high-profile people select their online handles and imagery very carefully, and Tate describes himself, in word and in image, as a 'cobra' - a highly venomous snake. Venom is toxic to all who are infected by it and the definition of 'snake', when it is applied to a person, is "someone who is treacherous and deceitful".
When people tell you so explicitly who they really are: believe them.
READ IT ALL:
Unless you happen to be resident on a particularly remote colony of Mars (and frankly, even they probably have WiFi […]
miriaf.co.uk
www.calmdownben.com
